| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
141. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Sonya Corvinus wrote: Mike Voidstar wrote: No one needs a defense from AFK campers. Everyone deserves a chance to hunt any ship in space, even cloaked ones. It does not have to be cheap or easy, we can start with simply making it possible. ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.30 17:56:14
|
142. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: The answer to that is in the quote. It isn't. Under your plan there would be no point in using a T2 cruiser because it would be less capable than a t3c at its specialised role.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.30 17:02:22
|
143. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: Cade Windstalker wrote: Personally I feel like this kind of switching would only really be attractive to nomads and other very very niche play-styles, which is why CCP didn't go with it. There's little point in having a ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.29 22:00:58
|
144. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Starrakatt wrote: baltec1 wrote: Beast of Revelations wrote: baltec1 wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Then add one huge versatility item that lets T3C pilots switch roles on the fly. Let Tech 3 Strategic Cruisers (that don't at that momen...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.29 21:39:55
|
145. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Beast of Revelations wrote: baltec1 wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Then add one huge versatility item that lets T3C pilots switch roles on the fly. Let Tech 3 Strategic Cruisers (that don't at that moment have a weapons timer) refit from thei...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.28 11:18:55
|
146. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Then add one huge versatility item that lets T3C pilots switch roles on the fly. Let Tech 3 Strategic Cruisers (that don't at that moment have a weapons timer) refit from their cargo holds without need of a Ship Maintenance ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.28 09:01:34
|
147. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Mike Voidstar wrote: Yet the one thing they are supposed to do, provide a safe place, is done better by a cloak. Cloaks don't come armed with a doomsday, invincibility or asset protection.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.27 10:39:56
|
148. Help pls - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
That's what happens when you don't secure your pods seatbelt, your ship left without you.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.27 10:26:50
|
149. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A big chunk of the problem comes from the Vast fitting room so bringing that into line is a big help alone.
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 18:47:56
|
150. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I'm basing my working out on what CCP have told us so far with the exception of the null/cov ops combo which I see as too powerful and easy mode and SP loss which is frankly pointless. That said even that is up for discussion. There are some rathe...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 17:43:37
|
151. Super Battleships ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lothros Andastar wrote: People only use cruisers en-mass because they are a LOT faster to move and half the cost of the same sized battleship fleet. T3C tank more, are harder to hit, move faster, are easier to get cap stable with a prop mod ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 10:43:44
|
152. Super Battleships ? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Beast of Revelations wrote: I'm not opposed to the idea in theory. But it would be nice if they fixed current battleship issues with respect to tank, firepower, etc. before we ask for super-battleships. Many people don't even fly battleships be...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 08:50:37
|
153. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Nonesense Care to explain given what has been pointed out so far?
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 08:48:19
|
154. Sticky:AFK CloakingGäó: Ideas, Discussion, and Proposals - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Dracvlad wrote: OK, I was told reliably that CCP are intending to set up the uncloaking wave idea within a system with a long cooldown attached to a citadel, so that active campers will have no issues but those that are AF...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.26 08:44:14
|
155. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Infinity Ziona wrote: Tung Yoggi wrote: Making out of the box fits for your activities do not equate making doctrine ships. You are not solving any problem with the proposed fits, besides maybe making Great Wildlands a better missioning pl...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.25 11:32:39
|
156. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: sero Hita wrote: We use the Hac doctrines more often, because unleashing T3Cs means everyone docks up. Kinda funny conclusion, people won't fight T3Cs because they are OP so T3Cs are used less than HACs. Self-regulati...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.25 07:11:03
|
157. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote: I look forward to the rebalance. Long overdue. Will effectively make other ship choices much more valid, no buffs required. I don't see the plan to nerf them into the ground, but focus on what (should) make the ship class ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.25 06:07:16
|
158. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jeremiah Saken wrote: Who broke Salvos? baltec1 is that you? He went off the deep end. But here is where CCP have said they want them CCP Ytterbium wrote: Tech3 ships need to be put down, like a rabid dog drooling everywhere in the ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 19:14:06
|
159. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1 wrote: Salvos Rhoska wrote: This is a bad idea, with too many hedged interests involved, with no benefit to anyone except baltac1s interest. Again, how does nerfing most of the ships we use in our fleets ...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 18:43:41
|
160. Strategic cruiser balance pass - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Salvos Rhoska wrote: baltec1: Lol at trying to skew this into a Malcanis Law issue by citing how many Titans you can field, how rich you are, and how little SP loss matters. I see what you are trying. Doubling the SP loss, and increasing b...
- by baltec1 - at 2017.04.24 18:37:24
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |