| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Captain Tardbar
Sons of Sam
656
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 03:48:00 -
[31] - Quote
Don't worry.
Four months after the PS4 comes out, no one will be playing on their PS3.
Problem solved. |

Lugia3
Emerald Inc.
640
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 06:41:00 -
[32] - Quote
From dust... to ****. |

WInter Borne
Stimulus Rote Kapelle
94
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 18:51:00 -
[33] - Quote
Stop playing dust and just let it die? |

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
331
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 20:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
WInter Borne wrote:Stop playing dust and just let it die?
Um... why? It's more fun than EVE is right now. |

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
7243
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 20:46:00 -
[35] - Quote
Its time to add Helmets and bubblewrap to the Eve store and NEX.
Oh wait...that right, life is rough, so CCP is building the knee pads, helmets, and someone to kiss the boo-boos right into the game now.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
3630
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 21:08:00 -
[36] - Quote
I'm kind of bothered by this "meta game" stuff.
Is using meta game elements OK? Apparently this has been so in Eve. But DUST has not yet seen much of this (do I understand this right?)
To say that metagaming in a sandbox is OK may imply that it's OK to leave the sandbox and waylay someone who kicked your sandcastle in the parking lot, or spare your sandcastle by nailing the door of their house shut later.
but stoicfaux points out that this is a different crowd. Indeed it is. If I had to put up with "Eve stuff" to do FPS, I'd play another FPS. People come to Eve to play Eve, and to FPS to kill and be killed with more simplicity. Adding espionage and subterfuge to an FPS might be unwise.
We should recall that old DUST video where the guy on the ground is asking for backup and the guy in the station is hanging his ground pounders out to dry (whilst a gun is being aimed at his head unknowingly). Perhaps it was once intended for Eve players to do the dirty underhanded stuff that DUST players would be a part of, but not necessarily the butt of. Maybe this relationship has failed or never came to be?
|

Sebastien LeReparteur
SpaceTravelers Freelance Corp La Division Bleue
16
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 21:24:00 -
[37] - Quote
Oh bad would it be to manage the crappy corp system in a console controller!!! 
Silly you thinking this is your game... It's CCP's game, dust is a dead on arrival children they are trying to bring to life again. You can;'t have that and have a second entity player base (podders) able to grief the other side.
Pull your head out of your... belief system and feel the vibe. Where you feel this harsh reality is super nice, it also means Eve is a niche game, they don't have to do the same with Dusties
|

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
331
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 21:29:00 -
[38] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:but stoicfaux points out that this is a different crowd. Indeed it is. If I had to put up with "Eve stuff" to do FPS, I'd play another FPS. People come to Eve to play Eve, and to FPS to kill and be killed with more simplicity. Adding espionage and subterfuge to an FPS might be unwise.
The reality check that is needed is this: If CCP was making DUST 514 just to make an FPS, DUST never had a chance. There's way too much money in Battlefield and Call of Duty. It's like trying to get people to watch your sports show while the Superbowl is on. CoD and BF will pretty much always dominate the traditional multiplayer FPS space. (However, the scifi nerds are probably happy to watch scifi instead of the Superbowl.)
DUST is a strategy FPS for people who want a deep rich MMO universe where decisions matter. People play DUST for the sandbox. Because if people were going to play a game for the FPS and the FPS alone, it wouldn't be DUST. CCP doesn't have the resources dedicated to DUST to compete with Call of Duty or Battlefield directly.
Their best bets are: - Gun gameplay should rely heavily on our scifi genre. Different planet types, varying gravity, stuff that would be out of place in a regular FPS. - Heavy implementation of the sandbox. |

Carmen Electra
The Scope Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 22:06:00 -
[39] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Or possibly.... CCP is not 'falling into the same trap' But taking steps because the player base is becoming increasingly hostile to each other and using lower & lower tricks to exploit the system. Look at yourselves first before you start blaming CCP.
This. I'm having a tough time sympathizing with the OP's botched attempt to mercilessly grief other players. I wonder if EVE's current sociopathic cesspit of a playerbase is really what CCP envisioned in 2003.
|

Kubats Mercia
Inner Shadow C.L.O.N.E.
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 22:31:00 -
[40] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:but stoicfaux points out that this is a different crowd. Indeed it is. If I had to put up with "Eve stuff" to do FPS, I'd play another FPS. People come to Eve to play Eve, and to FPS to kill and be killed with more simplicity. Adding espionage and subterfuge to an FPS might be unwise. The reality check that is needed is this: If CCP was making DUST 514 just to make an FPS, DUST never had a chance. There's way too much money in Battlefield and Call of Duty. It's like trying to get people to watch your sports show while the Superbowl is on. CoD and BF will pretty much always dominate the traditional multiplayer FPS space. (However, the scifi nerds are probably happy to watch scifi instead of the Superbowl.) DUST is a strategy FPS for people who want a deep rich MMO universe where decisions matter. People play DUST for the sandbox. Because if people were going to play a game for the FPS and the FPS alone, it wouldn't be DUST. CCP doesn't have the resources dedicated to DUST to compete with Call of Duty or Battlefield directly. Their best bets are: - Gun gameplay should rely heavily on our scifi genre. Different planet types, varying gravity, stuff that would be out of place in a regular FPS. - Heavy implementation of the sandbox.
To say people play Dust for the sandbox is naive at best. Dust is only alive due to eve players supporting it so obviously posts like this will be butthurt about gms just like in every anti-carebear post on these forums. So yes you are probably right that this should stop because mainly eve players with a similar mentality play. However, if CCP ever wants dust to be a success and make more money they can't. Why? Because most eve players will not play dust even though most dust players play eve. As such, people coming in are coming from another fps looking for a twist. They want to shoot stuff and do it for a reason in a unique way that dust delivers. Introducing and enforcing a strict sandbox on a Community that is not purely there for the sandbox is going to kill the player base outside of current eve players. Eve is renowned for being the hardest game for new players to pick up and as such has kept the player base tiny compared to other mmo games. In fps gameplay numbers are the lifeblood. It's not an option. CCP didn't throw hundreds of thousands at a new game to emulate eve. It did to make another game type spun off its current universe to draw in new players. If they wanted to just make another eve with guns they would have put it in an expansion. I would find it hilarious if dust did take off forming a unique player base that hated eve babies as much as eve babies hate care bears while having direct influence on eve babies universe. That would make me lol. |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
600
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 22:51:00 -
[41] - Quote
Honestly, post --->here<---. Most people in GD don't give a fck about dust. |

To Be Me
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
41
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 22:58:00 -
[42] - Quote
On a related note make eve playable using qwerfg like in league of legends pls
As of now theres just too many keys its too hard |

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
332
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 23:03:00 -
[43] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Honestly, post --->here<---. Most people in GD don't give a fck about dust.
This is CCP reversing the actions of EVE players. |

Trillian Stargazer
Origin. Black Legion.
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.13 23:48:00 -
[44] - Quote
Jihad Destroyer 011011 wrote:DUST514 Corp Leaders are getting favoritism over EVE Corp Leaders. Recently several of us have been doing very bad things to corps from within. Corp Espionage has been and should always be considered normal to meta game play in New Eden. it is part of what makes what we do special. We started our plans over 7 months ago and started pulling the triggers on multiple corps in the last few days... In a true sandbox game if you don't do your homework you will get burned HARD. These corps were aligning against some equities we support and decided now was the time. Recently in several espionage operations GMs have been stepping in to stop or delay corps with DUST members from being taken over rightfully by our team of crack black box operators using normal and well documented espionage methods which I will not go into here. This is an unfair protection of corps with DUST members. I will not post the GMs comments but suffice to say they are hand holding the corps with DUST members and intervening on their behalf to save them unfairly. Failure of the BuildClearly all Corps and their leaders SHOULD definitely have access to their shares in EVE and DUST514. Majority DUST514 Corps should not have to have an EVE alt join them to become part of an alliance. Those however are not exploits they are failures of the game build at this time and much higher priority should be placed on getting the code written to allow corps to manage their corps on an equal basis with EVE corp leaders. Additionally EVE leaders should have the same parity to issue DUST specific roles which were recently introduced. Definitely not an ExploitAt no point were any of the conspiring alts made CEO to cause the shares to be created in the first place, and in a true sandbox game if you do not do your homework and learn you will get burned. Let them burn. I was the second one in for every case, they all had EVE members besides me with experience and therefore we were operating clearly within the mechanics of the game. GMs jumping in the way they did shows favoritism for DUST514 members which paying EVE players NEVER get. Examples:While not related to me it is a good example: A corp believes there is a bug and towards the end it comes out the espionage agent was really good at covering his tracks and the CEO/Director is unable to understand what is happening to him. How is this the espionage operators fault? It isn't. The purpose of Espionage involves sewing deception and confusion into their ranks to further cause issues. (as a side note I spoke with the agent that did this, In their corp channel the corp members began threatening the espionage agents real life afterwards. Not the kind of people we want talking to kids who may be playing the game if you ask me. ) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119273&find=unreadIn this next case the CEO is reasonably expected to be upset, they just had their corp stolen, however they went and begged for help and were given an unfair protection from GMs because they "dont know the rules". If I did this in EVE I would have gotten a "Too bad man, HTFU." This espionage is clearly not an exploit as they had admitted to having a great deal of very experienced members in EVE in their corp the whole time, and the leaders were not very smart about their choices. (Also this was legendary in the rage posting from their whole alliance in their EVEmails to me for the last two days. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119973Opportunity for Course CorrectionSo we ask for parity... Corps with DUST leadership should not get special treatment and protections and CCP should really consider putting a priority on ensuring equality and access to roles for EVE and DUST514 leaders managing a corp. Also please consider merging the DUST514 forums into the EVE forums so the DUST players can learn and not suffer in isolation any longer.
Last time i checked this was the EVE ONLINE forum and not the DUST514 forum. Please take your post to the DUST514 forums and stop posting this **** in EVE GD.
|

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
Desperado-Enforcement LLC
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:07:00 -
[45] - Quote
Carmen Electra wrote:This. I'm having a tough time sympathizing with the OP's botched attempt to mercilessly grief other players. I am too. From my limited knowledge of the subject it is impossible for dust players to control shares from their side. This is an abuse of game mechanics that they cannot combat without creating eve accounts, and is extremely poor design. In addition, reading the thread on the dust forums and seeing a post linking to the travesty that is the eve online wiki made me realize how little information is really disseminated to them.
Carmen Electra wrote:I wonder if EVE's current sociopathic cesspit of a playerbase is really what CCP envisioned in 2003.
Cesspit of a player base... Can't agree with this one. This game was designed to be a microcosm of society with many restrictions removed. In addition the devs and gm's have repeatedly supported meta gaming in eve over the years. The difference is that in eve the same mechanics that are used to scam and grief players can also be turned against their attackers. In this specific instance dust players are essentially defenseless.
I hate to disagree with you,-ábut there is nothing subjective about "boring" in connection to "mining". -á-á-á-á -- Solstice Project's Alt |

Carmen Electra
The Scope Gallente Federation
87
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:14:00 -
[46] - Quote
BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote:This game was designed to be a microcosm of society with many restrictions removed.
You nailed it. I'm starting to think that restrictions/inhibitions are not a totally bad thing after hanging with this community for a while though!
|

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld White Mountain Coalition
525
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:15:00 -
[47] - Quote
Jihad Destroyer 011011 wrote:DUST514 Corp Leaders are getting favoritism over EVE Corp Leaders. Recently several of us have been doing very bad things to corps from within. Corp Espionage has been and should always be considered normal to meta game play in New Eden. it is part of what makes what we do special. We started our plans over 7 months ago and started pulling the triggers on multiple corps in the last few days... In a true sandbox game if you don't do your homework you will get burned HARD. These corps were aligning against some equities we support and decided now was the time. Recently in several espionage operations GMs have been stepping in to stop or delay corps with DUST members from being taken over rightfully by our team of crack black box operators using normal and well documented espionage methods which I will not go into here. This is an unfair protection of corps with DUST members. I will not post the GMs comments but suffice to say they are hand holding the corps with DUST members and intervening on their behalf to save them unfairly. Failure of the BuildClearly all Corps and their leaders SHOULD definitely have access to their shares in EVE and DUST514. Majority DUST514 Corps should not have to have an EVE alt join them to become part of an alliance. Those however are not exploits they are failures of the game build at this time and much higher priority should be placed on getting the code written to allow corps to manage their corps on an equal basis with EVE corp leaders. Additionally EVE leaders should have the same parity to issue DUST specific roles which were recently introduced. Definitely not an ExploitAt no point were any of the conspiring alts made CEO to cause the shares to be created in the first place, and in a true sandbox game if you do not do your homework and learn you will get burned. Let them burn. I was the second one in for every case, they all had EVE members besides me with experience and therefore we were operating clearly within the mechanics of the game. GMs jumping in the way they did shows favoritism for DUST514 members which paying EVE players NEVER get. Examples:While not related to me it is a good example: A corp believes there is a bug and towards the end it comes out the espionage agent was really good at covering his tracks and the CEO/Director is unable to understand what is happening to him. How is this the espionage operators fault? It isn't. The purpose of Espionage involves sewing deception and confusion into their ranks to further cause issues. (as a side note I spoke with the agent that did this, In their corp channel the corp members began threatening the espionage agents real life afterwards. Not the kind of people we want talking to kids who may be playing the game if you ask me. ) https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119273&find=unreadif true, it's exceptionally bad practice from ccp and an abuse of the sandbox. In this next case the CEO is reasonably expected to be upset, they just had their corp stolen, however they went and begged for help and were given an unfair protection from GMs because they "dont know the rules". If I did this in EVE I would have gotten a "Too bad man, HTFU." This espionage is clearly not an exploit as they had admitted to having a great deal of very experienced members in EVE in their corp the whole time, and the leaders were not very smart about their choices. (Also this was legendary in the rage posting from their whole alliance in their EVEmails to me for the last two days. https://forums.dust514.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=119973Opportunity for Course CorrectionSo we ask for parity... Corps with DUST leadership should not get special treatment and protections and CCP should really consider putting a priority on ensuring equality and access to roles for EVE and DUST514 leaders managing a corp. Also please consider merging the DUST514 forums into the EVE forums so the DUST players can learn and not suffer in isolation any longer.
Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction... |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
1500
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
All I really see here is yet another good reason to uncouple DUST from this game as fast as possible, so that it can be allowed to die quietly without seriously effecting our own game mechanics. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Toshiro Ozuwara
SniggWaffe WAFFLES.
285
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:28:00 -
[49] - Quote
DUST IS A BABBY. A WEE ONE. Diapers |

PotatoOverdose
Handsome Millionaire Playboys
600
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 00:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Honestly, post --->here<---. Most people in GD don't give a fck about dust. This is CCP reversing the actions of EVE players. Again, no one here really gives a **** what people do to or with dust bunnies one way or the other.
Dust is pretty much a failed project for CCP imo. It can't compete with BF4/PS2/any decent current gen shooter. And in a year or two it certainly won't be able to compete with BF5/PS3/any decent next gen shooter. Hopefully the EA dudes they brought in can monetize it enough to where CCP recoups at least a small part of their investment. |

Silentsam187
SONS of LEGION RISE of LEGION
22
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 12:10:00 -
[51] - Quote
I am mainly a DUST player, and I agree with this. Hand holding makes for sloppy organizations.
If people play with fire there should be a chance of getting burned.
They really do need to make DUST corp leaders the same as EVE corp leaders. Give us the ability to form alliances, and even set EVE pilots roles without needing an EVE character to do so.
Quit being squeamish about integrating these two games and give us console players the complexity we crave. Quit judging us by the games that came before and give us the New Eden experience we came for. |

Lugalbandak
Anunnaku Industrial Corp. Northern Associates.
256
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 13:33:00 -
[52] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:WInter Borne wrote:Stop playing dust and just let it die? Um... why? It's more fun than EVE is right now.
yeah i like it , its quick pew pew in new eden The police horse is the only animal in the world that haz his male genitals on his back |

Fractal Muse
Sebiestor Tribe Minmatar Republic
287
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 14:24:00 -
[53] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:All I really see here is yet another good reason to uncouple DUST from this game as fast as possible, so that it can be allowed to die quietly without seriously effecting our own game mechanics. Oddly, I see it as the opposite: I see this as a reason to give DUST players access the functionality and features that already exists in their Corps.
This is happening because Corp Leaders in DUST don't have the ability to see shares and the like in their Corp. That was a silly move by CCP in the first place.
I have a hard time saying, "it's their fault" in regards to DUST CEOs when their game client doesn't even reveal the underlying share system of Corporations. The fault, at the end of the day, rests with CCP and not with the players involved.
CCP should have, at least, revealed that there were shares behind the scenes in DUST Corps to give DUST CEOs the option of taking action or being taken advantage of. As it is, this isn't taking advantage of someone who could have done something - the CEOs had no recourse via game mechanics to do anything about it. That's a failure on CCP's part not on the players.
This should be taken as a catalytic moment for CCP to stop treating DUST players as if they are bunnies and realize that they are gamers as well - they aren't substantially less intelligent or capable than EVE players. Give them the tools to start shaping the sandbox and let them in on the greater game.
In my opinion: The more integrated the two games becomes the better for everyone since more people playing in the sandbox creates more opportunity for everyone. |

Asuka Solo
Stark Fujikawa Stark Enterprises
2560
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 14:41:00 -
[54] - Quote
I have had to throw Eve alts into tons of Dust corps to help them apply to alliances over the last few months.
Knowing Dust does not have these menus.... I take my time to explain the concepts of shares and director level access to these Dust CEOs who in all probability, couldnt care less.
As far as I'm concerned, GM's should avoid assisting in these situations.... Devs should ensure that the required Eve side menus and features are coded into Dust's 1st expansion (Due anytime now?) and from there on out, nobody needs a babysitter.
If your going to give a shady character control of your corp... you can sleep in your bed the way you make it. Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk! |

TigCobra
Wildly Inappropriate Goonswarm Federation
3
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 15:57:00 -
[55] - Quote
All CCP needs to do is release this for PC for PC Gamers, the master race. |

March rabbit
True Horde
881
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 16:05:00 -
[56] - Quote
Crasniya wrote:PotatoOverdose wrote:Honestly, post --->here<---. Most people in GD don't give a fck about dust. This is CCP reversing the actions of EVE players. they do it every time some idiot finds bug and exploits it
any more news? Null people are like a kid who broke his own toy and is jealous about another kid that still has a new, shiny toy. In the kid's mind, the only way to happiness is to grab that shiny toy and break it so both kids are in equal misery.
|

Lord LazyGhost
The Bastards The Bastards.
183
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 16:13:00 -
[57] - Quote
the day the dust bunnys pay to play and effect the game i play is the day i will care if there corps get ****** over or not until then i realy dont. dust can die a death for all i care get the programmers back onto the game that is paying their wage and make that best it can be before pissing developer time and money up the wall on something thats 5-10years behind ever other fps on the market |

Crasniya
Strange Energy Gentlemen's Agreement
333
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 16:28:00 -
[58] - Quote
PotatoOverdose wrote:Dust is pretty much a failed project for CCP imo. It can't compete with BF4/PS2/any decent current gen shooter. And in a year or two it certainly won't be able to compete with BF5/PS3/any decent next gen shooter.
Obviously you fail to see how BF4/PS2/CoD have no real way of comparing with DUST 514, because it's not even a similar type of game. |

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
4844
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 16:48:00 -
[59] - Quote
This is an EVE issue as it is related to the links between DUST and EVE, like it or not.
GM intervention in a situation where a player had all the tools at their disposal to defend themselves would be bad, but this appears to be a situation where that was not the case. It is a game mechanic issue that needs to be resolved.
Issues of this type were inevitable, and will be inevitable until DUST is fleshed out with the options we take for granted in EVE.
Once that is done, if a DUST CEO screws up it will be on his head alone. To carve a successful niche for yourself in EVE you need to be able to out sell, out produce, out fight,-á out run, or out wit your competitors. If you can do none of the above, your only option is to complain on the forums that somehow you are at a disadvantage using the exact same tool set-áas the rest of the player base. |

Cosmar
Aliastra Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2013.11.14 17:06:00 -
[60] - Quote
Metagaming is dumb (and by definition outside of the sandbox... box) and CCP know better than to lose the last few thousand or so dust players they have to stupid undocumented game design decisions on their part.
Also Dust is not a sandbox game it's just a console shooter with mild RPG elements to it. There is just one thing you do in that game and that's shoot at people on premade maps if you call that sandbox then what the hell isn't. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |