|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 13:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
The Mittani wrote:I think that instituting some kind of protection against scamming for newbies would be wise from a business perspective, somewhere below the 1-million sp level.
I'm not sure how you could rationalise protecting newbies from scams while still allowing them to scam themselves. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.17 13:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Zyrbalax III wrote:Mittens,
I fully agree with the "risk vs reward" principle, and I agree that there is little risk in hisec activities.
I am curious as to whether you think null, w-space or lowsec is currently most "risky"? My uninformed opinion (having not lived in null yet) is that much of null is actually pretty safe for residents (low populations, alliance control, intel channels etc), whereas much of lowsec (I have spent time in lowsec) is pretty risky (higher population density per QEN, plus regular roaming gangs of ebil piwates). And w-space depends on how well you control your statics (I have lived in w-space too), but if you're good at that you're also relatively safe.
And following on from that, where do you think attention most needs to be focussed to get the risk/reward balance right?
Thanks Z3
I think you're focusing too much on immediate personal risk (i.e. having your ship explode) and not enough on longer term, more abstract risks such as losing your space and access to all your assets, or even just being booted from corp. I have tens of billions of assets sat in stations I could easily lose the ability to dock in.
Not to mention the safety you're describing in 0.0 is provided by the hard work of other people. If they stop doing that work all the security just disappears. Thats a risk too. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
35
|
Posted - 2011.11.24 14:03:00 -
[3] - Quote
Hi The Mittani
I know you are in favour of a WoW style customizable UI in EvE but I'd be interested in hearing your views on how it would affect the balance of power between the haves and have nots. A well organised group like GoonSwarm would have the resources and skills to create a UI that potentially gives them a huge advantage. Not to mention the risk of ending up with "Must Have" UI mods which provide so much of an advantage you're completely unable to compete without them (stuff like gladius and decursive). |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.08 18:21:00 -
[4] - Quote
Arkanon Nerevar wrote: 3.Null corps have (il admit rather old) rap for being highly dominering, most people do understand the concept of following the chain of command but there are limits to this (ultimately fictional) concept, Example: a player wishes to become a soldier in a null corp to participate in null battles, he will follow his superiors orders and fly the appropriate ship/fit/broad skill plan, but say he is told he must dedicate his skill training to some hyper specific plan for the next 6 months to fulfill the a extremely specific role as dictated to him with no deviance, do you support this philosophy and belive it is affecting the desire for people to plunge into Null.
These are ****** corps, but it should be their choice to be ****** corps and your choice to join said ****** corps if you want to. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.17 23:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
Camios wrote: For some people the holy grail of game design for sov warfare would be a system that encourages both military entities to split their forces over many objectives. This would mean that each one of current huge fights would be replaced by a number of concurrent, smaller fights that can be handled more fluidly by our hardware, are more interesting (because )and are more fun.
Have you considered that perhaps the best system is one that allows both a distributed attack OR a single massive pitched battle based on the circumstances rather than just forcing people from one extreme to the other. |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.18 00:18:00 -
[6] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:He said encourages, not forces.
Sometimes I stop reading posts at the first sentence too |

Yeep
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
41
|
Posted - 2011.12.21 12:28:00 -
[7] - Quote
Temba Ronin wrote: Could you please tell me how many Alliances you have run, how many nullsec systems YOU claimed sov for with your Alliances before you gave it all up to become a swarm member? Because i'm not convinced i am the one who is suffering from naivety in this particular conversation.
Hi I'm Yeep. I was a founding member of Goonfleet and a director for 3 years (and a CEO for a couple of weeks). I was heavily involved in organising and executing both fights and logistics for Syndicate, Outer Ring and Cloud Ring and to a lesser extent the Scalding Pass, Wicked Creek and Detorid campaigns.
You're still an idiot. |
|
|
|