|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
   |
Posted - 2011.11.02 09:07:00 -
[1] - Quote
These changes are good. How can anyone deny that? Unless, of course, they long for something dirt-cheap and overpowered. 90% web - lolwhat?
Speed of those is still way too good, though. I hope further steps will follow.
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 14:41:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Ytterbium wrote:Hey people, since this will go on Sisi soon and thus a Dev Blog may not be necessary, figured you would appreciate some comments on this.
Hope that helps a bit.
Awesome post, thanks. Seems like you're one of those rare sane individuals at CCP :)
I like your approach. Can they please get you working on other crucial things, too? Like, you know, those mentioned in my sig :)
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 14:59:00 -
[3] - Quote
Krell Kroenen wrote: But they will be used as the cheap ship replacements for the blobs which puts them below the status of drakes and cains because at least those ships can do other roles.
I am just disappointed as I am sure others here are as well that these new ships and their wonderful models will be nothing more than disposable platforms with no real use outside of the large alliances that can field them in lemming like numbers.
So you expected them to be on pair with Drakes and thus overpowered by definition? Okey....
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
Fon Revedhort
Monks of War
DarkSide.
17
|
Posted - 2011.11.02 16:15:00 -
[4] - Quote
Krell Kroenen wrote:Fon Revedhort wrote:Krell Kroenen wrote: But they will be used as the cheap ship replacements for the blobs which puts them below the status of drakes and cains because at least those ships can do other roles.
I am just disappointed as I am sure others here are as well that these new ships and their wonderful models will be nothing more than disposable platforms with no real use outside of the large alliances that can field them in lemming like numbers.
So you expected them to be on pair with Drakes and thus overpowered by definition? Okey.... I never stated I expected them be like drakes.
I've never stated 'like Drakes' either. I said 'on pair'. Drakes and the rest of the tier2 rabble are overpowered. Introducing something equally powerfull - but with a different role - will just shift the game balance towards ubiqutios BC even further - further away from a real diversity.
2008, CCP Zulu(park): "command ships are fine as is"
2011, CCP Greyscale: "is the Nighthawk actually underpowered?"
Nice progress, guys. |
|
|
| |
|