| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

John Caesse
Navy of Xoc The Remnant Legion
63
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:02:00 -
[1] - Quote
It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...
Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...
...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.
They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.
Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.
You're either with me, or against me.
The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.
We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed. |

Abrazzar
285
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:04:00 -
[2] - Quote
EVE
Everyone Vs Everyone Please visit your user settings to re-enable images. |

WuMaTih
League of Gentlemen Intrepid Crossing
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:08:00 -
[3] - Quote
this is a troll. |

URDEAD2ME
Rage and Terror Against ALL Authorities
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...
Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...
...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.
They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.
Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.
You're either with me, or against me.
The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.
We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.
i couldnt of put it better myself .
+1 |

Dave Kaplinski
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
TL;DR? |

Morganta
Peripheral Madness The Midget Mafia
265
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:10:00 -
[6] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...
Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...
...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.
They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.
Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.
You're either with me, or against me.
The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.
We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.
I've been trying to put this into words for a week now GJ +1
The American public's reaction to the change was poor and the new cola was a major marketing failure. The subsequent reintroduction of Coke's original formula, re-branded as "Coca-Cola Classic", resulted in a significant gain in sales, leading to speculation that the introduction of the New Coke formula was just a marketing ploy |

MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:12:00 -
[7] - Quote
URDEAD2ME wrote:
i couldnt of put it better myself .
Actually, you could have.
/pet peeve
|

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
290
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:17:00 -
[8] - Quote
TLDR Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Drifterin Thedark
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:17:00 -
[9] - Quote
This is what the people who believed in CCPs vision for EVE felt when everyone who was against their vision was rioting. Now that CCP has abandoned their vision and the people who wanted to see it are quitting, you're saying they should instead believe in your vision for EVE. |

Jenshae Chiroptera
134
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:19:00 -
[10] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:You're either with me, or against me.
I am indifferent to you. Just too tired to care any more. CSM do you think? No matter the changes, high sec people chose the safests. Lots of stick and they will leave. Half the problem is the players in null sec; we do not want to be there with you. |

mkint
292
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:23:00 -
[11] - Quote
I don't follow. |

Drifterin Thedark
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:25:00 -
[12] - Quote
mkint wrote:I don't follow.
A wise option when dealing with the blind.
|

Jita Alt666
466
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
MeestaPenni wrote:URDEAD2ME wrote:
i couldnt of put it better myself .
Actually, you could have. /pet peeve
While I agree with the accuracy of your "peeve", I am going to suggest that by using the word "of" instead of the word "have" in the sentence; "I couldn't of put it better myself ." The poster is demonstrating though words and sentence structure that indeed he/she couldn't have put it better. The poor use of grammar adds to the meaning of the post thus creating additional emphasis for those who notice.
|

MeestaPenni
Mercantile and Stuff
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote: While I agree with the accuracy of your "peeve", I am going to suggest that by using the word "of" instead of the word "have" in the sentence; "I couldn't of put it better myself ." The poster is demonstrating though words and sentence structure that indeed he/she couldn't have put it better. The poor use of grammar adds to the meaning of the post thus creating additional emphasis for those who notice.
That's funny.
|

Katrina Oniseki
Revenent Defence Corperation Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
118
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:43:00 -
[15] - Quote
Well said. Too much whining these days. |

Montevius Williams
Eclipse Industrial Inc
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:46:00 -
[16] - Quote
TLDR: Stop all the complaining and let CCP fix the game is what it boils down to.
|

Iceni
Angel Constellation
40
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:47:00 -
[17] - Quote
EVE has always been like the OP describes, it's nothing new.
That doesn't make it right of course, but it is how it is and it aint gonna change. |

Renan Ruivo
Hipernova Vera Cruz Alliance
290
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 19:51:00 -
[18] - Quote
Montevius Williams wrote:TLDR: Stop all the complaining and let CCP fix the game is what it boils down to.
Well, yeah.. i can agree with that.
The damned expansion doesn't even have a name ffs. Let it slide, see what happens, then complain. Rated ARG for Pirates. **** you. |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation
77
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:23:00 -
[19] - Quote
Drifterin Thedark wrote:mkint wrote:I don't follow. A wise option when dealing with the blind.
Unless it's very dark, in which case following the blind guy is possibly your safest option. |

Brock Nelson
36
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:24:00 -
[20] - Quote
Crashed Trade Hub? Wanna come up with something more realistic for everyone to chew down? |

Trainwreck McGee
Ghost Ship Inc.
102
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:27:00 -
[21] - Quote
Other then that few months where we were all screaming at the top of our lungs for CCP to change directions these boards have always been a QQ about every little thing that ever happens
This will not change and hell it should not change b/c CCP has no idea wtf they are doing. CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool |

David Grogan
The Motley Crew Reborn
199
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:31:00 -
[22] - Quote
WuMaTih wrote:this is a troll.
nah it looks more like a CCP alt detected thread Everytime you buy something that says "made in china" you are helping the rising unemployment in your own country unless your from china, Buy locally produced goods and help create more jobs. |

Henry Haphorn
Aliastra Gallente Federation
71
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:37:00 -
[23] - Quote
Drifterin Thedark wrote:mkint wrote:I don't follow. A wise option when dealing with the blind.
I think the OP is not saying that you are personally with him or against him. I think the OP is just trying to make a point about the varying camps that spit out the slogan "You're either with me or against me" while creating what appears to be Eve Online's version of a US Congress debating over stupid **** that has already been clearly explained a dozen times over.
Personally, I agree with the OP's statement about how divided we appear to act over varying issues while at the same time we all seem to unite when CCP does something stupid like it did early in the summer. Wonder Twin Powers, Activate! |

non judgement
Without Fear Flying Burning Ships Alliance
145
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 21:44:00 -
[24] - Quote
People always seem to have different opinions on everything. Why would it be different with EVE? |

Mag's
the united Negative Ten.
2020
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 22:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jita Alt666 wrote:MeestaPenni wrote:URDEAD2ME wrote:
i couldnt of put it better myself .
Actually, you could have. /pet peeve While I agree with the accuracy of your "peeve", I am going to suggest that by using the word "of" instead of the word "have" in the sentence; "I couldn't of put it better myself ." The poster is demonstrating though words and sentence structure that indeed he/she couldn't have put it better. The poor use of grammar adds to the meaning of the post thus creating additional emphasis for those who notice. I lol'd.
CCP Zulu..... Forcing players to dock at the captain's quarters is a form of what we actually wanted to get through, which is making Incarna a seamless part of the EVE Online experience. |

Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction The Star Fraction
762
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 22:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
Dave Kaplinski wrote:TL;DR?
Hilmar is an icelandic machiavelli
The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom. Jericho Fraction is Recruiting! |

mkint
296
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:01:00 -
[27] - Quote
Henry Haphorn wrote:Drifterin Thedark wrote:mkint wrote:I don't follow. A wise option when dealing with the blind. I think the OP is not saying that you are personally with him or against him. I think the OP is just trying to make a point about the varying camps that spit out the slogan "You're either with me or against me" while creating what appears to be Eve Online's version of a US Congress debating over stupid **** that has already been clearly explained a dozen times over. Personally, I agree with the OP's statement about how divided we appear to act over varying issues while at the same time we all seem to unite when CCP does something stupid like it did early in the summer. Wonder Twin Powers, Activate! Form of, A Troll!
I wouldn't argue with people so much if they weren't so stupid all the time. |

Vigdis Thorisdottir
Imperial Academy Amarr Empire
13
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:10:00 -
[28] - Quote
I agree with the OP. Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Most of the time though, he just looks like a whiner and gets ignored. Keep your mouth shut until it really matters. That will lend more weight to your cause than anything you can post on these forums. |

Jita Alt666
476
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:15:00 -
[29] - Quote
Vigdis Thorisdottir wrote:I agree with the OP. Sometimes the squeaky wheel gets the grease. Most of the time though, he just looks like a whiner and gets ignored. Keep your mouth shut until it really matters. That will lend more weight to your cause than anything you can post on these forums.
Pick your battles. Sage advice. |

KFenn
Percussive Diplomacy
48
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...
Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...
...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.
They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.
Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.
You're either with me, or against me.
The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.
We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.
+1. Although I will say everything we've been shown so far is needed. However, all this rage about suicide ganking being too easy is ridiculous. Commanding Officer of the Treacle Tart Brigade SLAPD Director |

Mariner6
EVE University Ivy League
27
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:25:00 -
[31] - Quote
CCP has rediscovered the old adage: "The customer is always right." Any company that is involved in providing a service that forgets this simple rule, will ultimately fail. The CEO in his letter realized and admitted to that temporary gaff. It would be equally foolish to not have a feedback loop to the company in an attempt to evaluate your product. That feedback loop is represented in the forum mechanic as we all know so well. To ask people to not voice their opinions and camp themselves is like asking: "please stop being human." It is what it is.
CCP will look at all our bitching, camps, politicking, "your with me or against me" etc etc and try to find compromises and solutions that satisfy the largest population base that they can. Their success to navigate this difficult task of making the majority happy will be represented by the bottom line. If they get it right... more players... get it wrong... less players and bankruptcy.
They know that can't make everyone happy all the time. But that's not the goal and they have to have the guts to make the hard calls. Just use prior communication when doing it to ease the blow to the "other camp."
But that doesn't mean people should stop voicing their opinions as vociferously as they want. Indeed a smart CCP would be one that would answer threads more often, even one liners or short responses; even if they said things like "nice idea, but not possible at this time." or something to that effect. When they make each player feel like their contributions and ideas are important it creates a sense of ownership by the player base. The fact that people are as vociferous as they are in their passion for this game is evidence of a loyal and dedicated customer.
Don't ask for less bitching.... just embrace the chaos and friction and make it work for you CCP.
NOW FIX GALLENTE and MY HYBRIDS!  |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
8
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:34:00 -
[32] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed. Has it occurred to you that some players are deliberately and repeatedly creating and driving "the sky is falling" topics to reduce the effectiveness of future campaigns as we saw with "Nexgate"?
There is a minority of rebel-rousers (I use the term loosely) - and this includes some 0.0 leadership and some high-sec stirrers - that stir trouble for their own ends, not for the benefit of the game. Add a huge number of newer, less politically savvy players prepared to jump on pony posts just so they feel they "fit" into Eve, the manipluation of these very players is easily achieved. I think someone once called them "the cool guys". Fairly apt I think too.
To counter, those rebellious efforts are being deliberately hidden behind lots of posting smoke to reduce their effectiveness. The people doing this are genuinely concerned about CCP's reaction to short-term riotous behaviour (and subsequent changes based on this short term popularity) rather than CCP keeping their focus on the long-term game.
An RL example of this is Climate Change. Enough people are "anti-climate change" for a variety of reasons and/or agendas and by repeatedly reducing the seriousness of the potential cause and effects, there is enough doubt and uncertainty created forcing the effect of the protest to be watered down. We all know politicians follow the short-term votes, not the long-term future and they won't mandate change if they feel they have not got majority support.
Turning any debate into an "either believe" or "you don't" is great for reducing polarisation and the greatest benefit is that the indifferent voter usually sides with the "you don't" side because he doesn't like being bullied or forced into a position.
TLDR. You counter "sky is falling" spin by creating more "sky is falling" spin. It is an effective method of reducing the effectiveness of any protests by generating tedium in the subject. It's used frequently by spinners in RL.
That's my view anyway. |

Cpt Fina
The Tuskers
81
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Heated debate is usualy a very good sign that things are not down the drain. It's when things looks the most grim and fear grab a hold of people that everyone - no matter their background - rallies behind a common goal.
And most changes DOES affect everyone. Wether you notice it or not GÇô increasing another players nominal income GÇô ceteris paribus GÇô is a nerf to your income. |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
97
|
Posted - 2011.11.07 23:59:00 -
[34] - Quote
I'm getting ready for an epic emorage over the free puppy that CCP was supposed to give us last Christmas.  |

KaarBaak
140
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 00:40:00 -
[35] - Quote
/disagree 133%
This is the most luducrous suggestion I've heard in a long time. It must be the most idiotic concept posted today. It's utter nonsense and if anyone else...especially CCP agrees with th OP, I shall wardec the lot of you and cancel my 8 accounts forthwith.
GOOD DAY, SIR! |

Ann133566
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:01:00 -
[36] - Quote
I mostly agree with the OP. Some people on here seem to do nothing but whine. Sometimes it's like something out of a monty python sketch. It's kinda tragic in comical way. But I wonder why they bother playing this game. |

Terminal Insanity
Convex Enterprises
68
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:12:00 -
[37] - Quote
Its because CCP is trying to cater to two completely different players.
It is trying to cater to hardcore pvp group... with its initial releases And now it wants to cater to the PvE group.
The problem is the PvP group requires that eve be left brutal.
The PVE group requires that they be allowed to have -EXACTLY THE SAME OPPERTUNITIES- but they dont want to lose their ships. They dont want to lose anything. These people have played Mortal Kombat and respawned with a full healthbar each time. They probably used GameGenie/GameShark too. These people played WoW and respawned with all their items each time they died, never losing a single thing. When they played Counterstrike they would be given money even if they die!
They have no concept, and no way of dealing with the eve environment. And because of this, they are whining about cloaks / autopilot / highsec ganks / insurance / etc etc etc.
They dont want to play eve the way we all know it... they want to play eve with Difficulty level 0 turned on. They want to complete everything, train everything. fly titans, and not lose any of it. This is just their mindset.
CCP has to choose between these player bases, because there is simply no way to cater to both. No game in history ever has. These players are usually kept seperate but because of CSM and how much sway the general population of eve has, these two camps are being shoved together, and a corporation who's looking for the fattest wallets are trying to decide who wins |

Ann133566
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 02:23:00 -
[38] - Quote
Terminal Insanity wrote:Its because CCP is trying to cater to two completely different players.
It is trying to cater to hardcore pvp group... with its initial releases And now it wants to cater to the PvE group.
The problem is the PvP group requires that eve be left brutal.
The PVE group requires that they be allowed to have -EXACTLY THE SAME OPPERTUNITIES- but they dont want to lose their ships. They dont want to lose anything. These people have played Mortal Kombat and respawned with a full healthbar each time. They probably used GameGenie/GameShark too. These people played WoW and respawned with all their items each time they died, never losing a single thing. When they played Counterstrike they would be given money even if they die!
They have no concept, and no way of dealing with the eve environment. And because of this, they are whining about cloaks / autopilot / highsec ganks / insurance / etc etc etc.
They dont want to play eve the way we all know it... they want to play eve with Difficulty level 0 turned on. They want to complete everything, train everything. fly titans, and not lose any of it. This is just their mindset.
CCP has to choose between these player bases, because there is simply no way to cater to both. No game in history ever has. These players are usually kept seperate but because of CSM and how much sway the general population of eve has, these two camps are being shoved together, and a corporation who's looking for the fattest wallets are trying to decide who wins
Good post. Sums nicely the problem CCP has. In trying to please everybody they please none. We can't have two EVEs one for the PvP type player and one for the other. In the end CCP will have to decide what type of game it wants to create. |
|

CCP Phantom
C C P C C P Alliance
139

|
Posted - 2011.11.08 09:44:00 -
[39] - Quote
Off topic posts removed. Please stay on topic, thank you. CCP Phantom - German Community Coordinator |
|

Elric Astrius
MarSec Industries Gold Star Alliance
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:30:00 -
[40] - Quote
John Caesse wrote:It seems that by the day the EVE community becomes more and more divided. In every thread, players are splitting off into camps: you are either Highsec or Nullsec, Carebear or PVP, WiS or FIS, etc, etc...
Only a few months ago a shaky unity was formed around the collective frustration at the state of the game. We posted, and crashed trade hubs, and generally raged until we got CCP's attention...
...then CCP did the worst thing they could do; they relented.
They recognized that some pretty big wheels were squeaking and needed some oil, so they got their supplies together and went to work trying to make sure everything would function smoothly again. And for a little while, it seemed like things were back on track.
Then the little wheels saw what happened, and decided they wanted their day. Now every small cause and pet issue has a vocal minority raging on the forums and in game about the importance of their particular gripe. Heaven forbid if CCP decides to focus their efforts on something other than their topic of choice - as a whole we seem to have taken to heart the view that anything done for another area/play style/point of view than the one we champion will negatively impact our cause.
You're either with me, or against me.
The careful ballet of implementing change to a system as large and complex as EVE Online cannot be viewed as a zero sum game. Everything that does not directly benefit you and your game experience does not have to be viewed as a loss.
We have demonstrated the power of a united playerbase, and CCP has shown that they can recognize their mistakes and are willing to listen to the players in order to produce the best experience they can. However, we as players need to recognize that we cannot see all the cards, do not know every detail, and cannot always see what is best for the game. Since the events of this summer, it seems whenever an issue arises the same calls for player-vs-ccp rebellion, canceled subscriptions, and prophecies that the game will end sound again.
This cannot continue; doing so dilutes the power which we, as players, can potentially wield. Like the boy who cried wolf, if we continue to throw tantrums, rage, and make demands about every little change and gripe when a real issue comes along we will not be heard.
So lets all take a step back, allow CCP to continue on their new path of giving us fixes and new content and save our ire for when its really needed.
You dont know how many times i have made postings along the same lines... Even my domestic partner read them and read what people have been saying here... He doesnt play EVE but hes truly digusted with how this community handles the cruelty towards eachother and I have noticed since 2006 about the split opinions and it saddens me.. seriously You should look up my other postings i dont think people will ever listen to the truth... and accept that this is a game... if you dont like it get in your ship and leave and live your life then come back to talk about the pain your in when you find out that your life sucks more than your ingame existence. I dont like how people are so hostile we need to realize we are all different.. So I for one is with you on your opinion.. I only wish more shared this belief. |

Long John Silver
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:35:00 -
[41] - Quote
Ann133566 wrote: We can't have two EVEs one for the PvP type player and one for the other. In the end CCP will have to decide what type of game it wants to create.
What absolute rubbish!
We have hi-sec for carebearing and we have nullsec for PvP. And there's even lowsec in between, to mix things up a bit. So yes, EVE is designed for different kinds of playing styles. It has worked well since 2003 and it should continue to stay that way imho. Long John Silver | Pirate Alt-áand Forum Troll. |

pussnheels
Vintage heavy industries
154
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 10:59:00 -
[42] - Quote
just as predicted a few months ago , i can't remember who said it or what the post was about but basicly said that as soon people would stop whinning about ccp they would start whinning about other olayers again or start blaming other players about this or that ...everything trivial I do not agree with what you are saying , but i will defend to the death your right to say it...... Voltaire |

Drifterin Thedark
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:26:00 -
[43] - Quote
The people leaving now over Incarna being delayed again are, for the most part, just doing so quietly. They aren't presenting ultimatums and throwing tantrums like we saw during the monocle debacle. I'd say the whine index is back to pretty average levels after all that.
As for the PvP vs PvE dead horse. The PvP enthusiasts got their way, Incarna is shelved, and all effort is being directed towards stuff to try and make them happy. However, these are the same people who never once said thanks to CCP for working tirelessly to improve fleet battles while neglecting every other aspect of the game, and instead insulted CCP relentlessly. They will never be happy. Nothing is ever enough. I've watched CCP try and please them for many years now getting nothing but abuse in return, and it's become increasingly hard to watch. Like a having a friend in an abusive relationship. You deserve better, CCP! |

Cunane Jeran
37
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 18:36:00 -
[44] - Quote
OP, you done well son. o7
Seriously though its understandable we all have our areas we care about, personally I'm all about the forgotten bastard child that is Factional Warfare, and with CCP apparently all ears, its only natural we are going to shout our causes.
|

SilentSkills
Estrale Frontiers Project Wildfire
19
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 20:02:00 -
[45] - Quote
agree with op |

Joseph Dreadloch
Strikingly Handsome Space Captain's Club
15
|
Posted - 2011.11.08 20:06:00 -
[46] - Quote
John Caesse wrote: You're either with me, or against me.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes... |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 :: [one page] |