| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
441
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 10:17:00 -
[1] - Quote
Could you verify that all the temperate planets in New Eden are actually in the Goldilocks zone?
This is messing with my immersion. Expensive Agent |

Ramona McCandless
Imperial Shipment Amarr Empire
1423
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 10:20:00 -
[2] - Quote
Why do they have to be?
You would need to cite the spectral class of the star or stars in the system you wish to survey. Non omnis moriar |

baltec1
Bat Country Goonswarm Federation
9029
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 10:23:00 -
[3] - Quote
A blue planet that rains diamonds horizontally. Sun cream is advisable. Join Bat Country today and defend the Glorious Socialist Dictatorship |

WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
67
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 12:07:00 -
[4] - Quote
The way you usually calculate this zone is somewhat simple actually! Since every star in EVE provides the necessary info! =D
We do it in a few steps
Ri = Sqrt( Lstar / 1.1 )
and then
Ro = Sqrt( Lstar / 0.53 )
where Ri = the inner boundary of the habitable zone in astronomical units (AU), and Ro is the same but the outer boundary. Lstar is the absolute luminosity of the star. 1.1 is a constant value representing stellar flux at the inner radius, and 0.53 like above represents the outer part. So just click info on any given star and calculate away!
For example, the sun in the 6-CZ49 system in EVE the sun has a Luminosity of 0.14, which means:
Ri = Sqrt( 0.14 / 1.1 ) which equals to an inner habitable zone radius of 0.35 AU from the star, and then Ro = Sqrt( 0.14 / 0.53 ) which equals to an outer habitable zone radius of 0.5 AU from the star.
To prove these calculations, input the same info using our very own star and you will get a delightful confirmation that the earth is indeed within the Goldilocks zone.
Furthermore there are other determinating factors. Such as the atmosphere of said temperate planet. If the atmosphere is several times thicker than the Earths atmosphere it would have a big greenhouse effect thus causing the temperature to be within the liquid water range. Also nuclear decay from the planet itself would cause sufficient background radiation to support liquid water and an atmosphere. Point being it IS possible for a planet to be outside the Goldilocks zone and still be habitable. |

Vincent Athena
V.I.C.E.
2349
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 15:12:00 -
[5] - Quote
Eve planets are all over the place. Ice planets where there can be no ice, temperate planets in wild locations. Sure there can be "special cases" but in eve most every system is "Special".
Also there are issues like the star in Luminaire is 30 billion years old. Which is sort of hard to have in a 13.7 billion year old universe. And no, its not clue to something odd. When I was in the AJ project I checked with CCP Dropbear. Its just a mistake. http://vincentoneve.wordpress.com/ |

Amber Kurvora
127
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 15:19:00 -
[6] - Quote
It's almost like it's a computer game where you're supposed to enjoy shooting things, and not worry about the scientific accuracy... Next up you'll be asking CCP to prove the biomechancial mechanism and software that allows the implants to interface with the human brain. |

Bel Tika
Deep Fried Industries
39
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 15:21:00 -
[7] - Quote
huh there is planets in this game? all i ever see is rocks and they speak to me |

ElQuirko
The Scope Gallente Federation
2765
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 16:37:00 -
[8] - Quote
WASPY69 wrote:The way you usually calculate this zone is somewhat simple actually! Since every star in EVE provides the necessary info! =D
We do it in a few steps
Ri = Sqrt( Lstar / 1.1 )
and then
Ro = Sqrt( Lstar / 0.53 )
where Ri = the inner boundary of the habitable zone in astronomical units (AU), and Ro is the same but the outer boundary. Lstar is the absolute luminosity of the star. 1.1 is a constant value representing stellar flux at the inner radius, and 0.53 like above represents the outer part. So just click info on any given star and calculate away!
For example, the sun in the 6-CZ49 system in EVE the sun has a Luminosity of 0.14, which means:
Ri = Sqrt( 0.14 / 1.1 ) which equals to an inner habitable zone radius of 0.35 AU from the star, and then Ro = Sqrt( 0.14 / 0.53 ) which equals to an outer habitable zone radius of 0.5 AU from the star.
To prove these calculations, input the same info using our very own star and you will get a delightful confirmation that the earth is indeed within the Goldilocks zone.
Furthermore there are other determinating factors. Such as the atmosphere of said temperate planet. If the atmosphere is several times thicker than the Earths atmosphere it would have a big greenhouse effect thus causing the temperature to be within the liquid water range. Also nuclear decay from the planet itself would cause sufficient background radiation to support liquid water and an atmosphere. Point being it IS possible for a planet to be outside the Goldilocks zone and still be habitable. This was the most science thing I read today. Kudos. Dodixie > Hek |

Remiel Pollard
Shockwave Innovations Surely You're Joking
2126
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 16:56:00 -
[9] - Quote
WASPY69 wrote:The way you usually calculate this zone is somewhat simple actually! Since every star in EVE provides the necessary info! =D
We do it in a few steps
Ri = Sqrt( Lstar / 1.1 )
and then
Ro = Sqrt( Lstar / 0.53 )
where Ri = the inner boundary of the habitable zone in astronomical units (AU), and Ro is the same but the outer boundary. Lstar is the absolute luminosity of the star. 1.1 is a constant value representing stellar flux at the inner radius, and 0.53 like above represents the outer part. So just click info on any given star and calculate away!
For example, the sun in the 6-CZ49 system in EVE the sun has a Luminosity of 0.14, which means:
Ri = Sqrt( 0.14 / 1.1 ) which equals to an inner habitable zone radius of 0.35 AU from the star, and then Ro = Sqrt( 0.14 / 0.53 ) which equals to an outer habitable zone radius of 0.5 AU from the star.
To prove these calculations, input the same info using our very own star and you will get a delightful confirmation that the earth is indeed within the Goldilocks zone.
Furthermore there are other determinating factors. Such as the atmosphere of said temperate planet. If the atmosphere is several times thicker than the Earths atmosphere it would have a big greenhouse effect thus causing the temperature to be within the liquid water range. Also nuclear decay from the planet itself would cause sufficient background radiation to support liquid water and an atmosphere. Point being it IS possible for a planet to be outside the Goldilocks zone and still be habitable.
The real question is...
Is it possible for that planet to be closer to the sun than the GZ and still be habitable?  You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Jandice Ymladris
Aurora Arcology
373
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 17:21:00 -
[10] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: [ The real question is... Is it possible for that planet to be closer to the sun than the GZ and still be habitable? 
It would be hard (on high luminosity stars it could be easier, on low ones alot harder due to the tidal lock that will happen at such short distances), but considering what freaky exoplanets we discover every other week, I wouldn't rule it out. The dark humor of capsuleers Latest Top Newsfeed: The State needs YOU! |

WASPY69
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
69
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 17:26:00 -
[11] - Quote
Jandice Ymladris wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: [ The real question is... Is it possible for that planet to be closer to the sun than the GZ and still be habitable?  It would be hard (on high luminosity stars it could be easier, on low ones alot harder due to the tidal lock that will happen at such short distances), but considering what freaky exoplanets we discover every other week, I wouldn't rule it out. Well let's just say it's not impossible, just very very, very unlikely. Look at Venus for example, there's signs it may have had water in the past, but it's atmosphere, consisting of 96% or something CO2 is basically a greenhouse effect gone out of control causing the temperature to evaporate all the water. So "habitable" is all relative. Perhaps habitable for micro organisms living deep inside the crust or something. |

Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
441
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 18:48:00 -
[12] - Quote
This is a solid discussion, but I posted this like 8 hours ago, and CCP still hasn't fixed this "issue".
Now I want the Ice planets on the backend of the GZ. Expensive Agent |

Forum Clone 77777
Do You Even Irony Broew
133
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:18:00 -
[13] - Quote
As stupid and useless as this thread is, its unfortunately not the first of its kind.. |

Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo Red Coat Conspiracy
441
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:23:00 -
[14] - Quote
As stupid and useless as your opinion is, its unfortunately not the first of its kind..
Expensive Agent |

Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
671
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:25:00 -
[15] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:WASPY69 wrote:The way you usually calculate this zone is somewhat simple actually! Since every star in EVE provides the necessary info! =D
We do it in a few steps
Ri = Sqrt( Lstar / 1.1 )
and then
Ro = Sqrt( Lstar / 0.53 )
where Ri = the inner boundary of the habitable zone in astronomical units (AU), and Ro is the same but the outer boundary. Lstar is the absolute luminosity of the star. 1.1 is a constant value representing stellar flux at the inner radius, and 0.53 like above represents the outer part. So just click info on any given star and calculate away!
For example, the sun in the 6-CZ49 system in EVE the sun has a Luminosity of 0.14, which means:
Ri = Sqrt( 0.14 / 1.1 ) which equals to an inner habitable zone radius of 0.35 AU from the star, and then Ro = Sqrt( 0.14 / 0.53 ) which equals to an outer habitable zone radius of 0.5 AU from the star.
To prove these calculations, input the same info using our very own star and you will get a delightful confirmation that the earth is indeed within the Goldilocks zone.
Furthermore there are other determinating factors. Such as the atmosphere of said temperate planet. If the atmosphere is several times thicker than the Earths atmosphere it would have a big greenhouse effect thus causing the temperature to be within the liquid water range. Also nuclear decay from the planet itself would cause sufficient background radiation to support liquid water and an atmosphere. Point being it IS possible for a planet to be outside the Goldilocks zone and still be habitable. The real question is... Is it possible for that planet to be closer to the sun than the GZ and still be habitable? 
It's easier for a planet to warm itself up than cool itself off.
For example, one of the moons of Jupiter is thought to have liquid water under it's icy surface that could sustain life.
AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |

Dont UseYourAlt OnTheForums
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
15
|
Posted - 2013.12.14 19:29:00 -
[16] - Quote
Everything is possible.
/thread |

NEONOVUS
Diabolically Sexy Eureka-Secret Science R Us
543
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 00:39:00 -
[17] - Quote
Bel Tika wrote:huh there is planets in this game? all i ever see is rocks and they speak to me I've had that happen. Fascinating what you can do with quartz crystals. |

Tavi Baldocchi
Blue Sun Industry ArK Alliance
22
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 05:19:00 -
[18] - Quote
EVE IS REAL |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6931
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 07:27:00 -
[19] - Quote
Considering planets don't actually orbit and that many stars are impossibly old (like hundreds of billions of years) I wouldn't count on them having that kind of attention to detail. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
6931
|
Posted - 2013.12.15 07:28:00 -
[20] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:For example, one of the moons of Jupiter is thought to have liquid water under it's icy surface that could sustain life.
Yep, that would be Europa.
Venus is also much, much hotter than Mercury owing to its extremely thick and CO2 rich atmosphere, despite Mercury being much closer to the sun. Latest video - Pandemic Legion titan and supers killed |

Sabriz Adoudel
Mission BLITZ
1331
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 06:41:00 -
[21] - Quote
WASPY69 wrote:Jandice Ymladris wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: [ The real question is... Is it possible for that planet to be closer to the sun than the GZ and still be habitable?  It would be hard (on high luminosity stars it could be easier, on low ones alot harder due to the tidal lock that will happen at such short distances), but considering what freaky exoplanets we discover every other week, I wouldn't rule it out. Well let's just say it's not impossible, just very very, very unlikely. Look at Venus for example, there's signs it may have had water in the past, but it's atmosphere, consisting of 96% or something CO2 is basically a greenhouse effect gone out of control causing the temperature to evaporate all the water. So "habitable" is all relative. Perhaps habitable for micro organisms living deep inside the crust or something.
I was under the impression that Venus's atmosphere was more H2SO4 than CO2. I could be wrong.
CO2 is not the only greenhouse gas, it is just that on Earth it is the one that has had the most change on our climate. Methane is significantly more active as a greenhouse gas, for instance.
Back on the original question, a planet with a highly reflective atmosphere could probably exist inside the inner boundary of the Goldilocks zone while still being inhabitable for human life. Consider how Earth has had phases of 'nuclear winter' caused by volcanic eruptions - a planet that was seismically active enough to have constant volcanic eruptions might have nuclear winters most of the time and could thus have a temperature under 50 celcius (122 F) constantly. It may even have polar ice caps. Such a planet would need an ecosystem that could absorb all of the sulfur that volcanoes tend to vomit out but perhaps bacteria (or some form of life with no Earth analogue) exist on it that can do just that.
Furthermore, a planet inside the Goldilocks inner boundary might be habitable near the poles but have an unsurvivable equator. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238931 - an idea for a new form of hybrid PVE/PVP content. An enemy is just a friend that you stab in the front. |

Sim Cognito
Ardent Spirits
9
|
Posted - 2013.12.16 12:56:00 -
[22] - Quote
Amber Kurvora wrote:It's almost like it's a computer game where you're supposed to enjoy shooting things, and not worry about the scientific accuracy... Next up you'll be asking CCP to prove the biomechancial mechanism and software that allows the implants to interface with the human brain.
That doesn't mean that sci-fi (or any other setting) is exempt from being, at least to a degree, believable. This thread is nitpicking though. |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |