|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |

Defcon2
|
Posted - 2006.02.17 18:01:00 -
[1]
Hey Strickero give me a shout ingame maybe we can help each other out 
|

Defcon2
|
Posted - 2006.02.18 11:48:00 -
[2]
I think maybe you are being too hard on 3fa Surive 
They arn't the best pvpers from my personal experience and with people like ck etc running around they need allies to surive out here. Therefore the smart thing to do is nap the strongist current faction to help defend them.
Yes maybe they appear to simply nap the strongist faction currently in the area to save themselves hassle, and "backstab" former allies that may not be as strong as a new alliance in the area. But at the end of the day EvE isn't about morals and if you can't beat em, join em 
The only thing I find a little strange is that 3fa are napped with OSS who kos neutrals outside their claimed space, somthing that I would imagine is at odds with 3fa as they take an anti-pirate stance afaik. But I guess isk > morals.
|

Defcon2
|
Posted - 2006.02.20 09:01:00 -
[3]
Thats the way Ichabod, ignore the post and instead attack the person writing it, you know that's how threads turn nasty. As for JQA that was a long long time ago not sure why you had to bring it up again tbh seems a little irrelavent to the current situation in syndicate.
Back on topic gl -A-, syndicate is a pretty tough place to fight in I'm sure we will all fimd out pretty soon if 3fa are "going to pay" for not ;)
|

Defcon2
|
Posted - 2006.02.20 13:55:00 -
[4]
Icha, don't get upset, I'm not going to be drawn into a JQA debat as I've said before I pesonally can't see what the relavence is (after all that was probly 1yr+ ago) and suspect nobody really cares anymore :)
Originally by: Ichabod Crane Edited by: Ichabod Crane on 18/02/2006 16:24:18 Survie and Defcon, I hate to break it to you both for the Nth time, but you know nothing about 3rd Front. Fair enough for your opinions, but as far as we're concerned, they're based on the injustice you feel was done against you in JQA and hold little relevance to the situation here. JQA lost our support because of its own actions, not because of ours.
I'm sorry but that's the best example of an "argumentum ad hominem" I've seen on the forums in a while, and this quote is what I was refering to by personal attack ;)
|

Defcon2
|
Posted - 2006.02.23 19:38:00 -
[5]
Err I'd like to point out that it was a 3fa member who first brought up JQA in this thread. But as a "bitter and twisted" ( I think that's how clipped put it, after as there used to be around 500 pilots in JQA it stands to reson the every one of them that does not agree with 3fa must be some kind of twisted hatefilled pirate ) xJQAer I'd like to say maybe we could all agree to disagree 
And icha I think you maybe slightly misunderstood/misread my post from what I read of your reply.
|
|
|
|