|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
RAW23
496
   |
Posted - 2013.11.20 18:27:00 -
[1] - Quote
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:Scammers gonna scam.
In this case, scammers gonna get all their accounts permabanned 
Scamming in eve is one thing. Scamming a real life charity out of real money donations that are just being processed via the game is another thing entirely, both morally and according to CCP's rules.
There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |
RAW23
497
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 19:06:00 -
[2] - Quote
Abdiel Kavash wrote:CCP: "Scamming is legal, unless you are going to scam a real life charity working to mitigate immediate human misery in the aftermath of a major disaster. In that case, you get banned."
Fixed that for you.
There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |
RAW23
505
|
Posted - 2013.11.20 23:11:00 -
[3] - Quote
Major 'Revolver' Ocelot wrote:Ursula Thrace wrote:destiny2 wrote:this is why i donated money straight to red cross yes, because the red cross is such a trustworthy organization... I work near the British red cross HQ and once a month all the directors come and have a meeting. The car park is full of jaguars, mercs, bmw's and Porsche's. You'd never have thought charity to be such a profitable business.
I didn't realise that people who work for charities are obliged to be paid less than the market rate for their skills. You live and learn.
Or perhaps you are mixing things up and confusing the fact that charities raise and administer charitable donations with the idea that people working for these organisations should also provide their own services as a charitable donation.
There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |
RAW23
516
|
Posted - 2013.11.21 16:29:00 -
[4] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:
Well I suppose some people might not, but surely the person at the top of a charity, above all else, should be charitable. If everyone below them is willing to work for free, and our income comes from people giving up their time, resources and money, then the very least they could do is live in modest comfort.
I take accept that it might look seem rather unpalatable but it does actually make sense. The people at the very top of charities aren't the managers but the trustees and they do tend to give their time for free. They then have to make decisions about who to hire and how much pay to offer in order to best achieve their goals and they may very well think that paying a high salary to get the guys they want will have bigger knock on benefits in terms of the charity achieving their stated goals than would paying less and selecting either from the pool of people who are less able or from the much smaller pool of very talented people who are willing to accept much less than the market value for their skills (perhaps vanishingly small given the actual choices that charities do in fact make). The manager of a charity need not really have a single charitable bone in his body so long as he is able to deliver the end results.
There are two types of EVE player:
those who believe there are two types of EVE player and those who do not. |
|
|
| |
|