|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
   |
Posted - 2013.11.20 11:04:00 -
[1] - Quote
ok now buff HML since i dont have any viable weapon system to fit on my missile boats. |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 09:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
No to TE and TC for launchers,
Guys do you even know what youre saying?
where are you going to put those on your caracal?
low slots are already filled with bcs nanos dmg controls, caldari ships need the shield mods amarr need the webs.
just change ammo as someone sugested before or do something with the formulas,
no need for aditional mods for those, unless you want to get a 200 dps tengu with no tank etc
|
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 09:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Spugg Galdon wrote:hujciwdupe22 wrote:[quote=CCP Rise]
bla bla bla...
missiles stay broken,
bla bla bla warthunder bla bla bla
Rise Please,
the idea of burst missile spam is fine i like the idea alot,
But atm we dont have a proper missile systems outside of spacialised frig owning system
and brawling HAMs, (yes you need webs to apply damage)
just reverse the HM nerf and it all wil be ok Wow. You really are a self important little prickaren't you hujciwdupe22. I've met people like you in the past and CCP Rise is doing exactly what he should do with people like you and completely ignoring you.
lol? rise didnt ignore him at all, and he actually posted the best post in this thread
quoting
But atm we dont have a proper missile systems outside of spacialised frig owning system
and brawling HAMs, (yes you need webs to apply damage)
^^ i aprove this totally
|
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 11:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
single asb = death while realoading |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 12:49:00 -
[5] - Quote
no because all the properties should come from the warhead itself,.
at least it seems logical
even the damage boost from BCU is somwhat out of place,
i could understand the rof bonus though both on launchers and bcu.
as for teh tracking thingie you got target painters witch simulate those and do much more sense than tracking enchancers since missiles dont ''track'' in turret sense
then again,
range isnt a issue with missiles at any point atm,
Hell even the HM nerf made the range pretty balanced.
want to snipe with caldari you choose proper ships, you got one siuted in each class, ferox, caracal, cerberus, harpy, raven
why dont go further and make bcus giving overall boost to missiles? rof, dmg, expl velocity and radius at same time?
expl velocity and radius in a apropriate amount to prevent being too much when stacking 3 bcu or more at the same time.
(wow which an simple and epic idea) |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 12:57:00 -
[6] - Quote
Zvaarian the Red wrote:Zamyslinski wrote:no because all the properties should come from the warhead itself,.
at least it seems logical
You do realize you are dealing with a game where skill points directly affect the damage and damage application of guided missiles and even the rate of fire of missile launchers yes? I'm not sure what kind of logic you are using but it doesn't seem to be EVE logic.
sure :D
edted my post,
reread again |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.11.28 14:08:00 -
[7] - Quote
propose something else then |
Zamyslinski
Rionnag Alba
Triumvirate.
2
|
Posted - 2013.12.31 08:23:00 -
[8] - Quote
So,
Just wanted to share,
I took out a cyclone yesterday and was piloting it around curse.
It was ham fitted wit 3bcs and one explosion vel. rig.
I got engaged by 2 frigates and one of them got into my scram range.
basicly my deadly 600 dps battlecriuser wasnt able to peel off either the ranis (scram range) nor the ares.
If not for my ally mates i would diaf.
Missiles? - no thanks |
|
|
| |
|