| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
1. Solution to AFK Cloakers? - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Remove local and you remove the problem.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.07.18 07:40:47
|
2. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Legion and Loki are now horribly overpowered, get training into them.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.07.14 11:30:07
|
3. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
BESTER bm wrote: Dude, you do not even know what you are talking about and quite clearly have never seen nor run any of these sites. At this point you are merely a cracked record spouting the same nonsense as you really have no argument here....
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 22:22:24
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: You cant have more tank on the cloaky T3C because that renders the recons obsolete. This is an interesting point. Recons are e-war ships (for some reason) so making the cloak subsystem more tanky won't ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 22:16:00
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: JC Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: Or we can fix the 4 ships that have been causing problems or outright invalidating some 60+ other ships for years. maybe they used to years ago but not anymore meta cha...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 22:06:57
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: baltec1 wrote: They very much do apply as these ships have more uses outside of exploration. If you want a dedicated t2 cruiser for exploration then ask for one. we already have dedicated faction cruiser that won't do...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 22:05:58
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mhari Dson wrote: If you have to keep repeating yourself then one side or the other is wrong, since you're having everyone else in the thread come against you perhaps you should take a different look at your line of discussion. (That's as fa...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 20:34:36
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
BESTER bm wrote: You are twsting the argument to suit your needs here. You are trying to blanket the argument with basic and frankly non applicable comments. There currently is no high end exploration ship capabale of running the high end exp...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 17:49:01
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: Or we can fix the 4 ships that have been causing problems or outright invalidating some 60+ other ships for years. maybe they used to years ago but not anymore meta changed a lot since those days Yea, it...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 17:41:52
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: T3Ds can switch between modes to have better damage, better defense or better speed than the other destroyers. Do they count as generalist too? Supposed to, but they suffer from the exact same problems that have dogged...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 17:04:00
|
11. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: It's not fun to argue with you if all you're doing is keep repeating the same thing over and over again, while ignoring all options and possibilities that would change these ships. I have to keep on repeating myself be...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 15:49:56
|
12. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Well, we don't have T2 exploration cruisers, so why shouldn't we let the T3Cs to be? This is most likely the only role that doesn't overlap with any T2 cruisers. Because they are not specialist cruisers. Dior Ambra...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 14:30:53
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Sterling Blades wrote: There is a difference between 'very likely to die,' and 'gauranteed to die.' T3C are as likely to die doing these sites as a battleship in a level 4 mission in highsec. Sterling Blades wrote: You want it to ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 12:41:46
|
14. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Blazemonger wrote: Alderson Point wrote: If CCP wish, as I believe T3s to have the opportunity to continue as a Viable exploration ship, in the manner we can currently utilize them,even though refitting may now be needed, the solution in thi...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 11:03:35
|
15. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: baltec1 wrote: T3C are supposed to be the highly adaptable generalists, T2 are the specialists, T1 are the base model, faction are the posh base model and pirate are the high quality supermodel. This whole lineup is b...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.21 07:36:16
|
16. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: how many hacs does it take to kill a rattlesnake Depends. Are you trying to compare a cruiser with a pirate battleship?
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 22:44:56
|
17. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Again: what does "generalist" mean? Jack of all trades, master of none. Dior Ambraelle wrote: Also, why would you make a ship that's more expensive than the T2 ships, and has penalty for losing it if it should b...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 22:44:09
|
18. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Moth Eisig wrote: baltec1 wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: there's only one other exploration cruiser and it's initial design was nerfed below the state of running a superior cache due to whining over it bieng too powerful for null. So yea,...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 20:51:04
|
19. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
JC Mieyli wrote: baltec1 wrote: HACs are not bad ships compared to the other cruisers. which other cruisers the ones all in the trash only (non t3) cruisers i see are gila cyna stratios all pirates maybe a vaga dies or a cerb dies meani...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 20:40:45
|
20. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Mhari Dson wrote: there's only one other exploration cruiser and it's initial design was nerfed below the state of running a superior cache due to whining over it bieng too powerful for null. So yea, if a recon cannot run these sites then...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.06.20 18:43:26
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |