| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
3185
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 05:51:00 -
[61] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:1. Just because people are logging in doesn't mean they are spending any money on a F2P game. 2. The numbers you are showing show an all time low. 3. In order to recoup $12,000,000 in marketing, 240,000 players would have to spend $50 or more. If only 5,000 players at a max compared to EVE's 40,000 then do they have the numbers to support it? 5,000 players doesn't seem like 200,000 in Equivalent terms of EVE. If they had 20,000 concurrent players that would be the same ratio of having 200,000 players. That is if every single player spends $50 on a F2P game which they don't.
If that had been the attitude in EVE's first few months we'd not be having this discussion since the game would not even be here. They were losing money hand over fist in the early days. Now they are not.
CCP are visionary in the MMO business and don't buckle to the status quo.
I would be disappointed if they buried DUST in the first year. It may well end up that DUST revenue is what carries EVE forward in the future.
Players that are not complete morons should be encouraging CCP to diversify since they understand the advantages of multiple income streams.
Mr Epeen 
|

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
622
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:02:00 -
[62] - Quote
Here is some more math for Dust...
So lets say Dust has 5,000 max players per day at a single time (which it doesn't have number that high).
And players only played 2 hours a day...
Than at max there would be:
24*2=48
48*5000=24000 exactly.
Then all those players will have to spend $50 or more dollars to make a proft for at least the marketing costs of Dust.
But here is the problem...
1. Dust max players currently is not 5,000 2. Not every concurrent player only plays 2 hours a day. 3. The majority of players in a F2P game do not spend money.
Therefore it is impossible that Dust is making enough money to cover the advertising campaign.
Some people on google threw out that only 5-10% of players spend money on F2P games.
Therefore in order to make marketing money Dust would need at least 2,400,000 players with 50,000 player per day.
Hell in order to make as much as EVE which makes 400,000x15=$6,000,000 per month it would need at least 25,000 players concurrently per day with the 10% of players spending $50 or more. That scenario is unlikley because F2P players do not pay like subscription based models.
So no. Dust is not successful as EVE nor will it be able to support CCP if EVE fails.
|

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
622
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:04:00 -
[63] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Captain Tardbar wrote:1. Just because people are logging in doesn't mean they are spending any money on a F2P game. 2. The numbers you are showing show an all time low. 3. In order to recoup $12,000,000 in marketing, 240,000 players would have to spend $50 or more. If only 5,000 players at a max compared to EVE's 40,000 then do they have the numbers to support it? 5,000 players doesn't seem like 200,000 in Equivalent terms of EVE. If they had 20,000 concurrent players that would be the same ratio of having 200,000 players. That is if every single player spends $50 on a F2P game which they don't. If that had been the attitude in EVE's first few months we'd not be having this discussion since the game would not even be here. They were losing money hand over fist in the early days. Now they are not. CCP are visionary in the MMO business and don't buckle to the status quo. I would be disappointed if they buried DUST in the first year. It may well end up that DUST revenue is what carries EVE forward in the future. Players that are not complete morons should be encouraging CCP to diversify since they understand the advantages of multiple income streams. Mr Epeen 
Has anyone mentioned that DUST is a dead end product on the PS3. Everyone is buying PS4 now and turning their PS3 in at gamestop so unless CCP wants to pour more money into porting it to the PS4 or PC then the player numbers will not incease.
|

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1390
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:05:00 -
[64] - Quote
Quote:So no. Dust is not successful as EVE nor will it be able to support CCP if EVE fails.
Nor will it ever be. Next generation consoles will bury it. |

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
622
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:13:00 -
[65] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:So no. Dust is not successful as EVE nor will it be able to support CCP if EVE fails. Nor will it ever be. Next generation consoles will bury it. [Edit: Which is why it should have been a PC exclusive in the first place.
I'll make one concession... If CCP in their infinite wisdom decides to port Dust to PC, then it has a chance of being at least as successful as Planetside 2.
Deciding to release the game on a console in the end of its product cycle was a bad decision. The number of people who play a PS3 will only go down from here on out. Its numbers will never increase simply because people will stop playing their PS3 because they have a brand new PS4 or Xbox One. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1390
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:19:00 -
[66] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Quote:So no. Dust is not successful as EVE nor will it be able to support CCP if EVE fails. Nor will it ever be. Next generation consoles will bury it. [Edit: Which is why it should have been a PC exclusive in the first place. I'll make one concession... If CCP in their infinite wisdom decides to port Dust to PC, then it has a chance of being at least as successful as Planetside 2. Deciding to release the game on a console in the end of its product cycle was a bad decision. The number of people who play a PS3 will only go down from here on out. Its numbers will never increase simply because people will stop playing their PS3 because they have a brand new PS4 or Xbox One.
I agree. As far as marketing and development decisions go, Dust ranks up there with New Coke.
Particularly given that, with the extra 18+ months of development time if they had waited for the next console generation, it may not have released a buggy, awful mess.
I still say PC is their only hope, particularly given that the fanbase they were hoping to draw from (EVE players) are guaranteed to own a computer since they play EVE in the first place. But if they make it the typical crappy console port with the effed up UI, fps cap, and other kinds of bullshit that comes from the awfulness of consoles(seriously, **** you consoles, you ruined gaming), it dies nonetheless. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:31:00 -
[67] - Quote
Still waiiting on a reply to my OP.
But yeah, Dust is great isn't it?
Just imagaine if all our eve sub money was put back into eve development and not dust and vampires..........
If only CCP were Carlsberg |

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
622
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:36:00 -
[68] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:Still waiiting on a reply to my OP.
But yeah, Dust is great isn't it?
Just imagaine if all our eve sub money was put back into eve development and not dust and vampires..........
If only CCP were Carlsberg
"How better might todays eve have been if CCP had not over streched."
Well if that is the question you were asking.... I guess $12 million would have gone a lot towards making WiS more than it is now.
If not that, budget for new ships. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:44:00 -
[69] - Quote
Captain Tardbar wrote:Praise the Yeti wrote:Still waiiting on a reply to my OP.
But yeah, Dust is great isn't it?
Just imagaine if all our eve sub money was put back into eve development and not dust and vampires..........
If only CCP were Carlsberg "How better might todays eve have been if CCP had not over streched." Well if that is the question you were asking.... I guess $12 million would have gone a lot towards making WiS more than it is now. If not that, budget for new ships. CCP could be like Calrslberg maybe.
The adverts look good but when it come to taste, Stella Artois at least salvates the palate moar ? |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 06:57:00 -
[70] - Quote
to cut through the original mustard - ccp used eve sub money to fund risky projects which on paper at the minute are failing and / or might neverbe released.
my original point remains in that so much might have been better in eve if ccp had not devaited resources from their coreproduct.
all i ask is how much was wasted on dust and vampires and how might that cash invested into eve have resulted in a better live event experience for the players |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6223
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:03:00 -
[71] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:i can only but ask how eve might have been better today if CCP had not chanelled so much into speculative projects.
EVE wouldn't exist. Some might consider that "better." |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17295
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:05:00 -
[72] - Quote
It stopped being GÇ£subscriber cashGÇ¥ the moment the transaction went through.
CCP can and should do whatever they want with their money, and trying to expand the product catalogue is pretty much a necessity. Without separate products such as Dust or WOD, there would be no additional funding, so in terms of money flow, little would change for EVE. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:09:00 -
[73] - Quote
Tippia wrote:It stopped being GÇ£subscriber cashGÇ¥ the moment the transaction went through.
CCP can and should do whatever they want with their money, and trying to expand the product catalogue is pretty much a necessity. Without separate products such as Dust or WOD, there would be no additional funding, so in terms of money flow, little would change for EVE. That is not in doubt.
Companies should make profit rite ?
I can still call you out out on not answering my OP.
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17295
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:23:00 -
[74] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:I can still call you out out on not answering my OP. Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed.
|

Infinity Ziona
Cloakers
740
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:26:00 -
[75] - Quote
A company that relies purely on its current product to keep it alive is a company looking to go broke. Even power petroleum and similiar companies that have a captive customer base still look for alternative income streams. Who know if some genius will invent a perpetual motion machine or something right. Flight used to be pure fantasy too.
As for WIS I think that would have made EvE very popular and attracted lots more income for CCP. Monocles prove there is a market for non pvp stuff like WIS and vanity items.
Greed IS good. You just don't want you're customers reading leaked emails that outright state that. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1392
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:29:00 -
[76] - Quote
Tippia wrote:It stopped being GÇ£subscriber cashGÇ¥ the moment the transaction went through.
CCP can and should do whatever they want with their money, and trying to expand the product catalogue is pretty much a necessity. Without separate products such as Dust or WOD, there would be no additional funding, so in terms of money flow, little would change for EVE.
True, they do need to diversify.
But it must be acknowledged that Dust was pretty much the worst possible outcome they could have had, between both implementation and overall quality of the product. They took a pretty big PR hit with it too. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:33:00 -
[77] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Praise the Yeti wrote:I can still call you out out on not answering my OP. Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed. Enlighten me where the flaw is?
I poised the question that if ccp had not thrown eve subscriptions profits at other ventures yet to yield any form of returns, and instead focussed that capital on the game we pay for, how things might have been different.
Are you suggesting otherwise ? |

Frying Doom
3259
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:33:00 -
[78] - Quote
Tippia wrote:It stopped being GÇ£subscriber cashGÇ¥ the moment the transaction went through.
CCP can and should do whatever they want with their money, and trying to expand the product catalogue is pretty much a necessity. Without separate products such as Dust or WOD, there would be no additional funding, so in terms of money flow, little would change for EVE. Strange that people did not view it that way in the aftermath of Incarna. |

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
22267
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:36:00 -
[79] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed. As is everything YOU didn't come up with, Tippa, we all know that...
Still, the OP has a point. CCP diverted their attention (and thus their money) on other projects, while their prime source of income still lies "unfinished"... yes, I know a MMO is never truely finished. Further, that lack of focus hindered EVE's development and resulted in questionable and lacking content.
The logical conlusion is: EVE would, most likely be a better game today, if it wouldn't be for DUST, WoD (which I'm really looking forward too) and, now Valkyrie. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:45:00 -
[80] - Quote
Shalua Rui wrote:Tippia wrote:Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed. As is everything YOU didn't come up with, Tippa, we all know that... Still, the OP has a point. CCP diverted their attention (and thus their money) on other projects, while their prime source of income still lies "unfinished"... yes, I know a MMO is never truely finished. Further, that lack of focus hindered EVE's development and resulted in questionable and lacking content. The logical conlusion is: EVE would, most likely be a better game today, if it wouldn't be for DUST, WoD (which I'm really looking forward too) and, now Valkyrie. The fact my first thread was locked.
I can argue with logic all day.
Who is Tippia btw ?
Note the words on the thread title.
I still ask the question, if ccp had not diverted the profitts from their core game player base towards other ventures how might that live event have gone ?
|

Azeroth Uluntil
e X i l e The Initiative.
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:49:00 -
[81] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:Shalua Rui wrote:Tippia wrote:Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed. As is everything YOU didn't come up with, Tippa, we all know that... Still, the OP has a point. CCP diverted their attention (and thus their money) on other projects, while their prime source of income still lies "unfinished"... yes, I know a MMO is never truely finished. Further, that lack of focus hindered EVE's development and resulted in questionable and lacking content. The logical conlusion is: EVE would, most likely be a better game today, if it wouldn't be for DUST, WoD (which I'm really looking forward too) and, now Valkyrie. I enjoy logic. Who is Tippia btw ? I still ask the question, if ccp had not diverted the profitts from their core game player base towards other ventures how might that live event have gone last night?
No one responds to your question because you are an idiot. Your question is stupid and has been asked before. Therefor, no one wants to answer it again.
They can do with their money as they please. Pretty simple. |

destiny2
Perkone Caldari State
250
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:49:00 -
[82] - Quote
i came here expecting another somerblink thread i am leaveing dissapointed  |

John Bosch
State War Academy Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:50:00 -
[83] - Quote
As I said in the other thread, empire players would have been curbstomped in 20% tidi instead of 10%.
Even if DUST had never existed and all money been invested in better/more servers, maybe players would have seen a 10% drop in tidi. Better? Technically, yes. Worth the expense of new servers and the infrastructure to run them? No. There's just only so much a programmer can do within the limits of current tech and arguably antiquated code. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17295
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:52:00 -
[84] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:I still ask the question, if ccp had not diverted the profitts from their core game player base towards other ventures how might that live event have gone last night? It would never have taken place since CCP would have folded in 2011 after Incursion and Incarna. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:53:00 -
[85] - Quote
Azeroth Uluntil wrote:Praise the Yeti wrote:Shalua Rui wrote:Tippia wrote:Not really no, since I answered your OP: your premise is fundamentally flawed. As is everything YOU didn't come up with, Tippa, we all know that... Still, the OP has a point. CCP diverted their attention (and thus their money) on other projects, while their prime source of income still lies "unfinished"... yes, I know a MMO is never truely finished. Further, that lack of focus hindered EVE's development and resulted in questionable and lacking content. The logical conlusion is: EVE would, most likely be a better game today, if it wouldn't be for DUST, WoD (which I'm really looking forward too) and, now Valkyrie. I enjoy logic. Who is Tippia btw ? I still ask the question, if ccp had not diverted the profitts from their core game player base towards other ventures how might that live event have gone last night? No one responds to your question because you are an idiot. Your question is stupid and has been asked before. Therefor, no one wants to answer it again. They can do with their money as they please. Pretty simple. Sorry, but please enlighten me why your opinion is significant ?
Unless you can augment or support your point, or give me any reason to think why i might take notice then by default i dismiss it as moot.
Next? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17295
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:54:00 -
[86] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:Unless you can augment or support your point GǪand people are pointing out that you can't.
|

To Be Me
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
36
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:59:00 -
[87] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:ISD petioned for having personal vendettas for abusing powers and closing my last thread.
Petitioned him too.
Closing threads for no reason whatsoever or using some bad reason which isnt even right.
ISD Dorrim Barstorlode petitioned. |

Praise the Yeti
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 07:59:00 -
[88] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Praise the Yeti wrote:Unless you can augment or support your point GǪand people are pointing out that you can't. what was my point?
last i checked it was eve players are giving ccp cash while they develop other games
all i have done in this thread is suggest some people are unawware of the wider state of affiars? |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
17295
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 08:05:00 -
[89] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:what was my point? That the outcome of yesterday's event has anything to do with their diversifying into other game.
Hiding it behind the invisibly thin veil of a loaded question does not disqualify it from being your point, and you have offered nothing to support this premise. |

John Bosch
State War Academy Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 08:12:00 -
[90] - Quote
Praise the Yeti wrote:Tippia wrote:Praise the Yeti wrote:Unless you can augment or support your point GǪand people are pointing out that you can't. what was my point? last i checked it was eve players are giving ccp cash while they develop other games all i have done in this thread is suggest some people are unawware of the wider state of affiars?
That's what companies do. They grow, expand, get more financial capital, and develop new games. Natural order of things.
I'm pretty sure everyone here was already aware of the "wider state of things" well before you came along. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |