EVE Search - destroyers - gankers and high sec

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

destroyers - gankers and high sec

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 2 post(s)
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3796	Posted - 2013.09.16 13:02:00 - [1] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: In real life, I can derail a multi million dollar train with a $35 dollar crowbar. In real life, I can blow up a semi trailer, or even an armored car worth about $2,000,000 with about $5,000 worth of fertilizer. In real life, I can make napalm by mixing gasoline and packing peanuts (no ****, Styrofoam and gas makes napalm). In real life, criminals don't have a 100% chance of being caught. But most importantly, in real life I am not functionally a god. So please, tell me some more about how using something cost effective to defeat a larger ship isn't realistic, in a game where we can reincarnate after being incinerated in a fiery death millions of kilometers away. In real life the Titanic was sunk for free. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3838	Posted - 2013.09.18 19:51:00 - [2] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Side note though, in a 0.5 a T1 Cata can take out a hulk with relative ease, and that will set you back ~2m. A properly tanked Hulk will not be taken out by a 2M catalyst. Sure, if you slap on a DCII, and reinforced bulkheads, crippling your yield below that of cheaper ships, you will be killed by 2 of them. And what exactly is wrong with this? If the Hulk pilot pays attention they won't get blown up in the first place. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3839	Posted - 2013.09.18 20:23:00 - [3] - Quote Dave Stark wrote: Mallak Azaria wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: Sure, if you slap on a DCII, and reinforced bulkheads, crippling your yield below that of cheaper ships, you will be killed by 2 of them. And what exactly is wrong with this? If the Hulk pilot pays attention they won't get blown up in the first place. the fact that he's full of ****, is what's wrong with this. the only thing that outmines a 0 mlu hulk is a 3 mlu mackinaw. 1339m3/min - 3mlu mack 1302m3/min - 0mlu hulk 1275m3/min - 3mlu retriever 1228m3/min - 2mlu skiff numbers from eft. tank your hulk, or quit bitching about it. the yield is already the second highest possible yield BEFORE you put mlus on it. edit: totally forgot the covetor that gets 1m3/min more than the hulk if you put 2 mlus on it. 1m3, hilarious. due to truncation the likelihood of this 1m3 ever making a difference is basically nil. so they are in essence, the same yield. The real crime here is that SMA have not kicked this guy out yet. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3840	Posted - 2013.09.18 21:41:00 - [4] - Quote Shalua Rui wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: You forgot that the max yield AFK isk printer should be able to do its job without ever undocking. ...but you already can print money without ever leaving the stations, it's called "station trading". Seriously guys: Evil miner carebears ruining my game boo hu? Doesn't that get old at some point? No wonder nothing ever changes in this game... 18 nerfs to suicide ganking & the barge buff prove you wrong. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3841	Posted - 2013.09.18 22:57:00 - [5] - Quote The Git wrote: I wish those that enjoy and defend ganking miners would just man up and admit they do it because it's an easy game play style. No mysteries, very little tactics or strategy, and the end result is at least half known. And find a different argument than the "they aren't playing the game!!!11", "they're afk and making money.....". Big effing deal. What possible effect does that have on your game play. Here's a clue, none. Alliances that rent space are making money without being in the game. Moon production makes money without being in the game....blah, blah, blah...it is so tiresome. Just admit it. Ganking miners is easy, mindless game play. Its barely more involved than mining while working on a spreadsheet. As someone who leads ganking fleets accross highsec, I can assure you that it is not mindless & a lot of work goes in to chaining successful ganks. The only thing miners see is the end result. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3841	Posted - 2013.09.18 23:53:00 - [6] - Quote The Git wrote: Plastic Psycho wrote: There's intelligence to be gathered, plans to be made, targets to be identified. That's hilarious. You think it's easy because all you see is the end result. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3846	Posted - 2013.09.19 06:53:00 - [7] - Quote baltec1 wrote: CCP thought that hulks were being ganked because the hull was profitable which has never been true. In the vast majority of cases, it actually was. I spent a lot of time ganking Hulks & profiting solely from the T2 salvage. Only very occasionally did I get garbage salvage. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3846	Posted - 2013.09.19 06:55:00 - [8] - Quote Shalua Rui wrote: Yea... I'm sure CCP appreciates it, baltec... I'm sure they do aswell, since reasonable argument backed up by facts can potentially stop them from making pants-on-head changes such as how they buffed barges. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.
Mallak Azaria GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation 3848	Posted - 2013.09.19 10:22:00 - [9] - Quote Llwelyn- ap-Lorwerth wrote: typical flame on thread the OP makes a valid point and the rest of you blatantly avoid the point in question and blar blar blar rubbish. Ganking is out of control deal with it. In cases of gankage go to http://www.samaritans.org they are there to help you help your self One could also argue that mining in highsec is out of control & we are doing our part to maintain balance. RIP Scamming; CCP has finally acknowledged that the average gamer is too stupid to avoid being scammed & has decided to protect them from themselves with TOS changes that effectively ban the practice.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.