|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 12:33:00 -
[1] - Quote
Its possible to get above 750dps in several different ways (though none are very elegant) can't post fits atm as on my tablet. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 13:35:00 -
[2] - Quote
Urgh quite a few things less than optimal with that fit - the faction cap recharger isn't needed as it only has lower fittings over the T2 and your not short on CPU and you have the fittings spare for a T2 large capacitor battery which in the case of that fit gives a higher cap recharge rate and a much longer time til your cap runs out. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 13:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
Assuming your intention is tanking em/thermal heavy NPCs then its possible to transplant that fit to a loki with arty @ 755dps or ACs with 935dps.
EDIT: With faction ammo 848dps
[Loki, AC Test 1] Damage Control II Corpus A-Type Armor Thermic Hardener Corpum A-Type Medium Armor Repairer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer Republic Fleet Gyrostabilizer
Corelum C-Type 10MN Afterburner Republic Fleet Target Painter Cap Recharger II Medium Capacitor Battery II
425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M 425mm AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet EMP M
Medium Projectile Burst Aerator II Medium Anti-EM Pump I Medium Anti-Thermic Pump I
Loki Defensive - Adaptive Augmenter Loki Electronics - Dissolution Sequencer Loki Engineering - Power Core Multiplier Loki Offensive - Projectile Scoping Array Loki Propulsion - Fuel Catalyst
Hobgoblin II x5
I'm not saying this is a good fit or one any one should use its literally a quick dirty transplanting the prot fit to the loki with the the assumption its main use it em/thermal tanking as per your screenshot. (Add in the gunnery implants). |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 18:28:00 -
[4] - Quote
I don't think autocannons are too bad damage wise I would kind of like to mix hail up a bit though - reduce the tracking penalty a bit, increase the base damage (by about 15%) but decrease the rate of fire by about the same % to even it out (not sure if ammo can affect turrets in that way as is) and add a thermal component to the damage that increases the base damage by 5%. |
Rroff
Questionable Ethics. Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.18 20:40:00 -
[5] - Quote
T3s are fine (mostly) infact personally I'd find the game pretty dull without them, t1 and 2 ships are fine and all but a bit run of the mill. I think people vastly under-estimate the importance of this aspect of them. |
|
|
|