| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:20:00 -
[31]
Originally by: StinkFinger 1-245m
cheesy increments
1.246
...... |

StinkFinger
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:21:00 -
[32]
Edited by: StinkFinger on 14/02/2006 00:21:15 1-246.01m --
|

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:23:00 -
[33]
Originally by: StinkFinger Edited by: StinkFinger on 14/02/2006 00:21:15 1-246.01m
lol, fine:
246.02
...... |

throbbinnoggin
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:23:00 -
[34]
Originally by: StinkFinger Edited by: StinkFinger on 14/02/2006 00:21:15 1-246.01m
Sorry but LOL. OP's fault for not specifying minimum bid increments. Good rule of thumb imo is at least 1% of approximate value. ie: 2-3mil for #1.
Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln' |

StinkFinger
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:25:00 -
[35]
1)- 246,020,000.01 --
|

Caremas Orimar
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:27:00 -
[36]
so is that 246,020,000? because that is 246.02.
|

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:27:00 -
[37]
Originally by: StinkFinger 1)- 246,020,000.01
you do realize this will nvr end:
246,020,000.02
...... |

Marcus Grisbius
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:28:00 -
[38]
2. 185m
I can use that.
Certainty of death... little chance of success... what are we waiting for? - Gimli, son of Gloinn |

StinkFinger
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:31:00 -
[39]
Edited by: StinkFinger on 14/02/2006 00:31:26 1-250m
to the op, next time put a min bid increment --
|

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:32:00 -
[40]
Originally by: Lady Isabelle i allready won the rep several minutes ago. long past the "no sniper" rule.
apparantly thats not how the sniper rule works in this auction.
...... |

Lady Isabelle
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:32:00 -
[41]
i allready won the rep several minutes ago. long past the "no sniper" rule.
|

Caremas Orimar
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:33:00 -
[42]
Let's be serious gentlemen, and use a legitimate increase
|

Lady Isabelle
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:35:00 -
[43]
2) centum - 190m
|

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:35:00 -
[44]
1. 251
...... |

throbbinnoggin
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:37:00 -
[45]
Edited by: throbbinnoggin on 14/02/2006 00:43:43
Originally by: Marcus Grisbius nm, i'll retract my bid. Lady Isabella, you can have it. I'm not going to drag you into this because of the other gentlemen.
Indeed, bids retracted, this auction has left a bad taste in my mouth.
Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln' |

StinkFinger
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:38:00 -
[46]
is 1 mil a legit increase in an item going for 250m+??? --
|

Marcus Grisbius
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:39:00 -
[47]
nm, i'll retract my bid. Lady Isabella, you can have it. I'm not going to drag you into this because of the other gentlemen.
Certainty of death... little chance of success... what are we waiting for? - Gimli, son of Gloinn |

StinkFinger
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:40:00 -
[48]
Originally by: throbbinnoggin
Originally by: Caremas Orimar There is a 15 minute no sniper rule for this auction, one bid extends end time for all items
1. 255 2. 195
think he meant the rule applies to all items, not to the auction as a whole..ie, item a gets a bid near the end of auction, the auction for item a is extended only --
|

throbbinnoggin
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:45:00 -
[49]
Edited by: throbbinnoggin on 14/02/2006 00:45:15
Originally by: StinkFinger
Originally by: throbbinnoggin
Originally by: Caremas Orimar There is a 15 minute no sniper rule for this auction, one bid extends end time for all items
1. 255 2. 195
think he meant the rule applies to all items, not to the auction as a whole..ie, item a gets a bid near the end of auction, the auction for item a is extended only
No problems. See above.
Tis better to be silent and be thought a fool, than to speak and remove all doubt. 'Abraham Lincoln' |

Mustafa Ken'Yova
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:48:00 -
[50]
so did i win the auction at 251?
...... |

Caremas Orimar
|
Posted - 2006.02.14 00:53:00 -
[51]
winning bid on #1 was 255 mil and #2 was perchased through buyout
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |