EVE Search - Time for a new alliance ?!

All Channels

Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions

Time for a new alliance ?!

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 1 post(s)
Lord Spidey	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:03:00 - [121] Edited by: Lord Spidey on 16/02/2006 20:03:34 Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Lord Spidey Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Mallik Hendrake I dont think hes smacking as much as asking that his paragraphs perhaps get proofread by someone else for ease of reading? LMAO Are you suggesting that you guys are really having trouble comprehending what it is that Pacifica is trying to say. I would offer that he is doing a pretty good job of translating his opinions. If you cannot decipher his ôgrammarö then might I suggest you get a proofreader to correct his post for you as you are the one having the issue not Pacifica, and your shortcomings shouldnÆt be his responsibility to fix for you. That is stupidly faulty logic...by your way of thinking I could type utter gibberish and some idiot could say he understands it even though no one else does so its then their fault for not understanding gibberish rather than the person who typed utter gibberish. I hope this is simple enough for you to understand
Lone Bear	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:12:00 - [122] Edited by: Lone Bear on 16/02/2006 20:12:49 Originally by: Darcuese Now..Get back to ubject....new alliances will populate poluted places by to much carebears....north need to be cleaned Originally by: Darcuese A space which will be populated again by "carebears". Claiming a space means that this space is your home, that you can use its ressources. Which ressources are available in 0.0? Rare ore, fat npc, high level cplx. Space control? This is a joke so far, and only a shield to protect pre-said activities. Those are Carebear activities if you stick straight on the definition. So removing carebears to put other carebears on the throne? For what? Forum glory? Sig glory? Bio glory: "I've removed XXX carebears from YYY region and put ZZZ carebears in it"? I would suggest you to elaborate more suspensfull political or emotionnal reasons, cause the "carebear alliance must die" applies to any force that owns 0.0, any force that owns something and use it for profit, economical profit. In the end, only carebears will survive anyway. Edit: typo
Mortix	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:14:00 - [123] Originally by: Lord Spidey Edited by: Lord Spidey on 16/02/2006 20:03:34 Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Lord Spidey Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Mallik Hendrake I dont think hes smacking as much as asking that his paragraphs perhaps get proofread by someone else for ease of reading? LMAO Are you suggesting that you guys are really having trouble comprehending what it is that Pacifica is trying to say. I would offer that he is doing a pretty good job of translating his opinions. If you cannot decipher his ôgrammarö then might I suggest you get a proofreader to correct his post for you as you are the one having the issue not Pacifica, and your shortcomings shouldnÆt be his responsibility to fix for you. That is stupidly faulty logic...by your way of thinking I could type utter gibberish and some idiot could say he understands it even though no one else does so its then their fault for not understanding gibberish rather than the person who typed utter gibberish. I hope this is simple enough for you to understand I think the point was that everyone could understand what pacifica was saying.
Krauss	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:16:00 - [124] Originally by: Lord Spidey Edited by: Lord Spidey on 16/02/2006 20:03:34 Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Lord Spidey Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Mallik Hendrake I dont think hes smacking as much as asking that his paragraphs perhaps get proofread by someone else for ease of reading? LMAO Are you suggesting that you guys are really having trouble comprehending what it is that Pacifica is trying to say. I would offer that he is doing a pretty good job of translating his opinions. If you cannot decipher his ôgrammarö then might I suggest you get a proofreader to correct his post for you as you are the one having the issue not Pacifica, and your shortcomings shouldnÆt be his responsibility to fix for you. That is stupidly faulty logic...by your way of thinking I could type utter gibberish and some idiot could say he understands it even though no one else does so its then their fault for not understanding gibberish rather than the person who typed utter gibberish. I hope this is simple enough for you to understand Not quite. See the difference is I have enough sense to realize that Pacifica isnÆt trying to type ôutter gibberishö As studying the language in school I can clearly recognize the difference between someone doing a fine job of translation for you, and someone typing random characters of crap. Motive. Look that one up. Then ask yourself the question you asked me.
Lord Spidey	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:26:00 - [125] Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Lord Spidey Edited by: Lord Spidey on 16/02/2006 20:03:34 Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Lord Spidey Originally by: Krauss Originally by: Mallik Hendrake LMAO Are you suggesting that you guys are really having trouble comprehending what it is that Pacifica is trying to say. I would offer that he is doing a pretty good job of translating his opinions. If you cannot decipher his ôgrammarö then might I suggest you get a proofreader to correct his post for you as you are the one having the issue not Pacifica, and your shortcomings shouldnÆt be his responsibility to fix for you. That is stupidly faulty logic...by your way of thinking I could type utter gibberish and some idiot could say he understands it even though no one else does so its then their fault for not understanding gibberish rather than the person who typed utter gibberish. I hope this is simple enough for you to understand Not quite. See the difference is I have enough sense to realize that Pacifica isnÆt trying to type ôutter gibberishö As studying the language in school I can clearly recognize the difference between someone doing a fine job of translation for you, and someone typing random characters of crap. Motive. Look that one up. Then ask yourself the question you asked me. Whether or not he is doing a fine job is your OPINION...obviously some people are having a hard time understanding and when they mention it of course your eager to jump on your "ZOMG SMACKERS!!!" horse and ride off into the sunset. My point was not that he was typing random gibberish and if you dont understand that then you really should reread my post
Krauss	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:37:00 - [126] Then what we are getting at is why would you critic his grammer if you thought he was griefing you by typing giberish. It seem obvious to me he is trying to make decent english sentences and the best smack you can muster is to flame his english. Well there you go. Stand tall Pacifica, the worst insult the enemy can get on you is your "poor" english grammar, even though its not your native language. To me its a sure sign of your weakness in having to stoop to such low insults on a person.
Lord Spidey	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:42:00 - [127] Edited by: Lord Spidey on 16/02/2006 20:44:20 Please find me a quote where I insulted his grammar. Oh wait...you cant because I never did. Fine job. I eagerly await your apology

Jacques Archambault	Posted - 2006.02.16 20:58:00 - [128] This thread has drifted way off-topic. click Jacques' forum rules \| [email protected] \| Our new Website! Member of the official Eris Discordia Fanclub Fastest sig nerfer south of EVE Information Center FACT - you can't find a piece of brocolli in a glass of milk

Krauss	Posted - 2006.02.16 21:00:00 - [129] I never said that you did. You defended the person who did attack his grammer by posing the ridiculous argument that his sentences are comparable to a person just posting giberish, and that either person should be responible for making the post "easy for you to read". If you fail to be able to understand the post, I suggest you ignore it. I dont see the logic at all that he should get a proof-reader so that you can understand it. I feel if you dont get it now, you wont get it once its reformed into perfectly contructed proper sentences. I think the problem with it isnt the grammar, its the ideals maybe you cant understand.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.