|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
42
   |
Posted - 2013.11.08 12:09:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sad and happy at the same time.
Rise is officially the anti-solo. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 12:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
They were too good for solo and gudfites. They really really were. Now no solo pilot in his right mind will fit them.
It really is all or nothing at the moment with CCP. Including those sisters cruisers that went from all to nothing in the space of one heavy/sentry being removed. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2013.11.08 13:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
mynnna wrote:Alvatore DiMarco wrote:By the way, Rise, I saw that little trick you did there using Fury-type T2 kinetic missiles on kinetic-bonused hulls to artificially inflate the DPS numbers. How about some numbers with T1 thermal missiles? People who are actually good at this game wouldn't shoot T1 thermal missiles from T2 launchers on a kinetic bonused hull. Hope this helps.
And now the Goon CSMS are coming on an insulting people instead of addressing the issue.
Yayness. Thread officially now made of win.
|
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
Super interesting point (with special thanks to Wolf Crendraven for pointing this out)
If you split them into 2 groups, and fire one until complete, then fire the others til complete, it basically works out exactly the same as it is now. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:28:00 -
[5] - Quote
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:Volstruis wrote:Super interesting point (with special thanks to Wolf Crendraven for pointing this out)
If you split them into 2 groups, and fire one until complete, then fire the others til complete, it basically works out exactly the same as it is now. At which point you're better off fitting LMLs to your cruiser and just operating them normally. Higher sustained DPS and room to fit a massive tank.
Yep. Well you'd have to check bonuses. I don't have the energy lol. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 13:51:00 -
[6] - Quote
I said basically, and you'd have to check bonuses.
I'm too lazy to do the maths. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
49
|
Posted - 2013.11.12 14:09:00 -
[7] - Quote
Sorry for upsetting you CCP RIse. You'll find that when you blatantly ignore people and make bad decisions they tend to push back.
I can't help but wonder what the heck is going on here. The player base is saying as a collective we are losing patience and confidence in your work. CCP should listen to this.
I miss the eve of two years ago when some ships were bad, some were good, and the only thing that really needed balancing was the Dramiel.
EDIT: And the Worm. Which you haven't even looked at yet. |
Volstruis
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
52
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 06:35:00 -
[8] - Quote
ISD Cura Ursus wrote:Removed one post that went over the line for civilized discourse. (I will be reading more on this thread to make sure it does not go there again.)
Many many many of the posts seem to be attacking the person rather than the idea.
Please be civil and keep me from getting out my ginsu knives to slice and dice this thread.
Ludicrous argument and it won't stand.
We are challenging a game designer who is making several bad decisions in a number of proposals and will continue to do so. I agree though that all argument should be directed at the output of his work. That's what this thread is about.
|
|
|
| |
|