| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 9 post(s) |
Nyphur
   |
Posted - 2006.03.05 23:29:00 -
[31]
 Originally by: KilROCK
apoc structure peels off like a banana under the pressure! 
Off topic but I freakin' love your sigs.
Eve-Tanking.com - For the ultimate tanking spreadsheet and resources. |
Yarek Balear
|
Posted - 2006.03.05 23:34:00 -
[32]
Originally by: Kyguard
Quote:
...broadcast messages..
That'd be the best feature tbh. "Comrades, one last fight for the motherland! Chaaaarge!" All in a russian accent, crazy 
Playing way too much Cod2 !!!
|
Foulis
|
Posted - 2006.03.05 23:41:00 -
[33]
Originally by: Grimpak
or for example, with the AC's/howies
in overdrive mode you can shovel lot more ammo in it and increase the RoF.
...ofc that you run the risk of seeing the gun going *POP*, and you lose a bit of your armour while you're at it.
or even better, the rails/blasters. Overdrive mode and you get better tracking and RoF. But that means the gun can also reach critical point and the gun releases a powerfull EMP thru the ship severing her badly.
or...
...I could come up with lots of situations.
I think it would be cooler if ACs and Howis just jammed, and you had to either use a remote rep (sub targeted) or go to station to fix it.
----
I <3 Taranis
Cake > Pie - Imaran
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Boobies
|
Nafri
|
Posted - 2006.03.05 23:48:00 -
[34]
Originally by: j0sephine
I wanted the salvaging to be part of game for loooooooong time. ^^;
(just picture the number of thieves humping dread and freighter wrecks after a big battle o.O;
Lifewire will be one happy man
|
Corair
|
Posted - 2006.03.05 23:53:00 -
[35]
This makes me happy in my pants.
--------
I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code. |
Xio2
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 00:06:00 -
[36]
Ok..if they make ships where it takes a maxed out crafter with +5 crafting impalnts to produce an awesome ship, im going to be flat out ****ed off. SWG anyone? Pleaaaase by god dont do that!
--------------
now this is the way a sig should be
Xio2 |
Benglada
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 00:42:00 -
[37]
Originally by: KilROCK
Quote:
New Gang System - Combat Organization Project
The new gang system features a hierarchial structure, with broadcast messages, waypoints, navigation abilities and objectives.
That sounds nice.
Quote:
Salvaging - New Mini-Profession
Salvaging will be mostly used to harvest ingredients to manufacture Tech I and Tech II mods for both modules and ships. You salvage Wrecks, which are created on destruction of player and npc ships instead of cans. You will remove loot from wrecks as usual, but to salvage the additional ingredients you require Salvaging equipment and skills.
Your ship blows up and about 10 morons come by and start raping your ship wreckings LOL
lol @ macro salvagers.. imagine 20 chinese macroers following atuk around 24/7 :D
---------------------------
Originally by: Wrangler
Unfrtinately you dnot get to vote.. 
|
Foulis
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 01:14:00 -
[38]
Originally by: Xio2
Ok..if they make ships where it takes a maxed out crafter with +5 crafting impalnts to produce an awesome ship, im going to be flat out ****ed off. SWG anyone? Pleaaaase by god dont do that!
Most likely you will be able to modify your ship one way, but it will reduce it's stats in another. (Say an increase in shields at expense of cap, or armor, or something)
----
I <3 Taranis
Cake > Pie - Imaran
Originally by: CCP Hammer
Boobies
|
Khonsu
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 02:06:00 -
[39]
Originally by: Grimpak
50%, the apoc is in optimal
75%, the apoc starts to act queasy and the tachys start to fail their atempt to shoot.
90%, you start to see your ship's core a bit red-ish
100%, ship goes b00m.
Now imagine a lag spike or CTD... 
|
Ante
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 02:11:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Ante on 06/03/2006 02:14:30
Quote:
Skill Training - Queue
WHY!?!?! It just promotes laziness and stupidity. If people are too thick to set long skill training when they're going to be away that's their problem. First real step towards catering to dummies since I've been in the game. EDIT: dual training is a different aspect to skill queueing. Just needed to clarify which I don't like.
Quote:
Heat - The ability to overload your modules
Ugh. Please don't.
Quote:
Player Structures - "Housing"
It would richen the EVE universe and provide a simple player owned structure which could be introduced early for players to get into the player owned structure tree. However, usually opens up more cans of worms than it closes.
So long as we can destroy them, they don't have POS turrets for defense and they are not buildable in 0.5+.
|
|
|
Grimpak
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 02:55:00 -
[41]
Originally by: Khonsu
Originally by: Grimpak
50%, the apoc is in optimal
75%, the apoc starts to act queasy and the tachys start to fail their atempt to shoot.
90%, you start to see your ship's core a bit red-ish
100%, ship goes b00m.
Now imagine a lag spike or CTD...
hehe... realy, a module overdrive mode would be nice
----------------
Originally by: Abdalion
Shoot him ingame if you don't like this person. If you do like him, go mine veldspar with him.
|
Zero Omega
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 03:25:00 -
[42]
I'm in love with most of it.
Though if sub system targeting and heat come thats gonna be a hell of a lot of work to get it in a balanced form without screwing combat over.
---
Liberate Khanid!
Stop the oppression of Khanid II and put a true Khanid on the throne! |
DigitalCommunist
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 03:42:00 -
[43]
I may be a cynical bastard, but even I know when you get excited.. and this ain't it. You are quoting features which were mentioned on more than one occasion, and rely heavily upon good implementation for success.
Compared to the complexity of this with your standard overview, its likely to be bug ridden for at least 6 months. So like, chill out k?
Purchasing Complex Fullerene Shards, contact me ingame. |
Kel Shek
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 04:14:00 -
[44]
Originally by: Grimpak
MW4. Nova cat with full rack of ER-PPC's. Fire 'em all->"WARNING: heat level critical. Shutting down."->sitting duck
I remember in an earlier Mechwarrior.. full rack of beam lasers was it? alpha strike, BAM one less leg on the enemy.
I think as mentioned, alot of these things are far enough off, and dependant on exactly how they are implemented, that its not worth getting TOO excited about.
but, the future of the game should be good! alot to look forward to, in time.
~~~~~
To see a World in a Grain of Sand
And Heaven in a Wild Flower
Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand
And Eternity in an hour
~~William Blake |
Drigan
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 04:48:00 -
[45]
My friend feels overheating would suck because you got cap to worry about already and he doesn't want heat modules and skills.
I feel this would be cool, another thing to manage in battle. Instead of firing all 8 guns, you gotta manage like 3 guns at a time. Being king of dps would just take you out of the battle faster! People wanted an ability to target modules, but EVE combat is pretty fast for that to be effective. So overheating is probably the next best thing.
|
mamolian
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 04:53:00 -
[46]
Twinned Jumpdrive Structure - Starbases
A structure, which allows you to twin together jumpdrive structures from Starbases.
Now thats somthing i want.. the ability to jump from a pos/outpost all the way out on the edge of the universe, to another pos a few jumps from empire..
Caaammaaaan ccp give us the ability to have player stargates that can take huge chunks off our travel time ;P
|
Ishquar Teh'Sainte
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 06:09:00 -
[47]
As DigitalCommunist said ...
i'd rather see a proper implemention of less features, than a run for uber-micromanagment / uber-complexity ...
if you add to much complexity too fast you'll screw up everything - don't wanna know what computational problems will arise with the implemention of "modul-warfare" ...
balancing issues are another problem - /me fears the modified armor tank bs with no shields and enhanced cap recharge 
_________________________________________
Originally by: Skellibjalla
Life is a garden of perceptions. Pick your fruit.
Originally by: Tool - Hush
I can't say what I want to,even if I'm not serious. |
Xio2
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 06:18:00 -
[48]
yeah..if it gets too complex i might have to run back to WoW where all i had to do was hit people with a stick. 
--------------
now this is the way a sig should be
Xio2 |
|
TomB
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 06:58:00 -
[49]
Originally by: KilROCK
As for the scanning part in 3d.. how about they fully remake the probing coding when that comes out -_-
That's being done.
. |
|
|
TomB
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 07:06:00 -
[50]
Originally by: mamolian
Caaammaaaan ccp give us the ability to have player stargates that can take huge chunks off our travel time ;P
You already have the Titan
. |
|
|
|
KilROCK
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 07:08:00 -
[51]
Edited by: KilROCK on 06/03/2006 07:08:45
Originally by: TomB
Originally by: KilROCK
As for the scanning part in 3d.. how about they fully remake the probing coding when that comes out -_-
That's being done.
"with improvements in usage and functionality."
Woot, And 24 hours ban for double posting.
Don't ban me 
|
SengH
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 07:19:00 -
[52]
TomB are flagships gonna be t2 BS or BFS? You guys hinted at it being a BFS E-ON but I dont see any mention of advanced leadership skills or the promised upgrade to the leadership functions of T1 BCs, in the new in development / drawingboard pages.
|
|
TomB
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 07:25:00 -
[53]
Originally by: SengH
TomB are flagships gonna be t2 BS or BFS? You guys hinted at it being a BFS E-ON but I dont see any mention of advanced leadership skills or the promised upgrade to the leadership functions of T1 BCs, in the new in development / drawingboard pages.
BFS, you mean BCS? All I can tell you is they will nice ships to fly in.
. |
|
SpaceDrake Storyteller
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 09:15:00 -
[54]
Tom, BFS = Big Fracking Ship.
And yes, the pants are gone. Long gone. RIP pants.
--------------
What good are actions if there's no one to tell the tale afterward?
Player of the character "Andre Ricard". |
Shin Ra
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 09:23:00 -
[55]
Are CCP seriously considering locking certain 0.0 stargates or having sentry guns at them and can I have some of whatever your smoking
|
Grimpak
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 10:22:00 -
[56]
Edited by: Grimpak on 06/03/2006 10:22:35
Originally by: Kel Shek
Originally by: Grimpak
MW4. Nova cat with full rack of ER-PPC's. Fire 'em all->"WARNING: heat level critical. Shutting down."->sitting duck
I remember in an earlier Mechwarrior.. full rack of beam lasers was it? alpha strike, BAM one less leg on the enemy.
large beam lasers. they don't create that much heat, but they have great range, altho the RoF makes them more of a sniper weapon.
I always had fun popping out the head out of the mechs instakill
----------------
Originally by: Abdalion
Shoot him ingame if you don't like this person. If you do like him, go mine veldspar with him.
|
Twilight Moon
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 10:50:00 -
[57]
Edited by: Twilight Moon on 06/03/2006 10:51:54
Originally by: SengH
TomB are flagships gonna be t2 BS or BFS? You guys hinted at it being a BFS E-ON but I dont see any mention of advanced leadership skills or the promised upgrade to the leadership functions of T1 BCs, in the new in development / drawingboard pages.
Why would the commander of a fleet put himself in the largest target the fleet has? Look at modern warfare....you dont see any of the commanders on the front lines in the biggest, most pimped out tank they can get their hands on...
----
The heat thing.....I love it btw CCP. That would rock, and give a fair bit more diversity to ship setups. (and make Gankageddon extremely scary)
|
Arderich
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 11:04:00 -
[58]
Ship Sub-system Targetting
However, combat is far too short for this kind of tactical decision-making
Heat - The ability to overload your modules
However, combat is still too short for this kind of tactical decision-making.
I think this are the two most important statements on the drawingboard. Tactical decision-making? No more calling a first target that blows up in seconds?
|
Lefia
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 11:08:00 -
[59]
All I can say about this is, "WOOOT!"
Thank you, that is all.
Originally by: hired goon
------------------------------------------------
I agree with every point and counter point that has been brought up in this and every other argument ever had. |
sloany
|
Posted - 2006.03.06 11:11:00 -
[60]
Edited by: sloany on 06/03/2006 11:12:18
Originally by: Ante
Quote:
Heat - The ability to overload your modules
Ugh. Please don't.
Signed.
You'd think the advanced starship weapons of the day wouldn't have heat problems that result in the loss of your ship. Maybe damage the turret in question, but even that's lame, and belongs in games like Mechwarrior where it works, not eve.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |