Perhaps if he had stuck around in the Bonus Round all the way to the educational component, his English would be better.

Your still on the bonus round, I have gotten past that and moved on with another Orca on the fire. And you teach me something now that my friend is funny. Lets put it this way, in the seventh grade i was doing college level work. I didn't think on a game that punctuation would make a difference to some but seeing how it does will make an attempt to pay closer attention.

Your still on the bonus round, I have gotten past that and moved on with another Orca on the fire. And you teach me something now that my friend is funny. Lets put it this way, in the seventh grade i was doing college level work. I didn't think on a game that punctuation would make a difference to some but seeing how it does will make an attempt to pay closer attention.

Dude.

If you want to reach people, you have to reach them in the game
and have to put actual effort into it. More than writing a stupid post.

Furthermore are you simply wrong. If all miners suddenly stopped,
it would not only take quite a while until stockpiles are used up,
people would start creating mining alts.

Your still on the bonus round, I have gotten past that and moved on with another Orca on the fire. And you teach me something now that my friend is funny. Lets put it this way, in the seventh grade i was doing college level work. I didn't think on a game that punctuation would make a difference to some but seeing how it does will make an attempt to pay closer attention.

Okay once again i am not asking them to stop mining. I am simply asking them to raise the prices of the things they put on market for sell. There is a difference.

It's always "look at me!!" with you, isn't it.

For the record, I don't believe you that you were doing "college-level work" in the seventh grade, you've given me no reason to believe you, and frankly, I don't have to. However, if you want to go down that route....

I had an IQ of 147 when I was 11. It's gone down since then, to 127, which is a little sad, but in that time I've also learned that IQ isn't the last-word on intelligence, especially given how people like to focus their learning on specific subjects instead of broadening it too much. Given I was in the top 5% of Australian high school graduates, and the top 1% of the ICAS in 1999, a 127 right now isn't terrible. It is, in fact, considered above average.

Considering you can't even differentiate between 'your' and 'you're' that already makes me your intellectual superior by a considerable margin. So if you were doing "college-level" work (what does that even mean?) in seventh grade, then I was inventing Neutronium in first.

I would rather see someone who had their literary discourse criticised in such a way not get on the defensive, admit their fault, and attempt to rectify it. It would be more respectful then some half-arsed attempt to save face with a barely legible claim about intellectual superiority. And the fact that you somehow think your superior intellect excuses you from literacy ANYWHERE makes it even worse, because I guarantee you there isn't one single tertiary graduate with the intellectual level you claim to have that doesn't understand the importance of punctuation, even when abbreviating words in sentences for newspaper headlines or Twitter and the like.

LMAO really. For someone to claim to be so superior it seems as though you cant tell a game from RL. Talk about being defensive, I think I might have hit a nerve lol. And you said it your self ppl with a high IQ mainly focus on one thing, mine was history not on punctuation and the proper structure of a sentence. Honestly i can care less about that. If you read my post earlier i did admit to having bad punctuation and even said i would make a better attempt to correct it. Talk about over looking things. Paying attention must not have been your strong point seeing how you over looked my admission to my fault.

LMAO really. For someone to claim to be so superior it seems as though you cant tell a game from RL.

...mine was history not on punctuation and the proper structure of a sentence.

Paying attention must not have been your strong point seeing how you over looked my admission to my fault.

This has gotten off track of what this post was originally about, miners fighting back against the permits. If you wont to go a battle of wits im more then willing to go there on another day. Lets get back to the focus point thats at hand and its not a punctuation lesson.

Now i have played eve for about three years so im not a newbie.

im not here to pick a fight with goon cuz even i know thats not very smart. But what im trying to get across is ppl should leave the miners alone and stop trying to force these permits

Now i have played eve for about three years so im not a newbie...

GUYS!!!!!! I FOUND A LOOPHOLE IN THE CODE!!!!

If you actually buy a permit, you won't get ganked . . . problem solved!

Now i have played eve for about three years so im not a newbie. I have noticed that here recently WE MINERS are now being harassed by ppl who think we need a permit to mine. These ppl have forgot that if it was not for us MINERS eve wouldnt be able to stand. We mine, we build, and we put things on market for others to buy in which we make a pretty good profit off of and now we are being asked to pay for a permit. Yes i know that they say that its only 10M per character but if we give into this my friends and fellow miners we are opening up for a lot more to start happening. Look at history the governments that have caused wars within their own countries have taken little by little from their own ppl until finally their ppl had enough and its the same case here in eve if we allow them to get away for this then later on down the road they are going to keep asking for more and more and til there is nothing left to give.

So what i am asking is until these ppl that think they need to govern use pull back and stop this non-sense we raise the prices is eve's market and hold them high. If we do this it will open eve back up to free mining like it should be.

thank you for your participation

Oh look it's call for hi-sec unity #23,083

The OP will disappear into the obscurity from whence he came, and paint a large target on everything he flies if he hasn't already, just like the 23,082 people who've attempted to do it before him.

Oh look it's call for hi-sec unity #23,083

Have you heard of Cannibal Kane?
If you haven't I have a strong feeling you will soon.....

It's always "look at me!!" with you, isn't it.

For the record, I don't believe you that you were doing "college-level work" in the seventh grade, you've given me no reason to believe you, and frankly, I don't have to. However, if you want to go down that route....

I had an IQ of 147 when I was 11. It's gone down since then, to 127, which is a little sad, but in that time I've also learned that IQ isn't the last-word on intelligence, especially given how people like to focus their learning on specific subjects instead of broadening it too much. Given I was in the top 5% of Australian high school graduates, and the top 1% of the ICAS in 1999, a 127 right now isn't terrible. It is, in fact, considered above average.

Considering you can't even differentiate between 'your' and 'you're' that already makes me your intellectual superior by a considerable margin. So if you were doing "college-level" work (what does that even mean?) in seventh grade, then I was inventing Neutronium in first.

I would rather see someone who had their literary discourse criticised in such a way not get on the defensive, admit their fault, and attempt to rectify it. It would be more respectful then some half-arsed attempt to save face with a barely legible claim about intellectual superiority. And the fact that you somehow think your superior intellect excuses you from literacy ANYWHERE makes it even worse, because I guarantee you there isn't one single tertiary graduate with the intellectual level you claim to have that doesn't understand the importance of punctuation, even when abbreviating words in sentences for newspaper headlines or Twitter and the like.