| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 2 post(s) |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1472
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 04:19:00 -
[1] - Quote
Infinity Ziona wrote:Ok I'll play the stupid game with you. looks like you have a head start |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1472
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 04:23:00 -
[2] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Tippia challenges Infinity Ziona with: Why? Why should it cost more?
Ziona answers with: Because real life. based on her other ideas ziona's ideal game 'plays' like a second job vOv |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1473
|
Posted - 2013.09.16 04:33:00 -
[3] - Quote
even if that bullshit was true, anyone who pulls the "but ccp will make more money if they do x therefore they should do it" is spectacularly misunderstanding the relationship between a consumer and a service provider |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1510
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 22:34:00 -
[4] - Quote
Doris Dents wrote:This thread just proves highsec 'bears won't be satisfied until suicide ganking in empire is literally impossible, as in everyone is safety on with no way to change it. They demanded we were forced into frigate sized ships by the insurance nerf but still that's not enough. Never mind they have mining ships that are all but impossible to gank with a reasonable tank unless you have a gank fleet that'd be better off looking for freighters. They won't cease complaining until their max yield AFK isk printing machine is perfectly safe.
Well, the insurance nerf made a lot of sense. vOv
Crimson Gauntlet wrote:I also find it funny that most of the cute little "suggestions" they make have a tendency to also make it much, much easier to mine AFK or to outright bot. Honestly, at this point, ganking needs a buff, or exhumers need a nerf, they went too far. I say we take a page from the crybabies playbook, since it clearly works so well. Let's constantly campaign to have exhumers and concord nerfed. Let's start with taking 5% off the base resists of exhumers. That's not really very much, right? All it would do is make their ships balanced.
I reckon exhumer base tank should be nerfed and their fittings are improved so that they can fit the same max tank or yield as they can now
No actual change if you bother fitting your ship. Which miners won't. Which will get them ganked. Which they'll complain about. Which is hilarious. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1521
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 08:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Twylla wrote:If you want profitable yields, you could go to lowsec.. pfft. yeah right. Lowsec is a wasteland now that the pvp'ers have run everyone out of there. It's more-or-less guaranteed death. Miners would be hunted like an rabbit in a wolf pen. POS infrastructure would be picked apart for blueprints.
Mining in lowsec can be interruption-free if you're not stupid about it. There are tons of gits who start mining away in high-traffic systems or who base in highsec and jump a high-low gate every load. Or who go AFK in a belt. That said, I've only ever mined in low ~because I can~ and mining in highsec is really the way to go since you don't have to pay attention. Mining sucks. And I haven't bothered looking at how profitable lowsec mining is since the mineral redistribution.
A starbase is ignored if setup correctly. Nobody actually wants to spend an hour shooting a dickstar with a fleet when the owner has a day to take all the drops out. And good management of the number of datacores and T2 BPCs left inside reduces risk.
The only time anyone has bothered shooting my alt's starbase was the one time I was negligent and left the thing unfuelled. When you only have to shoot the lab, it's worth the time. Otherwise no. |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1525
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 13:30:00 -
[6] - Quote
if some people simply stopped insisting on being wrong all the time they needn't get their feelings hurt by tippia at all |

Benny Ohu
Chaotic Tranquility Casoff
1526
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 13:41:00 -
[7] - Quote
still raging about that eh |
| |
|