Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
371
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
Drop the cloak, drop the carebear bit, drop the laser bonus.
0/10. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
371
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 15:47:00 -
[2] - Quote
Alphax45v2 wrote::( @ the 2/4/4 on the frig; needs more highs for pew pew and cloak/probe. 4/4/4 would be great!
All the bad frigates have utility highslots. Mids and lows are far better. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
376
|
Posted - 2013.10.02 17:48:00 -
[3] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:On the Astero, it does not get a drone damage bonus. Hypothetically speaking if it did get a bonus are the following DPS values too much for a frigate? Using Hobgoblin IIs 1 DDA 182.6 DPS 2 DDA 219.17 DPS 3 DDA 247.93 DPS (lol Shield Tanked) 4 DDA 264.06 DPS (Trolol Shield Tanked)
No, because drone damage is a lie, and you get like 1/3 of your paper dps because drones are terrible. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
388
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 10:33:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hiiiiii
I'm very sorry you guys had to wait 60 pages for us to comment here. If you didn't know (we tried to be kind of quiet about it) we had a company trip out of the country this weekend and weren't anywhere near the forums for several days.
I can't say anything yet on the ships because I have to catch up quite a bit of reading first and then probably chat with the balance team. Thanks a lot for all the feedback and I promise to be back shortly with some comments.
If you aren't removing the covops cloak, I hate you. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
388
|
Posted - 2013.10.07 11:04:00 -
[5] - Quote
Bouh Revetoile wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:If you aren't removing the covops cloak, I hate you. The cloak is the whole point of the ship. It would be yet another drone cruiser without it.
|

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
402
|
Posted - 2013.10.08 14:41:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hey wanted to check in again.
We've been talking about these ships quite a lot the last day or two and still aren't settled on making any changes. I think we're in a relatively good spot, which is great. We do have some minor concerns about the power level that comes with a resist bonus and a full drone bandwidth allocation. That said, with no projection or application bonuses and larger sig there's still no way the Stratios can compete with the Ishtar at a fleet level so it's just a matter of figuring out if it's too much at a smaller scale, which is debatable to say the least.
We are also talking about the virus strength issue and there's good arguments on both sides. I think any change here will wait until we decide about the rest of the ship and be made in relation to those changes (for instance if it lost any damage output it would seem very sensible to increase the virus strength).
For now, I want to let this sit a bit longer while we think things over and see how the sisi feedback plays out.
Thanks for the discussion!
I don't see anything in your post about removing the covops cloaks. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 14:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Alright, after a lot of feedback and discussion I'm going to share what will likely be the last set of tweaks to the Stratios and Astero before launch.
We feel that while there are significant weaknesses in the cruiser that do balance it against major abuse, it's simply too strong in its current state. The combination of the covert cloak, black ops portal access and extremely high damage potential make for a ship that does a bit more than we are comfortable with. To tone it down slightly we are going to lower the drone bandwidth to 100mb/s and the drone bay to 400m3.
The ship will still have very high damage potential and will certainly still be very powerful overall.
This also makes me feel better about some other small changes that improve the ship, so we'll also be increasing the virus strength bonus to +10 and changing the laser cap use bonus to a medium energy turret optimal range bonus of 50%. We will also extend the virus strength bonus to the Astero.
Please post with feedback, but keep in mind that these changes are made after processing tons of feedback from the forums, my visit to EVE Vegas and a lot of internal discussion.
Thanks
Can't we just have a good ship that doesn't have a cloak, instead of a bad one that does? I know it's extremely good currently, but I'm assuming you guys will nerf its combat abilities at some point. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 15:47:00 -
[8] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote: Can't we just have a good ship that doesn't have a cloak, instead of a bad one that does?
Ishtar
One with actual lowslots and a tank. Also frigate-sized. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 15:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Destoya wrote:Ishkur (this is easy)
If I wanted to be as slow as a cruiser and cost 40m, I'd fly a cruiser. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
421
|
Posted - 2013.10.24 17:13:00 -
[10] - Quote
Rek Seven wrote:Omnathious Deninard wrote:Coincidently enough, 4 unbonused lasers do about the same amount of DPS a the lost drone. Remove the Turret hardpoints and please give us back our drones. Agreed. Why give it split weapon bonuses in the first place? ... Armour bonuses (amarr) and drone bonuses (gallente) along with the specialized ability to use a cover cloak was already enough to qualify it as a pirate faction cruiser.
as massively OP more like |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 16:07:00 -
[11] - Quote
Xequecal wrote:Niena Nuamzzar wrote:Xequecal wrote:I do not understand... I agree with you. Let me see... dual web: check, scrambler: check, 0.1125 tracking: check... I'd say it's quite good for the job. Why would I engage a Raven solo in a cloaky ship? The whole point of having a cloak is to choose my targets. Would you engage dual web, heavy neuting Domi - you wouldn't, right? Which battleships can the blaster gank version actually kill? If you're sitting at 2500m with keep at range you take full DPS from their guns and drones, you'll pop before they do unless you managed to catch them with a shitload of rat aggro and the rats don't switch targets at all. With my neut fit you can orbit at 7500-10000m and speedtank BS weapons down to very low DPS and kill basically anything that's not running multiple heavy neuts or webs.
The rats will always switch targets if you have any tackle mods. I'm surprised people aren't more mad about the state of rat AI - it's totally ********. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
422
|
Posted - 2013.10.27 21:53:00 -
[12] - Quote
M1k3y Koontz wrote:what the hell are you doing in lowsec?!
getting blobbed in plexes by cloaky ships and links |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
428
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 16:03:00 -
[13] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Quote:I was just thinking that instead of reducing the Stratios' firepower by limiting it's drone bandwidth, you could give it the same bonus as the Astero - 20% bonus to drone hitpoints Yep we thought of something like this also, but really it's much worse. Like others said above, the hp isn't nearly as useful on the cruiser, and it's a huge damage nerf. 50% instead of 20%.
50 bandwidth and double damage bonus pls. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
428
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 16:18:00 -
[14] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:50 bandwidth and double damage bonus pls. That's a very interesting idea. Two sentries becomes equivalent to four and a flight of mediums deals the same damage as a full flight of heavies. What are you trying to achieve with an approach like this?
Forget sentries for a minute. It's like heavy drones, except they can move faster than a drake, they can hit cruisers, they use less space, they are harder to kill and they are more easily replaced. Much better than 5 heavies and a 37% tracking and speed bonus or whatever they put on the ishtar and navy vexor. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
428
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 16:31:00 -
[15] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:50 bandwidth and double damage bonus pls. That's a very interesting idea. Two sentries becomes equivalent to four and a flight of mediums deals the same damage as a full flight of heavies. What are you trying to achieve with an approach like this? That would be STUPIDLY overpowered against smaller ships.
As opposed to a rapid light cerb, which isn't overpowered at all. |

TrouserDeagle
Beyond Divinity Inc Shadow Cartel
428
|
Posted - 2013.10.31 19:54:00 -
[16] - Quote
Malcolm Malicious wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:TrouserDeagle wrote:50 bandwidth and double damage bonus pls. That's a very interesting idea. Two sentries becomes equivalent to four and a flight of mediums deals the same damage as a full flight of heavies. What are you trying to achieve with an approach like this? That would be STUPIDLY overpowered against smaller ships. As opposed to a rapid light cerb, which isn't overpowered at all. This is a cool idea. Super scout drones.
Not even that. It's just medium drones for medium ships. |
|
|