|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 7 post(s) |
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
162
|
Posted - 2011.11.04 11:08:00 -
[1] - Quote
Greetings
Please post your feedback about capital ship balancing in this thread.
Thanks. Your Tallest. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
175
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Update:
Based on feedback, the following changes have been made in addition to the previously proposed changes. They will most likely come to SISI on Monday or Tuesday.
Supercarriers * All supercarriers: dronebay +25000 (5 extra fighters/fb)
Shield supercapitals * Shield nerf changed from -20% to -10% (shield recharge rate also changed accordingly) ** New values should be 90% of current TQ value
Naglfar * +2500 capacitor capacity (recharge time will be changed to have same base recharge.)
Nidhoggur: * 7,5% bonus to armor and shield transfer amount per carrier level instead of 5%. * +30000 PG * +2500 capacitor capacity (recharge time will be changed to have same base recharge.)
Hel: * 7,5% bonus to armor and shield transfer amount per carrier level instead of 5%. * +5000 capacitor capacity (recharge time will be changed to have same base recharge.)
XL autocannons: * +50% falloff
I also want to tell you that there are other very valid concerns that we will be looking into, but they will not make it into the November release. We don't have the solutions to all of these, but as I said, we will to try to find solutions to these issues after the November release.
* Shield leadership bonus should work like an armor bonus and not require recharging shields after every jump. * Capital ships cyno bumping/bouncing issue * XL missiles explosion radius and explosion velocity * There needs to be a shield HP implant set as a counterbalance to the Slave set. * There needs to be a remote shield boost implant like the 'Gentry' ZEX2000 is for armor * There need to be deadspace shield invulnerability fields equivalent to the A-Type EANM modules |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
176
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:29:00 -
[3] - Quote
Vincent Gaines wrote:Has there been any discussion as to nerfing remote tracking for Titans, to make sure they can't hit subcaps easily?
Actually, yes. I forgot to mention that. Added the following to my post:
Titan tracking issue: * "Immune to all forms of Electronic Warfare" will also make you immune to remote "electronic assistance", that is: remote tracking enhancers and remote sensor boosters. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
178
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:44:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tropic9 wrote:CCP Tallest wrote: * There needs to be a shield HP implant set as a counterbalance to the Slave set.
Would this mean that there also will be an armor tank version of the crystal set? In order to preserve balance in the universe? That is entirely possible. I like my universe balanced. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
179
|
Posted - 2011.11.10 15:52:00 -
[5] - Quote
Pattern Clarc wrote:November?
Well, it's on SISI in November.... |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
231
|
Posted - 2011.11.25 13:03:00 -
[6] - Quote
I am still reading everything in this thread. I did go on vacation about a week ago. This was after the cutoff date for changes that make it into the Crucible expansion had passed.
Will we remove capital drone bay parts from Titans and Dreadnoughts? Yes, this was done for Crucible.
Will I consider increasing the drone bay of supers so that they can hold 20 fighters and 20 fighter bombers? Yes, I will consider it after Crucible.
I believe that the current set of changes will have an overall positive effect on fleet fights. It's entirely possible that they will not. But whatever the effect, I will be reading your feedback, balancing work will continue and things will change again. |
|
|
CCP Tallest
C C P C C P Alliance
246
|
Posted - 2011.12.19 10:55:00 -
[7] - Quote
We are here and we are reading your feedback.
We will be iterating on our balancing efforts based on the feedback in this and other threads and will release some more balancing in early 2012. |
|
|
|
|