| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
   |
Posted - 2014.01.04 15:29:00 -
[1] - Quote
*A long term daily fee based on: amount of members * index number based on a scale (example: 1000 blues = x1.1, 2000 blues - x1.2 ect ect)
*An innitail nap fee (10mil isk per member?) + a 2 hour waiting timer.
Yes, the sov mechanics could be subjected to change but the innial motive to nap up is ISK.
As a result, the smaller non napping entities should have moar income benefits over the 10k entities. So we all have a moar interesing eve?
Death-to-Blues!!!
|
Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources
Tactical Narcotics Team
2166
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 16:29:00 -
[2] - Quote
...but CONCORD has nothing to do with standings...
Set all allies to red, leave everything else neutral, be NRSI, instant workaround found.
Why is it considered a bad thing to have friends anyway? |
Pipa Porto
1489
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 17:01:00 -
[3] - Quote
Danika Princip wrote:Why is it considered a bad thing to have friends anyway?
Friends are overpowered. Nerf Friends.
EvE: Everyone vs Everyone
-RubyPorto |
Felsusguy
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
310
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 17:22:00 -
[4] - Quote
What is this post? Cannot compute.
It's a stupid idea, and it will just be cleverly worked around anyway.
How droll. |
Secret Squirrell
Allied Press Intergalactic
30
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 17:46:00 -
[5] - Quote
The only two places players wouldn't just be able to work around it are:
Outpost settings
POS settings
So basically your punishing people for wanting a quality of life improvement (being able to more easily assess the risk of another ship) with massive financial penalties. Yeah, no. |
Mr LaboratoryRat
Confederation of DuckTape Lovers
25
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 18:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Secret Squirrell wrote:The only two places players wouldn't just be able to work around it are:
Outpost settings
POS settings
So basically your punishing people for wanting a quality of life improvement (being able to more easily assess the risk of another ship) with massive financial penalties. Yeah, no.
So corporation and alliances only blue up to "being able to more easily assess the risk of another ship". Hmm
|
Danika Princip
Freelance Economics Astrological resources
Tactical Narcotics Team
2167
|
Posted - 2014.01.04 18:18:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mr LaboratoryRat wrote:Secret Squirrell wrote:The only two places players wouldn't just be able to work around it are:
Outpost settings
POS settings
So basically your punishing people for wanting a quality of life improvement (being able to more easily assess the risk of another ship) with massive financial penalties. Yeah, no. So corporation and alliances only blue up to "being able to more easily assess the risk of another ship". Hmm
Please note that he did say we'd be able to work around risk assessments, and it'd purely be outpost and POS settings that wouldn't be worked around inside of ten minutes... |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |