|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 16:46:00 -
[1] - Quote
hello folks
me and i know a lot of others bought the mind link after themining barge change
at that point there was not a anouncement yet that they were going to change way they could be aquired
so i bought that thing 2.1 b
and about 2 days later they pronounce that the mind links could be bought with concorde lp
i say that they should reimburse the difference between the price we payed and the price it became
the price now is only a fraction of what is was when it was still a "rare" drop
already made a petition about this but all they simply dont care
i call this theft from the players by ccp
|

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 16:58:00 -
[2] - Quote
well you 2 both clearly miss the reason wy i made this threat
i would apreciate it if ppl dont troll in this case |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
8
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 17:04:00 -
[3] - Quote
Bizzaro Stormy MurphDog wrote:boernl wrote:well you 2 both clearly miss the reason wy i made this threat
i would apreciate it if ppl dont troll in this case Ignore the trolls buddy, you're in the right. Everyone who ever bought one of those mindlinks is due a heavy reimbursement by CCP. In all honesty, CCP should probably reimburse every character who ever lost isk due to a market fluctuation that came about from new/altered items. Fair is fair.
thats a little more than is realistic
if they would set a period of a week or 2 before they announced it ( since that is when they went skyhigh after the mining changes) that would be realistic |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.27 19:06:00 -
[4] - Quote
hatcontroller
i am not talking about market inflictions
im talking about a chaneg ccp made for the (again) newer players so they dont have to work so hard to obtain the mindlink
and yes i did expect ppl to respond to the threst thatswhere i made it for
only i dislike it a lot that so many ppl only respont with trols instead of decent comments |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 16:16:00 -
[5] - Quote
yes that is why they were called "rare" and rare items are expensive
if they wanna fix something like that
they could have announced it when they changed the mining system that would have bin fine
but instead they let the price go skyhigh and than they change it
that the price went up so much had to do with changing the mining system
the biggest problem are the players who are afraid to open theyr mouths if they disagree on something like this
but they do troll the ppl that do have the balls to go against ccp |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 17:06:00 -
[6] - Quote
X ATM092 wrote:The price went up because of the addition of other storyline missions which diluted the supply. You paid 2.1b for something you thought was worth 2.1b and you still have the thing, you lost nothing. You are bad at eve and bad at thinking.
dit bedoel ik dus mensen die alleen posten om te trollen en niets toevoegen |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 17:19:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tippia wrote:boernl wrote:X ATM092 wrote:The price went up because of the addition of other storyline missions which diluted the supply. You paid 2.1b for something you thought was worth 2.1b and you still have the thing, you lost nothing. You are bad at eve and bad at thinking. dit bedoel ik dus mensen die alleen posten om te trollen en niets toevoegen GǪexcept that he's right. If it wasn't worth 2.1bn for you, you shouldn't have bought it at that price.
at that moment yh it was worth it
than 2 days later it wasnt thatswhy i say that ccp should invert a reimbursement time a window of time
i apologise for the dutch line in between btw
|

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 17:27:00 -
[8] - Quote
Tippia wrote:boernl wrote:at that moment yh it was worth it
than 2 days later it wasnt GǪand presumably, at that point, you already had what you paid a fair price for. You probably even installed it, making all future prices irrelevant since there is no resale. Just because the markets change doesn't mean that you got an unfair deal. I presume that if you want a reimbursement period, it'll be two-way: if you buy something, and then, a week later, it becomes more expensive, the additional ISK is drawn from your wallet to cover this new, higher price? Why should they reimburse a deal that was entirely fair and which you felt was worth-while? If it was worth it, it was worth it, and you've lost nothing. If you were trying to speculate, then that risk is part of the business and you lost your gamble so there should definitely not be any reimbursement.
thats the whole point that i try to make clear
it was not a market change it was a interfearance of ccp |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:32:00 -
[9] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:So if it had made the price go up, you'd be demanding ccp take the additional value from your wallet
thats bull what you write here
if it goes from rare to lp item |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:47:00 -
[10] - Quote
Tippia wrote:boernl wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:So if it had made the price go up, you'd be demanding ccp take the additional value from your wallet thats bull what you write here if it goes from rare to lp item No, it's a logical consequence of your suggestion. You are asking to have your purchases adjusted after the fact if something happens to the market that alters their value for a period of time after the trade has been done. If the price goes down, you get reimbursed the additional ISK you had to pay. If the price goes you, you reimburse CCP the additional ISK you didn't pay.
if it was direct market related the post woudlent have made sense
but if ccp literary fucks the ppl over it does |
|

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:49:00 -
[11] - Quote
have to say what you say makes sense in 1 way |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 18:55:00 -
[12] - Quote
Tippia wrote:boernl wrote:but if ccp literary fucks the ppl over it does Good thing that they don't, then. Well, maybe the occasional market speculator, but that's the nature of speculation so it is as it should be.
they **** the players over all the time
trying to make this game easier for the newer players and "balancing" everything
up till a point that the nwer players dont have to work for something anymore but the ppl who played for years simply waisted all the effort they putted in getting things done |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 08:48:00 -
[13] - Quote
Wyn Pharoh wrote:This is not the first time, nor will it be the last time, that CCP devalues any particular item. It's been very expensive for a long time, and now it isn't. I'll bet the warfare mindlinks that I paid a premium for before the last expansion have lost value with the introduction of navy mindlinks, but I don't expect CCP to reimburse me. I also never got a reimbursement for skills I trained that are no longer requirements for other skills, and judging by the Character Bazaar, skillpoints can be worth a lot of isk.
I think you expected more support from the playerbase with your OP. I suggest that you adjust your expectations.
youre correct i was hoping for more support from the playerbase but as always most of the ppl that agree simply are afraid to go public
and the ppl that do get trolled to death |

boernl
L0s Zetas Brothers of Tangra
9
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 18:22:00 -
[14] - Quote
Goldiiee wrote:I am not sure if you were aware of the Features and Ideas Section of the forums.
If you were then you would have seen the Dev thread on Mindlinks posted over two months before the patch. In that thread they stated the intended changes to Mindlinks and it was discussed for 60 or 70 pages (Don't remember exactly). Anyone that had a Mining Mindlink immediately after reading the thread put it on the market and laughed all they way to the bank as people bought them up at, never to be seen again, prices.
Your thread is misguided, misdirected... well your anger is at the wrong person. You were scammed, by someone that read the Dev Thread and used his knowledge to make a profit off of others that don't read.
100 dreds of idears are noted
not even a fraction actualy will be implemendet |
|
|
|