EVE Search - Best ship for maximum shield resistances

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Ships and Modules

Best ship for maximum shield resistances

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Kintac	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:26:00 - [1] Hi, I¦m looking for the best ship you can fit in order to have a maximum shield resistances on all 4 damage types, if you include TechLvL2 items + shield skills. Proposed candidates: Scorpion, 8 mid slots Rook, 7 mid slots + higher base shield resistances Remember, goal is to have nearly 100% shield resistances on all damage types: EM => 100% Thermic => 100% Kinetic => 100% Explosive => 100% What is the maximum you could reach ? What fitting would be used ? thanks Kin
Nyphur	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:29:00 - [2] Depends on the cap you have. Tech 2 invulnerability fields are probably what you're looking for. Plug the values into the spreadsheet at eve-tanking.com and find out for yourself.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:46:00 - [3] Edited by: Toaster Oven on 14/01/2006 07:49:36 Claymore Ballistic Deflection Field II Explosion Dampening Field II Heat Dissipation Field II Photon Scattering Field II 2x Invulnerability Field II Siege Warfare link - Shield Harmonizing module
hupa	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:46:00 - [4] Edited by: hupa on 14/01/2006 07:47:09 Originally by: Kintac Hi, I¦m looking for the best ship you can fit in order to have a maximum shield resistances on all 4 damage types, if you include TechLvL2 items + shield skills. Proposed candidates: Scorpion, 8 mid slots Rook, 7 mid slots + higher base shield resistances Remember, goal is to have nearly 100% shield resistances on all damage types: EM => 100% Thermic => 100% Kinetic => 100% Explosive => 100% What is the maximum you could reach ? What fitting would be used ? thanks Kin With the new stacking things, this isn't even possible m8. Best you're going to be looking at I would think would be 85%-90% MAX to each resistance.
Altrex Stoppel	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:48:00 - [5] Originally by: Toaster Oven Claymore Ballistic Deflection Field II Explosion Dampening Field II Heat Dissipation FIeld II 3x Invulnerability Field II Siege Warfare link - Shield Harmonizing module I agree with Toaster Oven. The Claymore looks beastly .
hupa	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:51:00 - [6] Originally by: Toaster Oven Edited by: Toaster Oven on 14/01/2006 07:49:36 Claymore Ballistic Deflection Field II Explosion Dampening Field II Heat Dissipation Field II Photon Scattering Field II 2x Invulnerability Field II Siege Warfare link - Shield Harmonizing module :P you read my post... The photon scattering field would do only around .5% or less extra resistance. So a Shield booster or someting here would be better TBH.
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.01.14 07:56:00 - [7] Edited by: Toaster Oven on 14/01/2006 08:03:31 Originally by: hupa :P you read my post... The photon scattering field would do only around .5% or less extra resistance. So a Shield booster or someting here would be better TBH. Huh, wtf are you on about? And you are wrong btw if you're trying to say the EM hardener would do no good. It faces no more stacking penalty than any of the other resists Anyhow, just ran the numbers on my setup with max skills. EM - 94.296 EX - 90.874 KI - 86.31 TH - 90.874 And just for fun. Substituting 4x Estamel's hardeners + 2x Estamels' Invunerability fields gets you EM - 96.99 EX - 95.184 KI - 92.777 TH - 95.184
Toaster Oven	Posted - 2006.01.14 08:09:00 - [8] Edited by: Toaster Oven on 14/01/2006 08:09:09 And to compare against armor tankers. Numbers for a faction equipped Damnation are here: http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=277739&page=1#6
Nyphur	Posted - 2006.01.14 08:11:00 - [9] Edited by: Nyphur on 14/01/2006 08:11:17 Originally by: hupa :P you read my post... The photon scattering field would do only around .5% or less extra resistance. So a Shield booster or someting here would be better TBH. No it wouldn't. Hardeners stack depending on the resistance they add to. So while you can't run 8 invulnerability field IIs, you can run one of each hardener and teo invul fields without losing much to stacking penalty at all.
Dr Fighter	Posted - 2006.01.14 08:22:00 - [10] Edited by: Dr Fighter on 14/01/2006 08:22:17 Might be worth checking the eagle, obviously the parts can be upgraded depending on funds.. Eagle with: (5 mids) 1. Dread or better invul (37.5% or better) 2. Dread or better invul 3. EM Hardener (55% or better for the hardeners) 4. EM Hardener 5. Explosion Hardener Gets all resistances to the 90%'s, i dont have two dreads so i cant test the exact res, but im close with what i have, some excel number crunching helped to guess what that setup would be. If anyone that understands the stacking formula wants to calculate it, im sure it would be a contender

Dexter Rast	Posted - 2006.01.14 10:54:00 - [11] Edited by: Dexter Rast on 14/01/2006 10:54:57 vagabond has the best sheild res of any ship i think, but not sure if your looking for a standard ship like a BS of some description, never realy tried getting the res up much higher, might function with a couple of multispec sheild hardner II`s running, not sure the vagas cap could support them though, would have to check --------------------------------------------- Please use a signature that conforms with the EVE-Online forum rules for signatures - Jacques'
Colla Teral	Posted - 2006.01.14 10:55:00 - [12] Polaris Frigate. 99.9 Shield Resist w/o any hardners.
Sentani	Posted - 2006.01.14 10:58:00 - [13] Originally by: Toaster Oven And just for fun. Substituting 4x Estamel's hardeners + 2x Estamels' Invunerability fields gets you EM - 96.99 EX - 95.184 KI - 92.777 TH - 95.184 ____________ The cargo bay is overloaded and cannot be made to fit Expanded Cargohold I. It is currently only capable of fitting 8772.12 units and it is currently jammed full with 9558.33 units.
Teles666	Posted - 2006.01.14 11:39:00 - [14] Originally by: Nyphur Depends on the cap you have. Tech 2 invulnerability fields are probably what you're looking for. Plug the values into the spreadsheet at eve-tanking.com and find out for yourself. Nice site, but this made me chortle: "Things you will not find on this site: You will not find any cheats, hacks, scams, ISK sales or any game item, account or currency sales or purchases" And just to the right a big google ad bar with isk sales and such like :)
Ysolde Xen	Posted - 2006.01.14 11:52:00 - [15] Originally by: Teles666 Originally by: Nyphur Depends on the cap you have. Tech 2 invulnerability fields are probably what you're looking for. Plug the values into the spreadsheet at eve-tanking.com and find out for yourself. Nice site, but this made me chortle: "Things you will not find on this site: You will not find any cheats, hacks, scams, ISK sales or any game item, account or currency sales or purchases" And just to the right a big google ad bar with isk sales and such like :) I was just about to say that too ----- Just because you couldn't get a ship to do what you wanted doesn't mean it's a crap ship - it means you're a crap pilot of that ship.


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.