| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
522
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement? "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Gogela
Freeport Exploration Loosely Affiliated Pirates Alliance
2622
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement? I don't know why it happens, but for some reason around the end of the year PLEX prices go up. Typically through december you can see PLEX go as high as 700-750 mil ea but then in the spring they come back down to the 500 level. It's just the cycle I've seen since PLEX was introduced... but I don't know why it happens.
|

Tore Vest
327
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:18:00 -
[3] - Quote
I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  No troll. |

Obunagawe
233
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:19:00 -
[4] - Quote
PLEX price will keep increasing due to people not wanting to pay for EVE as it is such a bad game. This will increase PLEX demand and reduce PLEX supply. And the rate of increase will increase exponentially. |

BenDover
Maraque Enterprises
7
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:PLEX price will keep increasing due to people not wanting to pay for EVE as it is such a bad game. This will increase PLEX demand and reduce PLEX supply. And the rate of increase will increase exponentially.
Kindly GTFO. |

Horus V
The Destined Drunken Hyena Association
49
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:21:00 -
[6] - Quote
People are starting to actually use that new feature: "dual character training". Altocholism is what drives this game going. I really wish to see some data from CCP if I'm right. V |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
512
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:22:00 -
[7] - Quote
Why should he gtfo, does the truth hurt? |

Roime
Quantum Cats Syndicate Samurai Pizza Cats
3442
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:36:00 -
[8] - Quote
It's because goons use ISBoxer to run hisec incursions while ganking their hauler alts in tier 5 FW plexes and ******* salvage ALL cap escalations with dual Noctises that they scammed from RMT renter alliances.
I hope this clears this matter.
. |

Rekon X
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:37:00 -
[9] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement?
That would be my theory. |

Rengerel en Distel
1923
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:37:00 -
[10] - Quote
Perhaps it's the lack of PLEX sales giving an actual discount? The guy that runs the sales probably is on vacation.
With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
|

Rekon X
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:38:00 -
[11] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:PLEX price will keep increasing due to people not wanting to pay for EVE as it is such a bad game. This will increase PLEX demand and reduce PLEX supply. And the rate of increase will increase exponentially.
At least not if they have to spend real money on it. |

Lipbite
Express Hauler
814
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Less people playing EVE in September - November = higher price. Price will fall in February-April though it probably will be higher than 530 mil minimum during last summer. It's good moment to invest into PLEXes and sell them 1-2 months later with 25-40% profit. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
16537
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 18:47:00 -
[13] - Quote
Roime wrote:It's because goons use ISBoxer to run hisec incursions while ganking their hauler alts in tier 5 FW plexes and ******* salvage ALL cap escalations with dual Noctises that they scammed from RMT renter alliances.
I hope this clears this matter. You need to squeeze AFK cloaking in there as well, somehow.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

RomeStar
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:06:00 -
[14] - Quote
CCP is buying plex from the market inorder to drive the price up so more new players will be tempted to buy them and cash them out. Apply tinfoil hat now.......
Will we ever have proof that CCP seeds or buys plex off the market? We know they do we just dont have proof on the extent of the manipulation. Signatured removed, CCP Phantom |

Cade Windstalker
Donohue Enterprises Ad-Astra
221
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:07:00 -
[15] - Quote
Gogela wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement? I don't know why it happens, but for some reason around the end of the year PLEX prices go up. Typically through december you can see PLEX go as high as 700-750 mil ea but then in the spring they come back down to the 500 level. It's just the cycle I've seen since PLEX was introduced... but I don't know why it happens.
This actually seems to be correct, amazingly enough. (type in 500 and then hit set)
Historical data (set to 380 or the graph is unreadable due to data corruption or something) suggests that it probably is a supply contraction of some kind, possibly due to "the holiday season", winter, and people budgeting their money more carefully as a result of both. |

Rekon X
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:07:00 -
[16] - Quote
Lipbite wrote:Less people playing EVE in September - November = higher price. Price will fall in February-April though it probably will be higher than 530 mil minimum during last summer. It's good moment to invest into PLEXes and sell them 1-2 months later with 25-40% profit.
Simply less people would be relative. There would be less buying both in game and out of game and it would still be about the same price. Seems more likely school students buy more plex and don't play during the school months. |

BenDover
Maraque Enterprises
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:09:00 -
[17] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Why should he gtfo, does the truth hurt?
If EVE was truly such a bad game, people would not play it. If you're playing the game, don't moan about it being "so bad". The line between constructive criticism and outright whining is not a thin one. |

Rekon X
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:09:00 -
[18] - Quote
RomeStar wrote:CCP is buying plex from the market inorder to drive the price up so more new players will be tempted to buy them and cash them out. Apply tinfoil hat now.......
Will we ever have proof that CCP seeds or buys plex off the market? We know they do we just dont have proof on the extent of the manipulation.
Good possibility, they do make cash on it. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
16537
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 19:11:00 -
[19] - Quote
RomeStar wrote:Will we ever have proof that CCP seeds or buys plex off the market? We know they do we just dont have proof on the extent of the manipulation. Actually, we don't know that they do, and we have proof of the manipulation. The main difference is that they're reusing confiscated PLEX rather than seeding new ones or buying existing ones. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
513
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 20:33:00 -
[20] - Quote
BenDover wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:Why should he gtfo, does the truth hurt? If EVE was truly such a bad game, people would not play it. If you're playing the game, don't moan about it being "so bad". The line between constructive criticism and outright whining is not a thin one.
I play EVE in the sense I log on and adjust my ques maybe fool around trading, that's about it.
Local chat makes the game a dull campfest be it gate or station and wormholes are too much of a logistics pain to be a cure for the ailment.
I have no problem admitting I pay to play a bad game. I hope eventually CCP will see the light, EVE has promise, but as it stands its a big pile of mediocre poo and the guys remarks about plex and paying for a bad game are spot on.
|

RomeStar
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
285
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 20:34:00 -
[21] - Quote
Tippia wrote:RomeStar wrote:Will we ever have proof that CCP seeds or buys plex off the market? We know they do we just dont have proof on the extent of the manipulation. Actually, we don't know that they do, and we have proof of the manipulation. The main difference is that they're reusing confiscated PLEX rather than seeding new ones or buying existing ones.
what proof do you speak of? Signatured removed, CCP Phantom |

mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
526
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 20:43:00 -
[22] - Quote
RomeStar wrote:Tippia wrote:RomeStar wrote:Will we ever have proof that CCP seeds or buys plex off the market? We know they do we just dont have proof on the extent of the manipulation. Actually, we don't know that they do, and we have proof of the manipulation. The main difference is that they're reusing confiscated PLEX rather than seeding new ones or buying existing ones. what proof do you speak of?
It was a segment in an economic fanfest panel.
CCP has practically unlimited PLEX reserves from banned accounts. As far as we know CCP has only used them once, during the huge PLEX manipulation that happened a while back (sorry, forgot when). |

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
1660
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 20:44:00 -
[23] - Quote
Rekon X wrote:Lipbite wrote:Less people playing EVE in September - November = higher price. Price will fall in February-April though it probably will be higher than 530 mil minimum during last summer. It's good moment to invest into PLEXes and sell them 1-2 months later with 25-40% profit. Simply less people would be relative. There would be less buying both in game and out of game and it would still be about the same price. Seems more likely school students buy more plex and don't play during the school months. Or, looked at another way, less dads (with dollars) are playing during the summer. Because kids are home (in N. America at least) and they're out doing family stuff. Or out doing summer stuff of their own. Autumn is back to school time for kids, and back to indoors time for dad because of the weather. I.e. EVE time! |

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
3551
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:04:00 -
[24] - Quote
If you believe the latest FUD the Barbie-thumpersGäó are pushing as their new talking point, everyone is leaving EVE for SC.
Or, they will... or something..
The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the ho's and politicians will look up and shout 'Save us!' and I'll look down, and whisper 'Hodor'. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
445
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:14:00 -
[25] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:BenDover wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:Why should he gtfo, does the truth hurt? If EVE was truly such a bad game, people would not play it. If you're playing the game, don't moan about it being "so bad". The line between constructive criticism and outright whining is not a thin one. I play EVE in the sense I log on and adjust my ques maybe fool around trading, that's about it. Local chat makes the game a dull campfest be it gate or station and wormholes are too much of a logistics pain to be a cure for the ailment. I have no problem admitting I pay to play a bad game. I hope eventually CCP will see the light, EVE has promise, but as it stands its a big pile of mediocre poo and the guys remarks about plex and paying for a bad game are spot on. The notion school does this or that I believe is off base. Most people in school aren't dropping cash for plex. Adults with free income to do so, do. The school kids want to play free and when they go back to school the demand should drop if the theory were grounded. It doesn't and i'd wager it won't. My reasoning is partly due to what the post I defended suggested that more and more are not wanting to pay for EVE because the enjoyment factor requires hours to produce minutes of fun and the people who are original buyers/sellers of plex are finding less and less reason to continue buying more. A few billion of ISK is all youll really need in highsec where most play as there is a upward ship size you can use and with the protection of local nowhere near enough death occurs to give the demand ISK should have. Nullsec as a lifestyle requires something that plex can not buy nor can a bigger ship impart. Numbers. Since there is no worthwhile reason to go through the hassle of getting those numbers (you'd need quite a few to compete with null power blocs) Highsec is where most end up and will remain. War is a waste of ISK. War is essential for a healthy highsec. High sec rots. The supply of plex dwindles while the demand peaks . The demand isn't peaking because of high numbers, its peaking because more and more refuse to pay for the few hours of enjoyment they actually get out of EVE.
You need to come play in lowsec. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Obunagawe
234
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
Zappity wrote: You need to come play in lowsec.
Ah, lowsec.
The blobs and elitism of nullsec combined with the bad game mechanics of highsec. A perfect combination of the worst elements of both areas. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
445
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:26:00 -
[27] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:Zappity wrote: You need to come play in lowsec.
Ah, lowsec. The blobs and elitism of nullsec combined with the bad game mechanics of highsec. A perfect combination of the worst elements of both areas.
Yes. I admit it. I blob all the time. Ahem.
I prefer to look at it the other way: high is too boring, null is too much hassle, low is 'undock and find an insta-fight' land in the middle. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Angeal MacNova
LankTech Masters of Flying Objects
83
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:26:00 -
[28] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement?
Sounds solid.
The kids give up their summer jobs for school.
No work, no money, no buying plex to sell for isk on the market.
Combine that with people saving up for christmas, it's no surprise that prices would peak around that time. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
278
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:32:00 -
[29] - Quote
This game was always p2p. And if more people was denying that by wanting to PLEX all acounts, and less people are willing to buy the ISK form them by PLEX trading, you know what will happen then. New CQ prototype |

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
522
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:48:00 -
[30] - Quote
Hrm... According to the market data the same thing happened last year.
So is it the students who pay for the plex to fuel their PVP etc? Then why does it drop in winter when they are still in school?
Christmas gifts? "Entitlement" is a euphemism for "I hate the way you play and it makes me cry like a baby". If you fantasize about being immoral it means you enjoy being immoral deep down. |

Just Lilly
122
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 21:58:00 -
[31] - Quote
So, secure your needs for Plexes now, before the price goes up even more 
Buy Buy BUY! Powered by Nvidia GTX 690 |

Obunagawe
235
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:15:00 -
[32] - Quote
Just Lilly wrote:So, secure your needs for Plexes now, before the price goes up even more  Buy Buy BUY!
Already got 118. |

Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
1516
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:18:00 -
[33] - Quote
I'm interested as well in the statement by Tippia about proof of manipulation. I've no doubt CCP manipulates prices but, I am curious to see discussions on the topic.
It would make sense for CCP to fill a certain percentage of plex sell orders to hold up price to stimulate purchases on the revenue end and reducing in game supply. The more isk a person can get who is willing to purchase a GTC to convert to Plex, the more GTC they're willing to purchase. No doubt that CCP is continually attempting to find the most profitable price points both in game and out. And, it costs them nothing to fill someone's Plex sell order. It doesn't even inflate the amount of isk in game as long as they're using confiscated isk to do so. Although, doing so means a decrease of legitimate in game purchasing of plex as more expensive plex in game leads to lesser demand. I wonder to what extent is CCP willing to increase prices of plex. Don't ban me, bro! |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
16543
|
Posted - 2013.09.19 22:23:00 -
[34] - Quote
Mr Kidd wrote:I'm interested as well in the statement by Tippia about proof of manipulation. I've no doubt CCP manipulates prices but, I am curious to see discussions on the topic. Check the last two fanfest economy presentations GÇö complete with graphs. I don't remember off-hand if they published any devblogs about it as well, but I know it's in at least one set of CSM minutes. CCP have been fairly open about this fact and about how it's done. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Maldiro Selkurk
CHEMO IMMUNO RESISTANT VIRUS type X
55
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 08:45:00 -
[35] - Quote
CCP puts PLEX on sale, prices drop a bit, but every couple months they rock-bottom the price of plex and plex prices then drop in-game a lot.
simple market forces at work, with CCP pulling the strings. |

Cpt Arareb
DisturbedGamers. The Explicit Alliance
59
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 09:19:00 -
[36] - Quote
is very simple actually, the summer is ending, winter is comming, more night time, less sun, more rain, more time to play eve |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4584
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 10:11:00 -
[37] - Quote
winter is coming
n3's final victory approaches
freeze to death in the harsh coldness of space
progodlegend's frozen corpse There are no goons. The goons' 0.0 dream is over.
"Progodlegend said the goal of N3 is to destroy Goonswarm Federation, but in reality NCdot is in Fountain due to the fact it is virtually the last place there is action." ~NC., Fountain 2013 |

Logical Chaos
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
55
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 11:08:00 -
[38] - Quote
Confirming my Industry Army finished training and there is no need to keep Dual Character Training running on all my accounts to fill the empty slots!
Caliph Muhammed wrote:BenDover wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:Why should he gtfo, does the truth hurt? If EVE was truly such a bad game, people would not play it. If you're playing the game, don't moan about it being "so bad". The line between constructive criticism and outright whining is not a thin one. I play EVE in the sense I log on and adjust my ques maybe fool around trading, that's about it. Local chat makes the game a dull campfest be it gate or station and wormholes are too much of a logistics pain to be a cure for the ailment. I have no problem admitting I pay to play a bad game. I hope eventually CCP will see the light, EVE has promise, but as it stands its a big pile of mediocre poo and the guys remarks about plex and paying for a bad game are spot on. The notion school does this or that I believe is off base. Most people in school aren't dropping cash for plex. Adults with free income to do so, do. The school kids want to play free and when they go back to school the demand should drop if the theory were grounded. It doesn't and i'd wager it won't. My reasoning is partly due to what the post I defended suggested that more and more are not wanting to pay for EVE because the enjoyment factor requires hours to produce minutes of fun and the people who are original buyers/sellers of plex are finding less and less reason to continue buying more. A few billion of ISK is all youll really need in highsec where most play as there is a upward ship size you can use and with the protection of local nowhere near enough death occurs to give the demand ISK should have. Nullsec as a lifestyle requires something that plex can not buy nor can a bigger ship impart. Numbers. Since there is no worthwhile reason to go through the hassle of getting those numbers (you'd need quite a few to compete with null power blocs) Highsec is where most end up and will remain. War is a waste of ISK. War is essential for a healthy highsec. High sec rots. The supply of plex dwindles while the demand peaks . The demand isn't peaking because of high numbers, its peaking because more and more refuse to pay for the few hours of enjoyment they actually get out of EVE.
Although I do not 100% agree with what you conclude I agree that Highsec needs to be changed. First thing: Remove Highsec Incursions. Thanks. |

Harry Kawkenbawls
Pator Tech School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 12:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
No way to know how much this has affected the prices of PLEX but a major RMT dealer on a player auction site a recently list a whole lot of PLEX at prices considerably higher than normal for that site. I would love to see a CCP sting to catch and ban all the accounts for that merchant. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
45380
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 12:16:00 -
[40] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:winter is coming
Indeed |

Harry Forever
SpaceJunkys
778
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 12:46:00 -
[41] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement?
lets be honest, plex is undervalued, 500 million you can do pretty fast in the game, and a lot of people grind it easy
plex will hit over a billion soon, the correct price would be around 1,5 billion for what you get ... |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family
87
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 13:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Horus V wrote:People are starting to actually use that new feature: "dual character training". Altocholism is what drives this game going. I really wish to see some data from CCP if I'm right.
This. although personally my spare char slots are getting close to having their skills as i want them and i will then stop spending plex on dual account training. These extra account slot chars will have skillsets that will be useful for as long as i play the game even after i stop spending isk on them and so are well worth the price paid now. i imagine i am far from unique in this and in 2-3 months people like me will have stopped doing this entirely.
|

Aesheera
Ministry of War Amarr Empire
254
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 14:57:00 -
[43] - Quote
Obunagawe wrote:PLEX price will keep increasing due to people not wanting to pay for EVE as it is such a bad game. This will increase PLEX demand and reduce PLEX supply. And the rate of increase will increase exponentially. Congratulations!
You just won the bullcrap post of the day award!
Would you like it shipped to your location or shall we contract it to you in Jita? Primary since '07. GÖÑ
If It Bleeds, Kill It - II |

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
113
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 17:22:00 -
[44] - Quote
Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high 
Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.
PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years
detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below:
I might use the word "credit" to counter your "blame" however a sentence saying the same with "explain" in it in a neutral way is probably the most fair.
Two issues raised by the poster:
1) Why now ?
2) (perhaps implied) Why are plex prices going up more generally.
A1) the "now" as in September is more a matter of speculation. It did follow the same trend last year. A 5 year chart would be helpful to see if there are regular spikes seasonally. I believe there are.
A1a) Explanations about school are plausible although if you asked me to speculate without seeing the chart I'd have guessed that there would be less time to earn ISK through play during schoool. (perhaps though, play increases as there is more work to procrastinate which would certainly be an interesting psychology project to explore)
A1b) Perhaps there are waves of people returning to the game in summer (especially with an expansion this year realeased at the beggining of the summer. I would speculate there is a lag between people returning and people realizing full earning potential which allows more to plex accounts. I wouldn't be surprised that people are inclined to activate/reactivate more alt accounts the longer they play. As the school year wears on, perhaps they let those plexed accounts lapse or just pay a month or two when they're busy and come Winter break, start earning isk again causing another spike as they opt for that method
The two ideas run counter to each other but rely on the same underlying concept -- more play creates more demand .
Support for the later: More players should also create more need for isk but the Volume of plex doesn't vary substantially. This sort of supports my theory in A1b -- with more active play there should be more people who never like PVE or farming using real $/E to purchase isk via plex as they lose more ships because of more play...yet the steady volume suggests they're offset by some players on the cusp of that group more able to earn isk for ship losses as they get back int the groove of the game after a month or two.
2) Prices of plex fundamentally go up as the center of the bell curve of players find ways to earn more isk per hour. (I'm tempted to say "average" but really the incremental buyer is probably better defined as "average isk/hour of players with over 4 months in game and throwing out the isk/hour of the top 5% and bottom 40% - top 5% might be hyper multi boxes and bottom 40% might not partake at all in PVE based isk earning which is my focus)
Incursions have a very high ISK per hour relative to past PVE for the subset of players I define above. To keep some excitement game developers really need to have some noticable increase in earnings each year.
Even though I would credit the average EVE player as being smart enough to know that if everyone is earning more they're not exactly "ahead" they're here to have fun. A game world requires some "suspension of reality" and people go with that to enjoy it just like not expecting Action movies to be realistic (how come the Hero manages to never get hit in that rain of bullets yet the villains do).
It is fun for people to feel like they're able to earn more isk per hour each year. I'd say a 15% to 20% is annually is the minimum rate needed for players to notice and appreciated... how they can rake in more per hour than they did before.
Plex prices have generally gone up at that rate... maybe closer to 15% . At 15% increase compounded, and amount would double at the end of 4 years, at 20% compounded an amount would double at the end of 3 years.
Knowing that game players want to feel "progress" even as they know they are "suspending reality" in not getting ahead relative to other players...
.... we should expect the isk per hour of the center of the bell curve to increase 15 to 20%....
... which should almost certainly lead to a plex increase roughly in correlation to that isk/hour rate,
... which should mean that PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years
Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do. |

Death Reign
EntroPrelatial Industria DARKNESS.
11
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 18:57:00 -
[45] - Quote
Harry Forever wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:It seems that PLEX might hit the 600 million mark sometime soon and I am thoughtful to why this is happening now.
EVE population is down because of the return to school so one would think there would be less isk generation to buy PLEX which would entail the price should go down (but its not).
However, could it mean that students are more likely spend money on PLEX to sell on the market?
And that without them, there is less to go around.
Certainly its not really inflation because mineral prices are still at a year low.
So what do you think is cauing the upward price movement? lets be honest, plex is undervalued, 500 million you can do pretty fast in the game, and a lot of people grind it easy plex will hit over a billion soon, the correct price would be around 1,5 billion for what you get
Charge us that much in plex to run our armies of multibox miners, and watch the price of minerals rise right along with it. CCP would manipulate the plex market into a crash before they'd let them get that expensive. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:01:00 -
[46] - Quote
I think you're quite mistaken. CCP has no vested interest in how high minerals go. It doesn't really affect them. Crashing the plex market means the people who give them real cash no longer do. Your minerals, their cashflow. Yeah....
Mining is easy to do. It will always have a surplus of people botting it to pay for whatever portion of their plex they can. Plainly put mineral demand and supply will never affect the supply and demand of plex in the sense you imply.. |

Tikitina
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:08:00 -
[47] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote:Horus V wrote:People are starting to actually use that new feature: "dual character training". Altocholism is what drives this game going. I really wish to see some data from CCP if I'm right. This. although personally my spare char slots are getting close to having their skills as i want them and i will then stop spending plex on dual account training. These extra account slot chars will have skillsets that will be useful for as long as i play the game even after i stop spending isk on them and so are well worth the price paid now. i imagine i am far from unique in this and in 2-3 months people like me will have stopped doing this entirely.
Interesting how this possible explanation to the increase in demand for PLEX is being completely overlooked by many. |

Logical Chaos
Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships.
55
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:I think you're quite mistaken. CCP has no vested interest in how high minerals go. It doesn't really affect them. Crashing the plex market means the people who give them real cash no longer do. Your minerals, their cashflow. Yeah....
Mining is easy to do. It will always have a surplus of people botting it to pay for whatever portion of their plex they can. Plainly put mineral demand and supply will never affect the supply and demand of plex in the context you imply...
Of course CCP cares if Battleships start to cost 500m, because players WILL quit over that. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
449
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:11:00 -
[49] - Quote
CCP appears to want a relatively stable plex market. This was in last year's CSM minutes:
CSM minutes wrote:Dr.EyjoG also provided CSM with a report on PLEX intervention(s) made by the EVE Central Bank since the last CSM Summit. The major intervention was related to a PLEX price spike triggered by a large FW payout, and PLEX prices have remained stable since that time. The CSM was satisfied that the ECB had acted appropriately and in line with the procedures previously described. Dr.EyjoG noted that he hopes to have a devblog out in January that discusses this topic in more detail.
Check this thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194473 Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:14:00 -
[50] - Quote
Logical Chaos wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:I think you're quite mistaken. CCP has no vested interest in how high minerals go. It doesn't really affect them. Crashing the plex market means the people who give them real cash no longer do. Your minerals, their cashflow. Yeah....
Mining is easy to do. It will always have a surplus of people botting it to pay for whatever portion of their plex they can. Plainly put mineral demand and supply will never affect the supply and demand of plex in the context you imply... Of course CCP cares if Battleships start to cost 500m, because players WILL quit over that.
Nah they don't. And i'd say your implication is hyperbole and completely unfounded. People quit for a myriad of reasons but I've yet to see anyone make a real verifiable claim and follow through of quitting over ship prices. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:20:00 -
[51] - Quote
Zappity wrote:CCP appears to want a relatively stable plex market. This was in last year's CSM minutes: CSM minutes wrote:Dr.EyjoG also provided CSM with a report on PLEX intervention(s) made by the EVE Central Bank since the last CSM Summit. The major intervention was related to a PLEX price spike triggered by a large FW payout, and PLEX prices have remained stable since that time. The CSM was satisfied that the ECB had acted appropriately and in line with the procedures previously described. Dr.EyjoG noted that he hopes to have a devblog out in January that discusses this topic in more detail. Check this thread: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194473
Yeah let me address this. The EvE master economist is pacifying the people upset with plex prices. They released some locked plex which temporarily increased supply to stifle the price increase. That can only occur in finite supply. Eventually there will not be any locked plex. He also, while not wanting to say it, knows full well the higher plex goes the more plex they sell. He nor CCP give one "F" about whether someone can afford plex with ISK. They only care that people are willing to buy plex with cash. Whether or not I ISK sell the plex for 1 isk or 1 trillion isk doesn't matter one bit. All that matters is that I purchase plex using real currency. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
449
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:[CCP] temporarily increased supply to stifle the price increase...Whether or not I ISK sell the plex for 1 isk or 1 trillion isk doesn't matter one bit
I'm not sure I understand your clarification. The above points appear to be contradictory.
We do not know how many plex are currently locked. We do not know what CCP's target plex price band is but I am willing to bet it is somewhere between 'too expensive for most people' and 'not so expensive that buying plex with RL money will hugely inflate the markets'.
A market where plex is worth 1T in today's value would be, um, interesting. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:41:00 -
[53] - Quote
Let me clarify. People in large numbers want to play for free. CCP used extra resources (locked plex) and threw them a bone. Those resources are finite. It can not be done indefinitely. I doubt there was serious number of plex locked to begin with. There certainly isn't an infinite amount.
CCP has no target for plex prices aside from plex being at a ISK value that will motivate the ISK sellers to purchase them.
I say CCP has no target for plex prices because they aren't the owner of the plex. They have sold the plex. Therefore they can not have a target price for the owner to sell at. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
449
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:51:00 -
[54] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Let me clarify. People in large numbers want to play for free. CCP used extra resources (locked plex) and threw them a bone. Those resources are finite. It can not be done indefinitely. I doubt there was serious number of plex locked to begin with. There certainly isn't an infinite amount.
CCP has no target for plex prices aside from plex being at a ISK value that will motivate the ISK sellers to purchase them.
I say CCP has no target for plex prices because they are no longer the owner of the plex. They have sold the plex. Therefore they can not have a target price for the owner to sell at.
And at the risk of coming off as condescending as the owner of those purchased plex I don't care one iota whether joe average can play free or not or even at all. It's not my concern. My only concern when I purchase plex for resale is that I receive as absolutely much ISK for each as the market will allow. If I see the price of plex plummeting I assure you investing in plex is not something i'm going to do. And I think you'll find that a truth with anyone buying plex for resale. That's business.
That makes sense.
But why couldn't CCP seed more plex? Total plex numbers are currently decreasing due to destruction in ship ganks (I assume plex are actually destroyed if they don't drop) so eventually there will be no plex left. This is clearly reductio ad absurdum but you get the point. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:53:00 -
[55] - Quote
Plex is a privilege, not a right. When people understand this the price of plex will no longer be a concern. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 20:53:00 -
[56] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:Let me clarify. People in large numbers want to play for free. CCP used extra resources (locked plex) and threw them a bone. Those resources are finite. It can not be done indefinitely. I doubt there was serious number of plex locked to begin with. There certainly isn't an infinite amount.
CCP has no target for plex prices aside from plex being at a ISK value that will motivate the ISK sellers to purchase them.
I say CCP has no target for plex prices because they are no longer the owner of the plex. They have sold the plex. Therefore they can not have a target price for the owner to sell at.
And at the risk of coming off as condescending as the owner of those purchased plex I don't care one iota whether joe average can play free or not or even at all. It's not my concern. My only concern when I purchase plex for resale is that I receive as absolutely much ISK for each as the market will allow. If I see the price of plex plummeting I assure you investing in plex is not something i'm going to do. And I think you'll find that a truth with anyone buying plex for resale. That's business. That makes sense. But why couldn't CCP seed more plex? Total plex numbers are currently decreasing due to destruction in ship ganks (I assume plex are actually destroyed if they don't drop) so eventually there will be no plex left. This is clearly reductio ad absurdum but you get the point.
Because you can not seed an item you intend to sell for real life currency. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
16562
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:00:00 -
[57] - Quote
Zappity wrote:But why couldn't CCP seed more plex? Because seeding PLEXes would mean letting players play for free.
In fact saying GÇ£seed moreGÇ¥ means you go wrong from the very start, since they never seeded any to begin with. All the PLEX they re-circulate onto the markets are ones that players have already paid for, but which were never activated before CCP confiscated them. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Zappity
Kurved Space
449
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:04:00 -
[58] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Zappity wrote:But why couldn't CCP seed more plex? Because seeding PLEXes would mean letting players play for free. In fact saying GÇ£seed moreGÇ¥ means you go wrong from the very start, since they never seeded any to begin with. All the PLEX they re-circulate onto the markets are ones that players have already paid for, but which were never activated before CCP confiscated them.
Ah, OK. So a plex spawns in your inventory when you buy a time code? And then the way to increase supply and decrease plex prices is to have a sale. Hooray, I'm l33t! -á(Kil2: "The higher their ship losses...the better they're going to be.") |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
35
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:08:00 -
[59] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote:Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below: .[/b]
I see you did not historically check the price of plex over several years. It has been cyclical for several years running now in this pattern. Yet you want us to believe that because of the current bump up in price it will double from here every 3 to 4 years? I see no reason why it will not return to its normal low price by spring.
But that is what makes a market. When some believe it will continue up and some do not.
Also if you watched the 2012 fanfest you would know CCP has economists working on controling the price of plex. And controling the inflation in the game. But the game is allowed to spike quite a ways into an abnormal condition before they respond, often it will self correct before they have to act or so he said on tape. |

Vyktor Abyss
The Abyss Corporation
335
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:24:00 -
[60] - Quote
Every time I come to round to plexing my account after a break from Eve it seems the price spikes.
Someone in control hates me....
PS - Eve is dying and many people see it coming, hence the transfer from paid subs to plex for many of us. PSS - My crystal ball doesn't come for free, please deposit 1m each in my wallet. Thanks. |

Celeste Taylor
Ruby Dynasty
183
|
Posted - 2013.09.20 21:43:00 -
[61] - Quote
Diomedes Calypso wrote: A1) the "now" as in September is more a matter of speculation. It did follow the same trend last year. A 5 year chart would be helpful to see if there are regular spikes seasonally. I believe there are.
A1a) Explanations about school are plausible although if you asked me to speculate without seeing the chart I'd have guessed that there would be less time to earn ISK through play during schoool. (perhaps though, play increases as there is more work to procrastinate which would certainly be an interesting psychology project to explore)
A1b) Perhaps there are waves of people returning to the game in summer (especially with an expansion this year realeased at the beggining of the summer. I would speculate there is a lag between people returning and people realizing full earning potential which allows more to plex accounts. I wouldn't be surprised that people are inclined to activate/reactivate more alt accounts the longer they play. As the school year wears on, perhaps they let those plexed accounts lapse or just pay a month or two when they're busy and come Winter break, start earning isk again causing another spike as they opt for that method
Sounds about right. I remember converting a bunch of ISK into a pile of PLEX around this time last year as prices started getting closer to the 600M mark following the same speculation some here have (there was at least one thread on GD and market) about the prices going up. I believe the prices dropped to about 500m around January and I ended up down in net ISK value. It isn't that big of a deal though since I always consider PLEX value more static to the $ compared to ISK which tends to fluctuate over the years. For now though I will probably wait until January or so before converting large sums of ISK for PLEX. |

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
114
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 00:03:00 -
[62] - Quote
Hammer Crendraven wrote:Diomedes Calypso wrote:Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below: .[/b] I see you did not historically check the price of plex over several years. It has been cyclical for several years running now in this pattern. Yet you want us to believe that because of the current bump up in price it will double from here every 3 to 4 years? I see no reason why it will not return to its normal low price by spring. But that is what makes a market. When some believe it will continue up and some do not. Also if you watched the 2012 fanfest you would know CCP has economists working on controling the price of plex. And controling the inflation in the game. But the game is allowed to spike quite a ways into an abnormal condition before they respond, often it will self correct before they have to act or so he said on tape.
Your''e the one that didn't check your charts... you're looking at a 2 year trading range and missing the long term trend.
Plex prices started waht at 100 million.. when I started in 2009 I think they were in the high 200's .. when I took a break in 2011 they were in the mid to high 300s.. now they're in the 500s ...
If someone could give me a 500 day or 720 moving average I bet you anything the rate of increase was th 15% to 20% I guessed at
15% of 500 is 75 millioin..
Eventually the most important price growth rate metric is something very close to how much a mid bell-curve 6 month seasoned player can earn an hour.
In the short term markets are voting machine, In the long finacial market it is a weighing machine , (ben graham I believe)
18 months of a trading range? irrelevant for the most part... especially when the short term gyrations between 500 and 600 million mask my estimate... of the long term price.
The gyrations are almost 100 million.. the gryations would hide the long term trend but it will persist because any game is going to give players a bit more game currency over time to create the Entertainment of feelling like you're getting ahead just like an action scene in a movie excites even if there is no real connection to the outcome..
Get a clue and stop of the big picture and stop looking for emotional and political stuff to latch onto |
|

ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
435

|
Posted - 2013.09.21 20:26:00 -
[63] - Quote
This thread has been moved to Market Discussions. ISD Ezwal Lt. Commander Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs) Interstellar Services Department |
|

arabella blood
I Swear She Looked 18
166
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 20:33:00 -
[64] - Quote
Oh no. Troll for hire. Cheap prices. |

Ariel Dawn
F9X
1128
|
Posted - 2013.09.21 22:37:00 -
[65] - Quote
Hammer Crendraven wrote:Diomedes Calypso wrote:Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below: .[/b] I see you did not historically check the price of plex over several years. It has been cyclical for several years running now in this pattern. Yet you want us to believe that because of the current bump up in price it will double from here every 3 to 4 years? I see no reason why it will not return to its normal low price by spring. But that is what makes a market. When some believe it will continue up and some do not. Also if you watched the 2012 fanfest you would know CCP has economists working on controling the price of plex. And controling the inflation in the game. But the game is allowed to spike quite a ways into an abnormal condition before they respond, often it will self correct before they have to act or so he said on tape.
PLEX/gametime has only been going up in value since the start of EVE. For 270m 5-6 years ago, you could buy a 90 day GTC. PLEX when introduced were at 250m. The value of ISK is constantly decreasing, while game time is a fixed RL value commodity. Thus, you get more ISK per PLEX. Expect 1b+ per PLEX within a few years; it's not a "maybe", it's guaranteed to happen. |

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
116
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 00:47:00 -
[66] - Quote
Ariel Dawn wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:Diomedes Calypso wrote:Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below: .[/b] I see you did not historically check the price of plex over several years. It has been cyclical for several years running now in this pattern. Yet you want us to believe that because of the current bump up in price it will double from here every 3 to 4 years? I see no reason why it will not return to its normal low price by spring. But that is what makes a market. When some believe it will continue up and some do not. Also if you watched the 2012 fanfest you would know CCP has economists working on controling the price of plex. And controling the inflation in the game. But the game is allowed to spike quite a ways into an abnormal condition before they respond, often it will self correct before they have to act or so he said on tape. PLEX/gametime has only been going up in value since the start of EVE. For 270m 5-6 years ago, you could buy a 90 day GTC. PLEX when introduced were at 250m. The value of ISK is constantly decreasing, while game time is a fixed RL value commodity. Thus, you get more ISK per PLEX. Expect 1b+ per PLEX within a few years; it's not a "maybe", it's guaranteed to happen. And in terms of CCP manipulating PLEX prices, they've said that banned accounts have 10,000 or so PLEX that they could introduce should the price go too high, as well as PLEX deals/sales which they do already.
It is a shame we don't have easy access to the long term information.
I'd also assert that ISK per month of time via GTC is the same thing in terms of Value even if it tended to fluctuate less and could be purchased then resold on a speculative basis. I believe that 100 milion isk per month of game-time is a good starting point 2 years(verify?) into the games existence.
Price swings are more about seasonality, bumps related to expansions and outlyers like sharp influx of isk via new and focused NPC isk creation... and of course.. greedy financiers that can squeeze a market upward sharply when we sense drying up in supply.
I know I'm not the only one, but looking at the chart from the year before, I bought 40 plex from the market last week.. with isk that was primarily in cash and assets that I had been lazy or indifferent about selling (10,000 assorted data cores etc)
I'm sure 40 is a small number of plex for many people here. I also bet that other people here did something similar ... and I seriously doubt that any financiers were aggressively liquidating two weeks ago to offset many like me adding to positions.
..
My contribution to squeezing up the price by removing liquidity as a "noise trader" (one meaning of the term at least)
Without trying to initiate a broad discussion of different schools of technical trading or whether there is sufficient empirical data to support it's efficacy, there is a broader agreement that noise traders can influence markets in the short term.
I would postulate that any such ability to push price away from "value" would be exacerbated in thinner markets (I don't think that is really contestable by those that understand the contention), and that (more opinion perhaps ) EVE markets are more thin, the lack of reverse convertibility, and meta issues on the supply side that are heavily influenced in the short term by factors unrelated to the game economy such as "Fun" and "Time to play".
I do not refute that the game market will eventual "correct" the price of Plex towards the internal economies assestment of "value". That is accomplished by a rational cost benefit basis related to isk generating value of additional acounts engaged in things such as character creation or ME for resell etc.. among other methods. In the longer term character prices will track the isk/cost of plex but shorter term higher plex cost could reduce margins before purchase prices reflect that. All of this is incrmental and not much mind should be spent on arguing on the true motivations over 6 or 8 week periods.... as that would be more a pissing match and irrlevant long term.
.....
Long as this is getting, I'll only touch briefly on academic articles that support the contention that "noise traders" rather than creating a smoother market, actually create sharper short term swings, that then revert.
There are lots of articles with different nuances in their findings.. so I'll let you explore.
I'll quote one below for it's relatively easy to understand laguage for non economists:
http://forum.johnson.cornell.edu/faculty/saar/BO
Quote:Abstract We use a laboratory market to investigate the behavior of noise traders and their impact on the market. Our experiment features informed traders (who possess fundamental information), liquidity traders (who have to trade for exogenous reasons), and noise traders (who do not possess fundamental information and have no exogenous reasons to trade). We find that noise traders lose money on average: they do not engage in extensive liquidity provision, and thei
Aniother: UC Berkely Economist Brad Delong contributed to one of the first papers on the subject, with many findings being independently verified with some evolution from the 1986 findings http://www.j-bradford-delong.net/pdf_files/Noise_Traders_Main.pdf |

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 01:14:00 -
[67] - Quote
Ariel Dawn wrote:Hammer Crendraven wrote:Diomedes Calypso wrote:Tore Vest wrote:I blame Incursions.... Was that last time prices was high  Incursions are just the most recent method creating bounce in players steps by introducing lucrative new things to do.PLEX prices almost certainly will double in isk value every 3 to 4 years detailed explanation of my reasoning for any that care below: .[/b] I see you did not historically check the price of plex over several years. It has been cyclical for several years running now in this pattern. Yet you want us to believe that because of the current bump up in price it will double from here every 3 to 4 years? I see no reason why it will not return to its normal low price by spring. But that is what makes a market. When some believe it will continue up and some do not. Also if you watched the 2012 fanfest you would know CCP has economists working on controling the price of plex. And controling the inflation in the game. But the game is allowed to spike quite a ways into an abnormal condition before they respond, often it will self correct before they have to act or so he said on tape. PLEX/gametime has only been going up in value since the start of EVE. For 270m 5-6 years ago, you could buy a 90 day GTC. PLEX when introduced were at 250m. The value of ISK is constantly decreasing, while game time is a fixed RL value commodity. Thus, you get more ISK per PLEX. Expect 1b+ per PLEX within a few years; it's not a "maybe", it's guaranteed to happen. And in terms of CCP manipulating PLEX prices, they've said that banned accounts have 10,000 or so PLEX that they could introduce should the price go too high, as well as PLEX deals/sales which they do already.
Guaranteed to happen? And yet you state that CCP is manipulating prices? Would not it make price of PLEX in isk dependent on what CCP will do?
You may be right. You may be wrong.
You are using a very simplistic model. You assume than only isk and PLEX exist. But this could easily be thrown off if either isk is easier to generate or harder to generate or just as easy to generate over the next year(s) due to patches. Or what if some RL rich people take losses or decide to become speculators and buy PLEX to sell it for isk? Also there are other factors at play. For example minerals are sold for isk to buy PLEX, and, well then, well it gets too complicated for people to comprehend. So let's just see what happens.
There are no guarantees. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 01:51:00 -
[68] - Quote
CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. Thy have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200000 rel life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to relese locked plex, and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later. |

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 02:33:00 -
[69] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. Thy have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can.
Are you agreeing with me or disagreeing, and if you are disagreeing how so?
I would just really hate to flame you if you agree with me. It has never been a good strategy to argue with a person who agrees with you in my experience.
I am being velvet silky gentle with you. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 02:51:00 -
[70] - Quote
I don't know. The spiel sounded good and I went with it.
I appreciate your liberal use of lubricant. |

Daniel Plain
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
1482
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 03:09:00 -
[71] - Quote
PLEX goes up, PLEX goes down. can't explain that.
"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings" -MXZF |

mynnna
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1856
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 05:04:00 -
[72] - Quote
This is a ****ing awful thread. Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal |

Bad Bobby
Bring Me Sunshine
254
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 05:58:00 -
[73] - Quote
mynnna wrote:This is a ****ing awful thread. We already have our own awful PLEX thread, why do we need another awful PLEX thread imported from another section? |

arabella blood
I Swear She Looked 18
166
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 07:24:00 -
[74] - Quote
Bad Bobby wrote:mynnna wrote:This is a ****ing awful thread. We already have our own awful PLEX thread, why do we need another awful PLEX thread imported from another section?
This is where awful PLEX threads come to die...
Troll for hire. Cheap prices. |

Rhivre
TarNec Invisible Exchequer
419
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 15:08:00 -
[75] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. They have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can.
Can I get a [Citation needed] for that.
What is your evidence that CCP did not alter the price of plex? |

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
5
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 20:03:00 -
[76] - Quote
Rhivre wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. They have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can. Can I get a [Citation needed] for that. What is your evidence that CCP did not alter the price of plex?
Buy PLEX now. Price can only go up. :-) Did I get this right? 
This PLEX is really messing up Eve economics.
|

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 20:56:00 -
[77] - Quote
Rhivre wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. They have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can. Can I get a [Citation needed] for that. What is your evidence that CCP did not alter the price of plex?
What is your evidence they did? My evidence is found in human nature. They have been paid for gametime that's not honored. It's free cash. Whether you can play free or not matters not in the slightest to them. The only thing that matters is that plex resellers are happy to buy more and in that particular instance they have sold gametime that doesn't have to be honored.
I'm not worried about being taken as right in this instance. CCPs word wouldn't move me. I'd need a video of them putting for sale the plex to be satisfied. 1000 dollar pants perhaps prejudiced my view.
How much free gametime has any multi year veteran ever been given? And you believe the whines' of the general public about playing free means what to them? |

Rthor
Smugglers Inc.
5
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 21:06:00 -
[78] - Quote
Caliph Muhammed wrote:Rhivre wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. They have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can. Can I get a [Citation needed] for that. What is your evidence that CCP did not alter the price of plex? What is your evidence they did? My evidence is found in human nature. They have been paid for gametime that's not honored. It's free cash. Whether you can play free or not matters not in the slightest to them. The only thing that matters is that plex resellers are happy to buy more and in that particular instance they have sold gametime that doesn't have to be honored. I'm not worried about being taken as right in this instance. CCPs word wouldn't move me. I'd need a video of them putting for sale the plex to be satisfied. 1000 dollar pants perhaps prejudiced my view.
Right so I would agree with you that I would not sell the 10K PLEX. But if they said that they would then there is overhanging supply of PLEX that could or would reduce PLEX prices, and if you had lower PLEX prices then more PLEX would be bought but not from them. So in their place I would say it too that I could release 10K PLEX but I would not follow up. But maybe they would. I think that they are A-OK in my book so they might do it. I really think that this PLEX is a bad idea in the long run. |

Diomedes Calypso
Aetolian Armada
119
|
Posted - 2013.09.22 22:09:00 -
[79] - Quote
Rthor wrote:Rhivre wrote:Caliph Muhammed wrote:CCP can make any bold statement it wants to. When the price swings down plex sales slow. CCP releasing 10,000 plex on the market would be contrary to their best interest. They have been paid for gametime that will not be consumed. Tell me would you as a company essentially honor 200.000 real life cash in gametime for the temporary favor of disgruntled players or would you keep them off the market keeping the "free" 200000 cash and force the sale of more plex?
Let me simplify it for you. CCP isn't going to do 1 thing to alter plex prices, they are not going to release locked plex and you can rest assured plex will hit the 1 billion mark sooner or later.
They were fibbing. I say that as gently as I can. Can I get a [Citation needed] for that. What is your evidence that CCP did not alter the price of plex? Buy PLEX now. Price can only go up. :-) Did I get this right?  This PLEX is really messing up Eve economics.
There is a difference between saying:
Quote:Over a span of years, the average price of all plex traded will tend to go up at a 15% to 20% compounded rate. Plex will go up over time, because the isk/hour that an average player with over 6 months of play can earn will go up over time. The more they earn, the easier it will to pay a higher price in isk for plex, or for them to pay more isk for trained characters that in turn creates a demand for plex when there is a motivation to open acounts and train for resale, and other similar business motivations that over time connect earnings to plex price
New content that pays a bit more in game currency than a year or two before is something that developers of any game know they need to provide to keep players spirits a bit up.. players doing PVE (even to fund their PVP) do get glum if their earnings are static. EVE does seek more price stability than most, and the "extra" earnings per hour seems even more real if we keep the ISK price of battle cruisers and T2 components roughtly the same. Those items supply can be tweeked by altering availabilty of their ore components and ease to bring in more ore per hour by increasing or limiting sources via spawn rates etc. and
Quote:I know exactly where plex prices will be next month and they will be higher.
or
I deny that things like increasing or waning player interest, external economy issues, promotions reducing the $/euro price per plex , or manipulation by mega corps can create 30% swings, even 40 % swings within a year
I agree that prices can be 650 in a few weeks and 500 in December... 700 and 450 even... or the reverse. Those moves are almost irrelevant long term.. BUT it can be profitable short term making a good prediction without much risk long term.
People say we can't know the reason, or know what can happen . They are right Short term (6 months is short for me)
However
A contention about the nature of game structure related to isk/hour direction is different than claiming I know which human emotions, or external economy shocks or schedule fluctiations, or sudden war or unusual mega NPC payout will effect short term prices.
Because of a "fun based" need for iI am almost certain than the ISK per Hour of the middle of the bell curve player will be double what it is today by 2017 . If people want to talk about the relation of Isk/hour to plex in stand alone way I'm up for it. - x - x- Onto "Manipulation" by CCP and "meddling in the economy" there is a difference between:
1) Participating in the markets with the purpose of smoothing short term intra-year spikes and troughs - ( using methods to inject more plex in the market (by discount package deals increasing supply to market or by simply putting a stack of 100 for sale 5% off the ask price in Jita )
2) CCP participating in the Plex market in a way that sets the average price of plex over the year higher or lower than a free market would set the long term trend line at.
CCP intervention with the purpose to smooth would require far fewer Plex introduced to soften a spike caused by focused events or seasonal swingers deliberately made sharper by participant like myself and many others who en-masse drained supply.
CCP involvement in that smoothing function does not deny a player driven economy. It does reduce the -swings of the market- many of which are caused by "meta" events (vacations, expansions, special NPC payouts) , limits of the game economic system that would let market participants buffer the swing of plex like other goods if players could actually created supply in game rather than relying on purchasing the good from others that used non game currency to "make" it. Lack of reverse compatibility also restrains in game financier from reducing swings.
CCP short term involvement has a Meta goal - that is based on their opinion, based on their ownership for profit company, that sharp swings in plex prices lose them subscribers in ways that a swing of non-hybrid game assets , like ships and cloaking devices do not.
Given the hybrid meta/game-asset nature of the Plex, their meta interaction with the markets is really just a balance of other meta inputs. One meta deserves another . just as one player driven impact gets offset with player response.
As for Accusing CCP of long term "price fixing" of the plex markets . Off course they do but not through market participation. It would take far more PLEX being brought on the market , $ costing in terms of time/discounts given not needed with other methods, and ultimately futile if they were trying to stem an ever rising tide.
They do set the LONG TERM plex price... Their control Tool is their ability to adjust bounty rates and other NPC reward type payouts to meet isk/hour intentions... which in turn will set plex long term. |

Caliph Muhammed
Perkone Caldari State
516
|
Posted - 2013.09.23 13:44:00 -
[80] - Quote
Rthor wrote:Buy PLEX now. Price can only go up. :-) Did I get this right?  This PLEX is really messing up Eve economics.
Long term, yes. Barring any game killing features being added to the game that would introduce mass quits and such. MechWarrior managed to do this, it's not impossible. But if you have a lot of ISK laying around and no desire to trade plex investment is a sound idea.
Plex supply is limited. It can't be overproduced like a module. There are only so many people willing to pay out real cash for in game currency. I'd wager 99% of EVE dreams of playing absolutely free, indefinitely, through passively streamed income. How many plex resellers do you think that would take to meet that demand?
Keyword, long term. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |