| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
84
   |
Posted - 2013.11.04 23:21:00 -
[1] - Quote
Interdictor bubbles should cause aggro, this current state is stupid.
Tonight i jumped a gang of capitals to a Gallente station, a flycatcher then undocked and dropped a bubble on us, we couldnt warp in the bubble to cause it aggression, so it just docked, waited a bit and dropped another bubble. We had no choice but to slowboat the carrier fleet 35km to get out of range of the dictor undocking and slowboating with invul and then dropping the bubble and docking.
Yesterday we had 2 of our carriers tackled on a gate by a long range sniper gang, that had 2 sabres and 2 Arazus. The arazus were no problem we could shoot them and push the points off field, the sabres however, not so much, they could jump in, mwd cloak, bubble and jump back out of system. Our carriers were stuck for over an hour by two ships that didnt even get aggression.
Last week, we dropped dreads on a gate and sieged. The enemy gang responded by running back home keeping the gang docked and sending 6 interdictors back to the dreads, and using the same tactic of mwd/cloak/uncloak/bubble jump. We managed to slowboat the dreads out of the bubbles which took 30 minutes before their batphone arrived.
To me this all seems a bit wrong? Why should a ship have such an effect without even getting aggression? The only counter i have at my disposal that i can see is smartbombs, but i cant smartbomb bubbles on a station so they are useless to me there. So basically if a dictor wants to waste 30minutes of my life with no risk they can.
|
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
101
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 18:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Heinky wrote:TinkerHell wrote:Interdictor bubbles should cause aggro, this current state is stupid.
Tonight i jumped a gang of capitals to a Gallente station, a flycatcher then undocked and dropped a bubble on us, we couldnt warp in the bubble to cause it aggression, so it just docked, waited a bit and dropped another bubble. We had no choice but to slowboat the carrier fleet 35km to get out of range of the dictor undocking and slowboating with invul and then dropping the bubble and docking.
Yesterday we had 2 of our carriers tackled on a gate by a long range sniper gang, that had 2 sabres and 2 Arazus. The arazus were no problem we could shoot them and push the points off field, the sabres however, not so much, they could jump in, mwd cloak, bubble and jump back out of system. Our carriers were stuck for over an hour by two ships that didnt even get aggression.
Last week, we dropped dreads on a gate and sieged. The enemy gang responded by running back home keeping the gang docked and sending 6 interdictors back to the dreads, and using the same tactic of mwd/cloak/uncloak/bubble jump. We managed to slowboat the dreads out of the bubbles which took 30 minutes before their batphone arrived.
To me this all seems a bit wrong? Why should a ship have such an effect without even getting aggression? The only counter i have at my disposal that i can see is smartbombs, but i cant smartbomb bubbles on a station so they are useless to me there. So basically if a dictor wants to waste 30minutes of my life with no risk they can.
It is wrong that you drop capitals as solo pwn mobiles on gates without support to kill supcap fleets or ships. Capitals are meant to be fleet and support ships. Go home with your elitism pvp and get some friends in support ships.
Please tell me where i said i had no support? I said none of the ships on field can even lock the interdictors. due to a combination of no aggro and cloak/mwd trick.
Go cry about getting hotdropped somewhere else. |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
101
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 18:45:00 -
[3] - Quote
Also i would like to point out that Capital ships are used as the example as they are ships that are slow and therefore cant burn out of a bubble easily.
If im in a Vagabond ill just leave, it still doesnt mean there isnt a problem that the dictor still is not taking aggro. |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
102
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 19:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
GeeShizzle MacCloud wrote:TinkerHell wrote:Also i would like to point out that Capital ships are used as the example as they are ships that are slow and therefore cant burn out of a bubble easily.
If im in a Vagabond ill just leave, it still doesnt mean there isnt a problem that the dictor still is not taking aggro. your text make it seem like the situations that were described were put together theoretically and not a product of actually having those assets in those situations, which makes me wonder about the legitimacy of your concerns.
Please check my killboard and corp killboard, these are ingame events over the last week. I used the capital examples from the last week as this is where dictors are most broken in these situations. I gave ingame events as examples and you say its theory. Yet i even say in the op yesterday and last week, why would i say that of its theory lol. |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
102
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Launching a bomb counters the bubble, the bomb also has a longer cycle time. However this still doesnt counter the dictor itself that can just come back and place another. The dictor still has no aggro, which is the problem...Currently im going to have to field an entire ship to counter a single mod rather than a ship.. |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
103
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 15:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Still getting griefed by deaggroed dictors lol :(
We have to base our capitals out of lowsec instead of 0.0 non sov space because of this :( |
TinkerHell
Nocturnal Romance
Cynosural Field Theory.
103
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 23:31:00 -
[7] - Quote
ISD Ezwal wrote:As this is a discussion about a perceived problem in-game, this thread has been moved to Assembly Hall.
Please continue the discussion in a civil manner.
thank you :) |
| |
|