| Pages: [1] :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Seleene
   |
Posted - 2006.01.30 13:46:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Seleene on 30/01/2006 13:46:18
...but I can't because there are no BPO's for them in the game.
Fitting large mods of the same type (Shield/Energy/Remote Repair Xfer) does not matter because the ship bonus only applies to the X-Large variants.
The Events team carriers are using them. Why can't we?
I'd also like to fit some of those fancy damage mods for drones. That would be pretty cool... but I can't because there are no BPO's for them in the game.
The ships have been in game for nearly two months now, but their primary use other than as a fighter platform (fleet support) is unavailable due to the fact that we can't build the modules for them.
Why?
-
CCP - New Documentation Please?? |
Elissen
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 13:53:00 -
[2]
The ICSC would like to sell them with our carriers. And wasn't the advanced drone interfacing skill needed for the drone control module also missing?
----
ICSC
Red Moon Rising edition: Jumpplanner tool - Routeplanner for all jumpcapable ships! |
Kyguard
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:00:00 -
[3]
 Originally by: Seleene
Why?
I'm sick of this charade you're trying to put on Seleene. CCP doesn't have the time, what part of that don't you get?
They are busy fixing all those bugs like the targeting bug, the jumpgate error msg, the overview etc. Not even mentioning the drone AI, the shield/cap relay stacking "feature". 
-|-
The above thoughts are my own and do not represent my alliance.
Join LFC, become someone, become family. |
Asestorian
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:02:00 -
[4]
I don't think it takes a whole lot of time for CCP to seed some BPO's...
---
---
|
Slink Grinsdikild
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:04:00 -
[5]
In my opinion Red Moon Rising was a big mistake. They shouldn't have split the Kali patch in two, leaving us standed for the next umpteen months with an unfinished product.
.___.
{O,o}
/)__)
-"-"-
O rly? |
Azuriel Talloth
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:09:00 -
[6]
Add it to the list in my sig, and get in line 
-Fix RMR- |
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:10:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Kyguard
I'm sick of this charade you're trying to put on Seleene. CCP doesn't have the time, what part of that don't you get?
They are busy fixing all those bugs like the targeting bug, the jumpgate error msg, the overview etc. Not even mentioning the drone AI, the shield/cap relay stacking "feature".
YEah because seeing the missing BPOs is a while lot of work...
-------------
|
Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:13:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Kyguard
I'm sick of this charade you're trying to put on Seleene.
Charade? You mean I'm somehow faking the content of my post or making up issues to bring to CCP's attention?
Quote:
CCP doesn't have the time, what part of that don't you get?
Probably the part where you work at CCP and have the inside track on what they do and do not have time to work on / acknowledge.
Quote:
They are busy fixing all those bugs like the targeting bug, the jumpgate error msg, the overview etc. Not even mentioning the drone AI, the shield/cap relay stacking "feature".
Ah, you must be a CCP employee to know what their priorities are?
I'm sorry, but your post is just... well, strange. I don't expect miracles, but the fact remains that these ships are not only bugged but also lack 50% of their basic functionality. I feel that's worthy of a "What's up, CCP??" type thread. If you do not, fine. Take the flamethrower elsewhere.
-
CCP - New Documentation Please?? |
Kyguard
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:14:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Kyguard on 30/01/2006 14:14:57
Seleene, it was sarcasm. I completely agree 
-|-
The above thoughts are my own and do not represent my alliance.
Join LFC, become someone, become family. |
ObviouslyAnAlt
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:15:00 -
[10]
We found a Mod, May we burn him?
|
|
|
Seleene
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:16:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Kyguard
Seleene, I was joking. I completely agree
Ahhh... then the sarcasm was a bit lost on me. Spending months training for and building these things to only find them falling short of their promised potential isn't pleasant. No harm done, m8. 
-
CCP - New Documentation Please?? |
Joshua Foiritain
|
Posted - 2006.01.30 14:17:00 -
[12]
While we are at it finally having someone fix the names on the following items would be cool;
Yan JungArtifact 1
Yan JungArtifact 2
Yan JungArtifact 3
Yan JungArtifact 4
Yan JungArtifact 5
Yan JungComponent 1
Yan JungComponent 2
Yan JungComponent 3
Yan JungComponent 4
Yan JungComponent 5
Yan JungLore 1
Yan JungLore 2
Yan JungLore 3
Yan JungLore 4
Yan JungLore 5
-------------
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |