| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Filan
   |
Posted - 2006.02.15 00:50:00 -
[1]
the ships seemed to be running fine when they entered all the stargates they used, no odd energy readings based on our records. but our ship scanners arent terribly accurate as scanning ships is no business of the stargate crews.
|
Filan
|
Posted - 2006.02.15 02:53:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Insio Nores
I was jumping ahead of the freighters and, on a jump prior to Reschard, a stargate misjumped me about a million km off target. At the time I took it as a fluke, stargate malfunction. I warped the rest of the way to my target and went on.
It could well have been a random miscalibration, but given what happened, I have to wonder. I'd recommend examining not only the jump logs of the gate leading into Reschard, but all those the convoy moved through along the way.
-- Nores
we are reviewing jump logs but it will take time. the alignment of the gates in that whole constellation keeps drifting. this event in Reschard is truely more then meets the eye as we have seen nothing man made to date that could even phase a stargate.
more news is coming in as we finally have restored primary data links to our stargates in Reschard. sad news is the Energy pulse that knocked these gates offline also overloaded the main core on all three(maybe the being on backup power is causing odd jumps)but across the three gates we lost 600 of our family.
|
Filan
|
Posted - 2006.02.16 01:42:00 -
[3]
Stargate logs show that our systems did not alter the freighters in any way. the odd 100km off jumps we cant explain as normal entry and exit vectors show in our logs.
|
Filan
|
Posted - 2006.02.16 16:17:00 -
[4]
more important is who docked and dropped off cargo of relief supplies for the freighters. was any contracted out work done on the drive and power cores?
Originally by: Pytria Le'Danness
I cannot tell you exactly what happened. Upon approaching the Reschard system, the gates responded more and more sluggishly, stranding about a third of the members in my squadron of eleven. They caught up later.
The freighters where affected as well, the one piloted by Ippis ... umm, I forgot the last name, anyway, it had to have a complete system shutdown, and Sister Risendorf in the other freighter reported similar problems. Since the CAIN group I was with had chosen to fly close escort and remain with the freighters all the time we were last through the gates all the time - that might have caused more problems for us than the pilots who went through first.
as for the Sluggish and odd acting stargates, we have atleast 15 gates in that constellation still running on emergency backups. the overload from the pulse that hit the system as a whole badly damaged lots of our equipment. the crews of these gates are trying their best to vent the radiation from the lower engineering decks and restart the main reactors manually. but its taking longer then expected as we lost everyone on those decks when the reactors blew. we have relayed a message to all controlers in that area to tell high mass ships such as freighters to hold back for a few days.
|
Filan
|
Posted - 2006.02.16 21:40:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Halunoto Vankaalen
Funny, I can't find anything about a system-wide pulse in the news article 
well something messed up Concord system wide sensors post explosion and something screwed with our equipment(though the news or general media never even thinks of the stargates, heck most pod pilots dont even know people exist in these things).
|
| |
|