| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Radelix Cisko
Patriot Security Services
The Laughing Men
112
   |
Posted - 2013.09.28 00:20:00 -
[31] - Quote
Tikitina wrote:Time to add some more L4 Sisters Agents.
In .4 or lower. Got it. |
i-AA
Cream Pie Carpet Munchers
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 00:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
T4info
Im going to osmon too now
Im gonna mission non stop |
Dr0000 Maulerant
Union Nanide and Tooling
27
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 00:53:00 -
[33] - Quote
Vald Tegor wrote:
Fortunately nowadays CCP has the capacity to move a few key systems to reinforced nodes after downtime. They can also start by moving non-relevant systems off the one it's currently running on to improve performance with minimal disruption.
Pretty sure nodes are hot-swappable, karan went from 90% TiDi to 10% while staging for the battle @6VDT.
From that point until after bridgine jita was said to have very heavy TiDi.
You can howl "EVE has consequences" without context or explanation at whoever you like. This will not make it true. |
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
Cosmic Consortium
4108
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 01:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
A better option would be to move the Osmon SOE L4 Security agent to Old Man Star.
Note the emphasis on SOE ships: T1 hulls that can fit covops cloaks, obviously intended for operation in hazardous regions.
Day 0 advice for new players: Day 0 Advice for New Players |
Vald Tegor
Empyrean Guard
Tactical Narcotics Team
40
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 01:22:00 -
[35] - Quote
Dr0000 Maulerant wrote:Vald Tegor wrote:
Fortunately nowadays CCP has the capacity to move a few key systems to reinforced nodes after downtime. They can also start by moving non-relevant systems off the one it's currently running on to improve performance with minimal disruption.
Pretty sure nodes are hot-swappable, karan went from 90% TiDi to 10% while staging for the battle @6VDT. From that point until after bridgine jita was said to have very heavy TiDi.
Have to disconnect everyone in system to move it to a different node and there are multiple systems on each node with exception of the three super nodes on the same "super box" as Jita. To move it without breaking client connections they would first need to TiDi down to 0% and actually pause the game in the moving system. |
Julius Priscus
147
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 01:33:00 -
[36] - Quote
Morrigan LeSante wrote:uuuuuh...because whilst the agents and players can take it, the servers cannot?
simple answer is simple. move that one lvl 4 agent to low sec to be with the other lvl 4 SoE agents.
-»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |
The Spod
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
82
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 05:28:00 -
[37] - Quote
Still the only elegant answer is to just let it happen and reinforce the node. A new trade hub emerging "accidentally" is a part of history and makes the sandbox interesting. |
baltec1
Bat Country
8101
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 05:47:00 -
[38] - Quote
The Spod wrote:Still the only elegant answer is to just let it happen and reinforce the node. A new trade hub emerging "accidentally" is a part of history and makes the sandbox interesting.
It will last a few months and then become another motsu.
If people dont want the crowds then go to low sec. |
Mocam
EVE University
Ivy League
301
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 07:18:00 -
[39] - Quote
Doc Fury wrote:Richard Gere is single again, so all the hamsters are on lockdown.
well... iirc there was a trimmed plastic bat used as "the pipe" for that so... I suppose the analogy might fit...  |
Daisai
Daisai Investments.
156
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 07:56:00 -
[40] - Quote
Bienator II wrote:make it lowsec first
Nah, that would scare old the suicide gankers away. |
Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
288
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 09:05:00 -
[41] - Quote
Harry Kawkenbawls wrote:I'm going to go on the assumption that you are not as dumb as you're acting and you're simply after an argument. You just pointed out the flaw in your own statement. Players won't be forced to run the missions for the low sec agents.
So, basically what you are saying is that, instead of trying a in-game solution (move to less crowded system) first, you rather cry to CCP to have the game changed? HTFU!
I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC. -- TheGunslinger42 |
Solstice Project
I'm So Meta Even This Acronym
3989
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 09:11:00 -
[42] - Quote
Kill them all.
Problem solved.
Sissies. |
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3444
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 09:39:00 -
[43] - Quote
Great. That's where I keep a JC.
I hear that incursion LP can translate to Sisters LP anyway and the ISK payout is higher. Give it a couple of weeks for people to figure that one out, another week of "I has Drake" in the incursion channels (  You KNOW it's going to happen) and then the incursion runners will be like "WTF my incursion?"
Years of running SoE missions so not so bork my standings with any one faction gives me all the LP I need, but yeah, it would be a good idea to have more than 1 SoE level 4 security agent for a host of reasons.
|
Lipbite
Express Hauler
842
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 09:45:00 -
[44] - Quote
Concord LP (incursions) can be converted into Sisters' LP. |
Julius Priscus
147
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 10:36:00 -
[45] - Quote
too all you high sec hugging pussies in osmon earning 6k lp per mission lol..
GOTO ROIR-Y and get 16k lp per mission :P
or just do incursions in safety if you can get to one in time :P
-»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |
Kueyen
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
34
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 10:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Harry Kawkenbawls wrote:I'm going to go on the assumption that you are not as dumb as you're acting and you're simply after an argument. You just pointed out the flaw in your own statement. Players won't be forced to run the missions for the low sec agents. So, basically what you are saying is that, instead of trying a in-game solution (move to less crowded system) first, you rather cry to CCP to have the game changed? HTFU!
CCP caused this problem when on May 19th 2011 they limited mission agents to missions of one type, and nerfed Gicodel (the system with the only other HS L4 SoE agent) into the ground by making that agent a distribution one.
Support L4 highsec Sisters of EVE security agents in all four empire factions!
Those new SoE faction ships in EVE: Rubicon won't buy themselves! |
Sturmwolke
447
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:06:00 -
[47] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I hear that incursion LP can translate to Sisters LP ...
The exchange rate is 0.4 Concord LP to 1 SoE LP .... i.e for every 1000 SoE LP, you need to burn 2500 Concord LP.
Not worth it, imo. It's not the normal 0.8 you get for the standard empire faction.
|
Vera Algaert
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
1058
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:08:00 -
[48] - Quote
Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Harry Kawkenbawls wrote:I'm going to go on the assumption that you are not as dumb as you're acting and you're simply after an argument. You just pointed out the flaw in your own statement. Players won't be forced to run the missions for the low sec agents. So, basically what you are saying is that, instead of trying a in-game solution (move to less crowded system) first, you rather cry to CCP to have the game changed? HTFU!
server limitations aren't a part of game design.
if this was people asking CCP to spawn them more asteroid belts because the existing ones deplete too fast then I would agree completely with you - but having tidi in mission hubs and their surrounding systems is not a balancing feature intended by CCP.
Your post is the equivalent of "HTFU! why don't you just do small gang pvp instead of bringing 1000 vs 1000 and then complaining about tidi". But EVE is designed to encourage 1000 vs 1000 battles just as it is designed to accommodate 300 players in one mission hub (agents are designed to hand out an unlimited number of missions simultaneously, mission running is designed not to be a competition about limited resources like ratting and mining are). The Jita population cap exists to prevent an even worse playing experience, not because CCP's game designers decided that they want to discourage high population systems.
(Just remapping the surrounding systems to different nodes would probably help a lot - Korsiki being on the same node as Osmon is a big part of the problem) |
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
672
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:19:00 -
[49] - Quote
Due to the insane amounts of SoE Loyalty Points I have accumulated due to silly RP reasons (along with a flawless 10/10 in faction/corporation standing), I of course support any petty attempt at trying to prevent others from gathering SoE Loyalty Points. Nobody should bug in on the insane profits I am about to make here, obviously. Crap server performance due to another CCP oversight, is just the thing.
Thank you, Obama.
Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |
Sipphakta en Gravonere
4S Corporation
Goonswarm Federation
288
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:41:00 -
[50] - Quote
Vera Algaert wrote:
if this was people asking CCP to spawn them more asteroid belts because the existing ones deplete too fast then I would agree completely with you - but having tidi in mission hubs and their surrounding systems is not a balancing feature intended by CCP.
Of course not. Osmon moving to it's own node - fine. Spawning more level4 agents when the available ones aren't even used to the fullest extend - Not fine.
I say tomato, you say tomaCCP BAN ALL TOMATOES THEY ARE HARASSING ME I WANT TOMATO FREE HIGHSEC. -- TheGunslinger42 |
vextorious
Concordiat
Spaceship Samurai
1
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:48:00 -
[51] - Quote
Harry Kawkenbawls wrote:Sipphakta en Gravonere wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:uuuuuh...because whilst the agents and players can take it, the servers cannot? Judging from the NPC kills around Aeschee (2 Lvl4 SoE agents), there is still plenty of room for players to do missions. I'm going to go on the assumption that you are not as dumb as you're acting and you're simply after an argument. You just pointed out the flaw in your own statement. Players won't be forced to run the missions for the low sec agents. Fact - nothing you can do to change that. They will run the high sec Osmon one. Fact - again, nothing you can do about it. CCP WILL have to do something about it. Either add another level 4 security agent in high sec or reinforce the node. Did I make the only possible scenario simple enough for you?
Or maybe limit the number of missions per hour a given agent can offer? Oh simple one, you must open your mind to gain wisdom. LMAO.
Their are many ways to deal with this outside of your narrow point of view. |
Scrutt5
Spiritus Draconis
Sicarius Draconis
32
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:54:00 -
[52] - Quote
Tikitina wrote:Time to add some more L4 Sisters Agents.
There's loads available, get to low sec.
|
Red Templar
Monkey Attack Squad
Goonswarm Federation
282
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 11:58:00 -
[53] - Quote
Or there is another solution - remove SoE Agents from high sec.
CCP called those ships "pirate faction" ships. And up to now no pirate faction had agents in high sec.
Afaik there are no Angel/Guristas/Serpentis/etc agents in high sec where you can get their faction ships.
But i wouldn't be surprised if this is taken into account, and some sub division of SoE faction will be open, and they will have their own pirate npc space with own LP stores.
For Love. For Peace. For Honor.
For None of the Above.
For Pony! |
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
527
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 14:26:00 -
[54] - Quote
It seems many SoE systems are in TiDi - Airaken is in 49% TiDi right now - only 64 in local.
This is not good.
CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace!
-á~ Me |
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
527
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 14:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
Just got punted - Node being re-mapped.
Edit:
Yay! No TiDi!
CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace!
-á~ Me |
Murk Paradox
Duty.
The Cursed Few
535
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 15:20:00 -
[56] - Quote
The Spod wrote:Morrigan LeSante wrote:uuuuuh...because whilst the agents and players can take it, the servers cannot? Just put it on jita node.
Permanently right? Because screw sov eh?
This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation.
Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate. |
Daisai
Daisai Investments.
156
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 15:33:00 -
[57] - Quote
Scrutt5 wrote:Tikitina wrote:Time to add some more L4 Sisters Agents.
There's loads available, get to low sec.
Because its really worth going to low sec for some mission that pays a couple of mil isk.
|
Julius Priscus
147
|
Posted - 2013.09.28 23:35:00 -
[58] - Quote
Daisai wrote:Scrutt5 wrote:Tikitina wrote:Time to add some more L4 Sisters Agents.
There's loads available, get to low sec. Because its really worth going to low sec for some mission that pays a couple of mil isk.
clearly you are a great thinker.
-»\_(pâä)_/-»-á Sup cracka ! |
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific
Initiative Mercenaries
2905
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 00:15:00 -
[59] - Quote
Julius Priscus wrote:Daisai wrote:Scrutt5 wrote:Tikitina wrote:Time to add some more L4 Sisters Agents.
There's loads available, get to low sec. Because its really worth going to low sec for some mission that pays a couple of mil isk. clearly you are a great thinker.
lol
But on the upside,it's thinking like that that allows peopel who actually know what's up make fortunes in low sec doing sisters missions, faction warfare pve and Lv5s that "aren't worth it" lol.
Btw, those low sec systems with sisters security agents are seeing a lot more population too lol, so not everyone is that dumb.
|
Jenn aSide
STK Scientific
Initiative Mercenaries
2905
|
Posted - 2013.09.29 00:21:00 -
[60] - Quote
Red Templar wrote:Or there is another solution - remove SoE Agents from high sec.
CCP called those ships "pirate faction" ships. And up to now no pirate faction had agents in high sec.
Afaik there are no Angel/Guristas/Serpentis/etc agents in high sec where you can get their faction ships.
But i wouldn't be surprised if this is taken into account, and some sub division of SoE faction will be open, and they will have their own pirate npc space with own LP stores.
+1
These ships are gonna be dirt cheap, look at all the people stacking LP in osmon.
CCP needs to make more than just sisters ships if they are gonna make them available through empire pve. Like EOM.....
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |