Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Matilda Cox
State War Academy Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 19:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
We got -10 players ganking in x system atm. they fly cheap destroyers. I was wondering would it make sence to have a counter ship stashed in a orca? what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
|

Donbe Scurred
University of Caille Gallente Federation
245
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 20:17:00 -
[2] - Quote
Where is x system? |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
324
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 23:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details. This is the rule:-á In Eve it's always a trick. If you don't think it's a trick, you just don't have enough experience to know what the trick is. That doesn't mean you shouldn't launch on that fool anyway and roll the dice. |

Crimson Gauntlet
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
70
|
Posted - 2013.09.24 23:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details.
I heartily endorse this.
Think about it, folks. 10 million isk is a lot less than you will spend even buying a ship to fight us with, not to mention the time spent not mining while doing so.
And for a whole year? That's about 28,000 isk per day. Not a miner alive who can't understand that the math of that is good business. Number of times my posts have come in after the dev/mod locked the thread:-á 1 |

loyalanon
The Conference Elite Rainbow Dash Friends
104
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 00:21:00 -
[5] - Quote
I love the new order, they are so amateurish its funny |

Paul Tsukaya
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 00:36:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ravens are excellent at countering destroyers. You might have difficulty locking them quickly though. This is because you have your safety set to "green." If you set your safety to "red" then it increases your lock speed. |

Andracin
Sickology Dead Terrorists
251
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 00:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Since it's -10 players ganking and you have an orca, Im assuming your a high sec miner. If that is the case I am very well experienced in this activity. The answer to your question is almost any ship larger than a noob ship can kill a gank fit catalyst or thrasher.
If your expecting to stop a gank-in-progress, forget it. Once we land on your face with over-heated neutron blasters you will probably not even be able to switch ships fast enough to kill anything before CONCORD and the faction police show up and end us anyway. Best case sceneario you manage to ***** on a couple kills before we die. If anything its a "moral" victory for you, but your miner is probably dead. Alignment, situational awareness and not going AFK are your best defense. |

Omar Alharazaad
ZomCom
69
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 04:08:00 -
[8] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details.
Comply. Fight. Run, or die. The permit route isn't actually that unreasonble IMO... 10 mil for a year is pretty cheap really. Or you can fight em. They're gonna splode no matter what, they know this and are comfortable with it. Your goal if fighting them is to deny them their prize. (That would be you... on fire) To do this you're going to have to be constantly alert and have counters already in place for them before they arrive. It's difficult, but not impossible. Might try Ewar frigs? Run. Always an option. Move to somewhere they are not actively operating and pursue your rock nibbling there.
|

7'62 SKS
7.62
48
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 04:52:00 -
[9] - Quote
[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. Two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. |

Jove Death
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
87
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 07:51:00 -
[10] - Quote
Move to another systems 
Quoting "you will die" in EvE is fail Chars dont die in EvE. Unless you have a heart attack eek
|
|

Goretorium
BadWolf Gaming
6
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 08:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
Logi drones on your orca always running on your miner is a good deterrant. Logi in the high and keeping them locked also helps since the cap link booster is not really needed. |

Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
835
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 11:52:00 -
[12] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details. HAHAHA lols... We would not care at all what permit you hold dude,...
Edit: Your Orca just would get ganked in the process...
"Also, your boobs " -á CCP Eterne, 2012
|

Omar Alharazaad
ZomCom
69
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 12:09:00 -
[13] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat.
This. Conflict causes evolution. This is an example of adaptation in the face of adversity. I've never understood why miners don't either provide their own security or hire it on. Yes, I know that guarding miners is boring, so is mining... working in the security industry IRL I know all too well how boring this kind of job can be. It's boring until it's not, the real problem is that it's often peaceful for so long that you tend to let your guard down. However, payment can be incentive to remain alert... hire some mercs to guard you while you mine or to escort your haul to the trade hub. The mechanisms are in place, just most folks don't take advantage of the tools that are available to them. Hell, give the Kitsune a reason to exist  You see examples of this all over in scifi movies and shows, why wouldn't it be reasonable as well in EVE? If you plan a mining op, it just strikes me as careless as to not provide defensive cover for your "defenseless" miners... just my two ISK worth. |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
52
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 13:05:00 -
[14] - Quote
Paul Tsukaya wrote:Ravens are excellent at countering destroyers. You might have difficulty locking them quickly though. This is because you have your safety set to "green." If you set your safety to "red" then it increases your lock speed.
I spit my coffee out on my keys laughing. |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
52
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 13:08:00 -
[15] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat.
I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
|

Mike Adoulin
Trans-Aerospace Industries
353
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 13:32:00 -
[16] - Quote
Meh.
Best way to counter gank Cats is to Not. Be. There. When. They. Land.
IE......warp off when you see them in local.
Otherwise, they only real deterrent I know of is having a mining dreadnought equipped with t2 mining lasers......:) |

Mike Adoulin
Trans-Aerospace Industries
353
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 13:34:00 -
[17] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
Because they AFK silly!!!
Also, wouldn't work, the Griffin would get popped first....just means you have to spend an extra gank Cat to nail the miner. |

7'62 SKS
7.62
50
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 13:41:00 -
[18] - Quote
Mike Adoulin wrote:Leto Thule wrote:I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
Because they AFK silly!!! Also, wouldn't work, the Griffin would get popped first....just means you have to spend an extra gank Cat to nail the miner.
I thought about that, but I disagree. The Griffin can orbit at 40-50km from whatever they are protecting. Landing on top of them within AC range would be quite a feat. Anything else just gets them jammed out, even if they manage to land within scram range. If they do manage to get good at it, replace the Griffins with good ol' Blackbirds orbiting at 100km running SeBo w/scan res. Good luck landing on and popping one of those. |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
525
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 14:33:00 -
[19] - Quote
Matilda Cox wrote:We got -10 players ganking in x system atm. they fly cheap destroyers. I was wondering would it make sence to have a counter ship stashed in a orca? what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
Destroyers are glass cannon. You can pop them with almost anything. The problem is that they land fast, lock fast, and fire before you can organize a response... By which time Concord is on the scene, mucking things up. Stashing a counter-attack ship in an Orca is probably going to be much too slow a response - you've got just seconds to respond.
Your best bet is to Stay Alert and Aware, watch local, check your intelligence channels, and be prepared to react (Run!) when the Dessies show up on short d-scan. Alternatively, tank up and prepare to bear the brunt of the Destroyer's Alpha Strike. If you can stay alive 17 seconds or so, you're in the clear. CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2042
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 14:44:00 -
[20] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat. I can vouch for the general efficacy of this fit. I flew a similar fit* in last Sunday's Bomber's Bar Sunday Special, and can confirm that a first-time ECM pilot can use this fit effectively and with ease. It makes whoring on Concord KMs easy, too. 
(Only difference is that I was fit for Rainbow Jamming, and had some token DPS as well) Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |
|

Kialopreyst
Hole Exploitation Inc. Goonswarm Federation
2
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:03:00 -
[21] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:Mike Adoulin wrote:Leto Thule wrote:I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
Because they AFK silly!!! Also, wouldn't work, the Griffin would get popped first....just means you have to spend an extra gank Cat to nail the miner. I thought about that, but I disagree.
I also disagree. We just use a suicide Griffin to jam the other Griffin. |

Omar Alharazaad
ZomCom
71
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:15:00 -
[22] - Quote
Can that countercat griffin fit a tractor beam and a salvager in it's highs and still be viable? If so it would serve a dual purpose ship IMO... not only can you c*ckblock the gank, but you can scoop the loot after the fact. Just sayin... I'm not a ganker, but I'm gank-curious. Plus whiskey has a way of makin me wanna see things explode. Tangenting, sorry.... I like the fit and the idea quite a bit, partly because I'm quite enjoying the "emergent gameplay" that's been evolving as a result of this ganking phenomena. As an added plus it gives a purpose to ships that all too often are not used in game due to them not being incredibly useful in fleet engagements. If this trend results in more people using electronic attack ships to good use I'd say it's a damned good thing, as they are sorely underused in other aspects of the game. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2042
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:24:00 -
[23] - Quote
Kialopreyst wrote:7'62 SKS wrote:Mike Adoulin wrote:Leto Thule wrote:I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
Because they AFK silly!!! Also, wouldn't work, the Griffin would get popped first....just means you have to spend an extra gank Cat to nail the miner. I thought about that, but I disagree. I also disagree. We just use a suicide Griffin to jam the other Griffin. Me, personally? I'd just take my chances on the reaction time of the Griffin pilot, to be honest. Anything more complicated than that, you're risking the gank falling apart on timing issues. If you mis-time the griffin-jam, you've got Concord already on the scene when the gank boats land.
Omar; No reason why not. You can even fit a single drone, if you *really* want to pimp it out.  Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

7'62 SKS
7.62
50
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:24:00 -
[24] - Quote
Kialopreyst wrote:I also disagree. We just use a suicide Griffin to jam the other Griffin.
Hmmmm... Everything has a counter. Which brings up this:
[Blackbird, Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I Gravimetric Backup Array I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I ECCM - Gravimetric I ECCM - Gravimetric I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot] [empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Medium Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Medium Particle Dispersion Augmentor I
90 sensor strength vs Griffin with 5x jams at 8 strength each. |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
53
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:39:00 -
[25] - Quote
^ This |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
53
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 15:43:00 -
[26] - Quote
Bottom line here, is that some people are adapting gameplay. They are at the keyboard, playing the game. Attempting to use actual countermeasures instead of whining to change gameplay. Im glad to see it. Adaptation and emergent gameplay right? Both sides should be happy. |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
326
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 16:12:00 -
[27] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat. I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
I understand perfectly why they don't. If you think mining is boring, try guarding miners. I saw a miner get ganked one time by a newbro who slowboated past the "security" to the Retriever, bobbed around in space a bit while he got the nerve to do the needful, then he locked and killed the Retriever. The "security" woke up and try to stop the gank just as the retty sploded. I asked the guy via local why he didn't pre-lock and blow away the catalyst as soon as it went criminal. His answer: Youtube.
This is the rule:-á In Eve it's always a trick. If you don't think it's a trick, you just don't have enough experience to know what the trick is. That doesn't mean you shouldn't launch on that fool anyway and roll the dice. |

7'62 SKS
7.62
51
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 16:22:00 -
[28] - Quote
I truly have no dog in this fight, as I don't mine or gank, but the OP's question is interesting. The answer seems to be don't try to destroy the Catalysts, just jam them out for 20 secs and let CONCORD do the rest. The Catalysts aren't alpha machines, they're DPS. So interrupting that DPS would be a big problem for them. Reaction time for CONCORD appears to be about 18 seconds assuming everything in the gankers' favor. Even a half-asleep miner alt on a second account, or a corporate noob, in a Blackbird with no sebo should be able to do better than that by more than half. Theoretically, that means the gankers need to bring twice the number of Catalysts "just to be sure" (and/or one or two suicide Griffins maybe). That complicates their logistics, and as I said before, realistically just means they'll choose another target rather than trying to counter the counter and hoping for a lucky jam or sleeping Blackbird pilot.
The real issue seems to lie in motivation. If ganking is perceived as a realistic threat, then having a Blackbird on scene is a realistic counter. The problem is that for miners, mining efficiency seems to be their holy grail. Any pilot (alt or corpmate) placed in a security role is one less pilot mining, which lowers their efficiency from its potential. If you're talking a corpmate into doing it, then the Blackbird pilot needs to be compensated for their time, which would be very boring, and would cut into their efficiency again all to prevent an event that might not be coming in the first place.
For a miner running multiple accounts and using expensive ships, using one of those accounts for a Blackbird seems like an obvious choice.
|

Zappity
Kurved Space
463
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 16:38:00 -
[29] - Quote
Logic is great. But that Blackbird account could be another Retriever mining ore... Min/max is the real reason there are not more proper responses to ganking. Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec. |

7'62 SKS
7.62
51
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 16:45:00 -
[30] - Quote
Zappity wrote:Logic is great. But that Blackbird account could be another Retriever mining ore... Min/max is the real reason there are not more proper responses to ganking.
So in the end, it's the gankers who aren't doing their job properly. If they stepped it up a notch so that ganking was a realistic threat to the average miner, then min/max would require security to counter them. I guess, as it stands atm, it's better to take the risk of running a mining op without security in terms of min/max. |
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2043
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 16:57:00 -
[31] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:Zappity wrote:Logic is great. But that Blackbird account could be another Retriever mining ore... Min/max is the real reason there are not more proper responses to ganking. So in the end, it's the gankers who aren't doing their job properly. If they stepped it up a notch so that ganking was a realistic threat to the average miner, then min/max would require security to counter them. I guess, as it stands atm, it's better to take the risk of running a mining op without security in terms of min/max. No, not really... Except in as much as not enough people go a'ganking.
The biggest problem with defending against ganking is, as previously noted, guarding the Targets is boring. Reaction time falls off and attention wanders. But an at-the-keyboard miner doesn't really *need* external security anyway.
Rather than bothering with guards, they can load shield maintenance drones in the Orca and Barges. Assign the maintenace drones to the Orca, and the Orca pilot can put them on whichever Barge is in danger. I don't *think* that so-assigned, a particular Barges' drones can help their home boat, but all the others can. One or two barges might wish to reserve their own drones and put them on the Orca at the same time. Just so that all ships in the mining fleet are covered. Combine this with max-tank fits, and you've got a tough nut to crack, and one that is relatively boredom-proof.
Not impossible to gank, but you'll need more than a small fleet to do it. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

7'62 SKS
7.62
51
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 17:23:00 -
[32] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:Rather than bothering with guards, they can load shield maintenance drones in the Orca and Barges. Assign the maintenace drones to the Orca, and the Orca pilot can put them on whichever Barge is in danger.
I'm pretty sure that shield/armor maintenance drones cannot be assisted to anyone and thereby controlled by a "drone bunny" like DPS drones can.
|

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
58
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 18:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:Leto Thule wrote:7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat. I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers. I understand perfectly why they don't. If you think mining is boring, try guarding miners. I saw a miner get ganked one time by a newbro who slowboated past the "security" to the Retriever, bobbed around in space a bit while he got the nerve to do the needful, then he locked and killed the Retriever. The "security" woke up and try to stop the gank just as the retty sploded. I asked the guy via local why he didn't pre-lock and blow away the catalyst as soon as it went criminal. His answer: Youtube.
Should I be surprised? No.
Lol...
Maybe I should edit my statement to say "NON-AFK ECM".
Netflix should have its own KillBoard. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Sweet Sensations Radical Industries
13985
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 21:03:00 -
[34] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:Zappity wrote:Logic is great. But that Blackbird account could be another Retriever mining ore... Min/max is the real reason there are not more proper responses to ganking. So in the end, it's the gankers who aren't doing their job properly. If they stepped it up a notch so that ganking was a realistic threat to the average miner, then min/max would require security to counter them. I guess, as it stands atm, it's better to take the risk of running a mining op without security in terms of min/max. I was talking to a new player just the other day who -loves- mining, especially while AFK. He's only a couple months old, and only has one account, so the cost of a retriever is a big deal to him. He is aware of the possibility of getting ganked in high sec. However, he prefers to maximize his mining yield, loves to go AFK as much as possible, and doesn't bother to tank his ship at all, nor does he research ways to help increase his chance of surviving a gank. I'd call him foolish, but then again, he's been mining alone and carefree for weeks on end and no one has found him yet. Maybe he's made enough extra ISK by min/maxing to replace his retriever once/if he does get ganked. Maybe the fact that he can go AFK and do other stuff while mining increases the enjoyment he gets per hour, and he wouldn't be happy if he was forced to be at attention at all times watching mining lasers burn holes in rocks. *shrug* I would hope so, a Retriever should be able to pay for itself in around 4 hours if you assume 6-8 million isk p/h. I am furnishing this post "as is" I do not provide any warranty whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any relevance or fitness for purpose or any warranty that the contents herein are error-free.
|

Vrenth
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective
48
|
Posted - 2013.09.25 21:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
Matilda Cox wrote: what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
Smartbombs will destroy a large group of catalysts instantly  |

Sabriz Adoudel
Oppan Ganknam Style
855
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 02:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
Vrenth wrote:Matilda Cox wrote: what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
Smartbombs will destroy a large group of catalysts instantly 
I was going to suggest the same thing.
The smartbombs will also take out any nasty rats that get in the way of your mining too. Miner euthanization expert. An enemy is just a friend that you stab in the front. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. |

7'62 SKS
7.62
52
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 04:15:00 -
[37] - Quote
Smartbombs will also hit any cloaky neutral positive-sec-status alt that the gankers are using as a warp-in, thereby bringing CONCORD down on your smartbombing BS. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Oppan Ganknam Style
855
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 06:19:00 -
[38] - Quote
7'62 SKS wrote:Smartbombs will also hit any cloaky neutral positive-sec-status alt that the gankers are using as a warp-in, thereby bringing CONCORD down on your smartbombing BS.
People use cloaky positive sec status alts for warpins?
Odd.
I use a Procurer alt that doesn't have cloaking trained, and has a slightly negative sec status. Miner euthanization expert. An enemy is just a friend that you stab in the front. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. |

Kasenumi Aakiwa
Aakiwa Trading Assembly
4
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 09:59:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jove Death wrote:Move to another systems 
I wonder why that is so hard. At this very moment there are 12 systems that I can see in a quick look at the starmap that you can mine in the "borderline" of lowsec (.5 and .6) positioned in a way that the only ships jumping there are going there, so you will see a ganking from mile away.
But that is the "ego miner", they have to mine afk where the gankage is happening. They have to try to "fight the power" by hull tanking a group of people that experct to be concorded and still ask for advice on how to fight them.
Maybe the paying thing is the better anyways, so they stay there and dont come here. LOL
And I wonder what is the "average miner", because I havent seen most miners I know or heard of complaining about ganking. I see them earning fortunes because of gankage ghost around the afk miners and market speculation. As far as I can see, the prices in Caldari and 2 Gallentean regions changed a bit from the Interdiction thingy, and have been changing since the new generalized gankage fever, but the number of units traded remains the same, which leads to the inexorably conclusion that whatever gankage may be, it is not a problem for the "average miner", but just for the "low earning (semi) afk miner". |

7'62 SKS
7.62
52
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 13:33:00 -
[40] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:7'62 SKS wrote:Smartbombs will also hit any cloaky neutral positive-sec-status alt that the gankers are using as a warp-in, thereby bringing CONCORD down on your smartbombing BS. People use cloaky positive sec status alts for warpins? Odd. I use a Procurer alt that doesn't have cloaking trained, and has a slightly negative sec status.
Even if you saw a big smarty battleship sitting right on top of the miners you were intending to gank? It just seems like landing a neutral right next to the whole blob of miners and BS is an obvious counter. Plus, the BS and everyone being protected by the BS would have to be in the same corp as "close enough to kill the cats" would be in range of any possible gank target. |
|

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family
100
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 14:25:00 -
[41] - Quote
I would have thought an instacane would work pretty well to answer OP's question. It is also pontless as many people have stated. I made a mining alt and mined a couple of bill over time. In out of the way systems the main risk is being yellow boxed by BC's owned by the local miner whose ore you are "stealing". Being yellow boxed doesn't seem to affect yield in anyway. If you move to busier systems with lower sec status then u will start to see various new things. ventures behaving oddly and sometimes visibly locking you (no idea if they hadn't heard of passive targeters or were failing to use them properly) that are acting as scouts. u will also see this from other barges and various other ship types. You will also see the hoover mining fleets that swarm like locusts and destroy every roid in sight. You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once.
From this i learn that mining is very dull. Mining doesn't make enough isk unless you multibox. fitting for max yield will more than cover your losses from ganking. having a guard is stupid as they would be better off making isk and sending u a fraction of those rewards earned to buy u a new ship if your current one explodes.
Most miners however are strangers to logic, humour and polite language and it isn't the ship exploding that makes gankers gank. It i the sanity of the miner exploding all over local and in evemails. The only enjoyment i got from mining was reading local after a gank. This sometimes required google translate and those ones were especially amusing. I read http://www.minerbumping.com/ every day as it is easily the best blog in eve.
I no longer mine. |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
526
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 16:17:00 -
[42] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote: You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once.
I can't be everywhere. 
Actually, I'm taking a break from ganking Miners to learn how to gank Explorers. Something different to do; even gankers get bored. CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
66
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 16:54:00 -
[43] - Quote
Plastic Psycho wrote:Silvetica Dian wrote: You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once.
I can't be everywhere.  Actually, I'm taking a break from ganking Miners to learn how to gank Explorers. Something different to do; even gankers get bored.
Hmm... that could be very entertaining! And those ships are EXPENSIVE! Youll need to update a bit more once you get a few down...  |

Hammer Crendraven
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 22:56:00 -
[44] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote:I would have thought an instacane would work pretty well to answer OP's question. It is also pontless as many people have stated. I made a mining alt and mined a couple of bill over time. In out of the way systems the main risk is being yellow boxed by BC's owned by the local miner whose ore you are "stealing". Being yellow boxed doesn't seem to affect yield in anyway. If you move to busier systems with lower sec status then u will start to see various new things. ventures behaving oddly and sometimes visibly locking you (no idea if they hadn't heard of passive targeters or were failing to use them properly) that are acting as scouts. u will also see this from other barges and various other ship types. You will also see the hoover mining fleets that swarm like locusts and destroy every roid in sight. You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once. From this i learn that mining is very dull. Mining doesn't make enough isk unless you multibox. fitting for max yield will more than cover your losses from ganking. having a guard is stupid as they would be better off making isk and sending u a fraction of those rewards earned to buy u a new ship if your current one explodes. Most miners however are strangers to logic, humour and polite language and it isn't the ship exploding that makes gankers gank. It i the sanity of the miner exploding all over local and in evemails. The only enjoyment i got from mining was reading local after a gank. This sometimes required google translate and those ones were especially amusing. I read http://www.minerbumping.com/ every day as it is easily the best blog in eve. I no longer mine.
An industrial player is a little different than a miner. Industrial players measure everything in cost effectiveness. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
988
|
Posted - 2013.09.26 23:54:00 -
[45] - Quote
Quote:An industrial player is a little different than a miner. Industrial players measure everything in cost effectiveness.
I would disagree, and I know quite a few of them.
The real indy players are the guys who not only sell ganking catalysts, but retrievers too . The true indy player is just about the only guy who really wins at EVE. Other people can fight each other from across the sector, and no matter who survives the fight, he wins.
A miner is, by and large, someone pretending to play EVE, or at best, someone who prioritizes the single most boring activity in the game. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
526
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 17:08:00 -
[46] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Plastic Psycho wrote:Silvetica Dian wrote: You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once.
I can't be everywhere.  Actually, I'm taking a break from ganking Miners to learn how to gank Explorers. Something different to do; even gankers get bored. Hmm... that could be very entertaining! And those ships are EXPENSIVE! Youll need to update a bit more once you get a few down...  Shall do. :) CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

Tetsuo Tsukaya
Pixel Navigators
148
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 23:33:00 -
[47] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Vrenth wrote:Matilda Cox wrote: what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
Smartbombs will destroy a large group of catalysts instantly  I was going to suggest the same thing. The smartbombs will also take out any nasty rats that get in the way of your mining too.
Probably also hit someone who isn't suspect/criminal and cause your smart bombing battleship to get ganked by Concord. |

Silvetica Dian
Manson Family
102
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 00:48:00 -
[48] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:Plastic Psycho wrote:Silvetica Dian wrote: You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once.
I can't be everywhere.  Actually, I'm taking a break from ganking Miners to learn how to gank Explorers. Something different to do; even gankers get bored. Hmm... that could be very entertaining! And those ships are EXPENSIVE! Youll need to update a bit more once you get a few down... 
I have experiance here too. You need to scan the hacking site first. They will most likely be in cov-ops but will get distracted by the mini game. kill them then. they are all ready for ganking and fit WCS in lows to u need to kill them quick or have multiple points. stealth bombers fit with light missiles seem to work very well for this specialised task. The other method is the standard gate camp with someone ready to decloak at the bubble. a small bubble directly in line with a popular route works very well and to kill these guys even running the camp solo works fine. i have done this on both ends of the gun and evading gankers /killing explorers both work out well. |

Princess Bride
Corripe Cervisiam Trade Consortium
548
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 04:30:00 -
[49] - Quote
The new SoE ships might end up good both for exploring and decloaking to kill explorers. http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/ |

Daisai
Daisai Investments.
156
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 05:22:00 -
[50] - Quote
Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details.
Falsely represent ... bla bla bla |
|

ZAKURELL0 LINDA
Mordu's Military Industrial Command Circle-Of-Two
13
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 09:29:00 -
[51] - Quote
stay aligned + d-scan seems rocket science to HS carebears...... RIP Iron Lady |

Jonah Gravenstein
Sweet Sensations Radical Industries
14079
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 12:30:00 -
[52] - Quote
Daisai wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details. Falsely represent ... bla bla bla Can't falsely represent an informal all inclusive organisation, especially one that doesn't appear to exist for ToS enforcement purposes. I am furnishing this post "as is" I do not provide any warranty whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any relevance or fitness for purpose or any warranty that the contents herein are error-free.
|

K'Taulis
Free Lunch
0
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:55:00 -
[53] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Daisai wrote:Malcolm Shinhwa wrote:I recommend buying a permit. Contact your local gankers. Alternatively you can send me 10mil isk per pilot for a New Order mining permit. They are good for one year and valid throughout hisec. See http://www.minerbumping.com/p/the-code.html for more details. Falsely represent ... bla bla bla Can't falsely represent an informal, all inclusive organisation, especially one that doesn't appear to exist for ToS enforcement purposes.
Both true and False, because no mechanic 'officially' exists in game for the issuing of or the enforcement of these 'Mining Permits' it is not possible to successfully petition someone for falsely claiming to have a permit. However since many (but not all) New Order 'Knights' are in New Order Corps and Alliance Representing yourself as part of the Order (if you are not) should be done with extreme caution because you can be banned.
Disclaimer: I am not currently nor do I intend to be a Part of the New Order, simply playing Devil's Advocate |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
340
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 02:20:00 -
[54] - Quote
I remain unconcerned about being banned for representing an organization that doesn't, according to the ISDs, even exist. But you should pass this information on to my wife. She would be delighted to know there might be some way to get me to stop playing Eve. Hey CCP, please slush my fund like you did for SOMER Blink. |

Daisai
Daisai Investments.
158
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 07:21:00 -
[55] - Quote
Matilda Cox wrote:We got -10 players ganking in x system atm. they fly cheap destroyers. I was wondering would it make sence to have a counter ship stashed in a orca? what ship would this be? and how fast could i blow up a destroyer?
The best to avoid getting ganked in eve is by not playing the game, plenty of players have been going with that tactic and it has done pre-order's for 2 games pretty good. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
14084
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 11:44:00 -
[56] - Quote
Daisai wrote: The best to avoid getting ganked in eve is by not playing the game, plenty of players have been going with that tactic and it has done pre-order's for 2 games pretty good.
Citation needed.
TBH a lot of them will come back. Part of the attraction of Eve, even for so called "carebears" like myself, is the inherent risk presented by other players. Everybody takes a break sometime, otherwise it can turn into skill training online, especially for people that choose to play solo. I'm just about to take one myself, playing the crap out of games that present me with instant gratification, while planning out a new direction to take when I come back, for a few months. I am furnishing this post "as is" I do not provide any warranty whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any relevance or fitness for purpose or any warranty that the contents herein are error-free.
|

Princess Bride
Corripe Cervisiam Trade Consortium
550
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 13:32:00 -
[57] - Quote
I'm waiting to see how far they backtrack on the TOS debacle. I'm not sure why CCP feels the need to punch the living crap out of a tar baby once every 1-2 years but it does make me question the hours I spend on this game. http://eveprincessbride.wordpress.com/ |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1032
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 00:59:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Daisai wrote: The best to avoid getting ganked in eve is by not playing the game, plenty of players have been going with that tactic and it has done pre-order's for 2 games pretty good.
Citation needed. TBH a lot of them will come back. Part of the attraction of Eve, even for so called "carebears" like myself, is the inherent risk presented by other players. Everybody takes a break sometime, otherwise it can turn into skill training online, especially for people that choose to play solo. I'm just about to take one myself, playing the crap out of games that present me with instant gratification, while planning out a new direction to take when I come back in a few months.
This. In fact, a lot of this.
I'd like to add, by the way, that there's nothing wrong with single player games, or non MMO games in general. X Rebirth looks like a fine game, and I intend to buy it and play the crap out of it. It's fine to enjoy solo, single player gameplay, there's a place for that.
But that place is not EVE Online. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Yi-Ming Gren
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
23
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:23:00 -
[59] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:An industrial player is a little different than a miner. Industrial players measure everything in cost effectiveness. I would disagree, and I know quite a few of them. The real indy players are the guys who not only sell ganking catalysts, but retrievers too  . The true indy player is just about the only guy who really wins at EVE. Other people can fight each other from across the sector, and no matter who survives the fight, he wins. A miner is, by and large, someone pretending to play EVE, or at best, someone who prioritizes the single most boring activity in the game.
Quiet, don't give away my secrets, just because I deal arms to both sides of the conflict. I have bpo's for tanks too but sadly those hardly sell as well as the ORE ships, strip miners, and the cat hulls. |

Sabriz Adoudel
Oppan Ganknam Style
873
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 01:28:00 -
[60] - Quote
Silvetica Dian wrote:I would have thought an instacane would work pretty well to answer OP's question. It is also pontless as many people have stated. I made a mining alt and mined a couple of bill over time. In out of the way systems the main risk is being yellow boxed by BC's owned by the local miner whose ore you are "stealing". Being yellow boxed doesn't seem to affect yield in anyway. If you move to busier systems with lower sec status then u will start to see various new things. ventures behaving oddly and sometimes visibly locking you (no idea if they hadn't heard of passive targeters or were failing to use them properly) that are acting as scouts. u will also see this from other barges and various other ship types. You will also see the hoover mining fleets that swarm like locusts and destroy every roid in sight. You will rarely see a ganker and in my whole experiment i got ganked once. From this i learn that mining is very dull. Mining doesn't make enough isk unless you multibox. fitting for max yield will more than cover your losses from ganking. having a guard is stupid as they would be better off making isk and sending u a fraction of those rewards earned to buy u a new ship if your current one explodes. Most miners however are strangers to logic, humour and polite language and it isn't the ship exploding that makes gankers gank. It i the sanity of the miner exploding all over local and in evemails. The only enjoyment i got from mining was reading local after a gank. This sometimes required google translate and those ones were especially amusing. I read http://www.minerbumping.com/ every day as it is easily the best blog in eve. I no longer mine.
I am pleased at your progression from miner to EVE player, and wish others would do the same.
I did not use passive targetters correctly for a long time, meaning I might have been one of those Ventures. The proper use of them isn't really documented in game at all and I didn't realise I was doing it wrong until I had my alt passive scan me. Miner euthanization expert. An enemy is just a friend that you stab in the front. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. |
|

Grunanca
Sickology Dead Terrorists
82
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 08:38:00 -
[61] - Quote
Andracin wrote:Since it's -10 players ganking and you have an orca, Im assuming your a high sec miner. If that is the case I am very well experienced in this activity. The answer to your question is almost any ship larger than a noob ship can kill a gank fit catalyst or thrasher.
If your expecting to stop a gank-in-progress, forget it. Once we land on your face with over-heated neutron blasters you will probably not even be able to switch ships fast enough to kill anything before CONCORD and the faction police show up and end us anyway. Best case sceneario you manage to ***** on a couple kills before we die. If anything its a "moral" victory for you, but your miner is probably dead. Alignment, situational awareness and not going AFK are your best defense.
Another serious answer from one of my members! Yay! We almost seem like... mature |

Grunanca
Sickology Dead Terrorists
82
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 08:41:00 -
[62] - Quote
Leto Thule wrote:7'62 SKS wrote:[Griffin, Hypnos Countercat] 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I 'Hypnos' Signal Distortion Amplifier I
'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I 'Hypnos' Ion Field ECM I
[empty high slot] [empty high slot]
Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I Small Particle Dispersion Augmentor I [empty rig slot]
Super cheap, low skill, locks a catalyst in 2.5 seconds or so, each jammer has about a 8 in 11 chance of jamming one catalyst for 20 seconds, depending on skills. This could remove 4 catalysts from the equation far sooner than CONCORD will in a 0.5 system. One or two of these orbiting the miners could really put a kink in the DPS...if pilot reaction time is reasonable. Once a catalyst is locked and jammed, he will be completely disabled until CONCORD can arrive, take over jamming, and destroy the cat. I have never understood why more people dont use ECM to protect against gankers.
Now the tears are gonna be complete when we use even more people to make the faction police not show up, and then kill your griffin for agressing us first |

Leto Thule
Sons of Retribution
72
|
Posted - 2013.09.30 14:10:00 -
[63] - Quote
Grunanca wrote:Now the tears are gonna be complete when we use even more people to make the faction police not show up, and then kill your griffin for agressing us first 
Yeah, because I meant that ecm should jam any ship that lands on grid.
Obviously if it were me, I would wait until you went yellow to jam you. And since my griffen has an optimal range of around 70km, GASP I wouldnt be anywhere in range of your cat. (This is pointless, because it would never be ME protecting miners, but I digress..)
There seems to be some giant misunderstanding in C&P lately about "TEARS". It seems the current belief system goes with this.
Tears = ANYTHING THAT IS SAID by your target. Allow me to elaborate. TEARS = crying about something. Maybe a little rage fit in local, maybe a nasty post on the forums demanding a nerf to combat, ect.
NOT Tears = constructive attempts/posts ect that attempt to develop a working countermeasure. Just because someone doesnt want to get ganked doesnt mean they are crying about it. And furthermore, I am HAPPY that some of them are starting to try. Its honestly more fun for everyone.
LOL @ "tears".
And before you go off on calling me a carebear or some such, take a look at my sec status and KB on zkill. Im a pvp player. I dont cry over spilled pixels. |

Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3992
|
Posted - 2013.10.01 15:15:00 -
[64] - Quote
Hurricane. 650mm ungrouped. High scan resolution. Sit at distance. Lock, lock, lock. F1, 0.5sec delay, F2, ship pops and game switches to next target, F3, delay, F4, ship pops and game ... etc etc |

Valleria Darkmoon
Heretic Army Heretic Initiative
128
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 07:34:00 -
[65] - Quote
If you are actually watching, you could fit an ECM burst, sure it will only break locks but assuming they are all -10 or criminally flagged there's a good chance you won't even get CONCORDED for it but even if you do being on 4-6 mails in your barge is worth the price of admission.
Not to mention the moment of confusion caused by the lock loss and the time it takes to relock may even save you. |

Luwc
Easy Co. Fatal Ascension
10
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 08:39:00 -
[66] - Quote
Balls... Balls are a good counter.
You man the f*ck up and drop some dessies / cruisers yourself.
a single BC should be able to deal with a bunch of dessies. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 :: [one page] |