| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lorth
   |
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[1]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
 |
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[2]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[3]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[4]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[5]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[6]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[7]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[8]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[9]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[10]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[11]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[12]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 03:58:00 -
[13]
I believe that shield tanking is better in most situations (PVP) in which you would actually tank.
Mostly because of the quicker HP regain time of a shield booster compared to an armor tank. Not to mention, for the most part I'm hard pressed to fit 2 LAR on nearly every ship I fly, which means shield tanking is far and away better. Also tech 2 iinvon fields mean that you have better reistances then you would using nano's as well as using less slots.
Though there are times when armor tanking is better. I carry a med rep on nearly all my fleet set ups, even scorps. Shield recharge on thier own, armor doesn't. Trying to shield tank a frig is simply dumb. And some ships, will never run a decent shield tank no matter what you try to do to them.
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[14]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[15]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[16]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[17]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[18]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[19]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[20]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[21]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[22]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[23]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[24]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
Lorth
|
Posted - 2006.02.27 04:11:00 -
[25]
I should also mention that since I still don't use any passive cap recharge mods on my ship, you will gain more HP back from shield tanking then you would from armor tanking. And at a fast rate to boot. Which is why, when I fly a ship that can do either, I nearly always try to shield tank
|
| |
|