Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: [one page] |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Rick II Egnald
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now? |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6101
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:18:00 -
[2] - Quote
Great post, thanks. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
549
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:27:00 -
[3] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Please refer to GM's/Dev's response to bumping
High-sec mining permit is 10m/isk per year, per mining character. Payable to any agent of the New Order. You can refuse to pay, but risk bump and/or gank from members of said order.
Also Minerbumping Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6101
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:30:00 -
[4] - Quote
I also like your incorrect use of "griefers" ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Is this normal now?
I don't know which Eve you've been playing . . . its always been normal. Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
892
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:31:00 -
[6] - Quote
Well, good sir, it is your lucky day.
For 10mil isk, and your fealty to the Savior of High Sec, James 315, expressed in your bio...
You can mine with zero harassment for a year!!!!
Otherwise, Agents of the New Order will continue to bump you to prevent you from becoming bot-aspirant.
Permit tank is best tank. Don't risk a red pen violation. Also visit www.minerbumping.com, to learn about the Code, and how to make high-sec a better place for all!!!
As an added bonus, I now also offer forum permits for returning players.
To post in any manner you choose, you can pay an additional 10mil isk to me.
For this you must swear fealty to Unsuccessful At Everything as the saviour of General Discussion. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6101
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:38:00 -
[7] - Quote
Forum permits, huh ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Rick II Egnald
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:39:00 -
[8] - Quote
Judging by the replies... I see this mindset is normal for this game... thanks |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:41:00 -
[9] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Judging by the replies... I see this mindset is normal for this game... thanks
It's not any different from 5 years ago :D Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
892
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:42:00 -
[10] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Forum permits, huh
*Shrugs*
Sure why not. Lot of returning players lately.
Gives a 25% boost to shitpoasting for newcomers. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6101
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:48:00 -
[11] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:Judging by the replies... I see this mindset is normal for this game... thanks It's not any different from 5 years ago :D Confirmed, it's a "waah james 315" troll. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
873
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:50:00 -
[12] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now? Griefing is against EULA & Bannable.
However.... He is not griefing if 'following you around' was in the same system. If you traveled a large number of jumps trying to loose him, or he bumped you for an hour and wouldn't even let you warp back to station when he had no intent to gank you, that is.
So, if someone does it to you, just leave. Also, get a Retriever, not a Hulk, Hulks are for Null sec mining ops really. Where the speed matters and you have haulers to help move cargo. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
892
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:52:00 -
[13] - Quote
Indeed, Alavaria.
And even after that insightful piece on TMC about killboards.
Some people just cannot be grateful.
Tears should be shed for James, though. The burden of high sec lays on his shoulders. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 06:56:00 -
[14] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now? Griefing is against EULA & Bannable. However.... He is not griefing if 'following you around' was in the same system. If you traveled a large number of jumps trying to loose him, or he bumped you for an hour and wouldn't even let you warp back to station when he had no intent to gank you, that is. So, if someone does it to you, just leave. Also, get a Retriever, not a Hulk, Hulks are for Null sec mining ops really. Where the speed matters and you have haulers to help move cargo.
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS. Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
873
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:01:00 -
[15] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far.
James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to.
If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
892
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:03:00 -
[16] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far. James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to. If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone.
Wow!!!
So the Saviour himself was out bumping today?
Can someone get us confirmation of this?
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:10:00 -
[17] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far. James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to. If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone.
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE. Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6103
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:12:00 -
[18] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far. James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to. If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone. Wow!!! So the Saviour himself was out bumping today? Can someone get us confirmation of this?  quick, to minerbumping.com ? ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
873
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:18:00 -
[19] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
See the above referred to GM posts on the topic.
The petitions you are talking about will have been miners whining because you bumped them for 5 minutes, then they warped to the other end of the ice field and you followed them, not stalking them for hours across new eden. Which as I've already said about the former, doesn't count. However the later does. Reason or not, you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them. |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
See the above referred to GM posts on the topic. The petitions you are talking about will have been miners whining because you bumped them for 5 minutes, then they warped to the other end of the ice field and you followed them, not stalking them for hours across new eden. Which as I've already said about the former, doesn't count. However the later does. Reason or not, you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them.
Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them?
You know what assuming does . . . Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |
|

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2273
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:22:00 -
[21] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them. But it's fine if you're ganking them. Oh god. |

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
873
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:22:00 -
[22] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them?
You know what assuming does . . .
Yet I know I'm right. Since the GM's have been so explicit on this subject with their own posts on the forums. And I also know what most miners are like. |

Alduin666 Shikkoken
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
330
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them?
You know what assuming does . . .
Yet I know I'm right. Since the GM's have been so explicit on this subject with their own posts on the forums. And I also know what most miners are like.
Freaking carebears man . . . "Yet I know I'm right" LOLOL
In Eve you can lie, cheat, and steal. The GM's copy and paste response to petitions are meant to make the filer of the petition think he has done something when in reality they haven't.
But I can already tell that you are just another highsec carebear who hasn't been on the other side of the river yet thinks he knows everything about it. I'm done here. Honor is a fools prize. Glory is of no use to the dead.
Be a man! Post with your main! ~Vas'Avi Community Manager |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6103
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:31:00 -
[24] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them?
You know what assuming does . . .
Yet I know I'm right. Since the GM's have been so explicit on this subject with their own posts on the forums. And I also know what most miners are like. Freaking carebears man . . . "Yet I know I'm right" LOLOL In Eve you can lie, cheat, and steal. The GM's copy and paste response to petitions are meant to make the filer of the petition think he has done something when in reality they haven't. But I can already tell that you are just another highsec carebear who hasn't been on the other side of the river yet thinks he knows everything about it. I'm done here. Heh. Carebears on general discussion ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1078
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:37:00 -
[25] - Quote
Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
See the above referred to GM posts on the topic. The petitions you are talking about will have been miners whining because you bumped them for 5 minutes, then they warped to the other end of the ice field and you followed them, not stalking them for hours across new eden. Which as I've already said about the former, doesn't count. However the later does. Reason or not, you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them.
You're right, to a degree. From my understanding, in order to invoke "harassment", you have to have moved enough jumps to require a locator to find you again. As for the amount of time bumping, it'd take hours of relentless, won't let you warp away bumping to trigger the harassment clause.
Bumping someone away from ice, letting them motor back, then bumping away again isn't the kind of relentless bumping i'm talking about.
I do find it amusing though, in a world of scams, corptheft, death at every turn, massive fleet battles, and insane metagaming....the act of harmlessly ramming your ship into another brings the most ire from devoted miners. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6107
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:47:00 -
[26] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:I do find it amusing though, in a world of scams, corptheft, death at every turn, massive fleet battles, and insane metagaming....the act of harmlessly ramming your ship into another brings the most ire from devoted miners. But they try to avoid talking or playing with anyone, so most of those don't happen.
Ganking is also somewhat rarer ... and makes people lose ships. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
549
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:48:00 -
[27] - Quote
Wait.. can't bump people for hours!?
*batphones freighter pilots* Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet |

Tydeth Gilitae
Magewright Artificers
48
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 07:53:00 -
[28] - Quote
The Minerbumping thing started in 2012, as an alternative to ganking since ramming incurs neither Concord response nor flagging. It is effectively normal now throughout High-sec space, though most of the systems are Agent-free at any given time since they lack the numbers to do 100% of them. This means you can deal with them in a non-combat manner by buying the permit or by jumping enough systems away to find an unattended system.
Part of the reason these kinds of play occur is from the misconception that High-sec space is safe. It is not; instead being only somewhat safer than Low or Null with a built-in retribution system to gaurantee that if someone attacks you outside of a War or use of aggression mechanic trickery, they explode as well. You can attack in 0.9 or even 1.0 space; you just have to be able to deliver enough damage to the target before Concord arrives to vaporize you. The only time you can not attack, is against a newbie in any of the systems listed here: https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Rookie_Systems
Sometimes the group may follow a target from High-sec to Low-sec, Null-sec, or J-Space, but that's more along the lines of wars than their standard operational fare. It's actually fairly uncommon, and most of the time they're in Concord-patrolled space to prove that it is not safe.
While some of the characters associated with the New Order bump, a significant portion of the official NO alliance (Code.) stick with the tried and true suicide gank, while others will do Awoxes or WarDecs to get the job done against non-compliant corps and alliances. To protect yourself against a ganker, you'll need to employ a good resistance/buffer tank of either armo(u)r or shield. A Covetor or Hulk is probably not the best for this, especially if you're solo mining. Given identical skills, the Procurer barge has give-or-take triple the HP of a Hulk, with the same low and mid slots for fitting options and a better ore hold iirc. Shield-tank the Proc with T1 mods and slap a DCU in a low, and it'll cost the gankers a lot more to kill you than it cost you to fit the thing. Yield won't be too terribly below that of the Hulk, with how the barges were teiricided. Procurers can also laugh at rats, giving you plenty of time for even basic-skilled drones to pop them.
Example fit:
Procurer, Gank-resistant
High: 1. Strip Miner or Ice Miner (Depending on which you're mining)
Mid: 1. Adaptive Invulnerability Field (Can be the regular I version or the Limited, whichever you find at a better price) 2. EM Ward Field (Same as above) 3. Thermic Dissipation Field (Same as above, these three provide your main resistances) 4. Medium Shield Booster or Medium Shield Extender of choice (Personal preference on this one)
Low: 1. Damage Control (pick a reasonably-priced flavor and stick it on) 2. Mining Laser Upgrade or Reinforced Bulkheads or Power Diagnostics System (Personal preference. MLU lets you fill your hold up faster so you're not sitting around as long, RBH gives you hull HP to make more use of that DCU you installed, and PDS gives you more shields, cap and power. (Cue Tim "The Tool Man" Taylor grunt))
Rigs: (Optional, but they help. Stick with Tech1 rigs.) 1. Medium Anti-Kinetic Screen Reinforcer I 2. Core Defense Field Extender I 3. Core Defense field Extender I
Drones: 5x Hob I
It's by no means optimal, but it is certainly effective. According to EFT, Shield Booster/MLU fit with the rigs gives me with my skills a 62.8k effective HP ship, 66.3k against the Antimatter-loaded blasters found on the common ganking vessel, the Catalyst. Replacing the MLU with a tank mod will make it even harder to kill, with a negligible effect on yield. Hob I can kill High-sec belt rats easily enough. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6108
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 08:07:00 -
[29] - Quote
Wow, complete with a fit, even. ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2355
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 08:22:00 -
[30] - Quote
The answer is yes, there are now more new order douches than previously, so yes, this is more common. The worst possible thing you can do is pay them, since that encourages them to d it more. In realism paying them only usually stops the one person doing it for now, and they will soon be back to tell you some other made up rule you've broken which invalidates your payment. I've seen it happen time and time again.
The best thing you can do is simply move to a new system (more than a few jumps away). If they follow you, petition it, since they are not allowed to follow you around bumping you forever. Also, there are unwritten limits. If they are completely preventing you from being able to do anything leaving you with only the option of not playing, it's been going on for more than a couple of hours, and they have no ability to kill you or gain anything from it, CCP will usually ask them to cease if you raise a ticket.
Essentially what it boils down to is while CCP are not going to step in every time anyone gets bumped as it's a valid method of gameplay, if gets to the point of stupid and starts risking them losing subs, they'll usually take action.
Remember though, regardless of what the forum trolls tell you, if you feel harassed, and feel that it's gone on too long, you do have the right to raise a ticket about it. It may not get anything done if CCP feel it's within their limits, but you are free to report what you feel is harassment. At the end of the day, this is a game and we're all here for entertainment. Silently putting up with not having any fun at all because some troll on the forum told you you are a carebear won't do anything. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

Jacob Holland
Weyland-Vulcan Industries
227
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 08:36:00 -
[31] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:It's not any different from 5 years ago :D I think it is...
Though can baiting was relatively prevalent five years ago the bumping was all but unheard of, the majority of miners had to pay attention to when Hulkageddon was due but the New Order wasn't a thing yet.
Five years ago the Nullsec Hulk fits (loaded with Gist or Pith A-Type boosters) in highsec were the ones at real risk, the ones who copied fits from the interwebs without thinking about what they actually needed. |

Nariya Kentaya
Always Negative
973
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 09:00:00 -
[32] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
See the above referred to GM posts on the topic. The petitions you are talking about will have been miners whining because you bumped them for 5 minutes, then they warped to the other end of the ice field and you followed them, not stalking them for hours across new eden. Which as I've already said about the former, doesn't count. However the later does. Reason or not, you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them. Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them? You know what assuming does . . . its been stated by GM/Dev clarification multiple times i believe, that repeated bumping agaisnt a single target, over long periods of time, and across distance (constellation or region) IS griefing.
now, if he refuses to pay and you wardec/gank him, it is not griefing, but bumping nonstop for the sole purpose of preventing warp IS bannable.
you want to encourage him to pay? then quit being a **** and just gank him already. |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 10:33:00 -
[33] - Quote
Minerbumping... Is there a thing that might be more boring than mining? minerbumping? at least you can mine afk, guess that's kinda harder while bumping. but hey, it's a sandbox... you gotta take "fun" wherever you find it. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
711
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 10:35:00 -
[34] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:The answer is yes, there are now more new order douches than previously
Lucas Kell wrote:They pester around in like 3 systems and they are losing members left right and center to groups that actually matter.
Why don't you just admit that you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about?
Lucas Kell wrote:The worst possible thing you can do is pay them... they will soon be back to tell you some other made up rule you've broken which invalidates your payment. I've seen it happen time and time again.
Poppycock. The Code is clearly laid out for all to read and anyone who has their permit revoked is guilty of violating it. I understand that some people are opposed to the New Order in the safety of the forum, but please at least try and have a clue before posting. Your willful dis-information is only going to cause more miners to have their ships confiscated at gunpoint. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 10:36:00 -
[35] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Your willful dis-information is only going to cause more miners to have their ships confiscated at gunpoint.
how tragic. |

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
3260
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 10:53:00 -
[36] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Yes it is, and CCP thinks this is why you pay them 15 euros/USD each month. You're free to disagree them, of course. Try doing something else were you can't be prevented from playing. Or just try playing another game; Space Engineers is fashionable now, and Kerbal Space Program plans to go Multiplayer sometime this year. Also, X Rebirth may be worth it in a few months once the modders and Egosoft get their sh*t together.
Being bumped in EVE is totally optional. And remember: never agree to blackmail as that only encourages further blackmail. The Greater Fool Bar is now open for business, 24/7. Come and have drinks and fun somewhere between RL and New Eden! |

Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
772
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:06:00 -
[37] - Quote
Stating that harassment is against the EULA while on the other hand stating it is acceptable when the victim can pay to (maybe) have it stopped, is so typical :CCP:.
That line is so blurred that it basically comes down to the mood of the day of the senior GM when he handles the issue. Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook-á |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2357
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:09:00 -
[38] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:The answer is yes, there are now more new order douches than previously Lucas Kell wrote:They pester around in like 3 systems and they are losing members left right and center to groups that actually matter. Why don't you just admit that you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about? So what you are saying is that you cant comprehend how there might have been less members than there are now, while they are still currently losing members?
It's called a peak. 5 Years ago the new order were nothing, a tiny group of people. Since then, they have built up to a peak, and since peaking (and since the barge changes) have been decreasing in numbers as their efforts are less effective.
This by the way people just shows the level of moron required to qualify as an agent of the code. They not particularly difficult to outwit, since even basic concepts are way over their heads.
admiral root wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:The worst possible thing you can do is pay them... they will soon be back to tell you some other made up rule you've broken which invalidates your payment. I've seen it happen time and time again. Poppycock. The Code is clearly laid out for all to read and anyone who has their permit revoked is guilty of violating it. I understand that some people are opposed to the New Order in the safety of the forum, but please at least try and have a clue before posting. Your willful dis-information is only going to cause more miners to have their ships confiscated at gunpoint. Bullshit. It's written to be purposely vague so you idiots can interpret it in whatever way benefits you at the time.
You seem to be taking it pretty seriously. Honestly, I thought even you new order guys knew you were an absolute joke. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1080
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:12:00 -
[39] - Quote
Jowen Datloran wrote:Stating that harassment is against the EULA while on the other hand stating it is acceptable when the victim can pay to (maybe) have it stopped, is so typical :CCP:.
That line is so blurred that it basically comes down to the mood of the day of the senior GM when he handles the issue.
It's not pay to have it stopped, it's having options TO stop the action.
You may not like some of the options to stop, say, bumping, but they're there. You can logoff, move to a different system, sacrifice some sec status and gank the bumper, refit for less yield and make bumping harder...
EVE is one of the few games out there where not everyone gets a pat on the butt and a trophy just for logging in. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Hasikan Miallok
Republic University Minmatar Republic
114
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:15:00 -
[40] - Quote
Though the occasional "new order" type can probably PvP and does the "New Order" thing just for lulz most of them are wannabes and you rarely if ever see them in losec, people might actually shoot back at them.
Just feel sorry for the sort of person that wastes an entire hour bumping barges in 0.9 to make a measly 10 mill ransom :D (That btw is a whole 30 cents US per hour at current plex rates) . |
|

embrel
BamBam Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:17:00 -
[41] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
EVE is one of the few games out there where not everyone gets a pat on the butt and a trophy just for logging in.
obviously, you need to bump a ship first. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1081
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:25:00 -
[42] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: It's called a peak. 5 Years ago the new order were nothing, a tiny group of people. Since then, they have built up to a peak, and since peaking (and since the barge changes) have been decreasing in numbers as their efforts are less effective.
Five years ago, the New Order didn't exist. You may be confusing it with Hulkageddon, which while similar, was run by different people with different goals. Since I've been around, the New Order channel has pretty steadily grown from an average of ~20 people online, to ~45-50. You do realise, we're not exactly organized like ~elite pvp alliances~ with CTAs and all that jazz, right? James doesn't come down from on-high and declare "We must focus our efforts in X system!"
admiral root wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:The worst possible thing you can do is pay them... they will soon be back to tell you some other made up rule you've broken which invalidates your payment. I've seen it happen time and time again. Poppycock. The Code is clearly laid out for all to read and anyone who has their permit revoked is guilty of violating it. I understand that some people are opposed to the New Order in the safety of the forum, but please at least try and have a clue before posting. Your willful dis-information is only going to cause more miners to have their ships confiscated at gunpoint. Bullshit. It's written to be purposely vague so you idiots can interpret it in whatever way benefits you at the time.
You seem to be taking it pretty seriously. Honestly, I thought even you new order guys knew you were an absolute joke.[/quote]
You seem pretty intent on degrading members of New Order as "morons" and other such fun terms. Not having some RL/Game disconnect issues, are you? I mean, all it takes for me to stop being a "New Order Agent" is logging in a different account.
Anyway, here's the big super secret behind The Code. People who follow it are effectively ungankable. The whole "Pay attention, don't be AFK, tank your mining ship...." bit, advice handed out pretty freely, that's following The Code. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
677
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:32:00 -
[43] - Quote
wardec them with your alt corp, put some recons in system for a while, either you will kill the bumper or he will leave you alone. They probably wont form a fleet and stay in system just because of 1-2 wartargets in local afk cloaking, in same time they surely wont hang out in a belt for bumping with these 1-2 wartargets in local. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15467
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:43:00 -
[44] - Quote
Hasikan Miallok wrote:Though the occasional "new order" type can probably PvP and does the "New Order" thing just for lulz most of them are wannabes and you rarely if ever see them in losec, people might actually shoot back at them. You somehow seem to have missed some of the words contained in the name "New Order of Highsec", highsec being one of them. |

Proletariat Tingtango
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
795
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:46:00 -
[45] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:The answer is yes, there are now more new order douches than previously, so yes, this is more common. The worst possible thing you can do is pay them, since that encourages them to d it more. In realism paying them only usually stops the one person doing it for now, and they will soon be back to tell you some other made up rule you've broken which invalidates your payment. I've seen it happen time and time again.
The best thing you can do is simply move to a new system (more than a few jumps away). If they follow you, petition it, since they are not allowed to follow you around bumping you forever. Also, there are unwritten limits. If they are completely preventing you from being able to do anything leaving you with only the option of not playing, it's been going on for more than a couple of hours, and they have no ability to kill you or gain anything from it, CCP will usually ask them to cease if you raise a ticket.
Essentially what it boils down to is while CCP are not going to step in every time anyone gets bumped as it's a valid method of gameplay, if gets to the point of stupid and starts risking them losing subs, they'll usually take action.
Remember though, regardless of what the forum trolls tell you, if you feel harassed, and feel that it's gone on too long, you do have the right to raise a ticket about it. It may not get anything done if CCP feel it's within their limits, but you are free to report what you feel is harassment. At the end of the day, this is a game and we're all here for entertainment. Silently putting up with not having any fun at all because some troll on the forum told you you are a carebear won't do anything.
:frogout: of the CFC |

Ice Eagle
6
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 11:56:00 -
[46] - Quote
skiff with a simple t2 passive fit ie, couple large extenders invols and t1 rigs will give an effective tank of around 14-16k.
in regards to bumping,
make a bm in the belt, approach said bm (gives the impression you are still playing), minimize eve and play something else for a couple hours, mow the lawn, goto work, what ever. let them brainlessly bump you for as long as they like. jokes on them
like anything, if they don't get any response from you then it isn't fun, they will move on and, depending how drunk or stoned they are, will remember that you did not provide them with tears.
Passive aggressive, always an option
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
1987
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 12:12:00 -
[47] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: Anyway, here's the big super secret behind The Code. People who follow it are effectively ungankable. The whole "Pay attention, don't be AFK, tank your mining ship...." bit, advice handed out pretty freely, that's following The Code.
Its almost astounding that some people STILL dont get this *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
67
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 12:23:00 -
[48] - Quote
The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Haedonism Bot
Revolutionary Front
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:01:00 -
[49] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: It's called a peak. 5 Years ago the new order were nothing, a tiny group of people. Since then, they have built up to a peak, and since peaking (and since the barge changes) have been decreasing in numbers as their efforts are less effective.
This sentence alone proves that you are making things up as you go along. Five years ago the New Order didn't exist, because we weren't needed. Miner ganking, ninja salvaging, and canflipping were at an all time high and life was good in highsec. The New Order came into existence in 2012 as a reaction to the mining barge/exhumer changes, a way to save miner ganking as a profession from near extinction and to call attention to the problem of all avenues for highsec PvP being systematically nerfed by CCP to appease the "carebears". Since then we have been steadily growing.
Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them. The New Order works hard and uses all of its ingenuity to engage these people and to protect highsec from them, in spite of all the obstacles that have been placed in our path.
We also operate in all regions of highsec, even out to the remote fringes. Because we are a decentralized volunteer organization with members from many different corporations and alliances, there tend to be clusters of activity all over the place where different agents and their friends prefer to concentrate their efforts.
everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com |

Katran Luftschreck
Stillwater Corporation
2154
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:09:00 -
[50] - Quote
You'd be amazed at how good gank Catalysts are at blowing up other gank Catalysts.
And a heck of a lot more satisfying than actually paying these retards. Nullsec in a Nutshell: http://nedroid.com/comics/2006-08-24-2155-arrrdino.gif |
|

Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
677
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:12:00 -
[51] - Quote
Katran Luftschreck wrote:And a heck of a lot more satisfying than actually paying these retards.
paying lol. Pay them with lead and antimatter. |

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
87213
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:42:00 -
[52] - Quote
Ice Eagle wrote:
like anything, if they don't get any response from you then it isn't fun, they will move on and, depending how drunk or stoned they are, will remember that you did not provide them with tears.
False statement.
They will not stop.
Bumping is legal. Griefing is not. That's the line CCP must manipulate policy around.
Just take two or three screenshots about 5-10 minutes apart, as you are bumped a few times into different parts of the belt from your desired location. Try to get proof of your Orca or Hulk moving away at 250 m/s on speedometer.
Forward the photos and story in a Petition, and I guarantee you will not see that Bumper "for awhile".
Or........................just move somewhere else and mine.
"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."-á - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882 |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1019
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:52:00 -
[53] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions.
that 1 trillion times! That is the greater offense or attack someone can commit upon a new player. Shoudl be bannable even. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1019
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:54:00 -
[54] - Quote
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:Ice Eagle wrote:
like anything, if they don't get any response from you then it isn't fun, they will move on and, depending how drunk or stoned they are, will remember that you did not provide them with tears.
False statement. They will not stop. Bumping is legal. Griefing is not. That's the line CCP must manipulate policy around. Just take two or three screenshots about 5-10 minutes apart, as you are bumped a few times into different parts of the belt from your desired location. Try to get proof of your Orca or Hulk moving away at 250 m/s on speedometer. Forward the photos and story in a Petition, and I guarantee you will not see that Bumper "for awhile". Or........................just move somewhere else and mine.
You will get nothign with taht. The bumper can simply claim that for roleplay reasons he is trying to save that belt. He is entitled to do it. To be considered harassment (ccp never uses the childish and pathetic term grief) he woudl need to follow you whatever damm system you go targetint you and only you with tht intend to clearly make you angry. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting Home Front Coalition
1119
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:55:00 -
[55] - Quote
I would like to remind you that people are quite easy to classify something as griefing. In this game, one can declare war upon another, and start killing their starbases, infiltrate in their ranks, utterly detroy them and still it is not griefing according CCP. So when you classify your ship being bumped around a little as griefing... 
Someone following you around and interdicting your activities, even over a long period of time, is technically still not griefing in the purest sense. In fact the focussed interdiction of PVE activities for a certain group is a valid strategy. Wars in Eve are won and lost on morale, and negatively impacting morale is also a valid strategy. It is absurd that on one end we are allowed to decimate each other's star empires by breaking people's will to fight... even to log on... but on the other end we have to walk on eggs around bumping-sensitive miners? It makes no sense and it's a double standard, subscriptions be damned. |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
96
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 13:55:00 -
[56] - Quote
Haedonism Bot wrote:[quote=Lucas Kell] Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them.
well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4213
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:06:00 -
[57] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
So you can't deal with someone engaging you in a multiplayer game?
That decision to stop playing EVE you made 5 years ago, that was the right move. Be right again lol.
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8129
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:09:00 -
[58] - Quote
embrel wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:[quote=Lucas Kell] Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them.
well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. Yeah I bet CCP are really kicking themselves for providing a means to maintain a subscription without providing any income for them whatsoever. Or maybe they're smarter than you give them credit for and it's actually you who misunderstands how PLEX works. My EVE Videos |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2361
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:12:00 -
[59] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Lucas Kell wrote: It's called a peak. 5 Years ago the new order were nothing, a tiny group of people. Since then, they have built up to a peak, and since peaking (and since the barge changes) have been decreasing in numbers as their efforts are less effective.
Five years ago, the New Order didn't exist. You may be confusing it with Hulkageddon, which while similar, was run by different people with different goals. Since I've been around, the New Order channel has pretty steadily grown from an average of ~20 people online, to ~45-50. You do realise, we're not exactly organized like ~elite pvp alliances~ with CTAs and all that jazz, right? James doesn't come down from on-high and declare "We must focus our efforts in X system!" I didn't bother checking the date you guys started up. I just assumed it had been longer than 5 years. And while your little channel maybe growing, there's considerably less of your actively patrolling and hassling than their used to be.
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Bullshit. It's written to be purposely vague so you idiots can interpret it in whatever way benefits you at the time.
You seem to be taking it pretty seriously. Honestly, I thought even you new order guys knew you were an absolute joke. You seem pretty intent on degrading members of New Order as "morons" and other such fun terms. Not having some RL/Game disconnect issues, are you? I mean, all it takes for me to stop being a "New Order Agent" is logging in a different account. You realise it doesn't have to be affecting my real life for me to think someone is a moron right? The majority of the new order guys I've spoken to are not very bright. That is no surprise, since it's effectively a cult and cults aren't really known for attracting the brightest sparks.
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Anyway, here's the big super secret behind The Code. People who follow it are effectively ungankable. The whole "Pay attention, don't be AFK, tank your mining ship...." bit, advice handed out pretty freely, that's following The Code. Ungankable, sure. but that's why you guys bump. So you can hassle people into paying you. And once people pay, you have no reason to uphold your end of the deal, so you just make stuff up at a later date to do it again. It's not like that's not something that is common knowledge, though I understand why you scramble to protect yourselves. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
70
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:15:00 -
[60] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions. that 1 trillion times! That is the greater offense or attack someone can commit upon a new player. Shoudl be bannable even. Many say this, yet nobody is willing to help and put effort into balancing this and I can't do it alone, because there are too many of them. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2361
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:17:00 -
[61] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:embrel wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:[quote=Lucas Kell] Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them.
well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. Yeah I bet CCP are really kicking themselves for providing a means to maintain a subscription without providing any income for them whatsoever. Or maybe they're smarter than you give them credit for and it's actually you who misunderstands how PLEX works. Irony.
You realise plex subscriptions still produce income for CCP right? People would not buy plex and sell them on the market if there was no demand from them. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation Boarderline Cartel
1648
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:21:00 -
[62] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Yes. I'm an old-timer, from 2005. EvE certainly has changed a lot, there's a lot more douchebaggery but then again it's easier than ever to make iskies too. The "douchebags" can be rather entertaining and amusing, it's all good player-driven content creation. But gone are the days when you can just sit in a high sec belt and mine for hours and hours with your only fear being falling asleep and missing a bunch of cycles.
It's up to you how you want to deal with this situation, but deal with it you will have to. Personally I prefer mining in nullsec that way I can swap to a PvP ship and kill them without all these high sec rules and regulations getting in the way. |

Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction The Pursuit of Happiness
1019
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:27:00 -
[63] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions. that 1 trillion times! That is the greater offense or attack someone can commit upon a new player. Shoudl be bannable even. Many say this, yet nobody is willing to help and put effort into balancing this and I can't do it alone, because there are too many of them.
Problem is, those are in NPC corps, othwerwise they would be perma deced. "If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6116
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:29:00 -
[64] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:embrel wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:[quote=Lucas Kell] Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them. well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. Yeah I bet CCP are really kicking themselves for providing a means to maintain a subscription without providing any income for them whatsoever. Or maybe they're smarter than you give them credit for and it's actually you who misunderstands how PLEX works. Irony. You realise plex subscriptions still produce income for CCP right? People would not buy plex and sell them on the market if there was no demand from them. that reminds of of a special contributor to the community ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8130
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:29:00 -
[65] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:embrel wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote:[quote=Lucas Kell] Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them.
well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. Yeah I bet CCP are really kicking themselves for providing a means to maintain a subscription without providing any income for them whatsoever. Or maybe they're smarter than you give them credit for and it's actually you who misunderstands how PLEX works. Irony. You realise plex subscriptions still produce income for CCP right? People would not buy plex and sell them on the market if there was no demand from them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension My EVE Videos |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6116
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:36:00 -
[66] - Quote
This being general discussion, I'm ~sure~ everyone knows how CCP gets their money from monthly subscriptions and the sale of PLEX.
Also isk "faucets" ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Decaneos
Center for Advanced Studies Gallente Federation
84
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:40:00 -
[67] - Quote
Am i the only one who when i mine simply sets keep at range on a rock so the bumpers cant know me out of range? |

Xavier Higdon
Wolfbane Hauler Inc
286
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:42:00 -
[68] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
See the above referred to GM posts on the topic. The petitions you are talking about will have been miners whining because you bumped them for 5 minutes, then they warped to the other end of the ice field and you followed them, not stalking them for hours across new eden. Which as I've already said about the former, doesn't count. However the later does. Reason or not, you can't continually stalk someone like that just to bump them. Gee, can you please tell me how you know what petitions I'm talking about when I didn't provide links or give out specific details about them? You know what assuming does . . .
I wonder how you know what was in those petitions, considering a petition is private between the petitioner and CCP. You don't get a notification when a petition is filed against you, and GMs aren't going to ask you if you were harassing So-and-so. Furthermore, having a reason to harass someone is moot, since every harasser has a reason in that they're intention is to harass the person. Also, we all know that the reason you harass people in game isn't the "code," but rather because in real life you're a cuckold. Wearing horns for so long has made you think you're a devil. Wolfbane Hauler Inc Looking For Combat And Industrial Pilots |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1084
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:48:00 -
[69] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:You realise it doesn't have to be affecting my real life for me to think someone is a moron right? The majority of the new order guys I've spoken to are not very bright. That is no surprise, since it's effectively a cult and cults aren't really known for attracting the brightest sparks.
So, the answer to "Do you have some kind of RL/game disconnect issue" is a resounding "YES!".
Seriously man, judgement of intelligence in a video game, cult status...wowzers. It's a game. For real. We don't like, worship James 315.
Just in case you missed the whole creation of The New Order....When James first started up with the whole serious bumping thing, he sent in a petition asking about it's legality under EULA. He was told that in order to be a valid gameplay mechanic, there had to be a reason for doing it. Intro, The New Order.
It's fun to know that our antics have people actually thinking we are a real cult in the real world though. If you really think it's true, see a psychologist. You have some reality/fantasy issues that need worked on. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15469
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:49:00 -
[70] - Quote
Decaneos wrote:Am i the only one who when i mine simply sets keep at range on a rock so the bumpers cant know me out of range? Those are love bumps, wait till they hit you with a 100MN Stabber Fleet Issue (FSI). 50-60Km, on an exhumer, per bump if they get a good hit in.
An orbiting afterburner skiff is quite difficult to bump, needs a really good pilot or sheer luck to get a good hit. Getting ganked in one is also unlikely, it's generally too much effort and cost to carry it off. |
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
71
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:51:00 -
[71] - Quote
What I also don't get is why a player calls others griefers, although it's himself talking **** and insulting them for playing the game in ways that go beyond the typical, moronic lemming style of playing.
Of course there are always people who will enjoy picking on weak ones and of course some of them have questionable characters... but from how people talk about them, they are exactly on the same page and in no way better. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
1994
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 14:51:00 -
[72] - Quote
Player created corps: Check
Player created Banks: Check
Player created organised crime: Check
Player created nations: Check
Player created Universities: Check
Player created cults/religion: ZOMGNOWAIWHATAREYOUANOOBLOLDDUUHH!!!!1111!
Hmm
I sense a gap in the market *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1084
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:00:00 -
[73] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Player created corps: Check
Player created Banks: Check
Player created organised crime: Check
Player created nations: Check
Player created Universities: Check
Player created cults/religion: ZOMGNOWAIWHATAREYOUANOOBLOLDDUUHH!!!!1111!
Hmm
I sense a gap in the market
Player Created Cult Deprogrammers?
Maybe Player Created Anonymous, to sit outside station docks and protest us.
Hell, maybe we can have a Protestant Code Reformation. Ganking through faith alone. The reformer can virtually nail his 95 Bumping Theses to the station door. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
71
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:01:00 -
[74] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions. that 1 trillion times! That is the greater offense or attack someone can commit upon a new player. Shoudl be bannable even. Many say this, yet nobody is willing to help and put effort into balancing this and I can't do it alone, because there are too many of them. Problem is, those are in NPC corps, othwerwise they would be perma deced. And this is also something I get as response a lot, meaning that ...
YOU DON'T ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE!
The only way to balance it is having alts in starter corps balancing out all the carebearing vets who ruin the game for the new players! Why are people so completely blind to this? It's beyond me!
They are influencing new players right from the start. It's not far from forming and teaching the personalities of kids.
Does anybody actually understand the issue or is all you can do complain? I am complaining too, but I have tried doing something! All I get as responses when I'm asking for help are the same bullshit, predictable responses, instead of
"Yeah you're right! Instead of complaining, I'll join you in a starter corp and we'll start changing the future of the game together!" New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
71
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:09:00 -
[75] - Quote
I have to correct myself.
The issue aren't carebears in starter corps, the issue are you people who complain about them.
There is no good, unless it is being done.
The reason for the situation we have is because you don't do it. You just whine. Disgusting! New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Pewty McPew
EVE Corporation 2357451
467
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 15:24:00 -
[76] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Right click on asteroid you are not mining then left click "approach" Continue to mine Ignore New Order rhetoric Enjoy problem solved
|

Khergit Deserters
Crom's Angels
2582
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 16:32:00 -
[77] - Quote
Bumping/permit extortion is hard to categorize. It's sort of like PvP, but it's not really combat. It's sort of like scamming, but it's not really profitable like scamming. And it's sort of like giving the dorky kid at school a wedgie, but not exactly the same as that either. |

Haedonism Bot
Revolutionary Front
718
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 16:36:00 -
[78] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:I have to correct myself.
The issue aren't carebears in starter corps, the issue are you people who complain about them.
There is no good, unless it is being done.
The reason for the situation we have is because you don't do it. You just whine. Disgusting!
Too much work. I actually tried that once. I applaud your efforts but I have better things to do with my limited logged-in time than argue with idiots in starter corp chat. Voices of reason tend to get shouted down anyway, and most of the newbs think that the loudest voices are probably right. Until we can wardec them or new players somehow get booted out after a period of time, there isn't a realistic solution to this problem. everevolutionaryfront.blogspot.com |

RAIN Arthie
The Ascended Fleet Intrepid Crossing
186
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 16:40:00 -
[79] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Go to null. Sissies don't go there, they'd get shot. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 16:44:00 -
[80] - Quote
Haedonism Bot wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:I have to correct myself.
The issue aren't carebears in starter corps, the issue are you people who complain about them.
There is no good, unless it is being done.
The reason for the situation we have is because you don't do it. You just whine. Disgusting! Too much work. I actually tried that once. I applaud your efforts but I have better things to do with my limited logged-in time than argue with idiots in starter corp chat. Voices of reason tend to get shouted down anyway, and most of the newbs think that the loudest voices are probably right. Until we can wardec them or new players somehow get booted out after a period of time, there isn't a realistic solution to this problem. Yes. So you accept your defeat. That they are better than you. That they actually beat you on the game in the long run, because they form the game there where it counts.
You should be ashamed of yourself. You are the reason the things you complain about exist in the first place.
You are disgusting piece of ****. Congratulations. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:08:00 -
[81] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:embrel wrote:Haedonism Bot wrote: Carebears are a subset of EVE's population contributes little to nothing to the community or the content of the game, and does not deserve the special, protected status that the developers have given them.
well, they give CCP cashflow. as it seems (by reading the bragging on the forums) everyone else is plexing their accounts. and now you might begin to understand why they do have a protected status, coz they're the customers and you're the leeches. Yeah I bet CCP are really kicking themselves for providing a means to maintain a subscription without providing any income for them whatsoever. Or maybe they're smarter than you give them credit for and it's actually you who misunderstands how PLEX works. Irony. You realise plex subscriptions still produce income for CCP right? People would not buy plex and sell them on the market if there was no demand from them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension lol, Indeed I may need to read that :D. In my defense I've been reading and responding on my phone, though there can be no excuse for it. I acknowledge I have made a severe error, and I humbly request forgiveness for my transgression. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:23:00 -
[82] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You realise it doesn't have to be affecting my real life for me to think someone is a moron right? The majority of the new order guys I've spoken to are not very bright. That is no surprise, since it's effectively a cult and cults aren't really known for attracting the brightest sparks. So, the answer to "Do you have some kind of RL/game disconnect issue" is a resounding "YES!". Seriously man, judgement of intelligence in a video game, cult status...wowzers. It's a game. For real. We don't like, worship James 315. Just in case you missed the whole creation of The New Order....When James first started up with the whole serious bumping thing, he sent in a petition asking about it's legality under EULA. He was told that in order to be a valid gameplay mechanic, there had to be a reason for doing it. Intro, The New Order. It's fun to know that our antics have people actually thinking we are a real cult in the real world though. If you really think it's true, see a psychologist. You have some reality/fantasy issues that need worked on. Clearly not. When someone comes on a sperg rages at me about me calling their pretend gang stupid, it doesn't need me to conflict my real life and a game to call them a moron. Most of the new order guys I've spoken to and seen speaking are clearly on the lower end of the intellectual spectrum. And an in-game cult is and in-game cult. It still attracts the same type of people, and while your may be able to separate your two personas, it's clear for the amounts of rage spewed by some new order members that some of the members don't.
I do find it amusing though how when you guys spout off in the forum about all sorts of nonsense, you are all just "RPing", yet I respond to one foaming-at-the-mouth neckbeard and you jump into tell me that I'm the one that needs to separate my real life and my game. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:30:00 -
[83] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Player created corps: Check
Player created Banks: Check
Player created organised crime: Check
Player created nations: Check
Player created Universities: Check
Player created cults/religion: ZOMGNOWAIWHATAREYOUANOOBLOLDDUUHH!!!!1111!
Hmm
I sense a gap in the market There no problem with a player created cult or religion (though the fact that it's named after a WW2 political agenda involving the annihilation of the jews to be distasteful, especially considering the similarities in their stated goals). It's all of the repetitive propaganda that goes with it. Every time anyone posts anything about mining you can expect to see at least one new order clown trying to go on and on about the code. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6122
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:31:00 -
[84] - Quote
Are you suggesting they round up the miners and make them stay in the systems close to market hubs or something ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:36:00 -
[85] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:The only griefers I know sit in starter corps and tell you to play isolated. To mine or run missions. that 1 trillion times! That is the greater offense or attack someone can commit upon a new player. Shoudl be bannable even. Many say this, yet nobody is willing to help and put effort into balancing this and I can't do it alone, because there are too many of them. Problem is, those are in NPC corps, othwerwise they would be perma deced. And this is also something I get as response a lot, meaning that ... YOU DON'T ACTUALLY UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE! The only way to balance it is having alts in starter corps balancing out all the carebearing vets who ruin the game for the new players! Why are people so completely blind to this? It's beyond me! They are influencing new players right from the start. It's not far from forming and teaching the personalities of kids. Does anybody actually understand the issue or is all you can do complain? I am complaining too, but I have tried doing something! All I get as responses when I'm asking for help are the same bullshit, predictable responses, instead of "Yeah you're right! Instead of complaining, I'll join you in a starter corp and we'll start changing the future of the game together!" Actually, I think the reason so many people remain in NPC corps is that it's impossible to protect yourself joining a player owned one. I've run a few player corps in the past between myself and friends, but I'd never publicly recruit as I can't be bothered of going through all of the hassle of having some random be allowed to shoot everyone in the corp free of charge. There's no method of punishing someone for jamming an alt in a corp and blowing people up.
I think if they addressed that issue, even just by a flag on a corp level allowing and disallowing in-corp PVP by concord, it would go a long way to encouraging people to both join corps and recruit from them. Without that though, it's simply safer to either be in a one man corp (if you want to remove tax) or stay in an NPC one. Wars would still be an issue but those are less of an issue as they cost to initiate.
Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief them? If I were brand new to this game these days, I'd probably not bother sticking around long enough to realise there's other things to do. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:38:00 -
[86] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Most of the new order guys I've spoken to and seen speaking are clearly on the lower end of the intellectual spectrum. And an in-game cult is and in-game cult. It still attracts the same type of people, and while your may be able to separate your two personas, it's clear for the amounts of rage spewed by some new order members that some of the members don't.
I do find it amusing though how when you guys spout off in the forum about all sorts of nonsense, you are all just "RPing", yet I respond to one foaming-at-the-mouth neckbeard and you jump into tell me that I'm the one that needs to separate my real life and my game. Why exactly did you create a thread about this?
I mean ... it's rather obvious as why it is as it is. If you give a big group of people a way to grab the lowest hanging fruit without actual consequences, then a percentage of this big group of people will inevitably take it. A part of this smaller group of people will, OF COURSE, be of lower intellect. They love picking on easy targets, most likely because they are easy targets themselves, one way or the other.
Putting them all into the same pot is nonsense, though! That makes no sense! People have different reasons for what they do! The one thing I have observed myself though, is that many have turned completely blind to anything that's being said to them. They just read what they want to read, instead of reading what's written. There is NO point in talking to these people, so why do you actually make such an issue about it?
What exactly is the point of this discussion? You're talking about the sky being blue and the grass being green! New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:41:00 -
[87] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Are you suggesting they round up the miners and make them stay in the systems close to market hubs or something lol no, they cleanse the population of the miners they don't like. But yeah, read some of the stuff they write and you'll soon start to see the correlations. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6122
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:42:00 -
[88] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Are you suggesting they round up the miners and make them stay in the systems close to market hubs or something lol no, they cleanse the population of the miners they don't like. But yeah, read some of the stuff they write and you'll soon start to see the correlations. But the miners can just go elsewhere. It isn't as though they comb the edges of highsec for miners, there's tons nearby the trade hubs where they buy the catalysts (well the ones that gank anyway) ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18754
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:46:00 -
[89] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:49:00 -
[90] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Most of the new order guys I've spoken to and seen speaking are clearly on the lower end of the intellectual spectrum. And an in-game cult is and in-game cult. It still attracts the same type of people, and while your may be able to separate your two personas, it's clear for the amounts of rage spewed by some new order members that some of the members don't.
I do find it amusing though how when you guys spout off in the forum about all sorts of nonsense, you are all just "RPing", yet I respond to one foaming-at-the-mouth neckbeard and you jump into tell me that I'm the one that needs to separate my real life and my game. Why exactly did you create a thread about this? I mean ... it's rather obvious as why it is as it is. If you give a big group of people a way to grab the lowest hanging fruit without actual consequences, then a percentage of this big group of people will inevitably take it. A part of this smaller group of people will, OF COURSE, be of lower intellect. They love picking on easy targets, most likely because they are easy targets themselves, one way or the other. Putting them all into the same pot is nonsense, though! That makes no sense! People have different reasons for what they do! The one thing I have observed myself though, is that many have turned completely blind to anything that's being said to them. They just read what they want to read, instead of reading what's written. There is NO point in talking to these people, so why do you actually make such an issue about it? What exactly is the point of this discussion? You're talking about the sky being blue and the grass being green! I didn't create this thread...
I stated that the bumpers and gankers exist, that you shouldn't pay the new order guys as it encourages them and that if a players feels like what is happening to them is beyond gameplay and they feel genuinely harassed, to raise a support ticket. CCP are more than capable of deciding if it is or not and all that posting in GD will get you is trolled.
I stand behind that, and I'm more than capable of sustaining all of the trolling, attacks and defamation that the new order guys can throw at me. And why am I talking about it? Sheer boredom. I'm not home yet. :D The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 17:56:00 -
[91] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers. I think you missed the rest of my post. I wasn't claiming the new order guys grief them (though I wouldn't claim they don't either). I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. Why would a new player join a corp if all it give them is the opportunity to get killed by greens? Then at the same time, why would a CEO recruit publicly if they want to be able to safely field anything of value?
For miners for example, just in my alt corps alone for example I could field mining boosters, haulers, on grid protection and ore buyback programs. I wouldn't because the logistics of setting it all up so nobody can green kill anything shiny is too much of a pain in the ass.
And safety in numbers? How do you make yourself safe when those numbers could easily be the threat? Simply remaining in an NPC corp gives you more protection. This is why I was surprised when the idea of making corps able to select internal combat status came up and huge amounts of PVP players were screaming "No!". People should be encouraged to join players owned corp with benefits, not put off with additional risks.
EDIT: Oh and most of the gankers, scammers and extortionists also remain in NPC corps. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
73
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:02:00 -
[92] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:I didn't create this thread...
I stated that the bumpers and gankers exist, that you shouldn't pay the new order guys as it encourages them and that if a players feels like what is happening to them is beyond gameplay and they feel genuinely harassed, to raise a support ticket. CCP are more than capable of deciding if it is or not and all that posting in GD will get you is trolled.
I stand behind that, and I'm more than capable of sustaining all of the trolling, attacks and defamation that the new order guys can throw at me. And why am I talking about it? Sheer boredom. I'm not home yet. :D Whoops! Indeed! My bad! I just looked at the pic. -.-
Ah ... yeah, well, they can file a petition ... but it's no use anyway. ^^
I'll see myself out. This thread doesn't really do any good anyway. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6123
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:05:00 -
[93] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:[I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. If the corp is being griefed by an awoxer, can they petition it? ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18757
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:11:00 -
[94] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:I think you missed the rest of my post. I wasn't claiming the new order guys grief them (though I wouldn't claim they don't either). I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. GǪand I'm removing an incorrect usage of the word GǣgriefGǥ. Griefing, as you know, is something you get banned for doing in this game.
Quote:And safety in numbers? How do you make yourself safe when those numbers could easily be the threat? The same way the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: gather around a common goal. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6124
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:19:00 -
[95] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:And safety in numbers? How do you make yourself safe when those numbers could easily be the threat? The same way the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: gather around a common goal. Scammers gather around a common goal.... ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:25:00 -
[96] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Judging by the replies... I see this mindset is normal for this game... thanks
sad, isn't it? I honestly can't believe people would spend their time doing this. You just have to be glad you don't have the mind of a 12 y/o brat. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18757
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:26:00 -
[97] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Scammers gather around a common goal.... GǪand creating an entire website as a cover, even. Never mind that it's the most obvious and well-known fake in all of EVE, people still fall for it, don't they? 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:30:00 -
[98] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Scammers gather around a common goal.... GǪand creating an entire website as a cover, even. Never mind that it's the most obvious and well-known fake in all of EVE, people still fall for it, don't they? 
how can you ever imply that OTHER people are pathetic? "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15475
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:32:00 -
[99] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Tippia wrote:Quote:And safety in numbers? How do you make yourself safe when those numbers could easily be the threat? The same way the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: gather around a common goal. Scammers gather around a common goal.... The common goal is to be the scammer that scams all of the other scammers that are also trying to be said scammer.
Rick II Egnald wrote:Judging by the replies... I see this mindset is normal for this game... thanks Always has been, always will be, even though I'm a carebear it's one of the major reasons I play. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2283
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:35:00 -
[100] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. If the corp is being griefed by an awoxer, can they petition it? How many guys does the awoxer have to kill before it's properly petionable griefing, like a whole mining op? If your corp moves to another region and you follow them and then awox them, then it's griefing. Oh god. |
|

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
6125
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:41:00 -
[101] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. If the corp is being griefed by an awoxer, can they petition it? How many guys does the awoxer have to kill before it's properly petionable griefing, like a whole mining op? If your corp moves to another region and you follow them and then awox them, then it's griefing. So my test spy can't awox them since they've moved from null to lowsec to null to Vale...? ^^ Delicious goon ((tech nerf, siphon, drone assist, supercap)) tears.
Taking a wrecking ball to the futile hopes and broken dreams of skillless blobbers. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18757
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:42:00 -
[102] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:How do you have the audacity to imply that OTHER people are pathetic? What on earth are you on about? Or did you just quote the wrong post? 
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4221
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:43:00 -
[103] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Always has been, always will be, even though I'm a carebear it's one of the major reasons I play.
Me too. I'm flying a Stratios around null sec doing sites and dodging people trying to kill me, it makes the loot even sweeter lol.
It's conflict that makes things (like games and stories) better. Who ever read a book that said "once upon a time, people got along swimmingly and no one was ever mad at each other, the end" lol.
The crazy thing (to me) is that they are so many other games (like Star Trek Online for instance, which I play) that actively shield players from the unwanted interference and gameplay of others, where ALL interactions are consensual. And you couldn't PAY an EVE carebear to go play a game like that, yet they choose to play this game while all the while complaining about things that are natural parts of the game like ganking, scamming, piracy and whatever.
It doesn't make a lick of sense to me why they do that.
|

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2283
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 18:44:00 -
[104] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Riot Girl wrote:Alavaria Fera wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. If the corp is being griefed by an awoxer, can they petition it? How many guys does the awoxer have to kill before it's properly petionable griefing, like a whole mining op? If your corp moves to another region and you follow them and then awox them, then it's griefing. So my test spy can't awox them since they've moved from null to lowsec to null to Vale...? Only if you're not following them because that's harassment.
Oh god. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 19:32:00 -
[105] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. If the corp is being griefed by an awoxer, can they petition it? How many guys does the awoxer have to kill before it's properly petionable griefing, like a whole mining op? What? When did I say anything about petitioning them?
I'll say it as simply as I can. If people want other people to not say in NPC corps forever, they need to make player owned corps more appealing than NPC corps. As it currently stands, unless you are missioning there is no reason to join a layer corp, since all you will get is the opportunity to be shot by greens in high sec. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 19:37:00 -
[106] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:I think you missed the rest of my post. I wasn't claiming the new order guys grief them (though I wouldn't claim they don't either). I was claiming that players grief corps by joining them and awoxing them. GǪand I'm removing an incorrect usage of the word GǣgriefGǥ. Griefing, as you know, is something you get banned for doing in this game. Quote:And safety in numbers? How do you make yourself safe when those numbers could easily be the threat? The same way the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: gather around a common goal. Well no, you get banned for an excessive level of griefing. When you purposely roll and alt to get into a corp to kill someone for no gain, that's also griefing, it's just not bannable. You are doing it to cause grief.
And no matter what goal you pick it doesn't change the fact that anyone that joins can attack anyone else. honestly, I don't care, since I'm in null on my mains and a few single man corps on my alts. But all of this "waah, NPC corps" whining is put down to the simple fact that there is nothing gained but much lost by being in a player corp. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
368
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 19:40:00 -
[107] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:[Actually, I think the reason so many people remain in NPC corps is that it's impossible to protect yourself joining a player owned one.
Can you be more specific when you say that "it's impossible to protect yourself"?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1085
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 19:54:00 -
[108] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Always has been, always will be, even though I'm a carebear it's one of the major reasons I play. Me too. I'm flying a Stratios around null sec doing sites and dodging people trying to kill me, it makes the loot even sweeter lol. It's conflict that makes things (like games and stories) better. Who ever read a book that said "once upon a time, people got along swimmingly and no one was ever mad at each other, the end" lol. The crazy thing (to me) is that they are so many other games (like Star Trek Online for instance, which I play) that actively shield players from the unwanted interference and gameplay of others, where ALL interactions are consensual. And you couldn't PAY an EVE carebear to go play a game like that, yet they choose to play this game while all the while complaining about things that are natural parts of the game like ganking, scamming, piracy and whatever. It doesn't make a lick of sense to me why they do that.
Hey Jenn, how's that Stratios fly? I mean, say I have the resources and skills to fit one out reasonably, and I want to try out serious exploration, is it worth grabbing now or waiting on more of a price drop?
James says if we don't gather up more ISK for him he's going to gank our gankers. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
181
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:00:00 -
[109] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers.
yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.
or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk free activities. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2363
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:12:00 -
[110] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:[Actually, I think the reason so many people remain in NPC corps is that it's impossible to protect yourself joining a player owned one. Can you be more specific when you say that "it's impossible to protect yourself"? Sure. In a player run corp, you can be merrily playing away, then someone in your corp comes and blows you up either for fun or profit. Anyone that isn't doing missions has no need to leave an NPC corp, since all they are doing is opening themselves up to that.
Sure, you could say they could protect themselves by being cautious of greens, but why would they need to do that? They could simply stay in an NPC corp and avoid both that and wars, or they could create a 1 man corp if they want to get rid of tax.
Corp aggression being always on is just a really dumb mechanic that puts up too much of an issue. A high sec group running mining for example is better running out of NPC corps as their boosters and freighters then can't get awoxed or held to ransom.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18757
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:16:00 -
[111] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Well no, you get banned for an excessive level of griefing. Fair enough. You only get a warning and then a suspension for lesser levels.
Quote:When you purposely roll and alt to get into a corp to kill someone for no gain, that's also griefing, it's just not bannable. If it's griefing, it's bannable. And getting into a corp to kill someone is pretty much always done for gain GÇö its just not always for ISK gain, specifically.
Nerf Burger wrote:yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  As luck would have it, you're not forced to do anything. You have tons of tools at your disposal; numbers is one of them, and probably the most readily available one.
Quote:or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. It doesn't belong there any more or less than it does in highsec. And again, griefing is not allowed in this game GÇö GÇ£grief monkeysGÇ¥ get banned because they're breaking the rules. As for risk, the only reason for any activity be risk-free is because the players who are supposed to provide that risk fail in their duty to do soGǪ That's not something the devs can fix. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2364
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:19:00 -
[112] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:When you purposely roll and alt to get into a corp to kill someone for no gain, that's also griefing, it's just not bannable. If it's griefing, it's bannable. And getting into a corp to kill someone is pretty much always done for gain GÇö its just not always for ISK gain, specifically. It's not though is it. Some people do it specifically for the tears, which is fine, that's part of the game. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18757
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:20:00 -
[113] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:It's not though is it. Sure it is. It's just that griefing is far more narrowly and specifically defined in this game than in most.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15476
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:21:00 -
[114] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk and punishment free activities. So.... You're saying that ganking is an essentially risk and punishment free activity, which is as risky or costly as other players make it for them. While promoting the removal of activities you deem undesirable, such as "risk and punishment free" ganking, to low and nullsec to make doing pretty much anything in highsec a risk free activity.
How can you not see the hypocrisy in this? |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4222
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:23:00 -
[115] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers. yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk free activities. The low costs and risks associated with being a high sec "pirate" are the lamest and most imbalanced thing about this game by far. It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs.
And you're still going on about that dude who took your COSMOS item?
Look, you got outplayed. it's ok, it happens to all of us (like that time when i was a young mission runner and got tricked into CONCORDING myself). But damn guy, get over it. No wonder ccp told you to stop petitioning.
You know every time., you know that "princess" character is someone's alt and they read the forums. You know they get a good laugh everytime you allude to how they beat you out of your COSMOS item right? |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation Boarderline Cartel
1650
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:24:00 -
[116] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote: So my test spy can't awox them since they've moved from null to lowsec to null to Vale...?
Heh I doubt very much the "omgz griefing!" people in this thread are right. I'm sure you can get away with following someone and ganking them - for a LITTLE while. But of course if a GM looks at the logs and it becomes pretty evident that you're making a point to go out of your way to make the other guy miserable time and time again, then it's a EULA violation. But doing it once or twice is probably no biggie. After all, this IS New Eden, full of nice people. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4223
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:25:00 -
[117] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk and punishment free activities. So.... You're saying that ganking is an essentially risk and punishment free activity, which is as risky or costly as other players make it for them. While promoting the removal of activities you deem undesirable, such as "risk and punishment free" ganking, to low and nullsec to make doing pretty much anything in highsec a risk free activity. How can you not see the hypocrisy in this?
No he can't, and he couldn't when he made TWO general discussion threads about the same one COSMOS mission incident (this is after ccp told him to stop petitioning about the same incident, we only know this because he told us lol). The dude is seriously cracked lol. Nerf Burgers? He shoulda Nerfed crying  |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:26:00 -
[118] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers. yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk free activities. The low costs and risks associated with being a high sec "pirate" are the lamest and most imbalanced thing about this game by far. It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs. And you're still going on about that dude who took your COSMOS item? Look, you got outplayed. it's ok, it happens to all of us (like that time when i was a young mission runner and got tricked into CONCORDING myself). But damn guy, get over it. No wonder ccp told you to stop petitioning. You know every time., you know that "princess" character is someone's alt and they read the forums. You know they get a good laugh everytime you allude to how they beat you out of your COSMOS item right?
still mad about looking like an idiot in another thread I see 
try to contain your rage and discuss the topic kiddo, or we will have to ask you to go back to your basement. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18758
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:29:00 -
[119] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs. It is a disgusting imbalance. How does sociopathy in any way factor into all of this? And how is it being rewarded? How is it not harsh that you have to be aware of your surroundings or you'll get hit with some kind of loss?
What's this imbalance you're talking about? How is it an imbalance that proactive stance yields more than an inactive one? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15476
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:31:00 -
[120] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:No he can't, and he couldn't when he made TWO general discussion threads about the same one COSMOS mission incident (this is after ccp told him to stop petitioning about the same incident, we only know this because he told us lol). The dude is seriously cracked lol. Nerf Burgers? He shoulda Nerfed crying  He should join up with Dinsdale, any proposals they come up with between them will make the hopefully tongue in cheek "nerf highsec" proposals look sane. |
|

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:32:00 -
[121] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs. It is a disgusting imbalance. How does sociopathy in any way factor into all of this? And how is it being rewarded? How is it not harsh that you have to be aware of your surroundings or you'll get hit with some kind of loss? What's this imbalance you're talking about? How is it an imbalance that proactive stance yields more than an inactive one?
first of all, I'm not dumb enough to argue with someone so obtuse who spends their entire existence of the past, how many years now? on the EVE forums. If you want people to debate you seriously, try not to be so ridiculous. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Prie Mary
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
27
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:32:00 -
[122] - Quote
Id like to point out my thread to you:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=310665&find=unread
With the ToS as such I'm pretty sure you have good grounds to get the individual warned if not banned. Dont just think outside the box, Live outside of it... |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:37:00 -
[123] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:[Actually, I think the reason so many people remain in NPC corps is that it's impossible to protect yourself joining a player owned one. Can you be more specific when you say that "it's impossible to protect yourself"? Sure. In a player run corp, you can be merrily playing away, then someone in your corp comes and blows you up either for fun or profit. Anyone that isn't doing missions has no need to leave an NPC corp, since all they are doing is opening themselves up to that.
This sounds more like poor recruitment rather than poor game mechanics.
Lucas Kell wrote:Sure, you could say they could protect themselves by being cautious of greens, but why would they need to do that? They could simply stay in an NPC corp and avoid both that and wars, or they could create a 1 man corp if they want to get rid of tax.
Guilty or creating a one-man (+alt) corp to avoid tax (and also to avoid NPC corp chat).. I still don't understand why the game mechanics should protect you or me rather than you or I protecting ourselves and our investments.
Lucas Kell wrote:Corp aggression being always on is just a really dumb mechanic that puts up too much of an issue. A high sec group running mining for example is better running out of NPC corps as their boosters and freighters then can't get awoxed or held to ransom.
Or you could just make recruitment tougher, more focused, more exclusive. I guess my thinking is that there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of player-owned corps. It might be a visibility thing but why are you the only one I am seeing rag on the mechanics?
Let's just end this right now. I suspect it's not the mechanics that you despise. It's the people that kill you (and other people in hi-sec) with these mechanics. Might I suggest that CCP, Eve Online, and their associated game mechanics are not your enemy. The people shooting at you are your enemy and I think it's time you shot them back. You think you would find it more satisfying that impotently lobbying for changes on a forum that is rife with people who don't give a damn about what you're upset about.
**Disclaimer: Lucas I hope I don't come across as too disrespectful. Lately, these forums have been strewn with whining posts in whining threads and it is entirely possible that I have read more into your posting than is actually there. If that is the case and I just jumped your **** for no good reason then you have my apologies. I am simply tired of people bitching about all the **** they want to change in a game they claim to love. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1085
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:39:00 -
[124] - Quote
Tippia wrote: How does sociopathy in any way factor into all of this? And how is it being rewarded? How is it not harsh that you have to be aware of your surroundings or you'll get hit with some kind of loss?
What's this imbalance you're talking about? How is it an imbalance that proactive stance yields more than an inactive one?
Sociopathy is one of those words the uninformed like to toss around to sound smart, Tippia dear. It doesn't actually exist.
The closest thing would be Antisocial Personality Disorder, and a key part of that is "...failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors". Since ganking, awoxing, corptheft, missionbaiting, and all such activities are perfectly lawful according to CCP, you can't really assign an ASPD label to people performing them.
There's also the amazing lol that is diagnosing a RL mental disorder from behaviour in a video game. Using that logic, anyone who has killed others in multiplayer TF2 is a spree killer, Payday2 players are amazing robbers, and Call of Duty folks are all Special Forces Seal Team 6 Green Beret Rangers.
The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18760
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:51:00 -
[125] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:first of all, I'm not dumb enough to argue with someone so obtuse who spends their entire existence of the past... (how many years now?) on the EVE forums. If you want people to debate you seriously, try not to be so all around ridiculous. GǪand second of all?
Now since you're apparently dumb enough to argue with me (one must presume, since I don't fall into that category you just described and since you keep quoting my posts), maybe you could actually answer the question: how does sociopathy in any way factor into all of this? And how is it being rewarded? Have you tried taking your own advice and not try to sound so ridiculous as to drag in an obsoleted and in almost every way inapplicable term into a discussion about play styles and player choices? GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
897
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:57:00 -
[126] - Quote
The feeling when you return to a thread that half of the first page has your drunkposting filling it up, only to see it is still climbing upwards in pages as the hours go on....
    Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:58:00 -
[127] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:Tippia wrote: How does sociopathy in any way factor into all of this? And how is it being rewarded? How is it not harsh that you have to be aware of your surroundings or you'll get hit with some kind of loss?
What's this imbalance you're talking about? How is it an imbalance that proactive stance yields more than an inactive one?
Sociopathy is one of those words the uninformed like to toss around to sound smart, Tippia dear. It doesn't actually exist. Using that logic, anyone who has killed others in multiplayer TF2 is a spree killer, Payday2 players are amazing robbers, and Call of Duty folks are all Special Forces Seal Team 6 Green Beret Rangers.
logic you say?
you are equating simulated behavior, such as killing someone in a video game, with actual behavior, such as doing something solely for the purpose of causing grief.
You also think sociopaths can't exist in mmorpg video games? 
these clowns.  "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4223
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 20:59:00 -
[128] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Sociopathy is one of those words the uninformed like to toss around to sound smart, Tippia dear. It doesn't actually exist.
Yea it does, see you just typed it! Just like Brujlesprat, a word i just made up since other people can too . now i'm leaving, goin to the strip club to tell the grils to shake their Brujlesprats for me (lol).
Quote: The closest thing would be Antisocial Personality Disorder, and a key part of that is "...failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors". Since ganking, awoxing, corptheft, missionbaiting, and all such activities are perfectly lawful according to CCP, you can't really assign an ASPD label to people performing them.
There's also the amazing lol that is diagnosing a RL mental disorder from behaviour in a video game. Using that logic, anyone who has killed others in multiplayer TF2 is a spree killer, Payday2 players are amazing robbers, and Call of Duty folks are all Special Forces Seal Team 6 Green Beret Rangers.
We know the truth. Some people just need to believe that they are "normal" and it's the rest of the world that's screwed up, despite mountains worth of evidence that they are indeed screwed up. That's why everyone is a 'sociopath' or 'troll' or whatever to them, any defense mechanisim they can use to avoid looking in a mirror is a good thing as far as they are concerned.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15478
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:01:00 -
[129] - Quote
Drunk posting is the best kind of posting. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
897
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:04:00 -
[130] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Drunk posting is the best kind of posting.
Indeed, sir. Indeed.
Lmao. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1089
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:08:00 -
[131] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:logic you say? you are equating simulated behavior, such as killing someone in a video game, with actual behavior, such as doing something solely for the purpose of causing grief. You also think sociopaths can't exist in mmorpg video games?  these clowns. 
Nope, I'm equating simulated behaviour, such as killing someone in a video game, with simulated behaviour sich as....killing someone in a video game.
And as I said, sociopathy doesn't exist, at least not anymore. The only people who use that word are people trying to get a rise out of others.
Amusingly enough, ASPD personalities really wouldn't be drawn to "bad guy" behaviours in EVE. Another key component of the disorder, is the ability to make very fast, yet extremely shallow connections with others. You'd likely be best buddies with an ASPD personality, till they decided to throw you away for thrills....and it wouldn't be an "in-game" action they'd gun for. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8135
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:08:00 -
[132] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:There's also the amazing lol that is diagnosing a RL mental disorder from behaviour in a video game. Yeah, like how calling people out on "sperging" has become a thing even though it often has nothing to do with actual AS. My EVE Videos |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
183
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:11:00 -
[133] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: its the normal people who are screwed up, not me!
such sweet denial We know what you are. You are less than. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2364
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:14:00 -
[134] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:This sounds more like poor recruitment rather than poor game mechanics. You can call it what you want. Honestly, with how easy it is to awox, it's not hard to make a clean account that passes all scrutiny. But thats pretty much beside the point. There's still no benefit to joining a player run corp. If your CEO lets in an awoxer and he ganks you, it's a bit late to react.
Kimmi Chan wrote:Guilty or creating a one-man (+alt) corp to avoid tax (and also to avoid NPC corp chat).. I still don't understand why the game mechanics should protect you or me rather than you or I protecting ourselves and our investments. It doesn't have to. But all the time it doesn't NPC corps will be the favoured place for high sec players. A simple on/off switch for aggression in a corp would allow a CEO to control if his corp needs to be able to attack each other. Sure, a few awoxers would be sad about it, but in the long run it would promote player run corps over NPC corps. NPC corps should have a 10% tax on all refining too, bringing it in line with bounties.
Kimmi Chan wrote:Or you could just make recruitment tougher, more focused, more exclusive. I guess my thinking is that there are hundreds, maybe thousands, of player-owned corps. It might be a visibility thing but why are you the only one I am seeing rag on the mechanics? There is literally no way to make recruitment tough enough to eliminate this issue to the point that NPC corps and one man corps are not still a better choice
Kimmi Chan wrote:Let's just end this right now. I suspect it's not the mechanics that you despise. It's the people that kill you (and other people in hi-sec) with these mechanics. Might I suggest that CCP, Eve Online, and their associated game mechanics are not your enemy. The people shooting at you are your enemy and I think it's time you shot them back. You think you would find it more satisfying that impotently lobbying for changes on a forum that is rife with people who don't give a damn about what you're upset about. Uh, you couldn't have missed the mark more than this. I don't really play much in high sec, just a couple of alts and they never get ganked, bumped or anything. And I don't despise anything about the mechanics. I'm simply stating why it is that NPC corps are so favoured. Honestly, I'm perfectly happy with it remaining the way it is, as it doesn't affect me in the slightest. But it is a shame that newer players are effectively encouraged to avoid playing with others.
Kimmi Chan wrote:**Disclaimer: Lucas I hope I don't come across as too disrespectful. Lately, these forums have been strewn with whining posts in whining threads and it is entirely possible that I have read more into your posting than is actually there. If that is the case and I just jumped your **** for no good reason then you have my apologies. I am simply tired of people bitching about all the **** they want to change in a game they claim to love. Not at all, perfectly reasonable posts. And I do love eve, I'd just like more people to love it too. They need to make the gap between a day one player and a player interacting with others much much smaller. Once you start interacting with others and making friends, it makes it much more fun and harder to simply stop subbing. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
897
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:15:00 -
[135] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
*snip*
You'd likely be best buddies with an ASPD personality, till they decided to throw you away for thrills....and it wouldn't be an "in-game" action they'd gun for.
Indeed. And by that, Lady Fappington is referring to banging a girlfriend, or a mom.
Just saying.
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8135
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:18:00 -
[136] - Quote
I'm curious about the "mental gymnastics" that led you to whatever definition you happen to be using for that word. My EVE Videos |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4092
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:18:00 -
[137] - Quote
Not only are there still griefers, they are running the show now.
Fortunately griefers suck at running things, like dictators of banana republics, leaving the rest of us free to play the game the way it was meant to be played.
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:19:00 -
[138] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:It doesn't make a lick of sense to me why they do that.
Entitlement.
They have this notion that everyone should cater to them. If their demands are not met it is called bad game design or sociopath behavior.
It is also asinine.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1089
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:22:00 -
[139] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Indeed. And by that, Lady Fappington is referring to banging a girlfriend, or a mom. Just saying. 
Exactly correct, good sir. Sure, they'd use EVE to get to know you, but an in-game action would be waaaay to piddly to generate the thrills they seek.
Much, much more likely that the ASPD person would be the biggest defender of (your chosen playstyle) as they worm their way into your personal life via EVE, only to wreck RL relationships/ruin jobs/cause evictions. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:24:00 -
[140] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:**Disclaimer: Lucas I hope I don't come across as too disrespectful. Lately, these forums have been strewn with whining posts in whining threads and it is entirely possible that I have read more into your posting than is actually there. If that is the case and I just jumped your **** for no good reason then you have my apologies. I am simply tired of people bitching about all the **** they want to change in a game they claim to love. Not at all, perfectly reasonable posts. And I do love eve, I'd just like more people to love it too. They need to make the gap between a day one player and a player interacting with others much much smaller. Once you start interacting with others and making friends, it makes it much more fun and harder to simply stop subbing.
I seems my angst towards you was misplaced. I am very sorry and ashamed for having berated you a bit there and beg your forgiveness.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
899
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:27:00 -
[141] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
I seems my angst towards you was misplaced. I am very sorry and ashamed for having berated you a bit there and beg your forgiveness.
That truly touches my heart Kimmi, thank you.
Now could you please, for the love of all that is whatever, tell me...
What does purple taste like? Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:28:00 -
[142] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
I seems my angst towards you was misplaced. I am very sorry and ashamed for having berated you a bit there and beg your forgiveness.
That truly touches my heart Kimmi, thank you. Now could you please, for the love of all that is whatever, tell me... What does purple taste like?
Chicken.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2365
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:30:00 -
[143] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Indeed. And by that, Lady Fappington is referring to banging a girlfriend, or a mom. Just saying.  Exactly correct, good sir. Sure, they'd use EVE to get to know you, but an in-game action would be waaaay to piddly to generate the thrills they seek. Much, much more likely that the ASPD person would be the biggest defender of (your chosen playstyle) as they worm their way into your personal life via EVE, only to wreck RL relationships/ruin jobs/cause evictions. It's just the FOTM insult. Like any other it doesn't represent the behaviour of the associated group, only a generalisation recognisable by the masses. No need to really go too deep into that.
Kimmi Chan wrote:I seems my angst towards you was misplaced. I am very sorry and ashamed for having berated you a bit there and beg your forgiveness. No problems :p The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
899
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:33:00 -
[144] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
I seems my angst towards you was misplaced. I am very sorry and ashamed for having berated you a bit there and beg your forgiveness.
That truly touches my heart Kimmi, thank you. Now could you please, for the love of all that is whatever, tell me... What does purple taste like? Chicken.
NO WAY!!! Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

buyer Bedala
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
3
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:39:00 -
[145] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers. yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk free activities. The low costs and risks associated with being a high sec "pirate" are the lamest and most imbalanced thing about this game by far. It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs. It is a disgusting imbalance.
Its no cheaper or easier than mining or mission running in a decently fit ship. A miner with a few tank mods who is at his keyboard will over double his EHP. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
95
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:41:00 -
[146] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
1) Yes 2) Why are you mining? 3) Why not move to a different system 4) If he follows you report him for harrasment.
You're welcome |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
899
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:43:00 -
[147] - Quote
buyer Bedala wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Tippia wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, how can you expect people to move on if null sec players scam them, low sec players shoot them, and high sec players grief extort them? By doing what the scammers, gankers, and extortionists do: find safety in numbers. yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything.  or devs could do something that actually benefits the game and keep douche bag activity in low and null where it belongs. carebears are the lifeblood of EVE and the cancer is the tards who somehow think grief monkeys should have what are essentially risk free activities. The low costs and risks associated with being a high sec "pirate" are the lamest and most imbalanced thing about this game by far. It just sucks that so many total losers who gravitate to this kind of activity get off so easy. That is the kind of bullshit that makes people want to quit this game. Not that its harsh (that is the idiots arguing), but that sociopaths are so easily rewarded and never pay any meaningful costs. It is a disgusting imbalance. Its no cheaper or easier than mining or mission running in a decently fit ship. A miner with a few tank mods who is at his keyboard will over double his EHP.
Can confirm.
Used to carebear. Used to roll in the PLEX.
Now I pirate. Not sure if I will be playing in a couple weeks. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
370
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:49:00 -
[148] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:You can call it what you want. Honestly, with how easy it is to awox, it's not hard to make a clean account that passes all scrutiny. But thats pretty much beside the point. There's still no benefit to joining a player run corp. If your CEO lets in an awoxer and he ganks you, it's a bit late to react.
It doesn't have to. But all the time it doesn't NPC corps will be the favoured place for high sec players. A simple on/off switch for aggression in a corp would allow a CEO to control if his corp needs to be able to attack each other. Sure, a few awoxers would be sad about it, but in the long run it would promote player run corps over NPC corps. NPC corps should have a 10% tax on all refining too, bringing it in line with bounties.
There is literally no way to make recruitment tough enough to eliminate this issue to the point that NPC corps and one man corps are not still a better choice
Uh, you couldn't have missed the mark more than this. I don't really play much in high sec, just a couple of alts and they never get ganked, bumped or anything. And I don't despise anything about the mechanics. I'm simply stating why it is that NPC corps are so favoured. Honestly, I'm perfectly happy with it remaining the way it is, as it doesn't affect me in the slightest. But it is a shame that newer players are effectively encouraged to avoid playing with others.
Let me start by saying I do not like people wanting to make changes. Generally, they want something changed that favors only their playstyle without regards to others.
That being said, I don't hate the idea of toggling corp aggression and would encourage you to elaborate on it in F&I. Two issues that I would like to see addressed in such a proposal would be:
1) Making this change severely limits AWOXing which, while not enjoyed by the victims, is still enjoyed by some players. Is it fair to hamstring their playstyle?
2) The intended consequence is to get people out of NPC corps but moving into a player corp puts an individual player at risk of being wardecced at which point they just jump back to the safety of an NPC corp. Intended consequence fails so what is the point?
Thanks in advance for your response.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Rick II Egnald
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 21:55:00 -
[149] - Quote
Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it work be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts one my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
|

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
899
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:00:00 -
[150] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
10mil isk not only gets you 6 months of permit tank....it gets you a year.
No brainer, here. Plus we all know ESO is going to suck. Not even made by the good TES team. 
Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Lady Areola Fappington
New Order Logistics CODE.
1091
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:05:00 -
[151] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
Glad you stopped by and gave EVE a shot! It's not a game for everyone, and I hope whatever future MMO you decide to play fits your expectations better. The risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built and we want to keep that (infact, this is much more representative of the consensus opinion within CCP). |

Ptraci
3 R Corporation Boarderline Cartel
1652
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:06:00 -
[152] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:yes, because what is supposed to be a sandbox game should force you to seek safety in numbers to do anything. 
Sure, because not only is it a sandbox game, it is a multi-player sandbox game... If you want single player go play Homeworld or something. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2365
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:13:00 -
[153] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:1) Making this change severely limits AWOXing which, while not enjoyed by the victims, is still enjoyed by some players. Is it fair to hamstring their playstyle? All changes would be good for some, bad for others. This only eliminates a single style of high sec awox, and for it's benefit I think it would be worth it.
Kimmi Chan wrote:2) The intended consequence is to get people out of NPC corps but moving into a player corp puts an individual player at risk of being wardecced at which point they just jump back to the safety of an NPC corp. Intended consequence fails so what is the point? That's an interesting point. I think wardec mechanics would need to be looked at to encourage people to stay in a corp. The problem you have is that industrial corps would be completely unable to defend, and mercenary contracts are incredibly expensive. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4224
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:14:00 -
[154] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
Extortion is part of the game. It's not the bumper that is the porblem here, it's your lack of creativity in dealing with what he is doing. One right thing you did was move, very many miners would simply dock up and complain.
Quote: I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Your choice, if this kind of thing bothers you then you and EVE aren't good fits.
Quote: Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
Almost all I do is PVE, missions, exploration, incursions. I find it relaxing after a day of dealing with truly bad people. But at no point do I forget I'm playing EVE Online, a sandbox mmo legendary for being cold, harsh, dark and unforgiving. By PVEing I am playing the game correctly, as are the people trying to kill me. When I don't want that I play Star Trek Online rather than try to make EVE conform to my unreaosnable wishes. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15483
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:15:00 -
[155] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion. You are correct, it is extortion, which is allowed
Quote:Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while. They have options, they can pay the permit fee, depending on how much of an arse they are about it determines whether or not the bumpers honour it, they can move, as you did. Properly fitted skiffs and procurers make a gankers life hard, add an afterburner to the skiff and use orbit, then the bumpers life also becomes harder.
Quote:Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation. CCP disagree with you, it's explicitly not an exploit or bannable offence, nor is it griefing.
Quote:I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months. Enjoy.
Quote:Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it. It still can be, there's plenty of low traffic 0.5 to 0.7 systems with untouched belts once you get more than 5 or 6 jumps from a trade or mission hub regardless of TZ. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2244
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:19:00 -
[156] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:When I don't want that I play Star Trek Online rather than try to make EVE conform to my unreaosnable wishes.
It seems almost as if you're trying to imply that other games exist that might cater to different playstyles, and that people are free to choose to play those at times, instead of enforcing their demands upon this game.
Utter lunacy. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
552
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:34:00 -
[157] - Quote
Ishtanchuk Fazmarai wrote:
Yes it is, and CCP thinks this is why you pay them 15 euros/USD each month. You're free to disagree them, of course. Try doing something else were you can't be prevented from playing. Or just try playing another game; Space Engineers is fashionable now, and Kerbal Space Program plans to go Multiplayer sometime this year. Also, X Rebirth may be worth it in a few months once the modders and Egosoft get their sh*t together.
Being bumped in EVE is totally optional. And remember: never agree to blackmail as that only encourages further blackmail.
Dear god, if you cannot play the game because of an organization of players that is avoidable, biomass. Oh look, teehee, I hear Hello Kitty would be great to try out, teehee.
Put forth the effort, move systems, move halfway across high-sec, don't be stupid, watch local, tank your ship, keep tabs on NO whereabouts ..oh wait I'm implying that you have to try.. Actually and this is a laugh, if you don't want to try, pay the permit fee. But most of you will just petition and complain, cause why put forth effort in a video game that at its core is PvP based.
Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15486
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:43:00 -
[158] - Quote
^^ Requires effort and planning, not an acceptable solution for some. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2365
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:44:00 -
[159] - Quote
I know right? People expecting games to be fun an all... Makes me sick... You play EVE to work, not mess around having fun! The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
372
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:48:00 -
[160] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:1) Making this change severely limits AWOXing which, while not enjoyed by the victims, is still enjoyed by some players. Is it fair to hamstring their playstyle? All changes would be good for some, bad for others. This only eliminates a single style of high sec awox, and for it's benefit I think it would be worth it.[/quote]
Now I think it's clear why I do not favor most changes. Not that this is necessarily a bad idea but it does prevent a group of players from doing what they want to do.
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:2) The intended consequence is to get people out of NPC corps but moving into a player corp puts an individual player at risk of being wardecced at which point they just jump back to the safety of an NPC corp. Intended consequence fails so what is the point? That's an interesting point. I think wardec mechanics would need to be looked at to encourage people to stay in a corp. The problem you have is that industrial corps would be completely unable to defend, and mercenary contracts are incredibly expensive.
And the other reason I generally don't like changes. The smallest change, in order for it to fulfill it's intended consequences, would require another small change here and another and another.
Good intentions to be sure, but the implementation and fallout could be unforeseeably (yes I'm making up words) catastrophic or catastrophically unforeseeable. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2365
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:53:00 -
[161] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:[Now I think it's clear why I do not favor most changes. Not that this is necessarily a bad idea but it does prevent a group of players from doing what they want to do.
And the other reason I generally don't like changes. The smallest change, in order for it to fulfill it's intended consequences, would require another small change here and another and another.
Good intentions to be sure, but the implementation and fallout could be unforeseeably (yes I'm making up words) catastrophic or catastrophically unforeseeable. MMOs have to change though. If they stay the same way forever, they die. They need to adapt and evolve to the community to keep people both challenged and interested. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
372
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:54:00 -
[162] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
I will be checking that out too. Though Eve will still be my guilty pleasure.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
95
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 22:56:00 -
[163] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
Maybe you missed the part where if he's following you that you can petition CCP on grounds of harrassment as you astutely noted it is :) |

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 23:03:00 -
[164] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Great post, thanks. Confirming 4/5 of your likes are from self-created forum alts and buddy system "like" orgies.
:D |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
372
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 23:05:00 -
[165] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:[Now I think it's clear why I do not favor most changes. Not that this is necessarily a bad idea but it does prevent a group of players from doing what they want to do.
And the other reason I generally don't like changes. The smallest change, in order for it to fulfill it's intended consequences, would require another small change here and another and another.
Good intentions to be sure, but the implementation and fallout could be unforeseeably (yes I'm making up words) catastrophic or catastrophically unforeseeable. MMOs have to change though. If they stay the same way forever, they die. They need to adapt and evolve to the community to keep people both challenged and interested.
Agreed provided the changes do not hinder a group of people from doing what they want to do,
Miners mine - they claim that gankers prevent them from doing so but this is a gross exaggeration because there are not enough gankers to kill every single miner in the game and those times that a miner isn't ganked they are happily mining away while likely being AFK in a Shitfitriever. But they can still do what they want.
Mission runners run missions - PvP enthusiasts will still flip wrecks and bait and ransom objectives but these instances are few (happened to me once in 6 years - 4th room of Angel Extravaganza poor bastard burned out his warp scram and I escaped in my RNI which I then promptly sold so as not to be such a juicy target). As the incidences of these encounters is rare for someone not flying a pimped out loot sandwich, mission runners can still do what they want to do.
AWOXers, while as I said are not loved by their victims, have their own playstyle. I would imagine it requires that an individual be extraordinarily clever and creative. This change would eliminate their ability to do what they want in any way and does not solve the issue it is intended to solve: people hanging out in NPC corps. Can you think of any other change that would encourage departure from NPC Corps without debilitating any playstyles? A tough question I know but important nonetheless.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
27
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 23:09:00 -
[166] - Quote
Back on topic.
1) CCP can't really do anything about griefing without ruining the freedom of the game. They could be harsher with communications perhaps - ban people for simply being rude or douchey - and thus lessen the amount of actual victimizing. But CODE. walks that line quite well. They are rarely actually rude or at all insulting.
2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. In understanding that we can defend the freedom of the game, but we shouldn't really defend the griefers for using that freedom in such a manner.
The funny thing is when you tell griefers this, they will call it your "tears" and laugh it off. Yet I have seen over a dozen times, these griefers defend themselves as not being sociopaths on their blogs and forum threads. Clearly, it does bother them. :D |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15487
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 23:21:00 -
[167] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:Back on topic.
1) CCP can't really do anything about griefing without ruining the freedom of the game. They could be harsher with communications perhaps - ban people for simply being rude or douchey - and thus lessen the amount of actual victimizing. But CODE. walks that line quite well. They are rarely actually rude or at all insulting.
2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. In understanding that we can defend the freedom of the game, but we shouldn't really defend the griefers for using that freedom in such a manner.
The funny thing is when you tell griefers this, they will call it your "tears" and laugh it off. Yet I have seen over a dozen times, these griefers defend themselves as not being sociopaths on their blogs and forum threads. Clearly, it does bother them. :D Of course it bothers them, mental illness carries a very real social stigma. You appear to have arbitrarily based your diagnosis of sociopath on actions carried out in a video game, where those actions are allowed and considered legal.
Are you or any of the other people calling people sociopaths qualified mental health practitioners who've actually spoken to these deviants or did you just read wikipedia and make this crap up?
My vote is for wikipedia and crap. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2245
|
Posted - 2014.01.06 23:28:00 -
[168] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:crap.
Correct. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18764
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:08:00 -
[169] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. GǪand this is based on, what, exactly?
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

Domanique Altares
Rifterlings Point Blank Alliance
2247
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:14:00 -
[170] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. GǪand this is based on, what, exactly?
The slip of paper from the inside of a fortune cookie. Rifterlings pirate corporation is now recruitng members for lowsec PvP operations. Newbie friendly, free T1 frigate and dessy hangar, solo tutoring and PvP classes for new members. Join our in game channel 'weflyrifters' and speak to a recruiter today. |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
373
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:15:00 -
[171] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. GǪand this is based on, what, exactly?
Hearsay and conjecture. Alternatively, it could be that it was just pulled from someones ass.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
152
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:15:00 -
[172] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Well, good sir, it is your lucky day. For 10mil isk, and your fealty to the Savior of High Sec, James 315, expressed in your bio... You can mine with zero harassment for a year!!!! Otherwise, Agents of the New Order will continue to bump you to prevent you from becoming bot-aspirant. Permit tank is best tank. Don't risk a red pen violation. Also visit www.minerbumping.com, to learn about the Code, and how to make high-sec a better place for all!!! As an added bonus, I now also offer forum permits for returning players. To post in any manner you choose, you can pay an additional 10mil isk to me. For this you must swear fealty to Unsuccessful At Everything as the saviour of General Discussion. oo! I want a forum permit! How do I know that you are the valid retailer for these though? I'd much rather give my money directly to unsucessful at everything.
To the OP: By attempting to mine in high security space, you have put yourself under the domain of James 315. Please pay your dues to an appropriate agent. By following the code you will help finance the destruction of bots and bot-aspirants, while simultaneously protecting yourself from bumping and ganking, not just form the new order, but also from more nefarious organizations. If you would prefer to take a stronger stance against botting in eve, there is plenty of information at www.minerbumping.com to help you do so. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |

Ubat Batuk
Garoun Investment Bank Gallente Federation
111
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:41:00 -
[173] - Quote
Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far. James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to. If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone. It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE.
Well you know what, you should do this while being outside an alliance or an NPC corp so that the victim can wardec your corp in response to your behaviour. It think when this is done by people in your position it should be punishable. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15488
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:46:00 -
[174] - Quote
Ubat Batuk wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:Nevyn Auscent wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:
Bumping for an hour and/or over multiple systems without a reason is bannable. If you have a reason such as enforcing the will of the savior of highsec, AKA James 315, then it is perfectly legal and within the limits of the EULA/TOS.
No, even with reason it counts as harassment/griefing and is bannable if taken too far. James 315 can not stalk people, nor 'happen' to have an alt in every system a particular miner flees to. If he stakes out a system a week and moves systems every sunday, and they happen to pick the wrong next system, well that's a different thing, since the GM's can see his pattern of bumping. But a reason is not sufficient excuse to grief someone. It is completely within the EULA/TOS. I don't care how wrong you think I am, but I am right. I have had many harassment/griefer petitions filed against me but because I was enforcing the code and not doing it without a purpose they were all unfounded. I would go into it further but that would mean discussing GM stuff on the forums, which is against the EULA/TOS, unlike enforcing the CODE. Well you know what, you should do this while being outside an alliance or an NPC corp so that the victim can wardec your corp in response to your behaviour. It think when this is done by people in your position it should be punishable. So it's ok for miners to hide from wardecs in NPC corps or large alliances, but not gankers? Ok got it 
FYI his alliance isn't that big, it would cost a mere 87 and a bit million isk to wardec his entire alliance as opposed to 50 million for a one man corp, besides they'd love people to wardec them, but majority of the people who'd like to do so are hiding in an NPC corp, so they can't. |

BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie
NEW ORDER DEATH DEALERS CODE.
152
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:49:00 -
[175] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:I have to correct myself.
The issue aren't carebears in starter corps, the issue are you people who complain about them.
There is no good, unless it is being done.
The reason for the situation we have is because you don't do it. You just whine. Disgusting!
No need to attack people that agree with you. Encouraging action is good, but spin is important. Before you say anything about me, I spend a good deal of my time in the public E-Uni chat channel and try to help players find activities that might interest them. The other day I saw someone asking about missions because he was bored of level 2's and the response from multiple players was that "Level 4's make more isk". I messaged the player and got him some resources to get started in faction warfare. I too am sick of the tutorial straight into pve setup for the new player experience, but ranting on someones else's rant thread is not the way to go.
Ubat Batuk wrote:Well you know what, you should do this while being outside an alliance or an NPC corp so that the victim can wardec your corp in response to your behaviour. It think when this is done by people in your position it should be punishable. They can wardec us just fine while we're in an alliance thank you. There are plenty of wars going on with NODD at all times. Hell, we start some of them. New player resources: http://wiki.eveuniversity.org/Main_Page - General information http://www.evealtruist.com/p/know-your-enemy.html - Learn to PvP http://belligerentundesirables.com/ - Safaris, Awoxes, Ganking and Griefing-á |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:53:00 -
[176] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it.
Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:59:00 -
[177] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Tippia wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. GǪand this is based on, what, exactly? Hearsay and conjecture. Alternatively, it could be that it was just pulled from someones ass.
or you know... psychology textbooks. That is a serious case of denial you have. Are you really denying the existence of sociopaths? 
haven't you clowned yourself in this thread enough already? lol.
so many uneducated bumpkins in this thread. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15489
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 00:59:00 -
[178] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day.
CCP have no need to do anything of the sort, they're not in that particular predicament. Speaking of heads and arses, hows the view from there? |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
99
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:03:00 -
[179] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:Repeatedly bumping someone who is mining to keep them from mining and demanding a ransom to stop the bumping is not an accident.... it would be termed more as a form of in game extortion.
Miners have no ability to retaliate in .9 or 1.0 space against someone who repeatedly follows them from belt to belt for hours constantly bumping them off their asteroids.
I did pack up and move about 16 jumps out and hopefully that will solve the problem for a while.
Repeatedly bumping someone for an hour and chasing them through all the belts in a system with the sole purpose of keeping them from enjoying what they pay money to do is nothing but harassment plain and simple. Demanding a ransom to stop the activity should be a should be considered as proof that it is not "accidental" and should be a bannable offense considering there is a chat log of the conversation.
I seriously doubt at this point I will renew either of my accounts once my 6 months expires at this point and will focus instead on Elder Scrolls Online in a few months.
Mining is what attracted me to this game, its peaceful and quiet and I enjoy doing it. Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day.
Big Fat NOOPEEE.
CCP doesn't play this game for us, it gives us the tools to do everything ourselves. It's your choice to use them or not. Don't complain about things you didn't do, only things that you couldn't.
Example: probing down a titan and bumping it during E-Warp
Players use skills in fitting ships, scanning and organisation to destroy a titan ((albeit later being declared an exploit) This was changed because the Titan pilot had no way to respond to the situation with systems disabled in E-Warp.)
Miner sucking rocks is bumped out of range,
CCP does nothing. Miner cries on forums. CCP still does nothing.
Let us analyze the differences, Miner could move to new system/space/area, Join a player corp and wardecc bumper, Could shoot him in the face and get concorded anyway, could hire mercs,. so forth.
Did Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Did Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem?
Could Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Could Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem? |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
99
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:04:00 -
[180] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Nerf Burger wrote: Can't blame ya man. EVE is still a joke with regards on how it deals with high sec "pirates". Maybe CCP will pull their head out of their ass one day.
CCP have no need to do anything of the sort, they're not in that particular predicament. Speaking heads and arses, hows the view from there?
I feel the need to introduce NB to the pot. |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15490
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:08:00 -
[181] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote: Big Fat NOOPEEE.
CCP doesn't play this game for us, it gives us the tools to do everything ourselves. It's your choice to use them or not. Don't complain about things you didn't do, only things that you couldn't.
Example: probing down a titan and bumping it during E-Warp
Players use skills in fitting ships, scanning and organisation to destroy a titan ((albeit later being declared an exploit) This was changed because the Titan pilot had no way to respond to the situation with systems disabled in E-Warp.)
Miner sucking rocks is bumped out of range,
CCP does nothing. Miner cries on forums. CCP still does nothing.
Let us analyze the differences, Miner could move to new system/space/area, Join a player corp and wardecc bumper, Could shoot him in the face and get concorded anyway, could hire mercs,. so forth.
Did Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Did Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem?
Could Miner take any proactive steps to solve his problem? Could Titan pilot take any proactive steps to solve his problem?
Please refrain from using logic and reason in replies, it disturbs the creatures of the night natives and makes them restless post. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:16:00 -
[182] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:
Big Fat DERP.
yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success.
I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway? They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days.
so many nonsensical clowns. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:20:00 -
[183] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Big Fat DERP.
yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success. I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway. They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days. so many nonsensical clowns.
Then man the **** up and do something that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning that isn't moaning |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:21:00 -
[184] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Big Fat DERP.
yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success. I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway. They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days. so many nonsensical clowns. Then man the **** up and do something that isn't moaningthat isn't moaningthat isn't moaningthat isn't moaningthat isn't moaning
hey aren't you just whining about valid complaints? pretty sure you are. But hey its typical for hypocritical self serving types to not have a problem with something that doesn't effect them in a negative way. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:27:00 -
[185] - Quote
They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? You have access to everything everyone else does, your steadfast stance on doing absolutely nothing proactive about the situation and demanding that someone else do it for you is laughable.
Shall i go farm some sleepers for you to go pay for whatever you lost in time being bumped?
If the reason you want things to be changed is because you don't want to do anything for yourself you really don't belong here. |

Jennifer Maxwell
Crimson Serpent Syndicate
91
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:33:00 -
[186] - Quote
Mining permits are bullshit. New Order crap is bullshit.
|

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:33:00 -
[187] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here?
it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Paranoid Loyd
University of Caille Gallente Federation
238
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:39:00 -
[188] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further.
So in essence, you want eve to be a single player game? I've got bad news, it's not. 
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4225
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:41:00 -
[189] - Quote
Jennifer Maxwell wrote:Mining permits are bullshit Emergent Gameplay. New Order crap is bullshit Emergent Gameplay.
Fixed |

Paranoid Loyd
University of Caille Gallente Federation
238
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:43:00 -
[190] - Quote
Jennifer Maxwell wrote:Mining permits are bullshit. New Order crap is bullshit.
Show us on the mining barge doll where the New Order touched you.  |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:43:00 -
[191] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further.
Punished for what?
You want them punished for something you don't like. They take risks by playing the game in a way that inflames other players such as yourself.
Thing is you don't do anything about it.
Nerf Burger wrote: it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, How does it have nothing to do with not standing up for yourself? That mean old kid pushed you, and pushed you, and pushed you. You know spaceships have guns, try sticking one to him.
You are in EvE a MMO you don't have an option to PvE and not be messed with. That's not your desicion to make...
I have no problems in reading comprehension. You have a self entitled attitude is all.
If you approached this thread in a manner that you actually were looking at ways to fix your problems people would be more inclined to your "plight" (word used verrryyy loosely here.) |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15492
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:49:00 -
[192] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success.
Is this because you've told them how you think it is, or because they've tried and failed? I'd hazard a guess that the percentage of highsec carebears, myself included, being affected by the people you're calling douchebags more than once a year is tiny.
Quote:I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway? They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days.
so many nonsensical clowns. The "cowardly grief monkey" dollar is just as strong as yours. Belligerent undesirable was a much better term btw, yours is trying way too hard to catch on. |

Nerf Burger
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
188
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:50:00 -
[193] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further. So in essence, you want eve to be a single player game? I've got bad news, it's not. 
Try your hardest to comprehended this with that limited intelligence. Not everything in a mmorpg has has to be done with a group of people, especially a game touted as a "sandbox". Also, expecting everyone to always have friends at their disposal for every mundane task is an unrealistic and moronic expectation. "I think weGÇÖre just getting closer and closer to a place where the people we lose are people that itGÇÖs okay to lose." -Kristoffer Touborg, Eve lead designer
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
100
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:52:00 -
[194] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further. So in essence, you want eve to be a single player game? I've got bad news, it's not.  not everything in a mmorpghas has to be done with a group of people, especially a game touted as a "sandbox". If you weren't a moron you would understand this.
Nowhere does it say anything that has to happen within the game, you crossed the line when you asked for restrictions on how some other people play.
Who says your playstyle is any more right than theirs? |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
375
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:52:00 -
[195] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you post on these forums any further.
Don't ******* play the game! Literally no one is going to miss you. The only thing you're good for is spewing vitriol all over the forums anyway. I am more than amused that you think your posts, which I am sure you believe to be jewels each and every one, are in any way going to convince anyone here to see things your way. *** Spoiler Alert *** They're not.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jennifer Maxwell
Crimson Serpent Syndicate
91
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:57:00 -
[196] - Quote
Paranoid Loyd wrote:Jennifer Maxwell wrote:Mining permits are bullshit. New Order crap is bullshit.
Show us on the mining barge doll where the New Order touched you.  I don't fly a mining barge. And please, I invite New Order pilots to come where I fly; Black Rise can always use more targets. Matter of fact, come to Tama. That's a nice quiet system to bump miners in. I'm sure you'll have a great time. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2827
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 01:58:00 -
[197] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:
Big Fat DERP.
yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success. I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway? They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days. CCP has some words for this situation. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15492
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 02:07:00 -
[198] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Paranoid Loyd wrote:Nerf Burger wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:They're not valid cmplaints though, thats what my beef lies with.
If you and your friends aren't interested in standing up for yourselves why are you here? it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you reply in this thread any further. So in essence, you want eve to be a single player game? I've got bad news, it's not.  He's right it's not a single player game. Your assertion as to the risk and cost involved with ganking is questionable at best, it's down to players to provide the things that CCP don't. If they can't be bothered to do so then whose fault is it when ganking is seen as riskless? Beyond the shoot them anywhere sec status, suspect flags, not forgetting Concord and the faction police of course.
Quote:Try your hardest to comphened this: Not everything in a mmorpg has has to be done with a group of people, especially a game touted as a "sandbox". Also, expecting everyone to have friends at their disposal for every mundane task is an unrealistic and moronic expectation. As I understand it a sandbox means that an individual or group of individuals can try and play as they want to, it also means that I as an individual or as a member of a group can try and prevent them from doing so, because I can try and play as I want to. What do you think it means? If we can get to what you see the sandbox as then we might just get somewhere instead of calling each other names.
You also seem to be unfamiliar with the concept of a group being able to accomplish more than an individual, I find this puzzling because it's true in real life as well. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15492
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 02:14:00 -
[199] - Quote
meh double post please ignore |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16414
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 02:35:00 -
[200] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Tippia wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote:2) Most griefers are somewhat sociopathic, mainly stemming from childhood issues such as bullying at school or a lack of proper parenting. GǪand this is based on, what, exactly? Hearsay and conjecture. Alternatively, it could be that it was just pulled from someones ass. or you know... psychology textbooks. That is a serious case of denial you have. Are you really denying the existence of sociopaths?  haven't you clowned yourself in this thread enough already? lol. so many uneducated bumpkins in this thread. No one denies it, just as no one would deny that murderers exist. The problem you have is that you are comparing RL actions, with those that take place in a game. A game that is by design, a place that specifically allows for the shooting and killing of whomever you want, where ever you want, whenever you want.
Your stance is ridiculous, as you already agreed it was when I pointed out how it applied to chess players.
It's quite obvious you have little knowledge, in regards to conditions of the mind and their relation to game mechanics. For if you did, you wouldn't resort to name calling, but would instead post facts on the subject.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
|

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2285
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 02:51:00 -
[201] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:[or you know... psychology textbooks. LOL. Think anyone will actually believe you've read one? Oh god. |

Mister Simms
Society for Miner Education
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 03:05:00 -
[202] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
I find the whole miner bumping thing to be highly annoying. I don't like extortion in any form. However, you will need to learn to deal with it. Here are some suggestions.
- Orbit the rock and keep your speed up. There are very few bumpers with the skill to consistently hit you. - Keep the rock between you and the bumper, harder to do but it helps. - Go to a different belt/system. - Remember that while you are mining, earning isk, they are wasting their time on you. - Never, EVER pay them money. - Laugh at them in local.
I heard rumor that CCP was looking at a mechanic that would cause damage to ships involved in collisions. Is this true?
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2829
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 03:13:00 -
[203] - Quote
Mister Simms wrote: - Orbit the rock and keep your speed up. There are very few bumpers with the skill to consistently hit you.
Orbit at range - allows you to maintain a higher absolute velocity.
Quote:- Keep the rock between you and the bumper, harder to do but it helps. It it's a New Order Doctrine-fit bumper, you're going to have a hard time keep away.
Quote:- Go to a different belt/system. Use your intelligence channels - They tend to clump.
Also - Set a ring of safes around the system, so you're always pointing at, or nearly at, a safe. That way, if you're orbiting at speed, and a NO ganker hits the belt instead of a bumper, you have a higher chance to escape. This is where orbiting at range makes a difference; you'll already be at or nearly at warp entry velocity. Of course, you also have to keep your eyes peeled, and your intelligenec channels clear. Situational awareness == best tank. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

DeMichael Crimson
Republic University Minmatar Republic
19356
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 05:11:00 -
[204] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now? Yeah, things sure have changed a lot within the past 5 years.
Anyway, welcome back to Grief Online.
Er, I mean Eve Online.
DMC |

Rainbow Dash
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
78
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 05:27:00 -
[205] - Quote
Mister Simms wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now? I find the whole miner bumping thing to be highly annoying. I don't like extortion in any form. However, you will need to learn to deal with it. Here are some suggestions. - Orbit the rock and keep your speed up. There are very few bumpers with the skill to consistently hit you. - Keep the rock between you and the bumper, harder to do but it helps. - Go to a different belt/system. - Remember that while you are mining, earning isk, they are wasting their time on you. - Never, EVER pay them money. - Laugh at them in local. I heard rumor that CCP was looking at a mechanic that would cause damage to ships involved in collisions. Is this true?
CCP isn't looking into anything. It's not a problem, so they're not "fixing" it. |

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
552
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:11:00 -
[206] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote: yea, tell that to my friends who I can't get to play EVE because none of them wants to ever be at the mercy of cowardly douchebags who take no risks and pay no real consequences for failure or success.
I guess CCP didn't want their money anyway? They would rather keep cowardly grief monkeys who are afraid of challenge happy? Like I said, hopefully CCP will pull their head out of their ass one of these days.
Nerf Burger wrote:
hey aren't you just whining about valid complaints? pretty sure you are. But hey its typical for hypocritical self serving types to not have a problem with something that doesn't effect them in a negative way.
Nerf Burger wrote: it has nothing to do with standing up for ourselves, you ridiculous clown. It is the fact that high sec "pirates" can't really be punished and take no risks and sometimes people just want to pve and not be ****** with. You have serious reading comprehension issues you need to work out before you post on these forums any further.
Nerf Burger wrote: Try your hardest to comprehended this with that limited intelligence. Not everything in a mmorpg has has to be done with a group of people, especially a game touted as a "sandbox". Also, expecting everyone to always have friends at their disposal for every mundane task is an unrealistic and moronic expectation for high sec players.
From reading some of your posts I see the same recurring issue that you have with this game. You don't want to do anything that would help your situation, however, you want someone else to do it for you. This is not how things work here. Also indirectly threatening CCP about money if you don't get your way is very childish.
You should put forth the effort "stand up for yourself" and take the necessary steps and precautions to reduce the likelihood of being ganked. CCP has given you everything you need, you just need to be smart enough to use it.
If you came here legitimately looking for ways to counter NO and admitted that you really didn't know how to, people from NO, other pirates and other people in this thread would have been the first to offer help. It's all about your attitude.
You can play Eve Online as a solo player until someone else decides to bring you back into the fold. Another idea to consider, once you make a mistake and loss a ship is what you do next is paramount to the way others view you in this game. Example, you get ganked, but instead of putting forth the effort to reduce the probability of getting ganked again, you come to the forums and rage about it, you demand CCP intervention whether that be directly, or indirectly, you threaten to quit said game.. etc. If you can't handle this, I have two questions. 1) Why the hell did you sign up for this game? 2) Can I have your stuff?
Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2371
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:23:00 -
[207] - Quote
Wow, so this thread, like all others has rapidly turned into trolling.
All of you guys banging on about how people HTFU, and should do thing for themselves and waah, waah, waah, your a bunch of idiots. This is a game guys, not a career. New players don't like this game, because they turn up and we just smash them into the ground and scream HTFU in their fact when they try to talk about it. This game is doomed to be just alts forever, because most of the community just wants to feel the power and stroke the epeen.
Honestly, I'm surprised new players even show up nowadays. I used to try to encourage my mates to play, now if people ask about eve, I simply say "you probably won't like it". At the end of the day, people play games to be entertained. It's not entertainment to be bumped, ganked and insulted by a 10 year vet who's got nothing better to do, then told to HTFU by the community.
Please proceed to shower me with all the trolling, whining and insulting we normally see in GD. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4361
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:32:00 -
[208] - Quote
Nerf Burger wrote:But hey its typical for hypocritical self serving types
Interesting. This user won the forums on 18/09/2013, then lost on 18/12/2013. |

Jessica Danikov
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
207
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:50:00 -
[209] - Quote
GD is mostly populated by vocal people with the more polarised opinions.
Most new players aren't being relentlessly smashed into the ground and told to HTFU. A number of them land in any of a plethora of larger or smaller corps that are supportive and educational for newer players and involvement in those communities is what helps them adhere to the game.
EVE isn't 'just a game' in the sense that you're not entitled to have fun with it- it's not designed to be a 'pick up and play' game, it's not something you can bring home to the family and play with them around the table after dinner over Christmas. Like any MMO, there's a depth of content that can only be explored and enjoyed over time. Unlike most MMOs, a large amount of that content is player driven.
HTFU isn't telling people not to be cry-babies. It's about telling them to take control of their experience. They can chose a life of compliance, a life of defiance, or they can seek out alternatives. HTFU is for people who expect the game to be meted out to them in crafted chunks for their consumption and expect to have that experience protected, to which CCP and the community resolutely gaze down and say 'No'. |

Anomaly One
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 07:58:00 -
[210] - Quote
Quote: Wow, so this thread, like all others has rapidly turned into trolling.
And I suppose your post isn't trolling? where the **** are all these bumpers and griefers because i've been living in high sec for 7 months, MINING and didn't see one, anyway.. the normal whiners crybabies in this thread, people tell you to HTFU because they're sick of your ****..
Quote: your a bunch of idiots.
lol. Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4
Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |
|

Anomaly One
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:01:00 -
[211] - Quote
this thread summed up for the whiners about ganking:
"This is a sandbox !! I should be allowed to do whatever I want! but others shouldn't do whatever they want! because they are interfering with MY gameplay!! this is a sandbox everyone should be able to do whatever they want!! except those guys!" Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4
Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:10:00 -
[212] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:Quote: Wow, so this thread, like all others has rapidly turned into trolling. And I suppose your post isn't trolling? where the **** are all these bumpers and griefers because i've been living in high sec for 7 months, MINING and didn't see one, anyway.. the normal whiners crybabies in this thread, people tell you to HTFU because they're sick of your ****.. Quote: your a bunch of idiots. lol. :D First post of the morning.
And nobody is telling me to HTFU, since I'm not the OP. But I've seen countless noobs insulted and trolled into leaving. It's pointless trolling from a bunch of neckbeards.
Jessica Danikov wrote:EVE isn't 'just a game' in the sense that you're not entitled to have fun with it- it's not designed to be a 'pick up and play' game, it's not something you can bring home to the family and play with them around the table after dinner over Christmas. Like any MMO, there's a depth of content that can only be explored and enjoyed over time. Unlike most MMOs, a large amount of that content is player driven. Bull. EVE is a game like any other, designed for entertainment. Just because half the community wants to treat it like it's the most important part of their life and that it must be endured and worked doesn't change that. The really dumb thing is all this "player driven content", like the alts bumping and ganking miners isn't really done to older players. I've never been bumped or ganked, simply because I've played long enough before it existed to know how to avoid it now. So basically what's happening is new players are arriving, getting bullied by the older ones and not bothering to stick around. NEWSFLASH: That's not content.
You seriously need to observe a new player coming into the game without helping them or guiding them and watch what the new player experience is like. It's absolute rubbish. The game tells them nothing and when they ask for assistance anywhere they get trolled or scammed. It honestly shocks me that new accounts are still ticking up, and I'm convince that the majority of it is vets creating alt accounts. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:12:00 -
[213] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:this thread summed up for the whiners about ganking:
"This is a sandbox !! I should be allowed to do whatever I want! but others shouldn't do whatever they want! because they are interfering with MY gameplay!! this is a sandbox everyone should be able to do whatever they want!! except those guys!" Uh, not quite. Seriously, if you can't see what the issues being raised are then clearly you can't be bothered to read the thread so I can't really be bothered to explain it to you.
So go back to your bridge, have a herring and take a nap. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:20:00 -
[214] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, I'm surprised new players even show up nowadays. I used to try to encourage my mates to play, now if people ask about eve, I simply say "you probably won't like it". Most people have never liked it and never will. That's why it's popular, because it's a niche game that appeals to a certain type of player. CCP doesn't need to appeal to your friends, they need to appeal to the niche market that enjoys the game.
Oh god. |

Anomaly One
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:34:00 -
[215] - Quote
Quote: So go back to your bridge, have a herring and take a nap.
coming from you i'd take that as a, nothing.
Quote: Uh, not quite. Seriously, if you can't see what the issues being raised are then clearly you can't be bothered to read the thread so I can't really be bothered to explain it to you.
Your post made much to increase the awareness in this thread. Good thing there aren't 590239 other threads like this one, but wait, this one is different. IB4 "the fact that there are 4903493 other threads means there is an issue"
But hey i'm glad you decided to reply to my post!
Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4
Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:43:00 -
[216] - Quote
Anomaly One wrote:Quote: So go back to your bridge, have a herring and take a nap. coming from you i'd take that as a, nothing. Quote: Uh, not quite. Seriously, if you can't see what the issues being raised are then clearly you can't be bothered to read the thread so I can't really be bothered to explain it to you. Your post made much to increase the awareness in this thread. Good thing there aren't 590239 other threads like this one, but wait, this one is different. IB4 "the fact that there are 4903493 other threads means there is an issue" But hey I'm glad you decided to reply to my post! I don't even know what this post was trying to accomplish. It certainly had nothing to do with the OP.
And you're right, there's no issue. Let's just merrily plod along as is. You can go mine AFK while running your little bumper alt. I'll continue to play around in null and we can just await the inevitable collapse that is inherent to any game where the vets are completely intolerant of new players.
I could be wrong though. It's not like CCP employees are hastily jumping ship or anything right? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:48:00 -
[217] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Honestly, I'm surprised new players even show up nowadays. I used to try to encourage my mates to play, now if people ask about eve, I simply say "you probably won't like it". Most people have never liked it and never will. That's why it's popular, because it's a niche game that appeals to a certain type of player. CCP doesn't need to appeal to your friends, they need to appeal to the niche market that enjoys the game. Well that really depends on if the niche market is big enough to sustain the company. As time progresses other games are coming out in the same market, and this one is beginning to age. We're still running on single threaded servers and have practically reached the limit of what the game can hold, while other games are able to adapt and improve.
And bear in mind that even the niche market players are put off. Unless you really believe the market is "People who like to get told by some sperg raging 12 year old to HFTU (with animated gifs to say the same)".
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:56:00 -
[218] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:It's not like CCP employees are hastily jumping ship or anything right?
You mean a few well-known devs have left CCP over the past year? I think someone managed to beat a list out of one of your fellow conspiracy theorists and it came to something like 4 of them. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 08:59:00 -
[219] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Well that really depends on if the niche market is big enough to sustain the company. It clearly is.
Quote:As time progresses other games are coming out in the same market, and this one is beginning to age. I can't say I know of any other games that accomplish what Eve has. If there were more modern alternatives, I'd try them out.
Quote:We're still running on single threaded servers and have practically reached the limit of what the game can hold, while other games are able to adapt and improve. Which other games? WoW isn't even as old as Eve and has far more technical limitations due to primitive coding or something. All games become outdated.
Quote:And bear in mind that even the niche market players are put off. They are? Oh god. |

Anomaly One
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 09:07:00 -
[220] - Quote
ah **** it, i'm replying to a troll.. go back to the covops thread pls.
you're a nullbear, i'm a carebear, you're worst
love the psychology bullshit in this thread though keep it up (P.S: it's the same person who had the avatar of a bald woman and started various threads on it psychology/gankers, now in doomheim) Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4
Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
76
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 09:49:00 -
[221] - Quote
Wow! 11 pages of combined, collective stupidity. -.- New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:02:00 -
[222] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:It clearly is. Yeah you're right. Clearly this game is stronger than ever.
Riot Girl wrote:I can't say I know of any other games that accomplish what Eve has. If there were more modern alternatives, I'd try them out. Accomplish what? Spaceships? A community filled to the brim with neckbeards? Or a complete lack of additional content? We've already lost a few to Star Citizen.
Riot Girl wrote:Which other games? WoW isn't even as old as Eve and has far more technical limitations due to primitive coding or something. All games become outdated. Are you mental? I'm not a fan of WoW, but I'm still puzzled as to where you get that idea from. Just because they like their formula doesn;t mean they are limited. And here, we can;t even split the load of a system onto 2 process on the same node. That's a pretty bad limitation to run into and is the reason a 20 minute fight takes several hours to wait through.
Riot Girl wrote:They are? No. Every person that comes here and doesn't stay is automatically "not niche enough", and idiots that like to make the game practically unplayable for newbies specifically targets the non-niche. You are the nichest. We bow to your superiority.
Anomaly One wrote:ah **** it, i'm replying to a troll.. go back to the covops thread pls.
you're a nullbear, i'm a carebear, you're worst
love the psychology bullshit in this thread though keep it up (P.S: it's the same person who had the avatar of a bald woman and started various threads on it psychology/gankers, now in doomheim) What psychology bullshit? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2023
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:04:00 -
[223] - Quote
If you dont like it, get out
"Already lost a few to Star Citizen" was when your guff became transparent *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:07:00 -
[224] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:If you dont like it, get out "Already lost a few to Star Citizen" was when your guff became transparent Thanks for your contribution or lack thereof.
I don't even get what you guys are defending. You are defending the ability to bump noobs for hours on end. Is that really all you have left to do? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2023
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:12:00 -
[225] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Thanks for your contribution or lack thereof.
I don't even get what you guys are defending. You are defending the ability to bump noobs for hours on end. Is that really all you have left to do?
You are an idiot who not only fails to understand anything thats been said, but your made-up facts and baseless personal attacks do nothing to support your "side" of the discussion
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:14:00 -
[226] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Yeah you're right. Clearly this game is stronger than ever. That wasn't even my point but yeah, figures seem to agree with that.
Quote:Accomplish what? Spaceships? A community filled to the brim with neckbeards? Or a complete lack of additional content? We've already lost a few to Star Citizen. The sandbox, the meta, the emergent gameplay, not to mention the frequent events and interaction between the developers and the community, which is something other MMOs don't have.
Quote:here, we can;t even split the load of a system onto 2 process on the same node. They can't even create a decent market system.
Quote:No. Every person that comes here and doesn't stay is automatically "not niche enough", and idiots that like to make the game practically unplayable for newbies specifically targets the non-niche. You are the nichest. We bow to your superiority.
Nah, I'm not that special, I'm just doing my part to help out.
Oh god. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
384
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:19:00 -
[227] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:A lot of stuff.
Lucas, I would ask that you slow down and read some of the posts from these "newbies" you're talking about. Many are simply filled with vitriol and venomous nonsense, not just in this thread but in every thread they have posted in on this subject. It is one thing to say, "I don't like being bumped" and quite another to say, "You're all a bunch of sociopaths and clowns".
The nice thing about this community is that they are helpful to people who ask for help. They are also justifiably intolerant of people who just want to rant and carry on like a spoiled ******* brat.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:37:00 -
[228] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Thanks for your contribution or lack thereof.
I don't even get what you guys are defending. You are defending the ability to bump noobs for hours on end. Is that really all you have left to do? You are an idiot who not only fails to understand anything thats been said, but your made-up facts and baseless personal attacks do nothing to support your "side" of the discussion LOL. That MUST be it. It can't POSSIBLY be that I simply hold the opinion that while freedom to do whatever you want in a sandbox game is a good thing, hassling new players for no reason beyond boredom is a dumb idea.
Seriously guy...
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:50:00 -
[229] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:A lot of stuff. Lucas, I would ask that you slow down and read some of the posts from these "newbies" you're talking about. Many are simply filled with vitriol and venomous nonsense, not just in this thread but in every thread they have posted in on this subject. It is one thing to say, "I don't like being bumped" and quite another to say, "You're all a bunch of sociopaths and clowns". The nice thing about this community is that they are helpful to people who ask for help. They are also justifiably intolerant of people who just want to rant and carry on like a spoiled ******* brat. I've read them. A lot of them are simple legitimate concerns. People come he to play a game, to have fun and get greeted by someone literally spending hours to make sure they can't play. So they post on the forum, many understandably frustrated, and they get met with "HTFU noob", "Go play hello kitty online", "waah, entitlement", and any number of other trolls. In all honesty, this whole community is an absolute disgrace, myself included. We've got to the point that we are so incredibly elitists that we refuse to let new people in. When I joined it was harsh, yeah, but it wasn't like it is now. People didn't go out of their way to ensure it's as difficult as possible for you to play. In all honesty, I really wonder how (and in fact if) we even attract new players.
I love EVE, it's a great game, and it would be really nice to be able to share that with other people, but you can't. Unless a player already has an account and understands the mechanics they get met with us idiots trolling them into the ground, and that's a damn shame. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2287
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 10:53:00 -
[230] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:we are so incredibly elitists that we refuse to let new people in. No one is refusing to let new people in. Everyone wants fresh meat, but at the end of the day, I doubt any amount of tweaks to the NPE is going to encourage new players to stay. They either like the game or they don't, and it seems most don't. Oh god. |
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2024
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 11:28:00 -
[231] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:LOL. That MUST be it. It can't POSSIBLY be that I simply hold the opinion that while freedom to do whatever you want in a sandbox game is a good thing, hassling new players for no reason beyond boredom is a dumb idea.
Seriously guy...
No, but misquoting people on purpose and obtusely refusing to understand what is being said.
NO ONE is advocating "hassling new players for no reason beyond boredom".
In fact, hassling new players is strictly against the EULA and the mdoerated rules of both the game and the forums.
You are CHOOSING to interpert it in this way to forward your own sense of importance.
You are CHOOSING not to see that what you are stating is what the vast majority of us actually support.
You seem to be under the impression that anything that happens that you dont agree with is because other people are "bad", by extention making you the paradigm of virtue.
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2024
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 11:33:00 -
[232] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: People come he to play a game, to have fun and get greeted by someone literally spending hours to make sure they can't play. So they post on the forum, many understandably frustrated, and they get met with "HTFU noob", "Go play hello kitty online", "waah, entitlement", and any number of other trolls. In all honesty, this whole community is an absolute disgrace, myself included. We've got to the point that we are so incredibly elitists that we refuse to let new people in. When I joined it was harsh, yeah, but it wasn't like it is now. People didn't go out of their way to ensure it's as difficult as possible for you to play. In all honesty, I really wonder how (and in fact if) we even attract new players. .
So how come out of the ten people in the last year Ive introduced EvE to, 7 are still playing? Most of those are so addicted, they log in pretty much every night?
Of the three who left;
1 didnt like the fact he couldnt leave his ship to mine while he went to the shops
1 couldnt undertand the GUI or the market screen
1 didnt have the time to invest in a game of this depth *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
386
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 11:41:00 -
[233] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:A lot of stuff. Lucas, I would ask that you slow down and read some of the posts from these "newbies" you're talking about. Many are simply filled with vitriol and venomous nonsense, not just in this thread but in every thread they have posted in on this subject. It is one thing to say, "I don't like being bumped" and quite another to say, "You're all a bunch of sociopaths and clowns". The nice thing about this community is that they are helpful to people who ask for help. They are also justifiably intolerant of people who just want to rant and carry on like a spoiled ******* brat. I've read them. A lot of them are simple legitimate concerns. People come he to play a game, to have fun and get greeted by someone literally spending hours to make sure they can't play. So they post on the forum, many understandably frustrated, and they get met with "HTFU noob", "Go play hello kitty online", "waah, entitlement", and any number of other trolls. In all honesty, this whole community is an absolute disgrace, myself included. We've got to the point that we are so incredibly elitists that we refuse to let new people in. When I joined it was harsh, yeah, but it wasn't like it is now. People didn't go out of their way to ensure it's as difficult as possible for you to play. In all honesty, I really wonder how (and in fact if) we even attract new players. I love EVE, it's a great game, and it would be really nice to be able to share that with other people, but you can't. Unless a player already has an account and understands the mechanics they get met with us idiots trolling them into the ground, and that's a damn shame.
Let me draw up two scenarios here. Admittedly, they are relatively simplistic but I think it will illustrate a point.
Scenario 1
I have a friend that I used to play another game with. For the sake of the scenario, we'll call it Rift. He and I used to PvP in Conquest (instanced PvP). I also play Eve and tell him that he might enjoy it. So I tell him more about how the PvP is everywhere. I accurately tell him the difference between high-security space (where PvP has consequences enforced by Concord and about aggression mechanics etc.) and low/null security space (where PvP still has consequences but that they are not enforced by the Concord mechanic - except for ******* gate guns in low sec). I explain scams to him (advising that anything being linked in Jita is generally an attempt to **** you).
Based on my desciption he decides to give it a try and finds that he enjoys mining and building stuff with the minerals he collects. One day he is spotted by a ganker, Jeff Beidermaier (just kidding, Jeff is not a ganker and is an awesome guy) in a belt in a 0.6 system. Jeff promptly dumps all 8 barrels of his gank-fit Catalyst into my friends hull. My friend, because he knew what to expect, says in local, "You got me Jeff, well done! I obviously don't like losing my ship but I get it. Any advice you can give me to make me a better miner?"
Not only is my friend playing Eve but he is also making new friends.
Scenario 2
Another person has a friend they used to play another game with. Instanced PvP was a nice diversion from the leveling from 1-whatever in a week (veiled disdain of easy mode gaming and instant gratification levelling). They also tell their friend about Eve. They inaccurately describe high security space as "safe" (I think you see where this is going - the same place it has always gone). He also describes low/null security space as "where pirates live".
So this friend starts playing Eve and enjoys mining (so much so that he AFKs while doing it because he is "safe"). Jeff comes along and pops him and his pod. This friend goes ballistic in local, "YOU CAN'T SHOOT AT ME IN HIGH SECURITY SPACE! IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE SAFE! GO TO LO-SEC WHERE YOU PIRATES BELONG!" The friend petitions a GM because he believes that Jeff has broken the rules of a safe hi-sec. GM tells the friend to "HTFU". The friend then comes to this forum and subsequently loses their ****.
Here's the thing Lucas. This game is not for everyone and it never will be for everyone. I don't think there is a single game on the market that can cater to every expectation or playstyle of what is undoubtedly a vastly diverse PC gamer community. We, as players, have a responsibility to accurately describe what this game is. I love it! I will tell friends about it but I will do so honestly and candidly without pulling punches or sugar coating the naked truth. If I adequately educate my friend and he decides it's not something he's keen on, then so be it. It's not for everyone. If I don't adequately educate him and he decides to play it, then Jeff Beidermaier (sorry I just can't help myself) WILL educate him.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2025
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 11:47:00 -
[234] - Quote
Long ago, the great Frith made the world.
He made all the stars, and the world lived among the stars. He made all the animals and birds, and at first, he made them all the same. Now, among the animals was El-ahrairah, the prince of rabbits. He had many friends, and they all ate grass together. But after a time, the rabbits wandered everywhere, multiplying and eating as they went.
Then Frith said to El-ahrairah, 'Prince Rabbit, if you cannot control your people, I shall find ways to control them. So mark what I say.' But El-ahrairah would not listen. He said to Frith, 'My people are the strongest in the world, for they breed faster and they eat more than any of the other people.'
This angered Frith, so he determined to get the better of El-ahrairah...not by means of his own great power, but by means of a trick. He gave a present to every animal and bird, making each one different from the rest. When the fox came, and others, like the dog and the cat, the hawk, the wolf and the weasel, to each of them, Frith gave a fierce desire to hunt and slay the children of El-ahrairah. Then El-ahrairah knew that Frith was too clever for him and he was frightened, for he had never before seen the black rabbit of death. 'My friend,' said Frith, 'have you seen El-ahrairah, for I wish to give him a gift?' 'Uh, no,' said El-ahrairah, 'I have not seen him. He is far away. He wouldn't come.'
So Frith said, 'Come out and I will bless you instead.' 'No, I cannot,' said El-ahrairah, 'I am busy. The fox and weasel are coming. If you want to bless me, you'll have to bless my bottom.' 'Very well,' said Frith, 'Be it so.'
And El-ahrairah's tail grew shining white and flashed like a star. And his back legs grew long and powerful. And he tore across the hill, faster than any creature in the world. And Frith called after him, 'All the world will be your enemy, prince with a thousand enemies. And whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first, they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, Prince with a swift warning. Be cunning, and full of tricks, and your people will never be destroyed.'
This is the tale I tell to the new Children of New Eden. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2374
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:13:00 -
[235] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Here's the thing Lucas. This game is not for everyone and it never will be for everyone. I don't think there is a single game on the market that can cater to every expectation or playstyle of what is undoubtedly a vastly diverse PC gamer community. We, as players, have a responsibility to accurately describe what this game is. I love it! I will tell friends about it but I will do so honestly and candidly without pulling punches or sugar coating the naked truth. If I adequately educate my friend and he decides it's not something he's keen on, then so be it. It's not for everyone. If I don't adequately educate him and he decides to play it, then Jeff Beidermaier (sorry I just can't help myself) WILL educate him. Sure, it's not. But I think we're getting more and more elitist, and for what? What do we gain by pushing random people out of the game? I'm a big fan of EVE, I run 8 accounts, so I have to like it a fair bit, but if I started now, I'd probably not bother. I'd take one look at the amount of trolling thrown about and be like "I CBA with dealing with all of that".
But honestly the biggest question is that. What do we gain? The new order guys are probably sitting around bored in a 10% tidi fight somewhere, so they log an alt and start bumping and hassling randoms, to the point that they come on the forum to complain. We then troll the ever living hell out of them, and they quit. What has been accomplished? I know most people will answer something along the lines of "We got a pathetic wimp out of the game", but that's absolutely nonsense. People should expect to have fun in a game and being battered by the existing playerbase for no reason is no fun, so it's no surprise when they leave.
Ramona McCandless wrote:Long ago, the great Frith made the world. One of my favourite books that. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2288
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:15:00 -
[236] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:What do we gain by pushing random people out of the game? The satisfaction of a job well done.
Oh god. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2025
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:16:00 -
[237] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Long ago, the great Frith made the world. One of my favourite books that.
Then its message should not be lost on you. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2378
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:36:00 -
[238] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Long ago, the great Frith made the world. One of my favourite books that. Then its message should not be lost on you. Sure, though El-ahrairah was given the benefit of being faster than the animals that hunt him. We don't give our newbies that, we just kill them mercilessly, because we are bigger, tougher and more experienced than they are.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
388
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:39:00 -
[239] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:But honestly the biggest question is that. What do we gain? The new order guys are probably sitting around bored in a 10% tidi fight somewhere, so they log an alt and start bumping and hassling randoms, to the point that they come on the forum to complain. We then troll the ever living hell out of them, and they quit. What has been accomplished?.
I don't endorse the actions of this New Order. Do I think they have a place in Eve? - of course. Would I ever join and enforce the CODE? - no.
When they come to the forums to complain there are some that will give them ideas they maybe didn't think of, for example mining in a Rokh. Too often, they ignore this advice, troll the person giving the advice, and continue their deluge of douchebaggery.
They also lobby for the game to be changed to suit their AND ONLY THEIR playstyle. That is just plain selfish. I could get along with a single thread of that nature here and there but it is all over the place in here.
What is accomplished is that a game that is, as I am sure you and I can agree, not for everyone just lost another person for whom this game was not for. We don't tell them things like "GB2WOW" (which I have never told anyone because WoW just sucks - ******* pandas?) because we don't want them here. We tell them that because they don't want to be here.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2026
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:39:00 -
[240] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Long ago, the great Frith made the world. One of my favourite books that. Then its message should not be lost on you. Sure, though El-ahrairah was given the benefit of being faster than the animals that hunt him. We don't give our newbies that, we just kill them mercilessly, because we are bigger, tougher and more experienced than they are.
You do not understand.
I explain it calmly, using a tale you claim to be familiar with and STIlLL you refuse to see.
Tell me, are you aware of what a metaphor is? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
389
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:48:00 -
[241] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:We don't give our newbies that, we just kill them mercilessly, because we are bigger, tougher and more experienced than they are.
I can't give specific figures because I am not a miner but I would imagine that it takes at least 2-3 months to get into a Retriever with enough skill to make it worthwhile. These people you are defending are not "newbies". They're lazy. They're AFK. They're not fitting their ship appropriately to avoid or mitigate a gank.
The only helpless victims in this game are the people that choose to be helpless victims. Please forgive me for not having sympathy for a person that makes that choice.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 12:55:00 -
[242] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
NO ONE is advocating "hassling new players for no reason beyond boredom".
In fact, hassling new players is strictly against the EULA and the mdoerated rules of both the game and the forums.
This is the central blindness/stubbornness of those in the "it's fine the way it is, don't change anything" crowd.
Hassling includes ganking. Hassling includes scamming contracts. Hassling includes bumping. Hassling includes tricking people into becoming a 'suspect'. See #1.
Hassling is a more PC term for griefing. New players get griefed and they get frustrated. Then they quit. Good job CCP! Yes, players can and *should* learn how to protect themselves better. But that takes time. Literally weeks, of you consider the time it takes to train up skills enough to be able to use the tools effectively. It would be interesting to find out how long the average new player lasts. 3 days? A week?
So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2027
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:05:00 -
[243] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:
Hassling includes ganking. (Citation needed) Hassling includes scamming contracts. (Citation needed) Hassling includes bumping. (No citation needed, CCP has stated it only does so under particular circumstances) Hassling includes tricking people into becoming a 'suspect'. See #1. (Citation needed)
Hassling is a more PC term for griefing. New players get griefed and they get frustrated. Then they quit. Good job CCP! Yes, players can and *should* learn how to protect themselves better. But that takes time. Literally weeks, of you consider the time it takes to train up skills enough to be able to use the tools effectively. It would be interesting to find out how long the average new player lasts. 3 days? A week?
Please supply evidence to support this hypothesis. My own tests prove that only 10% of cases I personally studied resulted in this, and it was because the player felt that mining while they LEFT THEIR HOUSE was an acceptable form of interaction with the game. Do you think his right to go to the shops while mining should be protected?
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'.
Why do you insist on this myth that there are two groups: Pro-solo players and Pro-Gankers to the exculsion of all else?
As neither a ganker nor a miner I can say you are wrong on this. Factually wrong. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
394
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:13:00 -
[244] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'.
Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it.
The educated vets on these forums are not so earnest in their support of bullies. Most of us are enjoying the game exactly as it is. Even us veteran high sec carebears ( 0/ ) are not interested in your "modest" changes and in that we have earnest opposition.
You should know the history here. A few years back (I'd have to go digging for it or someone else can go find it) James 315 posted a Manifesto about how all highsec carebears want "One more nerf". They want CONCORD to be tougher. They want Barges and Exhumers to be tougher. They want it to be harder to gank. All day, everyday carebear miners would (and clearly continue) to come to this forum and demand "one more nerf". The end goal of all the "one more nerf"s being 100% safety in high sec.
You want to know who's to blame for minerbumping, ganking, and this hassling you describe?
People like you! Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2030
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:16:00 -
[245] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
You want to know who's to blame for minerbumping, ganking, and this hassling you describe?
People like you!
HEAR HEAR!!
*Bangs shoe on the table loudly* *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15510
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:22:00 -
[246] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: This is the central blindness/stubbornness of those in the "it's fine the way it is, don't change anything" crowd.
Hassling includes ganking. Hassling includes scamming contracts. Hassling includes bumping. Hassling includes tricking people into becoming a 'suspect'. See #1.
All of these are accept styles of gameplay, when not done to excess. If CCP thinks people are stepping over the line between acceptable and unacceptable they will let us know.
Quote:Hassling is a more PC term for griefing. New players get griefed and they get frustrated. Then they quit. Good job CCP! Yes, players can and *should* learn how to protect themselves better. But that takes time. Literally weeks, of you consider the time it takes to train up skills enough to be able to use the tools effectively. It would be interesting to find out how long the average new player lasts. 3 days? A week? Nope harassment is against the rules, as is griefing. I won't argue against newbies needing to be better informed of the nature of Eve before they undock, a more informed newbie is a newbie who has an inkling of what they're signing themselves up for.
Quote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Because we've seen people like you come and go repeatedly over the years, you and your ilk will be the death of independent gaming devs, you come into an established game and try and change it to suit yourself, and screw all the players who've put time and money into it over the years because they like it the way it is. If you succeed in changing it, you leave for the next big thing after 3 months because you're now bored, leaving the core audience with a broken game. You're like locusts.
Do yourself a favour, move onto a game that is more to your taste, many of us have found one that we like, and you're trying to ruin it. Think of it this way, if you want to see Eve style shenanigans happening on an MMO server near you, carry on along the path you're so blindly following.
This also applies :
Malcanis' Law wrote: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of GÇÿnew playersGÇÖ, that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.
[*] The secondary corollary is that when new players propose a change, they invariably lack the experience and insight to see how the change would again be exploited by older players far more efficiently than themselves. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
394
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:25:00 -
[247] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Because we've seen people like you come and go repeatedly over the years, you and your ilk will be the death of independent gaming devs, you come into an established game and try and change it to suit yourself, and screw all the players who've put time and money into it over the years because they like it the way it is, and if you succeed in changing it, you leave for the next big thing and leave us with a broken game. You're like locusts. Do yourself a favour, move onto a game that is more to your taste, many of us have found one that we like, and you're trying to ruin it. Think of it this way, if you want to see Eve style shenanigans happening on an MMO server near you, carry on along the path you're so blindly following. This also applies : Malcanis' Law wrote: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of GÇÿnew playersGÇÖ, that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.
The secondary corollary is that when new players propose a change, they invariably lack the experience and insight to see how the change would again be exploited by older players far more efficiently than themselves.
Seconded.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2030
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:28:00 -
[248] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Yes, players can and *should* learn how to protect themselves better. But that takes time. Literally weeks, of you consider the time it takes to train up skills enough to be able to use the tools effectively..
Confirming: Tactical Shield Manipulation 3/4 takes "weeks" *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2290
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:34:00 -
[249] - Quote
I want to hear about these modest changes. Call it morbid curiosity. Oh god. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15511
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:37:00 -
[250] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:I want to hear about these modest changes. Call it morbid curiosity. "Highsec, A New Vision"
|
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
398
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:38:00 -
[251] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Yes, players can and *should* learn how to protect themselves better. But that takes time. Literally weeks, of you consider the time it takes to train up skills enough to be able to use the tools effectively..
You wouldn't pilot an RNI into a level 4 mission without training all the support skills you need to do so effectively. Doing so would put you in jeopardy of losing your pretty RNI. There is not a shred of difference. If you don't have the necessary skills to pilot the ship, either don't pilot the ship OR possess some semblance of intellect to know that whatever happened because you did pilot the ship was your fault and not the fault of "poor game design".
Ramona McCandless wrote:Confirming: Tactical Shield Manipulation 3/4 takes "weeks"
But then he'd have to wait before training Mining Upgrades IV!!! Also ISK/hr!!! Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2033
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:46:00 -
[252] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
But then he'd have to wait before training Mining Upgrades IV!!! Also ISK/hr!!!
CCP should make it so you can fly a fully kitted Mackinaw as your noobship for trial accounts.
But all other professions should start in an Ibis thats on fire.
That would make it fair on the poor mining characters. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Scarlett Wesson
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:49:00 -
[253] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'.
Dude, you're wasting your time. You're arguing with people liking "tears". This "game" allows them to be jerks and to make other people miserable, and they love it, hiding behind "this is just a game" excuses, while blatantly ignoring that nearly all of the steps towards building something in EvE are boring as hell (whether ISK grinding or Production), thus being really annoying when you happen to lose it. Why would they accept to have it changed in order to protect their victims?
They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL.
A lot of people in here seem to forget the definition of "griefing", since EvE has its own meaning of the term. Nearly every form of player interaction would be banned if the real definition was used and enforced. That shows how much this game lacks content, relying on its playerbase's asshattery to do all the work. Long live the Litter box!
I suggest you move to another game, a real game, a fun one. As it is, the community is worse than it was when you left, and it won't get better. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:52:00 -
[254] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why do you insist on this myth that there are two groups: Pro-solo players and Pro-Gankers to the exculsion of all else?
As neither a ganker nor a miner I can say you are wrong on this. Factually wrong.
I've never suggested there are only 'pro-solo' and 'pro-ganking' groups. I thought it was pretty clear. Pro-ganking, and anti-ganking. There really is only 2 sides to this, like most things. Either you are okay with ganking, or not. Clearly there are many on either side, with the advantage on the pro-ganking side. Which includes CCP, sadly. But that does not mean that things can change, as many gankers have already expressed frustration with (can flipping changes and the like).
Eve's "harsh nature" won't be ruined by allowing people in highsec a little more protection against what we feel is anti-social bullying. I've said it many times before, and I'll keep saying it: I don't want 100% protection in highsec. Just make the decision to gank a much more serious one. I'll also add something I've not yet admitted. I have no sympathy for those who afk play, for any reason. I am very much opposed to botting. Heck, I don't even like multi-boxing, although I am seriously considering doing it myself to have a logi support my miner. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2291
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:54:00 -
[255] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Just make the decision to gank a much more serious one. How?
Oh god. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:55:00 -
[256] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it.
While your at it, could you let me know what I really want for dinner tonight? I might not know. |

Victor Dathar
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
241
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 13:57:00 -
[257] - Quote
I am a 0.4 warp core stabilizing grifer ^^^ lol that post is so bad you should get back 2 GBS m8 o7 |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
399
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:00:00 -
[258] - Quote
Scarlett Wesson wrote:Dude, you're wasting your time. You're arguing with people liking "tears". This "game" allows them to be jerks and to make other people miserable, and they love it, hiding behind "this is just a game" excuses, while blatantly ignoring that nearly all of the steps towards building something in EvE are boring as hell (whether ISK grinding or Production), thus being really annoying when you happen to lose it. Why would they accept to have it changed in order to protect their victims?
High sec mission running bear here. It is annoying when you happen to lose your stuff. But to demand the game be changed so you can keep your stuff without taking any responsibility for keeping your stuff is asinine. Also my victims are NPC rats and I don't care about their tears as long as they are blowing up.
Scarlett Wesson wrote:They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL.
I honestly don't even know where to start with this. The fact that the mining mechanic is boring is not sufficient justification for not playing the game. Miners have chosen to mine. The idea that because it's boring one should be able to AFK is ludicrous. If it bores you that much don't do it and find something you can actually be engaged in.
Scarlett Wesson wrote:A lot of people in here seem to forget the definition of "griefing", since EvE has its own meaning of the term. Nearly every form of player interaction would be banned if the real definition was used and enforced. That shows how much this game lacks content, relying on its playerbase's asshattery to do all the work. Long live the Litter box!
Shooting at peoples spaceships in a game about shooting at spaceships is not griefing.
Scarlett Wesson wrote:I suggest you move to another game, a real game, a fun one. As it is, the community is worse than it was when you left, and it won't get better.
There is literally no word in the English language that describes how much I agree with this statement. If you don't want to play the game as it is then don't play. Easy.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
399
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:03:00 -
[259] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:
Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it.
While your at it, could you let me know what I really want for dinner tonight? I might not know.
I'd be delighted to tell you what you want for dinner...
One more nerf.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15511
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:05:00 -
[260] - Quote
Scarlett Wesson wrote: Dude, you're wasting your time. You're arguing with people liking "tears". This "game" allows them to be jerks and to make other people miserable, and they love it, hiding behind "this is just a game" excuses, while blatantly ignoring that nearly all of the steps towards building something in EvE are boring as hell (whether ISK grinding or Production), thus being really annoying when you happen to lose it. Why would they accept to have it changed in order to protect their victims?
Why do the victims not protect themselves? Eve is marketed as a PvP game, why are people so surprised and outraged when it happens to them? Why do they not take some measures to prevent it happening to them?
Official New Player FAQ : 7 PVP (PLAYER VERSUS PLAYER) wrote:The essential core concept of EVE Online is that it is full time PvP in a sandbox environment. As has been mentioned in previous sections any player can engage another player at any time in any place. It even says so in CCPS official NP FAQ.
Quote:They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL.[quote]We know it's boring, which is why we don't do it unless we have to and even then we do it in fleets because fleet chat is always amusing, as an added bonus it makes solo miners cry.
[quote]A lot of people in here seem to forget the definition of "griefing", since EvE has its own meaning of the term. Nearly every form of player interaction would be banned if the real definition was used and enforced. That shows how much this game lacks content, relying on its playerbase's asshattery to do all the work. Long live the Litter box!
I suggest you move to another game, a real game, a fun one. As it is, the community is worse than it was when you left, and it won't get better. CCP's definition of griefing is the only definition applicable to Eve, as such the commonly accepted definitions don't apply to Eve. The reliance on the playerbases asshattery for content is on of CCPs major marketing devices, the limited and mediocre PvE is by design.
As for your last comment, I suggest you follow your own advice and move to a game that you find to be fun.
|
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:11:00 -
[261] - Quote
Thanks for a non-hysterical or insulting post. A refreshing change.
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Because we've seen people like you come and go repeatedly over the years, you and your ilk will be the death of independent gaming devs, you come into an established game and try and change it to suit yourself, and screw all the players who've put time and money into it over the years because they like it the way it is. If you succeed in changing it, you leave for the next big thing after 3 months because you're now bored, leaving the core audience with a broken game. You're like locusts. Do yourself a favour, move onto a game that is more to your taste, many of us have found one that we like, and you're trying to ruin it. Think of it this way, if you want to see Eve style shenanigans happening on an MMO server near you, carry on along the path you're so blindly following. This also applies : Malcanis' Law wrote: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of GÇÿnew playersGÇÖ, that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.
The secondary corollary is that when new players propose a change, they invariably lack the experience and insight to see how the change would again be exploited by older players far more efficiently than themselves.
edit ~ I am aware that your character is 5 years old. That doesn't exclude you from being a newbie. I have one 8 years old, but I've only actually /played about 9 months or so, fyi. Still pretty new. And each time I come back, I have to re-learn stuff.
I can appreciate your sentiment about transient players. There is merit to this, and I believe I have tried to be respectful of the existing core game. The thing is, I would rather have not felt the need to move and take multi-year breaks. I would rather have *wanted* to stay because Eve was the most fun and interesting game out there. It stands out among the crowd because of it's sci-fi nature, it's sandbox, and it's single shard (despite how woefully inadequate it is performance-wise).
I do not agree that making modest changes to highsec, providing a safer (not 100%!!) environment for people who do not consider it fun to be constantly in danger of getting killed, will break the game. There is a HUGE market out there (i.e. money) for PvE enthusiasts. For people who love PvP, but not open-world killing.
More players will not break Eve. Safer highsec will not break Eve. Changing Eve will not break Eve. There is still Null space and null sec where hard-core "pvp" players can find all the fun they can handle. Isn't there more low/nullsec than highsec? There are all kinds of ways to reach this goal. I suggested things like lowering the response time of Concord as low-hanging fruit. I'm sure experienced players can come up with really interesting solutions. But in the end, it all comes down to whether or not it is in Eve's best interest to attract more new, long-term players to the game, and how to do that. Making Eve a little more PvE friendly seems a good way to do that. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
902
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:11:00 -
[262] - Quote
Day 2 and this thread is coming along swimmingly.
Obligatory permit offer to all non-compliants. 10mil = 1 year of mining.
Permit tank = best tank.
Have a good day.
   Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2035
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:17:00 -
[263] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why do you insist on this myth that there are two groups: Pro-solo players and Pro-Gankers to the exculsion of all else?
As neither a ganker nor a miner I can say you are wrong on this. Factually wrong.
I've never suggested there are only 'pro-solo' and 'pro-ganking' groups. I thought it was pretty clear. Pro-ganking, and anti-ganking. There really is only 2 sides to this, like most things. Either you are okay with ganking, or not. Clearly there are many on either side, with the advantage on the pro-ganking side. Which includes CCP, sadly. But that does not mean that things can change, as many gankers have already expressed frustration with (can flipping changes and the like). Eve's "harsh nature" won't be ruined by allowing people in highsec a little more protection against what we feel is anti-social bullying. I've said it many times before, and I'll keep saying it: I don't want 100% protection in highsec. Just make the decision to gank a much more serious one. I'll also add something I've not yet admitted. I have no sympathy for those who afk play, for any reason. I am very much opposed to botting. Heck, I don't even like multi-boxing, although I am seriously considering doing it myself to have a logi support my miner.
The only point I have made ( and continue to make) is....
Why must CCP do your thinking for you?
EVERY other profession in EvE requires thought to avoid catastrpophic loss.
WHY must mining be a protected profession?
The tools already exist to have a life free from the fear of small gang ganking, what more do you want? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

embrel
BamBam Inc.
98
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:27:00 -
[264] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Either you are okay with ganking, or not.
it can be a tad more complex.
It's the risk that makes this game fun for me. And to add risk, gankers are important.
I however am not addicted to tears, so that - with the possible exception of a proof of concept gank - I don't think it's an activity I will pursue.
Same with pirates btw. Without them it would be kind of boring... |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
400
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:33:00 -
[265] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I do not agree that making modest changes to highsec, providing a safer (not 100%!!) environment for people who do not consider it fun to be constantly in danger of getting killed, will break the game. There is a HUGE market out there (i.e. money) for PvE enthusiasts. For people who love PvP, but not open-world killing.
Honestly. the allure of this game is that you are constantly in danger of getting killed. Hi sec is "safe enough". If not 100%, then what percent safe would make you stop clamoring for more changes, more nerfs, more safety? The answer is there isn't. Literally thousands of people get along just fine in high sec. I've played this game almost 6 years and have never been unshipped in high sec by another player. The vocal minority, of which you have decided to crusade for, are not interested in what is good for the other thousands of players in this game. Their only interest is what makes their game more fun. There is a market for PvE enthusiasts and it is filled to the busted seams with other games that these people can go to play and not be constantly in danger of being killed. Go have your version of fun!
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:More players will not break Eve. Safer highsec will not break Eve. Changing Eve will not break Eve. There is still Null space and null sec where hard-core "pvp" players can find all the fun they can handle. Isn't there more low/nullsec than highsec? There are all kinds of ways to reach this goal. I suggested things like lowering the response time of Concord as low-hanging fruit. I'm sure experienced players can come up with really interesting solutions. But in the end, it all comes down to whether or not it is in Eve's best interest to attract more new, long-term players to the game, and how to do that. Making Eve a little more PvE friendly seems a good way to do that.
Do you know why there is PvP in high sec? Because that is where the targets are. PvP players don't have to go to Null sec to find all the fun they can handle because PvP happens E V E R Y W H E R E. Safer highsec will not break Eve FOR YOU. But for others it does. What the hell gives you the right to tell people that pay the same sub as you what you believe they have the privilege of doing?
If you honestly can't play the game with it's mechanics as they are then stop playing the game. Alternatively, if you want a strictly PvE Eve experience, logon to Singularity. There are typically less than 100 people online and you can mine to your hearts content. You can mine AFK. You don't even need a permit. There is your PvE paradise now go forth and prosper. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15512
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:36:00 -
[266] - Quote
Yay sensible and honest post without hurf blurf, this is what we need more of.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: I have one 8 years old, but I've only actually /played about 9 months or so, fyi. Still pretty new. And each time I come back, I have to re-learn stuff.
I can appreciate your sentiment about transient players. There is merit to this, and I believe I have tried to be respectful of the existing core game. The thing is, I would rather have not felt the need to move and take multi-year breaks. I would rather have *wanted* to stay because Eve was the most fun and interesting game out there. It stands out among the crowd because of it's sci-fi nature, it's sandbox, and it's single shard (despite how woefully inadequate it is performance-wise).
For me Eve is still the most fun and interesting game out there, part of the sandbox is the ever present risk, no matter how slight, of somebody ruining your day. Highsec is relatively safe, not getting ganked there is very easy, all you need is a little knowledge of game mechanics and to not do anything dumb.
Quote:I do not agree that making modest changes to highsec, providing a safer (not 100%!!) environment for people who do not consider it fun to be constantly in danger of getting killed, will break the game. There is a HUGE market out there (i.e. money) for PvE enthusiasts. For people who love PvP, but not open-world killing. [quote]I would much rather see a player driven group making life riskier for people with neg sec status, a suspect or criminal flag than see CCP do it for them. The Crimewatch mechanic already allows this. not many people choose to do so. Instead they end up on the forums whining which is why without actually seeing your modest proposals most are going to assume that they're gamebreaking.
[quote]More players will not break Eve. Safer highsec will not break Eve. Changing Eve will not break Eve. There is still Null space and null sec where hard-core "pvp" players can find all the fun they can handle. Isn't there more low/nullsec than highsec? There are all kinds of ways to reach this goal. I suggested things like lowering the response time of Concord as low-hanging fruit. I'm sure experienced players can come up with really interesting solutions. But in the end, it all comes down to whether or not it is in Eve's best interest to attract more new, long-term players to the game, and how to do that. Making Eve a little more PvE friendly seems a good way to do that. My main problem with this is "There is still Null space and null sec where hard-core "pvp" players can find all the fun they can handle" that'll be a big fat nope, Highsec is as much for PvP as any other area in the game.
Lowering Concord response times will not curtail suicide ganking, all it will achieve is more ships being brought to do the job in the time allocated.
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:38:00 -
[267] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why must CCP do your thinking for you?
EVERY other profession in EvE requires thought to avoid catastrpophic loss.
WHY must mining be a protected profession?
The tools already exist to have a life free from the fear of small gang ganking, what more do you want?
Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat. Therefore people are flying combat ships designed for... combat. The tools to make a non-combat ship less attractive to a gank crew simutaneously makes the non-combat ship less effective at it's desired role.
Would you fit a few probe launchers to run combat missions? Expanded cargohold's in faction warfare? No, because it would make you less effective at your 'profession'. Mining is already too boring (really should be an NPC 'companion' job, i.e. passive like research points), and some people like to do it as little as possible. This means being as efficient as possible.
Dang. Maybe I should just advocate for a change to make mining passive like research points.... hmm... Every other thing you do you can do in a ship prepared for combat with no real loss of effectiveness. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2037
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:40:00 -
[268] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat.
Please tell me more about how Exploring, Salvaging, Couriering, Researching, Noob Training, Manufacturing and Cynoalting involve combat please *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15513
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:42:00 -
[269] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat. Therefore people are flying combat ships designed for... combat. The tools to make a non-combat ship less attractive to a gank crew simutaneously makes the non-combat ship less effective at it's desired role.
Would you fit a few probe launchers to run combat missions? Expanded cargohold's in faction warfare? No, because it would make you less effective at your 'profession'. Mining is already too boring (really should be an NPC 'companion' job, i.e. passive like research points), and some people like to do it as little as possible. This means being as efficient as possible.
Dang. Maybe I should just advocate for a change to make mining passive like research points.... hmm... Every other thing you do you can do in a ship prepared for combat with no real loss of effectiveness.
Every combat ship fit makes a balance between survivability and effectiveness at its role, a hauler fit does the same, what makes a mining barge different?
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2037
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:42:00 -
[270] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:
Would you fit a few probe launchers to run combat missions?
When you are ninja salvaging into missions, yes.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: No, because it would make you less effective at your 'profession'. Mining is already too boring (really should be an NPC 'companion' job, i.e. passive like research points), and some people like to do it as little as possible. This means being as efficient as possible.
Please tell me more about how putting shield modules on a Procurer affects your mining yield. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
400
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:44:00 -
[271] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:You should know the history here. A few years back (I'd have to go digging for it or someone else can go find it) James 315 posted a Manifesto about how all highsec carebears want "One more nerf". They want CONCORD to be tougher. They want Barges and Exhumers to be tougher. They want it to be harder to gank. All day, everyday carebear miners would (and clearly continue to) come to this forum and demand "one more nerf". The end goal of all the "one more nerf"s being 100% safety in high sec.
You want to know who's to blame for minerbumping, ganking, and this hassling you describe?
People like you!
Found it! Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:44:00 -
[272] - Quote
I have to quibble with the statement that "highsec is where the pvp is". First, a mendacious point hashed over plenty the past few days: ganking is not PvP, as the aggression and threat is from one side only. Ganking is the knock-out game.
But more importantly, IMHO, highsec is where pvp is because so many people in Eve aren't interested in true PvP, and instead look for the easiest way to kill someone else. Null/high sec is where true PvP is. People there *should be* prepared for it. But gankers, by and large, aren't interested in a true competitive fight. They are frequently found fighting people who can't fight back. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2040
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:50:00 -
[273] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Irrelevant waffle
You going to answer my counter-points to your statements or continue to ignore it when someone makes points that undercut your argument? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 14:52:00 -
[274] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat.
Please tell me more about how Exploring, Salvaging, Couriering, Researching, Noob Training, Manufacturing and Cynoalting involve combat please My apologies, I should have worded that from the other direction and clarified location. Allow me to re-state: Mining is the only in-space profession whose ships are meant to do something other than fight.
In all but one of your in-space examples (courier), there will be fighting, and more importantly, the ship you will be in will be designed to fight. I admit to not knowing what a cyno-alt is, but my guess is a character serving only as a jump bridge for others. Even there, you will be in a ship designed for combat.
Please, no one talk about how any equipment can be fit on any ship if it's the right slot! I would have to ask why you don't take an Orca into fleet warfare. Or a Hulk to assault a POS..... |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15513
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:00:00 -
[275] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I have to quibble with the statement that "highsec is where the pvp is". First, a mendacious point hashed over plenty the past few days: ganking is not PvP, as the aggression and threat is from one side only. Ganking is the knock-out game. In your opinion it isn't PvP, in mine it is PvP, it involves 2 or more players in a timed fight, one is fighting to survive long enough for the timer to run out, the others are trying to kill the victim before the timer runs out.
Quote:But more importantly, IMHO, highsec is where pvp is because so many people in Eve aren't interested in true PvP, and instead look for the easiest way to kill someone else. Highsec is where the targets are, it's as simple as that.
Quote:Null/high sec is where true PvP is. Define true PvP for us please?
Quote:People there *should be* prepared for it. Why shouldn't highsec dwellers be prepared for it? Highsec is a target rich environment, people go to where the targets are
Quote:But gankers, by and large, aren't interested in a true competitive fight. They are frequently found fighting people who can't fight back. Congratulations, you just defined traditional piracy, albeit in a new setting. Despite their hollywood good press, pirates traditionally attacked merchant and supply shipping, if something was capable of giving a good fight they generally gave it a miss. Also please explain how people can't fight back, it's normally that they can, but they won't. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2291
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:02:00 -
[276] - Quote
ZynnLee, if mining ships aren't designed for combat, you'd think miners would make more of an effort to avoid combat. Oh god. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
401
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:02:00 -
[277] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I have to quibble with the statement that "highsec is where the pvp is". First, a mendacious point hashed over plenty the past few days: ganking is not PvP, as the aggression and threat is from one side only. Ganking is the knock-out game.
But more importantly, IMHO, highsec is where pvp is because so many people in Eve aren't interested in true PvP, and instead look for the easiest way to kill someone else. Null/high sec is where true PvP is. People there *should be* prepared for it. But gankers, by and large, aren't interested in a true competitive fight. They are frequently found fighting people who can't fight back.
They are frequently found fighting people who won't fight back.
You need to be careful about the use of the word can't in your last sentence. There is literally nothing stopping anyone from fighting back. They just won't (not can't).
Ganking is PvP. It pits one or more players against one or more other players. The fact that one or more of these players won't (not can't) fit according and instead chooses to lie down and get killed does not magically make this something other than PvP. Admittedly, I find it silly that you continue to argue this point on the condition that everyone else accepts your misguided definitions of stuff. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Eram Fidard
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
649
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:03:00 -
[278] - Quote
Jacob Holland wrote:Alduin666 Shikkoken wrote:It's not any different from 5 years ago :D I think it is... Though can baiting was relatively prevalent five years ago the bumping was all but unheard of, the majority of miners had to pay attention to when Hulkageddon was due but the New Order wasn't a thing yet. Five years ago the Nullsec Hulk fits (loaded with Gist or Pith A-Type boosters) in highsec were the ones at real risk, the ones who copied fits from the interwebs without thinking about what they actually needed.
**** that, I was bumping miners in a stabber in 2008. Didn't have a 'code' to go with it, but who needs it? Poster is not to be held responsible for damages to keyboards and/or noses caused by hot beverages. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2042
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:03:00 -
[279] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat.
Please tell me more about how Exploring, Salvaging, Couriering, Researching, Noob Training, Manufacturing and Cynoalting involve combat please My apologies, I should have worded that from the other direction and clarified location. Allow me to re-state: Mining is the only in-space profession whose ships are meant to do something other than fight. In all but one of your in-space examples (courier), there will be fighting, and more importantly, the ship you will be in will be designed to fight. I admit to not knowing what a cyno-alt is, but my guess is a character serving only as a jump bridge for others. Even there, you will be in a ship designed for combat. Please, no one talk about how any equipment can be fit on any ship if it's the right slot! I would have to ask why you don't take an Orca into fleet warfare. Or a Hulk to assault a POS.....
Exploring: Buzzard. Armament: None Salvaging: Any Destoryer with tractors and salvager Armament: None Noob Training: Any ship, Armament: Variable Cynoalting: Any noob ship, Armament: None Courier: Transport, Armament: none *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15515
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:08:00 -
[280] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I would have to ask why you don't take an Orca into fleet warfare. It's more common than you think, an off grid fleet boosting Orca with the right boosts can be an extremely useful tool, especially when you can refit on the fly from it.
|
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
404
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:16:00 -
[281] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:And please, AGAIN can you tell me how SHIELDS make a PROCURER less good at MINING
I think the impetus behind this McCandless is that in order to load up the low slots with Mining Upgrade IIs your CPU has no more processing power for any shield extenders. Therefore, in order to squeeze every bit of efficiency from the strip miners you have to leave the Shield Extenders and Invulnerability Field unfitted or offlined.
I haven't actually done the PYFA-warrioring to confirm this but believe this to be at least somewhat accurate.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2044
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:31:00 -
[282] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:And please, AGAIN can you tell me how SHIELDS make a PROCURER less good at MINING I think the impetus behind this McCandless is that in order to load up the low slots with Mining Upgrade IIs your CPU has no more processing power for any shield extenders. Therefore, in order to squeeze every bit of efficiency from the strip miners you have to leave the Shield Extenders and Invulnerability Field unfitted or offlined. I haven't actually done the PYFA-warrioring to confirm this but believe this to be at least somewhat accurate.
I can confirm this is not the case.
The CPU on a Procurer is pretty decent, and besides, there are skills which help with that..
Oh wait, trainin skills, I forgot skills should probably be given out to miners at the start of the game too *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:39:00 -
[283] - Quote
You seem to scoff at the idea of efficiency as a goal for miners. Like it's completely useless in Eve since, duh! people will kill you easier if you fit for maximum efficiency! This is the root of the problem.
A combat ship is already fitted to maximum efficiency to serve in the role for which is was created! Fighting! A mining ship is *not* as free to fit in a way to make it as efficient as said combat ship, due to the actions of other players. Miners can do it and roll the dice, or they can sacrifice some mining efficiency to be a little more likely to survive a gank attempt.
Again, you wouldn't take your combat ship and fit expanded cargo holds or probe launchers if the activity you are doing has no use for them. Not if you wanted to get through the combat as fast and safely as you can. But you are saying miners have to equip safety modules that could end up making their mining less effective, meaning they have to do it far longer than is fun. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
78
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:42:00 -
[284] - Quote
Funny arguments. If I read that correctly, miners shouldn't have the need to tank properly, because they aren't designed to blow up? New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:50:00 -
[285] - Quote
No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2044
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:51:00 -
[286] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:You seem to scoff at the idea of efficiency as a goal for miners. Like it's completely useless in Eve since, duh! people will kill you easier if you fit for maximum efficiency! This is the root of the problem. A combat ship is already fitted to maximum efficiency to serve in the role for which is was created! Fighting! A mining ship is *not* as free to fit in a way to make it as efficient as said combat ship, due to the actions of other players. Miners can do it and roll the dice, or they can sacrifice some mining efficiency to be a little more likely to survive a gank attempt. Again, you wouldn't take your combat ship and fit expanded cargo holds or probe launchers if the activity you are doing has no use for them. Not if you wanted to get through the combat as fast and safely as you can. But you are saying miners have to equip safety modules that could end up making their mining less effective, meaning they have to do it far longer than is fun.
*Blinks* Reading your notes on what Ive said about ships, do you think IM suggesting mining in those ships? Because way to pick that up wrong!
Second, Im not scoffing at efficency. Im saying in what way do shields effect mining efficency?
Ok Ill make it easy: They dont. So put some on, and out-tank those gankers, okay?
Stop it with the "Theres combat, and theres mining".
BUZZARDS DONT FIGHT CYNOSHIPS DONT FIGHT SALVAGE BARGES DONT FIGHT
Why is this so hard for you to grasp? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2044
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:54:00 -
[287] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment.
Ive asked this four different ways so far, so heres a fifth
What mining equipment is it that goes in a medium slot?
A rock scanner?
You think a rock scanner makes for a more efficent build than an invul, or a ward, or a booster or an extender?
REALLY?
REALLY? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2294
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 15:55:00 -
[288] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment. Mining ships have already been rebalanced once and they were given too much tank. Next pass will probably see their fitting options limited even more.
Oh god. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
407
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:07:00 -
[289] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Again, you wouldn't take your combat ship and fit expanded cargo holds or probe launchers if the activity you are doing has no use for them. Not if you wanted to get through the combat as fast and safely as you can. But you are saying miners have to equip safety modules that could end up making their mining less effective, meaning they have to do it far longer than is fun.
I wouldn't take a combat ship into a mission without fitting a tank to it. I could. I could sacrifice survivability for additional DPS so I can increase my efficiency. The reason I don't is because that my efficiency, while important, is not as important to me as finishing the mission in a ship bigger than a pod.
BUT YOU WILL NOT LISTEN TO REASON.
YOU WILL CONTINUE TO ARGUE EVERY POINT OR PIECE OF ADVICE GIVEN TO YOU.
THE ONLY SOLUTION IN YOUR EYES IS ONE MORE NERF.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2046
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:16:00 -
[290] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
THE ONLY SOLUTION IS TO SHOOT NERFS INTO YOUR EYES.
I concur *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
408
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:17:00 -
[291] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment.
So your argument is NOT that gankers prevent you from having fun but that they prevent you from maximizing ISK/hr?
Brilliant!
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:21:00 -
[292] - Quote
Sheesh, no need to get all hyper. It's fine if you don't agree with me, but your 'reasonable' advice directly contradicts the point of what I've written. I will try to boil it down, again.
The reasonable advice to fit a tank to a mining vessel (not just a single ship, btw, but any of the ships designed for mining) means that some mining efficiency must be sacrificed (on most mining ships). Combat ships do not have to face that choice.
A combat ship/activity in a ship designed for combat/activities doesn't have to decide if they want to either maximize their combat efficiency (offensive and defensive modules), OR fit non-combat-type modules. They just fit for combat.
I'm beginning to think you are willfully choosing not to recognize this disparity, in favor of zero tolerance for anything that might make highsec a little more secure. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2046
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:23:00 -
[293] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: The reasonable advice to fit a tank to a mining vessel (not just a single ship, btw, but any of the ships designed for mining) means that some mining efficiency must be sacrificed (on most mining ships). Combat ships do not have to face that choice.
And as we have ask so many times its getting really boring; What efficency do you lose when you fit shield modules to a procurer?
And (again) combat ships DO have to make efficency choices, though that is not relevant to the entire point of the thread. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
408
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:24:00 -
[294] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:And please, AGAIN can you tell me how SHIELDS make a PROCURER less good at MINING I think the impetus behind this McCandless is that in order to load up the low slots with Mining Upgrade IIs your CPU has no more processing power for any shield extenders. Therefore, in order to squeeze every bit of efficiency from the strip miners you have to leave the Shield Extenders and Invulnerability Field unfitted or offlined. I haven't actually done the PYFA-warrioring to confirm this but believe this to be at least somewhat accurate. I can confirm this is not the case. The CPU on a Procurer is pretty decent, and besides, there are skills which help with that.. Oh wait, trainin skills, I forgot skills should probably be given out to miners at the start of the game too
I stand corrected. With all skills at V you can fit 2 MU IIs in the low slots and a MSE II and Adapt Invul II, leaving two more medium slots for a rock scanner and maybe an AB?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2046
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:26:00 -
[295] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
I stand corrected. With all skills at V you can fit 2 MU IIs in the low slots and a MSE II and Adapt Invul II, leaving two more medium slots for a rock scanner and maybe an AB?
No need, you get EHP 24,000+ with T1 modules for a fraction of the price, which is...GASP MORE EFFICENT use of isk
You can go up to 41,000+ without taxing your skills too badly *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2297
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:26:00 -
[296] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:that some mining efficiency must be sacrificed They already have efficient mining. They're not sacrificing mining efficiency for tank, they're sacrificing tank for even more mining efficiency (i.e greedy and deserves to die).
Oh god. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:28:00 -
[297] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:You do not understand.
I explain it calmly, using a tale you claim to be familiar with and STIlLL you refuse to see.
Tell me, are you aware of what a metaphor is? You didn't explain anything. You simply stated you tell newbies a story which is of no real relevance to their situation.
Kimmi Chan wrote:I can't give specific figures because I am not a miner but I would imagine that it takes at least 2-3 months to get into a Retriever with enough skill to make it worthwhile. These people you are defending are not "newbies". They're lazy. They're AFK. They're not fitting their ship appropriately to avoid or mitigate a gank.
The only helpless victims in this game are the people that choose to be helpless victims. Please forgive me for not having sympathy for a person that makes that choice. I'll help you out there. It takes 8 days,
And no, generally the AFK ones don't care about the bumping, since they are AFK and the experienced ones know where to go to avoid people. The ones that generally tend to get targeted are relatively new and inexperienced. There's nothing telling them in the NPE "by the way, it's possible for someone to bump you for several hours causing you to be completely unable to align ore move, and it's fully within the rules". The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
410
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:29:00 -
[298] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:The reasonable advice to fit a tank to a mining vessel (not just a single ship, btw, but any of the ships designed for mining) means that some mining efficiency must be sacrificed (on most mining ships).
Then you have a choice -
1) Fit a tank and increase your potential of surviving a gank attempt.
Or
2) Don't fit a tank and take your chances.
Your choice. Makes no difference to me how you want to play your game. I would just ask that you stop trying to change it, make your choice, and shaddup about what happened as a result of your choice.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2049
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:30:00 -
[299] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:You do not understand.
I explain it calmly, using a tale you claim to be familiar with and STIlLL you refuse to see.
Tell me, are you aware of what a metaphor is? You didn't explain anything. You simply stated you tell newbies a story which is of no real relevance to their situation..
I get it already, subtly and metaphor is something you have no knowledge or undertanding of
Im not about to explain to you what the other 98% of humanity can understand easily *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Frumpylumps Faplord
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:30:00 -
[300] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:
I'm beginning to think you are willfully choosing not to recognize this disparity, in favor of zero tolerance for anything that might make highsec a little more secure.
Yea, haha! the moment you mention any suggestion that high sec "pirates" shouldn't have it so easy, you get these same rabid grief monkeys descending on the threat, hurling mind-vomit in all directions in a spastic fit.
You are completely right btw, making high sec PVErs immune to the grief tactics of these low life individuals wouldn't break the game in at all, in fact, it would benefit the game. |
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:30:00 -
[301] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment. So your argument is NOT that gankers prevent you from having fun but that they prevent you from maximizing ISK/hr? Brilliant! Willfully obtuse. The un-fun activity is losing non-combat cargo and non-combat ship in highsec, plus all the time needed to replace everything and get back to the desired non-combat activity. In highsec. If it would cost the ganker extra time repping back up to execute the gank, they would think twice unless the cargo is particularly tasty. Or, if the window to enact the kill were reduced in half, again, the target would have to be a lot more tasty before they pulled the trigger. Instead people pop empty ships just for giggles. That is only fun for one of the two people involved. They pop boring Veldspar miners. They pop level 1 mission runners. No challenge minimal rewards. In highsec. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2297
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:31:00 -
[302] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:There's nothing telling them in the NPE "by the way, it's possible for someone to bump you for several hours causing you to be completely unable to align ore move, and it's fully within the rules". There's a whole bunch of stuff not included in the NPE. The reason for that is to not overwhelm new players with information about things they don't know or care about. That tends to turn people off games pretty quickly. Oh god. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
80
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:32:00 -
[303] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:No, miners should have better inherant protections in highsec meaning their chances of surviving an attack are better without having to replace mining equipment with defensive equipment. I don't quite see how that fits into how the game works. Can you explain?
Please add something to your thought process. History has shown that as long miners are getting blown up, people ask for increasing their safety. Where will this end? Why do miners refuse to take care of their safety on their own?
Thanks for including this. It's essential to understanding the issue of your... idea. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:33:00 -
[304] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Because we've seen people like you come and go repeatedly over the years, you and your ilk will be the death of independent gaming devs, you come into an established game and try and change it to suit yourself, and screw all the players who've put time and money into it over the years because they like it the way it is. If you succeed in changing it, you leave for the next big thing after 3 months because you're now bored, leaving the core audience with a broken game. You're like locusts. Do yourself a favour, move onto a game that is more to your taste, many of us have found one that we like, and you're trying to ruin it. Think of it this way, if you want to see Eve style shenanigans happening on an MMO server near you, carry on along the path you're so blindly following. This also applies : Malcanis' Law wrote: Whenever a mechanics change is proposed on behalf of GÇÿnew playersGÇÖ, that change is always to the overwhelming advantage of richer, older players.
The secondary corollary is that when new players propose a change, they invariably lack the experience and insight to see how the change would again be exploited by older players far more efficiently than themselves.
edit ~ I am aware that your character is 5 years old. That doesn't exclude you from being a newbie. First off, nonsense. Nobody I've seen here is trying to change the game to their liking. This is no uncommon on these forums, to see someone state "this is bad" and automatically read it as "this has to GO!". The game evolves buddy, that's just the way it is. People state things they like and they dislike and the devs make changes to keep to game healthy. What you are doing, claiming the game should remain exactly as is is just as bad as claiming a massive change needs to be made.
And Malcanis law? That's clearly not even remotely the case here. I don't even know how you would think it is.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
410
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:34:00 -
[305] - Quote
Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:in fact, it would benefit the game.
How exactly?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:34:00 -
[306] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:You do not understand.
I explain it calmly, using a tale you claim to be familiar with and STIlLL you refuse to see.
Tell me, are you aware of what a metaphor is? You didn't explain anything. You simply stated you tell newbies a story which is of no real relevance to their situation.. I get it already, subtly and metaphor is something you have no knowledge or undertanding of Im not about to explain to you what the other 98% of humanity can understand easily lol Whatever you want buddy. You spewed a bunch of nonsense and now want to claim I just don't understand. Whatever allows you to stroke your epeen. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:35:00 -
[307] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:There's nothing telling them in the NPE "by the way, it's possible for someone to bump you for several hours causing you to be completely unable to align ore move, and it's fully within the rules". There's a whole bunch of stuff not included in the NPE. The reason for that is to not overwhelm new players with information about things they don't know or care about. That tends to turn people off games pretty quickly. Well clearly, they DO care about it. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2049
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:36:00 -
[308] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:nonsense. Nobody I've seen here is trying to change the game to their liking.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: If it would cost the ganker extra time repping back up to execute the gank, they would think twice unless the cargo is particularly tasty. Or, if the window to enact the kill were reduced in half, again, the target would have to be a lot more tasty before they pulled the trigger.
Yup no one suggesting changes to their liking here >.< *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
411
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:37:00 -
[309] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:nonsense. Nobody I've seen here is trying to change the game to their liking.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: If it would cost the ganker extra time repping back up to execute the gank, they would think twice unless the cargo is particularly tasty. Or, if the window to enact the kill were reduced in half, again, the target would have to be a lot more tasty before they pulled the trigger.
Yup no one suggesting changes to their liking here >.<
GRR McCandless beat me to it. LOL
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:37:00 -
[310] - Quote
Angelica, that's the issue being debated: How the game works. I believe the game will continue to work and be fun for everyone were the 'security' in highsec increased a little by changing the formula gankers use to determine targets. The gankers would need to adjust to the new reality, and they will always have targets, but they will have to be a little more discriminate. A side effect of this could also be that the loot get's better. There is no way in hell I would ever carry a plex around in my cargo hold as it is now. But if it was more secure.......... |
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2050
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:38:00 -
[311] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:lol Whatever you want buddy. You spewed a bunch of nonsense and now want to claim I just don't understand. Whatever allows you to stroke your epeen.
Here is you displaying not understanding.
Lucas Kell wrote:You didn't explain anything. You simply stated you tell newbies a story which is of no real relevance to their situation..
And Im not your buddy, friend. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:38:00 -
[312] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2297
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:38:00 -
[313] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Well clearly, they DO care about it. Not until it affects them. Oh god. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
411
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:39:00 -
[314] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:They pop level 1 mission runners
Source?
There is nothing to be gained from ganking L1 mission runners. Therefore I believe this claim to be unfounded without supporting evidence. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2297
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:39:00 -
[315] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Angelica, that's the issue being debated: How the game works. I believe the game will continue to work and be fun for everyone were the 'security' in highsec increased a little by changing the formula gankers use to determine targets. The gankers would need to adjust to the new reality, and they will always have targets, but they will have to be a little more discriminate. A side effect of this could also be that the loot get's better. There is no way in hell I would ever carry a plex around in my cargo hold as it is now. But if it was more secure.......... You don't get it. CCP is making ganking easier, not harder. Oh god. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2050
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:40:00 -
[316] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety?
When she made it clear that she thought a 41,000+ HP 65%+ Resistance Procurer was insufficent to ward of a catalyst or to mine efficently in *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Frumpylumps Faplord
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:41:00 -
[317] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety?
he never did but the only way those opposed to change can make sense to themselves is if they argue in extremes. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
411
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:43:00 -
[318] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety?
Hi sec is already safe enough. I would venture that is 99.999% safe for a person that pays attention to what is going on, fits their ship properly, and does not AFK.
What Zynn is saying is THAT IS NOT ENOUGH and wants to cut the CONCORD response time in half across all of high sec.
On the surface it would seem a reasonable request, until the gankers start bring more guns at which point it needs to be made safer.
And safer.
And safer.
And are your starting to see the issue yet.
And safer. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:44:00 -
[319] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:nonsense. Nobody I've seen here is trying to change the game to their liking.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: If it would cost the ganker extra time repping back up to execute the gank, they would think twice unless the cargo is particularly tasty. Or, if the window to enact the kill were reduced in half, again, the target would have to be a lot more tasty before they pulled the trigger.
Yup no one suggesting changes to their liking here >.< GRR McCandless beat me to it. LOL
To be honest, I have a LOT of stuff I'd change if I got to be in charge. WiS would be the very next thing to go live. I'd have us able to walk around on a planet surface in a year (integrate DUST maps with PI). I'd also move us to a better game engine to handle massive combat. I'd put in-game penalties in place the punish people who get caught scamming. I'd get rid of the dumb jumpgate cloud-tunnel.... I could go on about market stuff.
As has just been pointed out, games must evolve, or they die. I'd like to see the game evolve to where it is more friendly to PvE layers, while preserving PvP activites (and ganking). |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:47:00 -
[320] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:And no, generally the AFK ones don't care about the bumping, since they are AFK
I assure you they're often quite mad when they get back to the keyboard, ranting, pleading for someone else to do something about it and making RL death threats in local.
Lucas Kell wrote:The ones that generally tend to get targeted are relatively new and inexperienced.
Wow. You just keep on making things up, don't you? You have no idea just how many of us are newbie-friendly and target older players as a result. There's no real satisfaction in making a new player cry, but someone who's been playing for years and should have a clue how to avoid us (ie: noobs)? Those tears are delicious. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2050
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:47:00 -
[321] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:
As has just been pointed out, games must evolve, or they die. I'd like to see the game evolve to where it is more friendly to PvE layers, while preserving PvP activites (and ganking).
Just tank your ship. It doesnt affect your yield and you cant be ganked. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:50:00 -
[322] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I'd put in-game penalties in place the punish people who get caught scamming.
Scamming already has all the in-game penalites needed: stupid and greedy people lose a lot of stuff / isk that they didn't mean to.  No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:50:00 -
[323] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Found it!This is why minerbumping exists. This is why ganking exists. This is why mining permits exist. Because a small minority of can't be bothered to fit my ship properly, AFKing, whining, carebear, PvE enthusiast players continue to demand "one more nerf". Honestly, I have no problem with a miner who chooses not to fit their ship properly. I have no problem with a miner that chooses to AFK while mining. I have no problem with PvE enthusiasts being a PvE enthusiast myself. I have a cataclysmically huge problem with people complaining because the mechanics, while they generally fit every persons playstyle, don't ALWAYS fit every persons playstyle. That that guy over theres playstyle is interfering with YOUR playstyle. And in those ever present and ever self-indulged threads, they demand in one helpless, alone, and vulnerable voice, "One more nerf!" Thanks for linking to a post about utter nonsense. That manifesto was a bunch of drivel then and it's still a bunch of drivel now. It was just a neckbeard banging on about carebears. He did it way before the changes too, the only thing that changed was hat he called it a manifesto.
And targeting newer inexperienced miners doesn't even do what the manifesto claims to be against (lets face it though, that's because noone really believes it all, the new order guys are just bored alts doing something else like a tidi fleet). ISBoxing 90 character miners now get used and the new order totally ignores them. All they really do is push down some of the regular miners making bots and multiboxers even more isk.
Hell, when I bother to do any highsec mining (which is pretty rare these days), I run ISBoxer now. I semi-afk while playing the xbox, chewing away on some rocks. See if you run a single miner, and you run it properly, your likely to run into some random douche sperging about how you owe them 10m isk. You run a fleet and they don't bother, since they can't bump all of you.
And there's nothing wrong with people challenging the mechanics. That's done every single day and I don't see you trolling every single post about it. That's how the game evolves. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
413
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:50:00 -
[324] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:The gankers would need to adjust to the new reality
That's right! Tell us all about your new reality. Why can you not adjust to the existing reality? Seriously, that question is the root of this debate.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:and they will always have targets
So long as people refuse to take steps to defend themselves this will always be true.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
81
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:53:00 -
[325] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Angelica, that's the issue being debated: How the game works. I believe the game will continue to work and be fun for everyone were the 'security' in highsec increased a little by changing the formula gankers use to determine targets. The gankers would need to adjust to the new reality, and they will always have targets, but they will have to be a little more discriminate. A side effect of this could also be that the loot get's better. There is no way in hell I would ever carry a plex around in my cargo hold as it is now. But if it was more secure.......... See and there is the end of the debate. In plain sight.
Security already got increased by a little. Over and over and over and over again. Some day there will be no need to increase it anymore, because there is no danger left. People will complain about getting blown up, because people refuse to adapt. Not all, but some. This only ends when there is no way to blow anybody up, thus it's not an option.
You are also completely ignoring the human factor. It's like in real life, really. Nowadays politics believes it makes sense to change everything to make the world saver for the weakest links, ignoring that it actually creates idiots who never learn to watch out for themselves.
TL;DR: If there was enough security provided for you to consider carrying a PLEX, then there is no danger in doing it in the first place. Otoh just buffing it a little more won't change the fact that you will still lose that PLEX and thus will ask for even more security.
This debate is nonsense, because most participants lack necessary information to validly talk about it. This game is based on the laws of nature. Modern societies more and more tend to ignore these, creating beliefs that are completely opposite to how the world successfully worked and developed for thousands of years. Buffing security just creates more weak links, thus damaging society as a whole.
Case closed. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:54:00 -
[326] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:And no, generally the AFK ones don't care about the bumping, since they are AFK I assure you they're often quite mad when they get back to the keyboard, ranting, pleading for someone else to do something about it and making RL death threats in local. Lucas Kell wrote:The ones that generally tend to get targeted are relatively new and inexperienced. Wow. You just keep on making things up, don't you? You have no idea just how many of us are newbie-friendly and target older players as a result. There's no real satisfaction in making a new player cry, but someone who's been playing for years and should have a clue how to avoid us (ie: noobs)? Those tears are delicious. Yes I'm sure you get the occasional one. But I've seen your group as a whole, not just the isolated incidents. More time that not it's a newbie, since those are usually the guys that can't fit all of the modules or fly in a fleet.
By all means though, please proceed to tell us how your dumbass group helps protects us from the evils of high sec. Better yet... don't. Nobody cares about the self-idolising rantings of a bunch of basement dwelling neckbeards. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Frumpylumps Faplord
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:54:00 -
[327] - Quote
high sec should be more safe. We need more players, not to keep grief monkeys content. There are large sections of EVE that are designed to be harsh and dangerous, and suggesting that making high sec more safe is going to hurt the game is completely ridiculous. It would help the game by keeping less players from quitting due to the fact that, currently, being a high sec pirates involves zero risk and costs almost nothing. High sec "pirates" are just cowards who are afraid of real pvp and there is no reason they should get special treatment. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:55:00 -
[328] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote: You run a fleet and they don't bother, since they can't bump all of you.
Confirming that the New Order has never pulled off simultaneous quad-ganks (much). No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2300
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 16:59:00 -
[329] - Quote
Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:High sec "pirates" are just cowards who are afraid of real pvp and there is no reason they should get special treatment. So what does that make all the whiny brats demanding nerfs?
Oh god. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2051
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:00:00 -
[330] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:High sec "pirates" are just cowards who are afraid of real pvp and there is no reason they should get special treatment. So what does that make all the whiny brats demanding nerfs?
Dont feed it. Seriously, its palm-mashing all the words designed to please. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:00:00 -
[331] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety? Hi sec is already safe enough. I would venture that is 99.999% safe for a person that pays attention to what is going on, fits their ship properly, and does not AFK. What Zynn is saying is THAT IS NOT ENOUGH and wants to cut the CONCORD response time in half across all of high sec. On the surface it would seem a reasonable request, until the gankers start bring more guns at which point it needs to be made safer. And safer. And safer. And are your starting to see the issue yet. And safer. Nope, I'm not. I think ganking is considerably easier to do now. It's very cheap to do, and it has no downsides whatsoever. You can even change your mind now and go back to being >-5 for only a few hundred mil. They may as well drop the rerolling rule with it being that easy. Plus, it's not just ganking. A cheap fit can keep a target perma-bumped, especially if you choose to bump a freighter, which have been known to be bumped for several hours.
And that right there that your doing, is committing a logical fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slope
If we were to follow that method of thinking, then no change would ever be made to the game as it will always fall into further changes inevitably resulting in the end of the game. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
413
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:01:00 -
[332] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:And there's nothing wrong with people challenging the mechanics. That's done every single day and I don't see you trolling every single post about it. That's how the game evolves.
Challenging the mechanics - fine Challenging the mechanics to compensate for a monumental lack of self responsibility and to the detriment of others - not fine.
And the reason I'm not trolling every single post about it is because there simply isn't enough time in the day.
How the game evolves into what exactly? A high sec area that is >99.999% safe?. A high sec area where there are no consequences for being AFK? Believe it or not there are some people that play this game that do not want to see this evolution.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:02:00 -
[333] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Lucas Kell wrote: You run a fleet and they don't bother, since they can't bump all of you. Confirming that the New Order has never pulled off simultaneous quad-ganks (much). lol, I've literally watched you guys shoot solo players then ignore a group miner. When questioned you've made up nonsense excuses (a common new order tactic). Realistically it's because there's only a handful of you, and none of you really wanting to put anythign on the line.
Come on, be serious. Do you honestly believe in what you are doing, or is it just though boredom? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
416
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:06:00 -
[334] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety? Hi sec is already safe enough. I would venture that is 99.999% safe for a person that pays attention to what is going on, fits their ship properly, and does not AFK. What Zynn is saying is THAT IS NOT ENOUGH and wants to cut the CONCORD response time in half across all of high sec. On the surface it would seem a reasonable request, until the gankers start bring more guns at which point it needs to be made safer. And safer. And safer. And are your starting to see the issue yet. And safer. Nope, I'm not. I think ganking is considerably easier to do now. It's very cheap to do, and it has no downsides whatsoever. You can even change your mind now and go back to being >-5 for only a few hundred mil. They may as well drop the rerolling rule with it being that easy. Plus, it's not just ganking. A cheap fit can keep a target perma-bumped, especially if you choose to bump a freighter, which have been known to be bumped for several hours. And that right there that your doing, is committing a logical fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeIf we were to follow that method of thinking, then no change would ever be made to the game as it will always fall into further changes inevitably resulting in the end of the game.
Then how safe Lucas?
Huh?
How safe does it need to ******* be for you and Zynn and Nerf Burger II to shut the hell up?
At what point is it safe enough?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:06:00 -
[335] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:And there's nothing wrong with people challenging the mechanics. That's done every single day and I don't see you trolling every single post about it. That's how the game evolves. Challenging the mechanics - fine Challenging the mechanics to compensate for a monumental lack of self responsibility and to the detriment of others - not fine. And the reason I'm not trolling every single post about it is because there simply isn't enough time in the day. How the game evolves into what exactly? A high sec area that is >99.999% safe?. A high sec area where there are no consequences for being AFK? Believe it or not there are some people that play this game that do not want to see this evolution. Sure, if you MASSIVELY exaggerate everything that is being said and completely ignore several points made then yes, it will evolve into some weird hello kitty space adventure.
However, if you stop incorrectly reading between the lines and instead rationally look at the situation from all sides, you'll see there are merits in some of the complaints. The situation as it currently stands is clearly not perfect on either side. I think more need to be done to rope in the ganking and bumping, especially when it's prolonged for hours, but then at the same time things like the ice anom locations and sizes being static is an issue too. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2051
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:07:00 -
[336] - Quote
Interestingly, the pro-nerf team consist of an upset miner who refuses to tank, a null-seccer and a non-enitity.
The status quo team contains missioners, cynoalts and even a ninja, but relatively few gankers.
I wonder what the "they are all griefmonkeys duurp" rants were based on.
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18772
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:08:00 -
[337] - Quote
Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:high sec should be more safe. We need more players, not to keep grief monkeys content. What makes you think that one would lead to the other?
Quote:There are large sections of EVE that are designed to be harsh and dangerous Indeed. They're called highsec, lowsec, nullsec and w-space. There are very very tiny sections of EVE that are designed not to be harsh and dangerous GÇö they're called the newbie systems.
Quote:It would help the game by keeping less players from quitting due to the fact that, currently, being a high sec pirates involves zero risk and costs almost nothing. GǪbecause the highsec victims want it that way. After all, they're the only ones who can control the risk and cost involved, and they've decided that it should be the amount and price it is.
GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8173
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:10:00 -
[338] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Nope, I'm not. I think ganking is considerably easier to do now. It's very cheap to do, and it has no downsides whatsoever. You can even change your mind now and go back to being >-5 for only a few hundred mil. They may as well drop the rerolling rule with it being that easy. Plus, it's not just ganking. A cheap fit can keep a target perma-bumped, especially if you choose to bump a freighter, which have been known to be bumped for several hours. And that right there that your doing, is committing a logical fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeIf we were to follow that method of thinking, then no change would ever be made to the game as it will always fall into further changes inevitably resulting in the end of the game. The **** are you doing in the CFC? My EVE Videos |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:11:00 -
[339] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Then how safe Lucas?
Huh?
How safe does it need to ******* be for you and Zynn and Nerf Burger II to shut the hell up?
At what point is it safe enough? Who knows, opinions vary.
The real question is WHY should we shut up? What right do you have to tell us to shut up? Who exactly are you? Why is it you can't have a reasonable discussion about pros and cons of particular ideas and instead choose to tell people they are wanting 100% safety and they should "shut the hell up"? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2051
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:12:00 -
[340] - Quote
Looks like Ive just cyno'd in the Capitals \o/ *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2380
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:12:00 -
[341] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Nope, I'm not. I think ganking is considerably easier to do now. It's very cheap to do, and it has no downsides whatsoever. You can even change your mind now and go back to being >-5 for only a few hundred mil. They may as well drop the rerolling rule with it being that easy. Plus, it's not just ganking. A cheap fit can keep a target perma-bumped, especially if you choose to bump a freighter, which have been known to be bumped for several hours. And that right there that your doing, is committing a logical fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeIf we were to follow that method of thinking, then no change would ever be made to the game as it will always fall into further changes inevitably resulting in the end of the game. The **** are you doing in the CFC? Same as everyone else. I was under the impression my personal opinions were in fact allowed however, as are yours. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
416
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:12:00 -
[342] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:The situation as it currently stands is clearly not perfect on either side.{/quote[
Why not and who is judging its perfection or lack thereof?
[quote=Lucas Kell}I think more need to be done to rope in the ganking and bumping{/quote}
Like reducing CONCORD response time by 50%? And how, exactly, are you defining "rope in"?
[quote=Lucas Kell]especially when it's prolonged for hours{/quote]
I don't disagree with this.
[quote=Lucas Kell]but then at the same time things like the ice anom locations and sizes being static is an issue too.
Why is that an issue?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
18772
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:14:00 -
[343] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:The real question is WHY should we shut up? Because you can't provide any coherent or well-founded reason why things should go your way. GÇ£If you're not willing to fight for what you have in GëívGëí you don't deserve it, and you will lose it.GÇ¥
Get a good start: newbie skill plan 2.0. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8173
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:15:00 -
[344] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Same as everyone else. I was under the impression my personal opinions were in fact allowed however, as are yours. There's a difference between having personal opinions by themselves, and being part of an organization where these opinions don't make sense.
If you denounce ganking and bumping, why choose to remain in an organization that does a fair amount of both? My EVE Videos |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
81
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:16:00 -
[345] - Quote
Does anybody notice the futility of this?
Those who ask for more security always ignore the human factor. They support the idea that helping the weakest somhow helps society as a whole, completely ignoring how nature handled this for millions of years. Instead of accepting that humans make stupid mistakes or willfully ignore dangers, they believe (willingly or by ignorance) that evedBody should be dragged down to their level.
I suggest getting rid of the weakest links in the game to make society healthier as a whole.
In before Godwin. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4372
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:17:00 -
[346] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Nope, I'm not. I think ganking is considerably easier to do now. It's very cheap to do, and it has no downsides whatsoever. You can even change your mind now and go back to being >-5 for only a few hundred mil. They may as well drop the rerolling rule with it being that easy. Plus, it's not just ganking. A cheap fit can keep a target perma-bumped, especially if you choose to bump a freighter, which have been known to be bumped for several hours. And that right there that your doing, is committing a logical fallacy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slippery_slopeIf we were to follow that method of thinking, then no change would ever be made to the game as it will always fall into further changes inevitably resulting in the end of the game. The **** are you doing in the CFC? Same as everyone else. I was under the impression my personal opinions were in fact allowed however, as are yours.
Slaves aren't allowed to have opinions. Now get out there & fight some war to keep our ratting space safe, slave. This user won the forums on 18/09/2013, then lost on 18/12/2013. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2051
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:17:00 -
[347] - Quote
*cloaks up as the cyno fades*
*** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8178
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:17:00 -
[348] - Quote
Social Darwinism is very much alive in EVE. My EVE Videos |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
83
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:19:00 -
[349] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Social Darwinism is very much alive in EVE. And then there's "modern" society ruining future generations completely, which leads to threads like this. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2381
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:22:00 -
[350] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Why not and who is judging its perfection or lack thereof? Well if you read the forums, you'll often see complaints from both sides. This indicates that it is in fact not in a situation that would be described as perfect.
Kimmi Chan wrote:Like reducing CONCORD response time by 50%? And how, exactly, are you defining "rope in"? No, not quite. From my personal point of view and just off the top of my head, a small reduction in the effect of bumping, perhaps an adjustment of freighters to allow custom resists like all other ships (though a freight bay to avoid cargo expanders). Reduced yield but an extra mid on the mack/retri, reduced yield on proc/skiff.
Lucas Kell wrote:especially when it's prolonged for hours{/quote]
[quote=Kimmi Chan]Why is that an issue? Currently it makes farming of ice way too easy. There's ~2400 block of ice in each ice belt, each belt spawning exactly 4 hours after the last one died and one after downtime if there isn't one present, in the same system.
Mining fleets (including bots) move between nearby systems farming the hell out of these. They arrive the minute it spawns, and clear it out in a single session. It's dull and it's predictable. Moving them around and varying their capacity by sec status would encourage more movement of mining fleets and more cooperation between miners, as well as giving a small chance-based market variation. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:24:00 -
[351] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:lol, I've literally watched you guys shoot solo players then ignore a group miner. When questioned you've made up nonsense excuses (a common new order tactic). Realistically it's because there's only a handful of you, and none of you really wanting to put anythign on the line.
None of which means we don't pull off multi-ship ganks, sometimes with multiple squads. It's hilariously entertaining, especially given how avoidable it is if our victims were to do something as outrageous as pay attention.
What would you like us to put on the line? Are you suggesting that we gank using more expensive ships just so our losses are higher than they need to be? We're using the correct tools for the job. You're starting to sound remarkably like the people who were crying when we used siege fleets to take a region or two when I was in the CFC. Boo hoo! They're stealing our regions without using capital ships! It's so unfair! 
Lucas Kell wrote:Come on, be serious. Do you honestly believe in what you are doing, or is it just though boredom?
Anyone who is bored in Eve is doing something wrong. Yes, I believe that we need to educate more players to the dangers that exist in highsec. The best way to do that is to directly violence their space pixels and anyone who resorts to vicious insults and RL threats of RL violence as a result of that needs professional help. It's also worth noting that even some miners enjoy the way local comes alive when we roll into town. We're creating some positive interaction between players, too. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2381
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:24:00 -
[352] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Same as everyone else. I was under the impression my personal opinions were in fact allowed however, as are yours. There's a difference between having personal opinions by themselves, and being part of an organization where these opinions don't make sense. If you denounce ganking and bumping, why choose to remain in an organization that does a fair amount of both? I don't denounce it. I denounce it when there's no real reason and it's purely being done for tear generation from noobs, but not the general principle. I take part in the ice interdictions and such.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
417
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:25:00 -
[353] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Then how safe Lucas?
Huh?
How safe does it need to ******* be for you and Zynn and Nerf Burger II to shut the hell up?
At what point is it safe enough? Who knows, opinions vary. The real question is WHY should we shut up? What right do you have to tell us to shut up? Who exactly are you? Why is it you can't have a reasonable discussion about pros and cons of particular ideas and instead choose to tell people they are wanting 100% safety and they should "shut the hell up"?
You misunderstand sir.
I don't want you to shut up about this. I want you to tell me at what point, to what extent, high sec will be safe enough to not require daily deluges of this nature on this forum?
This crusade for a safer high sec has but one victory condition - 100% safe. They do not want to get blown up unless it's on their terms. To be fair, I DON'T WANT TO GET BLOWN UP EITHER, but I have at least enough intellect to recognize how my choices affect that potential outcome. Others here do not feel that they should have to choose between efficiency and defense. Perish the thought!
You will also NEVER see me lobbying to change anything that would make me less likely to get blown up. I recognize this game for what it is and adapt accordingly. Unlike way too many people that have made themselves the vocal champions of not having to make choices. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:30:00 -
[354] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Well if you read the forums, you'll often see complaints from both sides. This indicates that it is in fact not in a situation that would be described as perfect..
No, but it could be described as balanced. Perfection is impossible to attain. Utopia is not an option for a species which thrives on conflict.
Lucas Kell wrote: I denounce it when there's no real reason.
Maybe you should consider denouncing things when there's no good result instead. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2381
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:32:00 -
[355] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:You misunderstand sir.
I don't want you to shut up about this. I want you to tell me at what point, to what extent, high sec will be safe enough to not require daily deluges of this nature on this forum?
This crusade for a safer high sec has but one victory condition - 100% safe. They do not want to get blown up unless it's on their terms. To be fair, I DON'T WANT TO GET BLOWN UP EITHER, but I have at least enough intellect to recognize how my choices affect that potential outcome. Others here do not feel that they should have to choose between efficiency and defense. Perish the thought!
You will also NEVER see me lobbying to change anything that would make me less likely to get blown up. I recognize this game for what it is and adapt accordingly. Unlike way too many people that have made themselves the vocal champions of not having to make choices. I really don't see this. I see a few people looking for 100% safety, sure, but I don't think I've seen that in this thread yet (though it's growing too fast to read it all). You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
37
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:32:00 -
[356] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:high sec should be more safe. We need more players, not to keep grief monkeys content. What makes you think that one would lead to the other? What makes you think it wouldn't?
Tippia wrote:Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:There are large sections of EVE that are designed to be harsh and dangerous Indeed. They're called highsec, lowsec, nullsec and w-space. There are very very tiny sections of EVE that are designed not to be harsh and dangerous GÇö they're called the newbie systems. And yet there is a numerical ranking of system security.... hmmm.... maybe the meaning of this could be used in some fashion.....[quote]
Would it really be such a hardship to have to adjust your formula for who get's to be your 'victim'? Don't you see that people on this side of the issue like the game, and want to see it get better? No one yet has suggested that the 'cold, hard reality(sic)' of Eve would be destroyed with a small adjustment to security rules in highsec. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2054
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:34:00 -
[357] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Would it really be such a hardship to have to adjust your formula for who get's to be your 'victim'?
Would it really be such a hardship to tank your ship properly so your problems simply cease to be an issue for you? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
420
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:35:00 -
[358] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Well if you read the forums, you'll often see complaints from both sides. This indicates that it is in fact not in a situation that would be described as perfect.. No, but it could be described as balanced. Perfection is impossible to attain. Utopia is not an option for a species which thrives on conflict.
Balanced you say? I concur.
Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote: I denounce it when there's no real reason.
Maybe you should consider denouncing things when there's no good result instead.
Your genius makes me quiver McCandless.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2058
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:38:00 -
[359] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
Your genius makes me quiver McCandless.
Now you are making me blush *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:38:00 -
[360] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:So while the gank-supporters are all for the system as-is, people like me are looking for modest changes to highsec. You gank-supporters see the only 2 options as being either the way it is, or 'hello kitty online', but that's just dumb. I don't see why the educated vet's on these forums are so earnest in their support for the bullies in game who like to play the Eve version of the 'knock-out game'. Modest changes to highsec? That is NOT what you want. You want it to be safe. It's not. Get over it. I may have missed something here, but when exactly did he state he wants complete safety? Hi sec is already safe enough. I would venture that is 99.999% safe for a person that pays attention to what is going on, fits their ship properly, and does not AFK. What Zynn is saying is THAT IS NOT ENOUGH and wants to cut the CONCORD response time in half across all of high sec. On the surface it would seem a reasonable request, until the gankers start bring more guns at which point it needs to be made safer. And safer. And safer. And are your starting to see the issue yet. And safer. Yes, I see the issue. You prefer to change nothing. No compromise, no adjustment, nothing. Despite telling you over and over, you are convinced that I am lying on my intentions. There's nothing I can do about that. Your opinion is that highsec is safe enough. I don't agree. YOu assume it's safe enough if we play in a way that you think is 'reasonable'. I disagree with the pre-conditions and wonder how you would feel if there were pre-conditions to you flying a combat ship that you didn't agree with.
But worse, you presume to dictate that I am just lying. That's not very nice. I won't hold that against you though, because I can see that you are a very emotional person. |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
423
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:38:00 -
[361] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir.
If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe.
You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
86
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:38:00 -
[362] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Well if you read the forums, you'll often see complaints from both sides. This indicates that it is in fact not in a situation that would be described as perfect.. No, but it could be described as balanced. Perfection is impossible to attain. Utopia is not an option for a species which thrives on conflict. Balanced you say? I concur. Ramona McCandless wrote:Lucas Kell wrote: I denounce it when there's no real reason.
Maybe you should consider denouncing things when there's no good result instead. Your genius makes me quiver McCandless. Her intellect makes her sexy as hell, I'm glad she's mine in my corp! ;) New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:41:00 -
[363] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Then how safe Lucas?
Huh?
How safe does it need to ******* be for you and Zynn and Nerf Burger II to shut the hell up?
At what point is it safe enough? Who knows, opinions vary. The real question is WHY should we shut up? What right do you have to tell us to shut up? Who exactly are you? Why is it you can't have a reasonable discussion about pros and cons of particular ideas and instead choose to tell people they are wanting 100% safety and they should "shut the hell up"? Reason is not the friend of hyperbole. Their argument boils down to: That's the way it is.
|

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2381
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:43:00 -
[364] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I thought we'd covered this. More than there is now, less than 100%. I'm not sitting here with a laid out plan on what needs to be changed, so as much as you keep pushing for me to spew some random number, It really wouldn't help. If you can tell me where on your numerical scale of safeness we are supposedly at, I'd say probably about 1/10th of the way between that number and 100%.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
86
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:44:00 -
[365] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. It makes sense to ask that, but you can go more meta or deeper with that.
The point is that as long as people get killed, people will ask for increased security ... so the question should be more detailed, as in: When do you think people will stop complaining about getting blown up?
Ccovers the ground much more precise and leaves less loopholes. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2058
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:44:00 -
[366] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Reason is not the friend of hyperbole. Their argument boils down to: That's the way it is.
Still avoiding the question as to why you dont tank your ship.
Incase you forgot, mining enhancement modules dont go in medium power slots. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
86
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:46:00 -
[367] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I thought we'd covered this. More than there is now, less than 100%. I'm not sitting here with a laid out plan on what needs to be changed, so as much as you keep pushing for me to spew some random number, It really wouldn't help. If you can tell me where on your numerical scale of safeness we are supposedly at, I'd say probably about 1/10th of the way between that number and 100%. Your response is as inprecise as the question was. Try answering mine instead. It covers the issue completely and leaves no room for vague or inprecise responses.
New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
423
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:46:00 -
[368] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Yes, I see the issue. You prefer to change nothing. No compromise, no adjustment, nothing. Despite telling you over and over, you are convinced that I am lying on my intentions. There's nothing I can do about that. Your opinion is that highsec is safe enough. I don't agree. YOu assume it's safe enough if we play in a way that you think is 'reasonable'. I disagree with the pre-conditions and wonder how you would feel if there were pre-conditions to you flying a combat ship that you didn't agree with.
Then I'll ask you the question.
How safe does it need to be?
Does it need to be safe enough for you to maximize efficiency? Safe enough to AFK?
Less than that? More safe than that?
At what point will you look upon the safety of high sec and say, "Okay guys! THAT'S SAFE ENOUGH!"
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:But worse, you presume to dictate that I am just lying. That's not very nice. I won't hold that against you though, because I can see that you are a very emotional person.
I dictate nothing. Answer the questions that have been asked.
Why must gankers conform to your new rules (CONCORD response reduced by 50%) rather than YOU adjusting to the EXISTING game mechanics?
You see, at the end of all of this, all of this back and forth, and vitriol and venom. This is the question that I don't have the answer to. This is the knowledge that eludes me and make me a very emotional person. (And you have my thanks for not holding that fact against me).
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:46:00 -
[369] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Would it really be such a hardship to tank your ship properly so your problems simply cease to be an issue for you?
WOuld it really be such a hardship to apply the same standard to shps not meant for combat as you do to combat ships? |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
87
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:47:00 -
[370] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Reason is not the friend of hyperbole. Their argument boils down to: That's the way it is.
Still avoiding the question as to why you dont tank your ship. Incase you forgot, mining enhancement modules dont go in medium power slots. Because her belief leads her to believe that humans shouldn't be made responsible for their wrong choices. Because she believes that those who make stupid choices need protection, instead of education.
Edit: I apologize for inaccuracy. It rather seems that she believes that humans shouldn't have to make decisions to protect themselves at all. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2060
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:49:00 -
[371] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Would it really be such a hardship to tank your ship properly so your problems simply cease to be an issue for you?
WOuld it really be such a hardship to apply the same standard to shps not meant for combat as you do to combat ships?
No, its not, thats why I do it. It doesnt affect anything I do (which isnt combat usually) to pop a bit of tank on when Im in anything but a cyno.
Please tell me why you are against putting shield modules in mid slots. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:50:00 -
[372] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. It makes sense to ask that, but you can go more meta or deeper with that. The point is that as long as people get killed, people will ask for increased security ... so the question should be more detailed, as in: When do you think people will stop complaining about getting blown up? Ccovers the ground much more precise and leaves less loopholes. People will never stop complaining. But that doesn't mean there's not a legitimate issue there right now. You're forcing the situation to absolutes, which it is not. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:50:00 -
[373] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers. |

Frumpylumps Faplord
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:50:00 -
[374] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Tippia wrote:Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:high sec should be more safe. We need more players, not to keep grief monkeys content. What makes you think that one would lead to the other? What makes you think it wouldn't? Would it really be such a hardship to have to adjust your formula for who get's to be your 'victim'? Don't you see that people on this side of the issue like the game, and want to see it get better? No one yet has suggested that the 'cold, hard reality(sic)' of Eve would be destroyed with a small adjustment to security rules in highsec.
With this topic you always end up arguing with the most irrational and narrow-minded individuals. They are in every thread, just keep that in mind before you take them seriously, it might save you some effort for debating people who are actually worth debating.
Regardless, it is still amusing listening to all the victim-blaming non-sense coming from the status quo crowd, who somehow, in defiance of all common sense , claims making high sec safer is going to break the game instead of help it.  |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2060
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:51:00 -
[375] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers.
Um... please someone else tell her please?
I dont want to, she'll think Im trolling her. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Riot Girl
You'll Cowards Don't Even Smoke Crack
2301
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:53:00 -
[376] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers. Would you be satisfied with that? Oh god. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:53:00 -
[377] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers. Um... please someone else tell her please? I dont want to, she'll think Im trolling her. lol, OK I'll do it. ZynnLee, security status already works that way, 1.0 is about 5 seconds for response and it's nearly impossible to effectively gank there. 0.5 is around 25 seconds in a prepped system, 20 unprepped. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4239
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:53:00 -
[378] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:
Would it really be such a hardship to have to adjust your formula for who get's to be your 'victim'?
No one should have to do any such thing. EVE provides all kinds of tools people can use to protect themselves. That you choose not to use them is yoru choice.
Quote: Don't you see that people on this side of the issue like the game, and want to see it get better? No one yet has suggested that the 'cold, hard reality(sic)' of Eve would be destroyed with a small adjustment to security rules in highsec.
High sec doesn't need to be safer. The reason it needs to be dangerous is the same reason EVE is on one server, not two. People like you think you want to be totally safe, but it's a lie, because if you really thought that way you'd not be playing EVE at all.
For years I have been amazed at the squeemish personality types that can't handle the concepts of loss or personal responsibility (for their choices and their game experience) in a video game. I also find the sense of entitlement amazing, EVE was (at conception) envisioned as a hardcore and unforgiving experience, yet people have been begging for it to be watered down for the sake of "new players" not mentally tough enough to enjoy the game as is.
Why is that? Is the existance of ONE hardcore "kick you in your pants when you stop thinking" game too much for the universe to bear? |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
87
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:53:00 -
[379] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. It makes sense to ask that, but you can go more meta or deeper with that. The point is that as long as people get killed, people will ask for increased security ... so the question should be more detailed, as in: When do you think people will stop complaining about getting blown up? Ccovers the ground much more precise and leaves less loopholes. People will never stop complaining. But that doesn't mean there's not a legitimate issue there right now. You're forcing the situation to absolutes, which it is not. Oh it is absolute, but not at this point of time. I am simply jumping right to the end of this whole circle, trying to prevent it from continuing and reaching that point in the first place. If you have followed and understand the issue, then you are able to see why it is indeed absolute. The whole circle of complaints and given increased security leads towards the absolute. Absolute safety. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
426
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:53:00 -
[380] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:People will never stop complaining.
[/thread]
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4241
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:57:00 -
[381] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers. Would you be satisfied with that?
We know the answer to you veiled rhetorical question (lol). When i started peole were flying mining ships (long before the ehp buff) and there were no "safeties" to prevent people from screwing up and getting themselves killed in high sec among other things. Now there is all this stuff and people STILL aren't happy.
It's because some people can't be pleased no matter what you do or what you change or what you give them. I know, I've been through a divorce  |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:57:00 -
[382] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Oh it is absolute, but not at this point of time. I am simply jumping right to the end of this whole circle, trying to prevent it from continuing and reaching that point in the first place. If you have followed and understand the issue, then you are able to see why it is indeed absolute. The whole circle of complaints and given increased security leads towards the absolute. Absolute safety. Logical fallacy. You are assuming that any single change would result in cascading changes inevitably ending with 100% safety. Totally not the case. It's perfectly reasonable to expect changes to the current mechanic which would not necessarily add more safety as a whole, but steer safety towards newer players. For example, barges above the procurer should require more skills, encouraging newer characters to fly that one first, rather than jumping straight into the others. The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
88
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:57:00 -
[383] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:People will never stop complaining. [/thread] Exactly, sister. And that's why there should be no increased security, because it doesn't help anybody. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15521
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 17:57:00 -
[384] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers. I'll also bite.
That's how it already works, average Concord Time To Kill the bad guys times are courtesy of Tippia
- 1.0 GÇö 6-¦1 seconds.
- 0.9 GÇö 6-¦1 seconds.
- 0.8 GÇö 7-¦1 seconds.
- 0.7 GÇö 10-¦1 seconds.
- 0.6 GÇö 14-¦1 seconds.
- 0.5 GÇö 19-¦1 seconds.
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:00:00 -
[385] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Please tell me why you are against putting shield modules in mid slots.
If I choose to mine in "high" security space, which means I have already accepted the smaller yields, vastly increased competition, and restrictions of what I can mine, I shouldn't also have to further restrict myself to certain hull's or fit's that allow me to survive gank attempts, IF those fit's or hulls will result in a lesser yield.
If I could count on Concord to handle the problem in highsec while utilizing a mining ship (or maybe even an industrial?) that is fitted optimally for mining, the greater yields and opportunities I woul dhave in lower security space would be better balanced.
Having so little time to learn the game, it's entirely possible there are mining ships that I can fit a shield onto that will have no negative impact at all on my mining. Is that true for any mining ship I may be able to pilot? Will a single shield extender be enough to delay the attack till Concord arrives? I don't know. In high security, I shouldn't have to worry about that as much as I do now. |

Frumpylumps Faplord
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
2
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:02:00 -
[386] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: People like you think you want to be totally safe, but it's a lie, because if you really thought that way you'd not be playing EVE at all.
"you think you want to be safe but you really don't"   
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
88
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:04:00 -
[387] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Oh it is absolute, but not at this point of time. I am simply jumping right to the end of this whole circle, trying to prevent it from continuing and reaching that point in the first place. If you have followed and understand the issue, then you are able to see why it is indeed absolute. The whole circle of complaints and given increased security leads towards the absolute. Absolute safety. Logical fallacy. You are assuming that any single change would result in cascading changes inevitably ending with 100% safety. Totally not the case. It's perfectly reasonable to expect changes to the current mechanic which would not necessarily add more safety as a whole, but steer safety towards newer players. For example, barges above the procurer should require more skills, encouraging newer character to fly that one first, rather than jumping straight into the others. This isn't a single event in a single point of time. Everything evovles. There already were a lot of changes that increased security. For miners, as last example I know, it was the barge buff. Did it stop the complaints? No.
You are looking at it from one point in time, while it's actually a long time frame. One more step and one more step and one more step etc etc. You're not the first to come up with this and you won't be the last. People will always demand as long as they get blown up.
All the reason why this exists is because people refuse to take care of themselves and demand that the system takes care of them. And all this won't stop until they learn it or leave.
So, when do you think people will stop complaining about getting ganked? New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2061
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:04:00 -
[388] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Please tell me why you are against putting shield modules in mid slots.
If I choose to mine in "high" security space, which means I have already accepted the smaller yields, vastly increased competition, and restrictions of what I can mine, I shouldn't also have to further restrict myself to certain hull's or fit's that allow me to survive gank attempts, IF those fit's or hulls will result in a lesser yield.
But it doesnt result in a lesser yield. I keep telling you you dont lose any mining ability with shields in midslots! *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:05:00 -
[389] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:lol, OK I'll do it. ZynnLee, security status already works that way, 1.0 is about 5 seconds for response and it's nearly impossible to effectively gank there. 0.5 is around 25 seconds in a prepped system, 20 unprepped.
EDIT: Oh and if it was unclear, 0.6-0.9 scales between the two. Let this be an example of how much I am opposed to ganking. I have actually structured my game around avoiding it. I don't get to do the things I'd like to thanks to the ability to get popped for any or no reason at all. My only ship loss since returning a month ago was a Venture in .5 space, and I think I have a hardener on it....
I have never in all the time played, had Concord show up to punish someone who attacked me. That is how seriously I avoid it. It is completely un-fun. But, I play BF4 almost daily, loved BG in WoW and ToR. A little insight into me that will probably allow my blush to fade faster...... |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
426
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:07:00 -
[390] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:For example, barges above the procurer should require more skills, encouraging newer characters to fly that one first, rather than jumping straight into the others.
/sigh
That sounds like a great idea when you are bringing it up here in a common sense way man.
The reality is that people will not fly a procurer if they can train a little longer for a more ISK/hr ship.
It is no different than combat vessels.
I'll hang out in this Caracal until I can get into a Drake.
I'll hang out in this Drake until I can get into this Raven.
The difference, at least as it seems to me, is that I train support skills
Shields Armor Missiles Navigation Engineering Gunnery Targeting etc.
The miner trains what they need only to the extent that they need to in order to maximize ISK/hr.
If you want an intended consequence of what you are proposing then change the requirements on Barges and Exhumers to include some defensive measures.
Or, you know, mention to the people that come to the forum and holler about gankers, that they can train those skills and fit that tank.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:09:00 -
[391] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote: People like you think you want to be totally safe, but it's a lie, because if you really thought that way you'd not be playing EVE at all.
People keep saying things like this, and it's always just /shrug How do you know what I think I want?! When have I ever said I want to be totally safe. Sheesh
Jenn aSide wrote:For years I have been amazed at the squeemish personality types that can't handle the concepts of loss or personal responsibility (for their choices and their game experience) in a video game. I also find the sense of entitlement amazing, EVE was (at conception) envisioned as a hardcore and unforgiving experience, yet people have been begging for it to be watered down for the sake of "new players" not mentally tough enough to enjoy the game as is.
Why is that? Is the existance of ONE hardcore "kick you in your pants when you stop thinking" game too much for the universe to bear?
See my last post. I play true PvP (with willing combatants) all the time. I don't like the 'knock-out' game, which is what highsec ganking is. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4374
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:10:00 -
[392] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Please tell me why you are against putting shield modules in mid slots.
If I choose to mine in "high" security space, which means I have already accepted the smaller yields, vastly increased competition, and restrictions of what I can mine, I shouldn't also have to further restrict myself to certain hull's or fit's that allow me to survive gank attempts, IF those fit's or hulls will result in a lesser yield.
Why not?
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:If I could count on Concord to handle the problem in highsec while utilizing a mining ship (or maybe even an industrial?) that is fitted optimally for mining, the greater yields and opportunities I woul dhave in lower security space would be better balanced.
Concord is not there to keep you safe, they are there to punish offenders. Survival in most cases is either due to a mistake made by the ganker, or successful preventitive measures taken by the would-be victim &/or his friends.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Having so little time to learn the game, it's entirely possible there are mining ships that I can fit a shield onto that will have no negative impact at all on my mining. Is that true for any mining ship I may be able to pilot? Will a single shield extender be enough to delay the attack till Concord arrives? I don't know. In high security, I shouldn't have to worry about that as much as I do now.
Why not? This user won the forums on 18/09/2013, then lost on 18/12/2013. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
89
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:12:00 -
[393] - Quote
Lucas... I want to add that your argument fits for every point in time regarding this issue, as long as people get blown up. It literally is the same argument used all the time. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
39
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:14:00 -
[394] - Quote
I gotta go do some damn work, but I'll be back this evening. |

Mallak Azaria
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
4374
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:14:00 -
[395] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:lol, OK I'll do it. ZynnLee, security status already works that way, 1.0 is about 5 seconds for response and it's nearly impossible to effectively gank there. 0.5 is around 25 seconds in a prepped system, 20 unprepped.
EDIT: Oh and if it was unclear, 0.6-0.9 scales between the two. Let this be an example of how much I am opposed to ganking. I have actually structured my game around avoiding it. I don't get to do the things I'd like to thanks to the ability to get popped for any or no reason at all. My only ship loss since returning a month ago was a Venture in .5 space, and I think I have a hardener on it.... I have never in all the time played, had Concord show up to punish someone who attacked me. That is how seriously I avoid it. It is completely un-fun. But, I play BF4 almost daily, loved BG in WoW and ToR. A little insight into me that will probably allow my blush to fade faster......
I get it now. You enjoy themepark style games & think EVE should also be a themepark instead of a sandbox.
How about no. This user won the forums on 18/09/2013, then lost on 18/12/2013. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
89
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:16:00 -
[396] - Quote
I like to add that people who opinionate PvP ... true PvP means there is lesser true PvP ... ignore that PvP is an absolute meaning that players go against players. Using "true PvP" in an argument invalidates it completely, because it's just bias towards what somebody prefers. It doesn't support a true discussion and is just a reflection of the personality of the one who says it. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
428
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:17:00 -
[397] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I shouldn't also have to further restrict myself to certain hull's or fit's that allow me to survive gank attempts, IF those fit's or hulls will result in a lesser yield.
So instead of you restricting yourself you want to restrict others.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:If I could count on Concord to handle the problem in highsec while utilizing a mining ship (or maybe even an industrial?) that is fitted optimally for mining, the greater yields and opportunities I woul dhave in lower security space would be better balanced.
This just further illustrates the myriad of choices available to you. Don't like getting ganked in hisec? Then go to lowsec and get ganked but with better ore.
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Will a single shield extender be enough to delay the attack till Concord arrives?
A single shield extender will mitigate more damage than no shield extender. Be advised, of course, that this is merely my opinion and has no real basis in fact. 
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I don't know. In high security, I shouldn't have to worry about that as much as I do now.
How much SHOULD you have to worry about it? Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4218
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:18:00 -
[398] - Quote
Riot Girl wrote:Frumpylumps Faplord wrote:High sec "pirates" are just cowards who are afraid of real pvp and there is no reason they should get special treatment. So what does that make all the whiny brats demanding nerfs? Heroes. It helps rabid carebears tear into highsec 'pirates' all the easier.
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15522
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:21:00 -
[399] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Please tell me why you are against putting shield modules in mid slots.
If I choose to mine in "high" security space, which means I have already accepted the smaller yields, vastly increased competition, and restrictions of what I can mine, I shouldn't also have to further restrict myself to certain hull's or fit's that allow me to survive gank attempts, IF those fit's or hulls will result in a lesser yield. The only two mining barges with a solo midslot are the Retriever and the Covetor, and thus not really tankable. If you're not prepared to factor ship losses into your mining income then the only sensible choices for hisec mining are the Mackinaw and Procuror. You should be comparing the cost of properly tanked ships vs ship replacement, and factoring that into any calculations.
If you are prepared to accept ship losses as a cost of doing business then by all means use a Retriever, I'd recommend a Procurer though, the cargo isn't big enough to really afk, you can fill the ore hold in 4 cycles without using t2 strips, and people tend to leave you alone.
The Mackinaw is a great ship if expensive, it has good yield and can pack a decent defense, the Procurer suffers a little on yield but can make any attempted gank prohibitively expensive. Obviously defence capabilities are down to whether or not you bother to fit a tank. The caveat is that no fit is gankproof, but you can certainly make yourself into an unattractive target.
If you're using a Hulk or Covetor solo then you deserve to die, they're designed to be used with Orca support, without it they're pretty meh. Skiffs are fun for all sorts of purposes. |

Malcolm Shinhwa
Bad Touches
995
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:22:00 -
[400] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Wow, so this thread, like all others has rapidly turned into trolling.
All of you guys banging on about how people HTFU, and should do thing for themselves and waah, waah, waah, you're a bunch of idiots. This is a game guys, not a career. New players don't like this game, because they turn up and we just smash them into the ground and scream HTFU in their fact when they try to talk about it. This game is doomed to be just alts forever, because most of the community just wants to feel the power and stroke the epeen.
Honestly, I'm surprised new players even show up nowadays. I used to try to encourage my mates to play, now if people ask about eve, I simply say "you probably won't like it". At the end of the day, people play games to be entertained. It's not entertainment to be bumped, ganked and insulted by a 10 year vet who's got nothing better to do, then told to HTFU by the community.
Please proceed to shower me with all the trolling, whining and insulting we normally see in GD.
I just had my 1yr anniversary in December. Brave Newbies is full of players who are both new and apparently loving the game. Tell us more about how new players don't like this game.
You are right, its not entertaining to be bumped and ganked. What is entertaining is fighting the bumper or ganker and winning. Its a competitive game. If you aren't a competitive person you're going to have a bad time. Luckily there are other games that cater to those who aren't. For instance, almost any other MMO. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose. |
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
91
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:24:00 -
[401] - Quote
This thread is the past, the present and the future.
It will never stop until either nobody gets blown up anymore or when new players stop getting educated by weak links.
It's the strong links' fault that the situation came to this in the first place. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

RAIN Arthie
The Ascended Fleet Intrepid Crossing
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:44:00 -
[402] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:This thread is the past, the present and the future.
It will never stop until either nobody gets blown up anymore or when new players stop getting educated by weak links.
It's the strong links' fault that the situation came to this in the first place.
I would like to enhance this statement. Quite a few players, when they hear someone is new, often want to blap them. Instead of using that mentality, point them to people who can help them with the game. At the very least you have given them a direction. No that is not the cold hard EVE online way, however by doing this you can create a more experienced and challenging eve player to blap later. Instead of shooting all of the cows to get meat now. Let them grow up to get bigger and meaty er and gain more from them. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
91
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:46:00 -
[403] - Quote
RAIN Arthie wrote:Angelica Dreamstar wrote:This thread is the past, the present and the future.
It will never stop until either nobody gets blown up anymore or when new players stop getting educated by weak links.
It's the strong links' fault that the situation came to this in the first place. I would like to enhance this statement. Quite a few players, when they hear someone is new, often want to blap them. Instead of using that mentality, point them to people who can help them with the game. At the very least you have given them a direction. No that is not the cold hard EVE online way, however by doing this you can create a more experienced and challenging eve player to blap later. Instead of shooting all of the cows to get meat now. Let them grow up to get bigger and meaty er and gain more from them. So plant an alt into a starter corp and start educating people beyond mining, running missions and thus playing isolated. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:49:00 -
[404] - Quote
Scarlett Wesson wrote:
They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL. .
Is that not the sign of something being broken if the way you should play it is by NOT playing? |

RAIN Arthie
The Ascended Fleet Intrepid Crossing
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:52:00 -
[405] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Scarlett Wesson wrote:
They don't care about the fact that the mining mechanic encourages players to AFK to not die of boredom. The "AFKness", "non-tankiness" or whatnot of their victims is just an excuse to let their inner asshats take control without risk of getting their ass kicked like in RL. .
Is that not the sign of something being broken if the way you should play it is by NOT playing?
Not sure that there is a "certain way" to play space anarchy. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:52:00 -
[406] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
Why do you insist on this myth that there are two groups: Pro-solo players and Pro-Gankers to the exculsion of all else?
As neither a ganker nor a miner I can say you are wrong on this. Factually wrong.
I've never suggested there are only 'pro-solo' and 'pro-ganking' groups. I thought it was pretty clear. Pro-ganking, and anti-ganking. There really is only 2 sides to this, like most things. Either you are okay with ganking, or not. Clearly there are many on either side, with the advantage on the pro-ganking side. Which includes CCP, sadly. But that does not mean that things can change, as many gankers have already expressed frustration with (can flipping changes and the like). Eve's "harsh nature" won't be ruined by allowing people in highsec a little more protection against what we feel is anti-social bullying. I've said it many times before, and I'll keep saying it: I don't want 100% protection in highsec. Just make the decision to gank a much more serious one. I'll also add something I've not yet admitted. I have no sympathy for those who afk play, for any reason. I am very much opposed to botting. Heck, I don't even like multi-boxing, although I am seriously considering doing it myself to have a logi support my miner. The only point I have made ( and continue to make) is.... Why must CCP do your thinking for you? EVERY other profession in EvE requires thought to avoid catastrpophic loss. WHY must mining be a protected profession? The tools already exist to have a life free from the fear of small gang ganking, what more do you want?
Miners are endangered didn't you hear? We need to set up reserves for them to flourish and populate.
|

RAIN Arthie
The Ascended Fleet Intrepid Crossing
187
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:56:00 -
[407] - Quote
I mine and protect my miners, in null. You see when i hear a miner has gotten blaped in HS I give them a hug and tell them it's ok because now matter how mean they are to you in HS, they are always to scared to do ANYTHING in null sec. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:57:00 -
[408] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:For example, barges above the procurer should require more skills, encouraging newer characters to fly that one first, rather than jumping straight into the others. /sigh That sounds like a great idea when you are bringing it up here in a common sense way man. The reality is that people will not fly a procurer if they can train a little longer for a more ISK/hr ship. It is no different than combat vessels. I'll hang out in this Caracal until I can get into a Drake. I'll hang out in this Drake until I can get into this Raven. The difference, at least as it seems to me, is that I train support skills Shields Armor Missiles Navigation Engineering Gunnery Targeting etc. The miner trains what they need only to the extent that they need to in order to maximize ISK/hr. If you want an intended consequence of what you are proposing then change the requirements on Barges and Exhumers to include some defensive measures. Or, you know, mention to the people that come to the forum and holler about gankers, that they can train those skills and fit that tank. Indeed, but the skills used to be tiered, and you would work from one barge to another. Then consider how it works for newbies combat ships. You fly around in a cruiser, doing your missions. Then you swap to a battlecruiser, and badly fit it and die. So you go back to the cruiser.
The same would work for barges. A newbie jumps into a retriever first, dies and simply tries again, over and over until they get would up and quit. If they had a week or so where they fly a procurer, they'd have something to fall back on that they feel comfortable and safe in, albeit with lower yield. I think simple changes like that would go a long way to steering people in the right direction without breaking the mechanics.
You wouldn't specifically need tank skills as a yield fit procurer is generally safe enough anyway. (though I think it would make sense if proc/skiffs needed shield skills, retriever/macks needed core skill and covetors/hulks needed yield skills).
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 18:57:00 -
[409] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Every other 'profession' except trading involves combat.
Please tell me more about how Exploring, Salvaging, Couriering, Researching, Noob Training, Manufacturing and Cynoalting involve combat please My apologies, I should have worded that from the other direction and clarified location. Allow me to re-state: Mining is the only in-space profession whose ships are meant to do something other than fight. In all but one of your in-space examples (courier), there will be fighting, and more importantly, the ship you will be in will be designed to fight. I admit to not knowing what a cyno-alt is, but my guess is a character serving only as a jump bridge for others. Even there, you will be in a ship designed for combat. Please, no one talk about how any equipment can be fit on any ship if it's the right slot! I would have to ask why you don't take an Orca into fleet warfare. Or a Hulk to assault a POS.....
Also for the record, every man and dog in a WH uses an orca in PvP  |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:02:00 -
[410] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:I have to quibble with the statement that "highsec is where the pvp is". First, a mendacious point hashed over plenty the past few days: ganking is not PvP, as the aggression and threat is from one side only. Ganking is the knock-out game.
You want us PvP in a fight not to our advantage?
Do tell me why on earth i would like to risk my 2.5b isk machariel against your 15 man fleet.
Cause then you would not be fighting "fair" PvP. The term "fair" is relative and is really silly to throw around. |
|

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2846
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:05:00 -
[411] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Riot Girl wrote:It clearly is. Yeah you're right. Clearly this game is stronger than ever. Riot Girl wrote:I can't say I know of any other games that accomplish what Eve has. If there were more modern alternatives, I'd try them out. Accomplish what? Spaceships? A community filled to the brim with neckbeards? Or a complete lack of additional content? We've already lost a few to Star Citizen. Seriously?! Neckbeards? EVERY MMO is awash with neckbeards. Seriously, do try to keep up, m'kay?
And StarCitizen? People are still riding that pony? C'mon. You can do better than that.
You should have long ago grown used to the fact that EVE is not for everyone. That it is, indeed, only for 'Teh Few.' This is a self-selected community. Many may try, few will stay. But enough stay that the game slowly grows, and that is more than sufficient.
Ramona McCandless wrote: Exploring: Buzzard. Armament: None Salvaging: Any Destoryer with tractors and salvager Armament: None Noob Training: Any ship, Armament: Variable Cynoalting: Any noob ship, Armament: None Courier: Transport, Armament: none
How is there fighting in these professions? And apart from the Destroyer, how are they designed for combat?
And in each of those cites, you *still* have to be ready for combat - albeit their part of combat is "run like hell!" stuff. Still, shots are being fired, and survival is at stake. Yes, that's combat. Just because it's not aggressive, but instead reactive, doesn't mean that ships will not explode. Doesn't mean that those boldly unarmed pilots aren't going to do their damnedset to thwart and defeat their foes - it' just means that for them, "victory" is "survival."
Every time a ganker has come after one of my hulls, and I've gotten away, you can bet I call it victory. I can do a "you missed me!" taunt equal to any ganker's victory "yaaar!"
As for tanking Barges, I'll flatly state that when I send out my mining alt (truthfully, not very often at all), he is often flying an untanked barge. Why? Because I count Barge losses into my proffit-and-loss planning. I know how often I get successfully ganked (not often), I know how much a stripped-down Barge costs vs. how much it can earn, and thus know exactly how many hours of mining are necessary to replace each hull. I also know how much a fully-fitted Barge costs. And I know how the difference between 'fully-tanked' and 'non-tanked' affects my loss rate (essentially zero change).
Beause I use situational-awareness tanking, I find that I get slightly better profit from bare-bones Barges. Unless I'm using my Barge as a scout for a gank, in which case I tank it to the gunwales. Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
428
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:05:00 -
[412] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Indeed, but the skills used to be tiered, and you would work from one barge to another. Then consider how it works for newbies combat ships. You fly around in a cruiser, doing your missions. Then you swap to a battlecruiser, and badly fit it and die. So you go back to the cruiser.
The same would work for barges. A newbie jumps into a retriever first, dies and simply tries again, over and over until they get would up and quit. If they had a week or so where they fly a procurer, they'd have something to fall back on that they feel comfortable and safe in, albeit with lower yield. I think simple changes like that would go a long way to steering people in the right direction without breaking the mechanics.
You wouldn't specifically need tank skills as a yield fit procurer is generally safe enough anyway. (though I think it would make sense if proc/skiffs needed shield skills, retriever/macks needed core skill and covetors/hulks needed yield skills).
" If they had a week or so where they fly a procurer, they'd have something to fall back on that they feel comfortable and safe in,"
That assumes that they aren't going back to the retriever to maximize their isk/hr. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:19:00 -
[413] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:Indeed, but the skills used to be tiered, and you would work from one barge to another. Then consider how it works for newbies combat ships. You fly around in a cruiser, doing your missions. Then you swap to a battlecruiser, and badly fit it and die. So you go back to the cruiser.
The same would work for barges. A newbie jumps into a retriever first, dies and simply tries again, over and over until they get would up and quit. If they had a week or so where they fly a procurer, they'd have something to fall back on that they feel comfortable and safe in, albeit with lower yield. I think simple changes like that would go a long way to steering people in the right direction without breaking the mechanics.
You wouldn't specifically need tank skills as a yield fit procurer is generally safe enough anyway. (though I think it would make sense if proc/skiffs needed shield skills, retriever/macks needed core skill and covetors/hulks needed yield skills).
" If they had a week or so where they fly a procurer, they'd have something to fall back on that they feel comfortable and safe in," That assumes that they aren't going back to the retriever to maximize their isk/hr. Sure, that's a choice. But at least if you guide them through the procurer, they'll at least know for sure there's an alternative, and probably still have it laying around.
At the end of the day I'm just highlighting one of many methods by which people could be guided to help themselves without having to go to either extreme of throwing bubble wrap around everyone or screaming "HTFU" in their faces. I wouldn't expect, nor want it to suddenly make every noob safe.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8180
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:23:00 -
[414] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:In high security, I shouldn't have to worry about that as much as I do now. "I shouldn't have to worry about anything because I'm in highsec." I got news for you pal. You're still playing the wrong ******* game for your mentality. My EVE Videos |

Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
219
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:30:00 -
[415] - Quote
At first I thought, "How did I miss this thread!?!" until I realized it was only a couple days old and still growing. Such is the interest and activity generated by the New Order both in and out of game.
I feel like I'm back in 2012 after reading the comments. No growth on the part of a lot of players who have been around long enough to know better and the same bull headed refusal to consider alternatives by the newer.
Here is what i expect from a miner when I bump him. I expect him to at least do what I tell him to do which is 1) go to www.minerbumping.com , 2) Read "The Code" and 3) consider whether or not he has to comply. So many are so sure we are illegitimate, that we are "griefers" and can be banned/resisted/ignored that they don't do the common sense thing of finding out what is, in fact, happening to them.
Once a miner reads the Code he has a decision to make. Join up! or attempt to resist. While permit tank is best tank and buying a permit is a wise economic decision and blah blah blah I realize it may take some convincing to get someone who actually believes mining in highsec is a good idea to pry open the old noodle a bit and consider a new viewpoint so I am willing to patiently bump them towards nirvana. Whether this is because I am so kind and benevolent or because I am a sociopath is probably not proveable and definitely not relevant. I do it because I can and because I want to. In Eve, this is reason enough.
So the entire discussion about whether what we do is harassment or griefing or allowed by EULA or a good idea for Eve or reflective of deep, real world insecurities DON'T MAKE NO MATTER! We have decided that the New Halaima Code of Conduct is in force in all New Order systems (those with sec status between .5 and 1.0). We bump or gank any offenders that we choose to. We expect and even welcome resistance as it is a definite step TOWARDS Code compliance by a bot aspirant.
The only thing debatable is whether we are effectively making a difference. Highsec is a pretty big place and my personal experience in Kino, where I've ganked literally hundreds over the last few months, show me that many miners don't consider us an existential problem. Much like the story of the starfish, we have to be content with making a difference to the one miner we are currently saving. For me, that's enough.
Because when you get right down to it, I am a zealot for the Code and I believe that what the New Order of Highsec is doing is important to the future of Eve. I know its a game and I know we play to have fun. But a safe highsec does not make for a fun game. In the best tradition of Eve Online, we, the players, are addressing the problem of the nerfing of highsec pvp.
Everyone else can decide whether to support us or to support bot aspirancy.
Highsec is worth fighting for.
Bing Bangboom Agent of the New Order of Highsec Belligerent Undesirable
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
429
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:37:00 -
[416] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:At the end of the day I'm just highlighting one of many methods by which people could be guided to help themselves without having to go to either extreme of throwing bubble wrap around everyone or screaming "HTFU" in their faces. I wouldn't expect, nor want it to suddenly make every noob safe.
Earlier in this thread I asked you to tell me how much more safe high sec would need to be in order for it to be adequately safe.
You mentioned that I should take a value and add 1/10th more safety.
I can do that without changing a single existing mechanic.
Get 10% of all miners to start fitting a tank. That is exactly the number we need! Hell if you were abler to get more to do just that you can make it safer.
And safer.
And safer
Do you see where this is going?
And safer.
Problem solved! Don't forget to tip your waitstaff! They work hard so you don't have to!
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
432
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 19:58:00 -
[417] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:At the end of the day I'm just highlighting one of many methods by which people could be guided to help themselves without having to go to either extreme of throwing bubble wrap around everyone or screaming "HTFU" in their faces. I wouldn't expect, nor want it to suddenly make every noob safe.
Earlier in this thread I asked you to tell me how much more safe high sec would need to be in order for it to be adequately safe. You mentioned that I should take a value and add 1/10th more safety. I can do that without changing a single existing mechanic. Get 10% of all miners to start fitting a tank. That is exactly the number we need! Hell if you were able to get more to do just that you can make it safer. And safer. And safer Do you see where this is going? And safer. Problem solved! Don't forget to tip your waitstaff! They work hard so you don't have to!
OH I CAN IMPROVE THIS EXPONENTIALLY!!
Get another 10% to stop AFKing.
If you get more than 10% you are doing even better at making hisec safer!
And safer.
And safer.
Okay I'm tired of this.
And safer!!
Theoretically, if you could get all miners to fit a tank and to NOT AFK you could increase safety in hisec by a whopping 200% and never touch the existing mechanics. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4218
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:01:00 -
[418] - Quote
Because bitching about bitching turns bitching into action. Rite guise?
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
109
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:09:00 -
[419] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:You seem to be making the assumption that the only goal is 100% safety.
And thus the question sir. If the only goal is NOT 100% safe then what IS the goal? At what point, and to what extent, does high-sec need to be made safe. You see I am looking for a goal post here. I want someone to tell me HOW SAFE IS SAFE ENOUGH and then stick to that. I'd offer a suggestion. What if Concord response time was a multiplier of the security status? 1.0 means arrival nearly immediately. 0.5 means Concord arrives as fast as it does now. Then extrapolate for the other numbers.
Because this make nothing safer at all... this idea will only change profit margins and losses for gankers. there is no effect on safety. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2382
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:11:00 -
[420] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:At the end of the day I'm just highlighting one of many methods by which people could be guided to help themselves without having to go to either extreme of throwing bubble wrap around everyone or screaming "HTFU" in their faces. I wouldn't expect, nor want it to suddenly make every noob safe.
Earlier in this thread I asked you to tell me how much more safe high sec would need to be in order for it to be adequately safe. You mentioned that I should take a value and add 1/10th more safety. I can do that without changing a single existing mechanic. Get 10% of all miners to start fitting a tank. That is exactly the number we need! Hell if you were able to get more to do just that you can make it safer. And safer. And safer Do you see where this is going? And safer. Problem solved! Don't forget to tip your waitstaff! They work hard so you don't have to! OH I CAN IMPROVE THIS EXPONENTIALLY!! Get another 10% to stop AFKing. If you get more than 10% you are doing even better at making hisec safer! And safer. And safer. Okay I'm tired of this. And safer!! Theoretically, if you could get all miners to fit a tank and to NOT AFK you could increase safety in hisec by a whopping 200% and never touch the existing mechanics. Look, it's clear that you have no actual interest in discussing this, you simply are going to troll for eternity, misrepresentting what people are askign for and demanding impossible to answer questions. You wanted some weird impossible to gauge numeric and I gave you exactly that.
At the end of the day I think newbies don't get enough given to them to avoid or defend against ganking and bumping which is IMHO way too easy to do these days. That's my opinion, and you will not change it. Trolling me in this thread will get nowhere, though to be honest, as with all threads on any subject in eve it's quickly filled with the usual troll crowd.
If an when CCP want to discuss this stuff then it will be worth discussing. Until then all we will do is get into the same deadlock we have now which is where we want some level of changes while you take that to mean 100% safety and refuse to listen to anything but that. In the meantime it affects me to the sum of zero since I live in nullsec.
Now that the new order plebs are starting to join in too I really can't be arsed to read pages and pages of bullshit, so I'm calling it here.
/part thread The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

Jessica Danikov
Clan Shadow Wolf Fatal Ascension
213
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:26:00 -
[421] - Quote
One guy makes a big fuss about bumping miners and suddenly there's a threadnaught about it?
Just because they're loud and they occasionally generate tears, doesn't mean they represent the entire new player experience. If anything, they're more the exception to the rule- the majority of new players will be left be to their own devices or find a home in one of the countless multitudes of newbie friend training corps, or grow old enough that encountering such people is no longer 'new player'. All this fuss is just free advertising.
If you feel what they're doing is wrong, compete with their content. Form the anti-Order corp. Contact all those who purchased mining permits, all those ganked by them, or recruit like-minded people to fight them. That would be a good story, successes and failures, their content and your content, feeding and building off each other. The sandbox empowers you to do that, just as it empowers them.
Or would that be too much work, too much action? You seem convinced that talking won't achieve anything, so why not do something instead. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
434
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 20:28:00 -
[422] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Look, it's clear that you have no actual interest in discussing this, you simply are going to troll for eternity, misrepresentting what people are askign for and demanding impossible to answer questions. You wanted some weird impossible to gauge numeric and I gave you exactly that.
At the end of the day I think newbies don't get enough given to them to avoid or defend against ganking and bumping which is IMHO way too easy to do these days. That's my opinion, and you will not change it. Trolling me in this thread will get nowhere, though to be honest, as with all threads on any subject in eve it's quickly filled with the usual troll crowd.
If an when CCP want to discuss this stuff then it will be worth discussing. Until then all we will do is get into the same deadlock we have now which is where we want some level of changes while you take that to mean 100% safety and refuse to listen to anything but that. In the meantime it affects me to the sum of zero since I live in nullsec.
Now that the new order plebs are starting to join in too I really can't be arsed to read pages and pages of bullshit, so I'm calling it here.
/part thread
I can assure you that I am not intentionally trolling you Lucas. 
I can say that I may or may not be guilty of trolling some others in this thread who feel they have the right to:
1) Not fit a tank 2) Go AFK 3) Demand changes because 1 and 2 are not safe.
You, unfortunately, got caught in the crossfire because you rushed to their defense. Lucas, the people you are defending in this thread are not newbie miners. They have been exposed to Eve for at least a year. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jenn aSide
STK Scientific Initiative Mercenaries
4245
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 21:16:00 -
[423] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Lucas Kell wrote:lol, OK I'll do it. ZynnLee, security status already works that way, 1.0 is about 5 seconds for response and it's nearly impossible to effectively gank there. 0.5 is around 25 seconds in a prepped system, 20 unprepped.
EDIT: Oh and if it was unclear, 0.6-0.9 scales between the two. Let this be an example of how much I am opposed to ganking. I have actually structured my game around avoiding it. I don't get to do the things I'd like to thanks to the ability to get popped for any or no reason at all. My only ship loss since returning a month ago was a Venture in .5 space, and I think I have a hardener on it.... I have never in all the time played, had Concord show up to punish someone who attacked me. That is how seriously I avoid it. It is completely un-fun. But, I play BF4 almost daily, loved BG in WoW and ToR. A little insight into me that will probably allow my blush to fade faster......
The bolded part is important, has it ever occured to you that the problem is you're choosing to play a game outside of your "enjoyment zone". The problem is your expectations, not what happens inside the game. No, the game should not change to fit your expectations, rather you should either adapt to it, or adapt out of it....
|

James Amril-Kesh
4S Corporation Goonswarm Federation
8191
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:08:00 -
[424] - Quote
Lucas Kell says highsec needs to be safer.
Holy ****, dude. Highsec has been continually made safer over the past several years and each time we hear "no it needs to be safer".
Now ganking is at an all time low and what do we hear? "Highsec needs to be safer." Get your head on straight ffs. My EVE Videos |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
114
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:42:00 -
[425] - Quote
I think this stems from the fallacy that high sec is actually "safe" at all. This attitude needs to be looked at.  |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
438
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:46:00 -
[426] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell says highsec needs to be safer.
Holy ****, dude. Highsec has been continually made safer over the past several years and each time we hear "no it needs to be safer".
Now ganking is at an all time low and what do we hear? "Highsec needs to be safer." Get your head on straight ffs.
Don't be too hard on Lucas. I think he sees this debate in the context of the moment and not in the context of its continued evolution.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
2851
|
Posted - 2014.01.07 23:50:00 -
[427] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell says highsec needs to be safer.
Holy ****, dude. Highsec has been continually made safer over the past several years and each time we hear "no it needs to be safer".
Now ganking is at an all time low and what do we hear? "Highsec needs to be safer." Get your head on straight ffs. See, this is precisely teh reason I started ganking. 'Cause I was sick and tired of this air of entitlement and nanny-ism.
The very advertisments for the game say "Be the Villain." The holiday vid has a bunch of miscreants blapping Santa's ship. Last year, the same miscreants vaprozied Santa in person, only to get a mega-nuke dropped on *their* heads by jolly ol' Saint Nick himself! The developers and staff have made a rap video telling folks to HTFU!
How many more times and how much more explicitly can the point be made..?! EVE is COMBAT. Including non-consensual combat. Hi-Sec is not supposed to be a nursery with CONCORD to kiss your boo-boos and give you a lolly... The most you can hope is that CONCORD gives your killer a good retaliatory bollocking. Hi-Sec is just a zone where you can expect a bit of impersonal vengeance - and not much of that, either.
Get used to it, folks! Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.
Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2384
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:05:00 -
[428] - Quote
silens vesica wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:Lucas Kell says highsec needs to be safer.
Holy ****, dude. Highsec has been continually made safer over the past several years and each time we hear "no it needs to be safer".
Now ganking is at an all time low and what do we hear? "Highsec needs to be safer." Get your head on straight ffs. See, this is precisely teh reason I started ganking. 'Cause I was sick and tired of this air of entitlement and nanny-ism. The very advertisments for the game say "Be the Villain." The holiday vid has a bunch of miscreants blapping Santa's ship. Last year, the same miscreants vaprozied Santa in person, only to get a mega-nuke dropped on *their* heads by jolly ol' Saint Nick himself! The developers and staff have made a rap video telling folks to HTFU! How many more times and how much more explicitly can the point be made..?! EVE is COMBAT. Including non-consensual combat. Hi-Sec is not supposed to be a nursery with CONCORD to kiss your boo-boos and give you a lolly... The most you can hope is that CONCORD gives your killer a good retaliatory bollocking. Hi-Sec is just a zone where you can expect a bit of impersonal vengeance - and not much of that, either. Get used to it, folks! Since that is in fact not what I stated at all this is pretty out of place... While I'll continue to read it, I'm departed from this discussion so I'm not going to be restating anything, but I would advise that you actually read back some of the posts before taking what someone has claimed I've stated as the truth.
The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |

SmilingVagrant
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
2240
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:05:00 -
[429] - Quote
voted five would vote again. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
905
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 00:53:00 -
[430] - Quote
How you feel when you come back to a thread, and it is becoming a threadnaught because of carebear entitlement...
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2068
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 07:47:00 -
[431] - Quote
silens vesica wrote: non-consensual sensual combat.
My favourite kind *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2068
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 07:53:00 -
[432] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote: Let this be an example of how much I am opposed to ganking. I have actually structured my game around avoiding it. I don't get to do the things I'd like to thanks to the ability to get popped for any or no reason at all.
1) Oxymoronic statement
2) If you are doing your best to avoid it, why would it happen?
3) You are passively opposed. At no point have you suggested actively fighting. And don't say it can't be done, I know plenty of people who do it.
4) You refuse to see the sense in fitting a shield tank to a Procurer, even though it does not effect your yield.
5) You say elsewhere you HAVE to put up with lower yields if you want to mine in High Sec. Um, yeah, why shouldnt the most populous area of sapce have the worst yields? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Ice Eagle
6
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:52:00 -
[433] - Quote
Rainbow Dash[quote=Rick II Egnald wrote:
I heard rumor that CCP was looking at a mechanic that would cause damage to ships involved in collisions. Is this true?
CCP isn't looking into anything. It's not a problem, so they're not "fixing" it.[/quote]
Receiving damage when bumping someone or an object in space used to be the norm, for those that remember. i think i remember multiple posts about people "ganging" other people in empire by effectively bumping them to death. this way of killing someone did not invoke the concord retaliation, and was quite quickly taken out of the game.
working from memory, i might not have it 100% right |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2083
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:55:00 -
[434] - Quote
Ice Eagle wrote: people "ganking" other people in empire by effectively bumping them to death.
Make sure you yell suprise first to avoid CONCORD *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Charles Dufresne
University of Caille Gallente Federation
1
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:23:00 -
[435] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:I think newbies don't get enough given to them to avoid or defend against ganking and bumping They have the tools they need, the trouble tends to lie in the fact they don't know how to use them. If ever a newbie complains about being ganked/bumped, just tell him how to avoid those issues. The more people that take part in this practice, the fewer tears there'll be. |

Arduemont
The State of War.
2886
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:44:00 -
[436] - Quote
War dec them. Or pay someone to do it for you. "In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf |

Careby
Careby Exploration
169
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 13:52:00 -
[437] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine?
Sarcasm is OP |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15538
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 15:14:00 -
[438] - Quote
Careby wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine? Requiring people to make an effort to avoid being bumped or ganked is an outrageous demand, they should be able to gather their virtual riches in peace while busy doing other things. Devs should ban the 'orrible bastards who interfere in the essential work of gathering virtual riches.
Oh wait this is Eve, if people can't be arsed to make an effort to protect themselves, then that's their problem. It's certainly not the problem of CCP, and it's definitely not the problem of the aforementioned 'orrible bastards that make life interesting. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 16:49:00 -
[439] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Careby wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine? Requiring people to make an effort to avoid being bumped or ganked is an outrageous demand, they should be able to gather their virtual riches in peace while busy doing other things. Devs should ban the 'orrible bastards who interfere in the essential work of gathering virtual riches. Oh wait this is Eve, if people can't be arsed to make an effort to protect themselves, then that's their problem. It's certainly not the problem of CCP, and it's definitely not the problem of the aforementioned 'orrible bastards that make life interesting. And how exactly do they protect themselves beside running away? Beside running away people suggest ganking them first, which is pretty much impossible except against the worst of gankers. Most of them use instant undocks and then warp straight to the target. Bumpers you could gank, but then you lose sec status so can't mine in high sec, and not everyone has multiple accounts (and that should not be a requirement to play).
I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. Security status does effectively nothing and all the setup can be handled by alts. Add on that ganking costs nearly nothing, and the result is one of the easiest things in the game to do. It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves. |

Lucas Kell
JSR1 AND GOLDEN GUARDIAN PRODUCTIONS SpaceMonkey's Alliance
2384
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 16:54:00 -
[440] - Quote
Careby wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine? The Indecisive Noob - A new EVE Fan Blog for news and stuff. |
|

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:05:00 -
[441] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:And how exactly do they protect themselves beside running away? They could tank their ships.
Quote:Beside running away people suggest ganking them first Which, is silly. Just tank your ship, you'll deter the vast majority of ganks.
Quote:I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. It's easier to avoid being ganked than it is to gank. If you're thinking otherwise, perhaps you should actually try ganking with the New Order. You'll learn a few things.
Quote:It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves. How hard is it to fit shield mods & rigs? Honestly? |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
457
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:10:00 -
[442] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. Security status does effectively nothing and all the setup can be handled by alts. Add on that ganking costs nearly nothing, and the result is one of the easiest things in the game to do. It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves.
Never been a ganker - never felt the need. Never been ganked - never played AFK.
Mining is easy because you can (though shouldn't) do it afk while you make dinner or play with your kids or do homework or do whatever you are doing besides actually playing the game.
I don't suppose a ganker would be able to do their job AFK. Again, never been a ganker, so maybe a ganker can come in here and let us know if that is possible.- to be AFK while ganking miners.
If miners were not AFK and if miners fit a tank, the advantage to the gankers that you assume is there would be drastically reduced.,
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15541
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:16:00 -
[443] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Beside running away people suggest ganking them first, which is pretty much impossible except against the worst of gankers. Most of them use instant undocks and then warp straight to the target. Bumpers you could gank, but then you lose sec status so can't mine in high sec, and not everyone has multiple accounts (and that should not be a requirement to play). They could try being a less desirable target for a start. Appropriate ships and fits, not going afk in space, and not flying loot pinatas are all good. Gankers generally go for the easy or profitable targets, not being an easy or profitable target is a logical step.
Quote:I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. Security status does effectively nothing and all the setup can be handled by alts. Add on that ganking costs nearly nothing, and the result is one of the easiest things in the game to do. It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves. You should try ganking before you dismiss it as easy, I've done it myself, and seen the amount of organisation and time people expend setting up insta-undocks, rallying fleets, scouting for targets, pre-prepping Concord etc. It's not a no effort lifestyle, it's not a guaranteed I win tactic and certainly doesn't cost next to nothing unless you're only counting the ISK. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
457
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:33:00 -
[444] - Quote
Lucas Kell wrote:Careby wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine? I'm pretty sure the OP stated that he moved and it was all resolved :p How is this thread still ongoing? EDIT: Yeah, he did here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4079866#post4079866
The threadnaught continues because there are people continuing to add their 0.02 ISK about how bad gankers are and how disadvantaged miners are. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:37:00 -
[445] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:They could tank their ships.
Which, is silly. Just tank your ship, you'll deter the vast majority of ganks.
It's easier to avoid being ganked than it is to gank. If you're thinking otherwise, perhaps you should actually try ganking with the New Order. You'll learn a few things.
How hard is it to fit shield mods & rigs? Honestly? If you tank, you get bumped instead. And I have ganked with the new order. It's a requirement to understand how your enemy works. Gankign and bumping is considerably easier than not getting bumped/ganked if you take away the "run away" option. Seems a bit weird to be forced to run away by the mechanics. Seems doubly weird that gankers would complain that they think their vicitms are the ones that are acting entitled.
Kimmi Chan wrote:Never been a ganker - never felt the need. Never been ganked - never played AFK.
Mining is easy because you can (though shouldn't) do it afk while you make dinner or play with your kids or do homework or do whatever you are doing besides actually playing the game.
I don't suppose a ganker would be able to do their job AFK. Again, never been a ganker, so maybe a ganker can come in here and let us know if that is possible.- to be AFK while ganking miners.
If miners were not AFK and if miners fit a tank, the advantage to the gankers that you assume is there would be drastically reduced., I've seen many non-AFK players get ganked, being bumped out of alignment by the scout prior to the gank. And if you are too tanked, they bump you, which is worse, because they can bump forever if they want to, meaning if you only have that one character, you can no longer play EVE until they decide to let you. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:44:00 -
[446] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Hitamino wrote:Beside running away people suggest ganking them first, which is pretty much impossible except against the worst of gankers. Most of them use instant undocks and then warp straight to the target. Bumpers you could gank, but then you lose sec status so can't mine in high sec, and not everyone has multiple accounts (and that should not be a requirement to play). They could try being a less desirable target for a start. Appropriate ships and fits, not going afk in space, and not flying loot pinatas are all good. Gankers generally go for the easy or profitable targets, not being an easy or profitable target is a logical step. Quote:I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. Security status does effectively nothing and all the setup can be handled by alts. Add on that ganking costs nearly nothing, and the result is one of the easiest things in the game to do. It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves. You should try ganking before you dismiss it as easy, I've done it myself (under the auspices of learning how gankers work so that I don't get ganked), and seen the amount of organisation and time people expend setting up insta-undocks, rallying fleets, scouting for targets, pre-prepping Concord etc. It's not a no effort lifestyle, it's not a guaranteed I win tactic and certainly doesn't cost next to nothing unless you're only counting the ISK. The only part most people see is the gank itself, the background work is generally unacknowledged, especially by those who can't be arsed to put effort into their own gameplay. As an "experienced anti ganker" you should be encouraging people to use the Crimewatch mechanic to hunt down and kill gankers, the risks involved in highsec ganking are directly proportional to the amount of effort that people put into making it risky. No effort from anti gankers = no risk for them. You should also be telling them to look for the gankers industrial and financial backbones, and attacking them, the information is relatively easy to find if you look for it. Gankers aren't just magicking ships from the ether, they often have contacts/alts in industrial corps that seed the market, or contracts at a preferential price. They aren't magicking ISK up either, people sponsor them, some because they want to see the world burn, some hire them to crap on the miners hiding in NPC corps and affecting their sales, others because it makes good business sense to do so as they are creating a demand in the market. Ganking goes much much deeper down the rabbit hole than you think. I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do. |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:49:00 -
[447] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do. Ganking isn't hard. It's pretty much the easiest form of PvP IMO. It is however, significantly harder than mining. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:55:00 -
[448] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Hitamino wrote:I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do. Ganking isn't hard. It's pretty much the easiest form of PvP IMO. It is however, significantly harder than mining. But it's significantly easier to gank or bump than to avoid it. Mining isn't PvP, it's PvE, and it's balanced out in comparison to other PvE by having incredibly low rewards. Everyone should be given a good chance to defend themselves though and they don't have that. If someone wants to bump them all day long, there's nothing they can do to stop them once they've started. At best, they can eject from their ship and warp their pod off. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15542
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:00:00 -
[449] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:If you tank, you get bumped instead. And I have ganked with the new order. It's a requirement to understand how your enemy works. Gankign and bumping is considerably easier than not getting bumped/ganked if you take away the "run away" option. An orbiting afterburner equipped Skiff begs to differ on your assessment of the easiness of not getting bumped or ganked.
Quote:Seems a bit weird to be forced to run away by the mechanics. Seems doubly weird that gankers would complain that they think their vicitms are the ones that are acting entitled. Running away is a time honoured military tactic, commonly known as a strategic withdrawal.
Quote:I've seen many non-AFK players get ganked, being bumped out of alignment by the scout prior to the gank. And if you are too tanked, they bump you, which is worse, because they can bump forever if they want to, meaning if you only have that one character, you can no longer play EVE until they decide to let you.
Why were the non AFK pilots ganked and bumped? Were they in freighters and haulers carrying multi billion ISK loads?, Were they flying a blinged out mission muncher?
If you're too tanked they bump you? Bollocks, they leave you alone and shoot a much easier target, gankers use scouts so that they know who has the most poorly fit ship in the belt. The man in the Procurer with a decent tank is much less likely to get ganked when there's a guy next to him in a Mackinaw whose fit consists of multiple MLUs and a civilian shield booster.
Quote:I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do. I never presented a sob story on the difficulty of ganking, I presented a fairly accurate representation of the effort involved in setting up for a gank. It's certainly harder than AFK mining or autopiloting your possessions across the universe, which is the sum total of effort that some people, usually the screaming victims of ganks, are willing to put in. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
718
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:00:00 -
[450] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Mining isn't PvP, it's PvE
You are so horribly wrong that it's utterly horrible. If I drop a gang of 20 hulks on the rock you're trying to mine we are most assuredly engaging in the noble art of PvP. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
458
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:02:00 -
[451] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Hitamino wrote:I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do. Ganking isn't hard. It's pretty much the easiest form of PvP IMO. It is however, significantly harder than mining. But it's significantly easier to gank or bump than to avoid it. Mining isn't PvP, it's PvE, and it's balanced out in comparison to other PvE by having incredibly low rewards. Everyone should be given a good chance to defend themselves though and they don't have that. If someone wants to bump them all day long, there's nothing they can do to stop them once they've started. At best, they can eject from their ship and warp their pod off.
I'm not going to lie. I think the bumping thing is mildly ********. If you want to annoy the miner just blow him up and be done with it. I suspect that while GMs reportedly are doing anything about it now, if there were enough petitions about it, at least from a support standpoint, they would have to figure out a way to make that problem go away.
TL;DR - less bump more shoot. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
718
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:07:00 -
[452] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:I suspect that while GMs reportedly aren't doing anything about it now, if there were enough petitions about it, at least from a support standpoint, they would have to figure out a way to make that problem go away.
Thank god they don't make decisions that way. Can you imagine if all the mouth-breathing NPC goon-hating forum alts were to take up arms support tickets, or if all the whinebears went on a petition campaign against suicide ganking? Eve would be destroyed within hours. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15542
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:11:00 -
[453] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:I suspect that while GMs reportedly aren't doing anything about it now, if there were enough petitions about it, at least from a support standpoint, they would have to figure out a way to make that problem go away. Thank god they don't make decisions that way. Can you imagine if all the mouth-breathing NPC goon-hating forum alts were to take up arms support tickets, or if all the whinebears went on a petition campaign against suicide ganking? Eve would be destroyed within hours. They've had plenty of petitions about the bumping, which is why there's a sticky in C&P regarding the GMs decision on the validity of it as a tactic.
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
459
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:12:00 -
[454] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:I suspect that while GMs reportedly aren't doing anything about it now, if there were enough petitions about it, at least from a support standpoint, they would have to figure out a way to make that problem go away. Thank god they don't make decisions that way. Can you imagine if all the mouth-breathing NPC goon-hating forum alts were to take up arms support tickets, or if all the whinebears went on a petition campaign against suicide ganking? Eve would be destroyed within hours.
Against suicide ganking - No, working as intended and the miner bears can **** off because they won't fit a tank and will do their mining AFK.
Against bumping - possibly. I guess I don't see the point of bumping people. But whatever, doesn't affect me either way.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:16:00 -
[455] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Careby wrote:Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, ... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships At the risk of stating the obvious, did you try going somewhere else to mine? Requiring people to make an effort to avoid being bumped or ganked is an outrageous demand, they should be able to gather their virtual riches in peace while busy doing other things. Devs should ban the 'orrible bastards who interfere in the essential work of gathering virtual riches. Oh wait this is Eve, if people can't be arsed to make an effort to protect themselves, then that's their problem. It's certainly not the problem of CCP, and it's definitely not the problem of the aforementioned 'orrible bastards that make life interesting. And how exactly do they protect themselves beside running away? Beside running away people suggest ganking them first, which is pretty much impossible except against the worst of gankers. Most of them use instant undocks and then warp straight to the target. Bumpers you could gank, but then you lose sec status so can't mine in high sec, and not everyone has multiple accounts (and that should not be a requirement to play). I'm actually an anti-ganker, so I have a bit of experience in the field, and it's clear that the balance between gankers and the ganked is swayed heavily in the favour of the gankers. Security status does effectively nothing and all the setup can be handled by alts. Add on that ganking costs nearly nothing, and the result is one of the easiest things in the game to do. It is quite amusing when you see all the gankers on here saying "ZOMG, entitled! Put the effort in" when they in fact need to put nearly no effort in themselves. Hey! My fleet was ice mining one time and you came in with your Blackbird. Scared all the gankers away! Seriously... they refused to even warp to grid with you there.
I appreciate that, thanks. I also think you should consider how this affects the debate of gankers vs gankees. It's like I said; your ONE Blackbird causes 3 gankers to flee system. Your simple presence did that.
What would happen if other miners brought Blackbirds along too? If that fleet of 6 Mackinaws droppped to 4 Macks and 2 Blackbirds... And what if that fleet swapped in Procurers or Skiffs instead?
The extra EHP combined with the jamming power of Blackbird would mean they need an absolute minimum of 6 catalysts/thrashers to gank a single ship; and that's in 0.5. Realistically, against 2 Blackbirds, they would need something like 10 gank ships on average to take down a single Procurer/Skiff. One day I do expect some group to put the effort in to gank one of my procurers. When that day comes, I will laugh at them in local as I link their bill and compare it to mine.
There certainly are ways to defend yourself against gankers, it's just most people are not willing to leave the comfort of their Mackinaw while watching Spankwire.
Now, the topic of bumping is seriously different. My fleet is large enough so I can warp a bumped barge out, warp it back in, and resetup before my next barge is bumped away. Thus bumpers tend to leave me alone. However as you said... the guy with one account has few options. You are right IMO and I believe CCP should make it so ships pass through eachother when not engaged in combat. It won't look realistic and places like Jita will look ridiculous, but it's better than the current broken mechanic. |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
460
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:17:00 -
[456] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:I suspect that while GMs reportedly aren't doing anything about it now, if there were enough petitions about it, at least from a support standpoint, they would have to figure out a way to make that problem go away. Thank god they don't make decisions that way. Can you imagine if all the mouth-breathing NPC goon-hating forum alts were to take up arms support tickets, or if all the whinebears went on a petition campaign against suicide ganking? Eve would be destroyed within hours. They've had plenty of petitions about the bumping, which is why there's a sticky in C&P regarding the GMs decision on the validity of it as a tactic.
Thanks man for pointing me to it. So you get bumped, move to another belt/system, and get back to work. Seems easy enough to me. Still prefer they just shoot the shitfitrievers and AFKers, but so be it.
So forgive me, what again was the problem?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
3
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:23:00 -
[457] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:But it's significantly easier to gank or bump than to avoid it. We've been over this. Avoiding a gank is as easy as flying the right ship, tanking it appropriately and not making it a loot pinata.
Bumping, while trickier to avoid is still easier to work around than it is to execute. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
719
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:30:00 -
[458] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:So forgive me, what again was the problem?
That e-thug / cyberbully / terrorist / animal rights activists / cultists ruin the gameplay of people who pay their subscription and are thus entitled to solo play without any non-consentual interaction with the rest of the playerbase. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15543
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:33:00 -
[459] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:Hey! My fleet was ice mining one time and you came in with your Blackbird. Scared all the gankers away! Seriously... they refused to even warp to grid with you there.
I appreciate that, thanks. I also think you should consider how this affects the debate of gankers vs gankees. It's like I said; your ONE Blackbird causes 3 gankers to flee system. Your simple presence did that.
What would happen if other miners brought Blackbirds along too? If that fleet of 6 Mackinaws droppped to 4 Macks and 2 Blackbirds... And what if that fleet swapped in Procurers or Skiffs instead?
The extra EHP combined with the jamming power of Blackbird would mean they need an absolute minimum of 6 catalysts/thrashers to gank a single ship; and that's in 0.5. Realistically, against 2 Blackbirds, they would need something like 10 gank ships on average to take down a single Procurer/Skiff. One day I do expect some group to put the effort in to gank one of my procurers. When that day comes, I will laugh at them in local as I link their bill and compare it to mine.
There certainly are ways to defend yourself against gankers, it's just most people are not willing to leave the comfort of their Mackinaw while watching Spankwire. This man seems to get it, he's suggesting proactive measure to avoid being ganked.
Quote:Now, the topic of bumping is seriously different. My fleet is large enough so I can warp a bumped barge out, warp it back in, and resetup before my next barge is bumped away. Thus bumpers tend to leave me alone. However as you said... the guy with one account has few options. You are right IMO and I believe CCP should make it so ships pass through eachother when not engaged in combat. It won't look realistic and places like Jita will look ridiculous, but it's better than the current broken mechanic. The problem with this is that PvP/combat in Eve is often nonconsensual, and bumping is often used to buy time for a fleet to get into place for the pursuit of explosions and profit. |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4218
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:39:00 -
[460] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So forgive me, what again was the problem? That e-thug / cyberbully / terrorist / animal rights activists / cultists ruin the gameplay of people who pay their subscription and are thus entitled to solo play without any non-consentual interaction with the rest of the playerbase. If by playerbase you mean gankbears, no one wants to interact with you and your prrrro peeveepee.
|
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
460
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:39:00 -
[461] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So forgive me, what again was the problem? That e-thug / cyberbully / terrorist / animal rights activists / cultists ruin the gameplay of people who pay their subscription and are thus entitled to solo play without any non-consentual interaction with the rest of the playerbase.
Anyone making that claim is just not paying attention to the forum and therefore must be AFK while posting. Someone should shoot at them (in game). Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
125
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:45:00 -
[462] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Bobby Frutt wrote: Lotta smart things
It seems to me, Proactive is not in a miners vocabulary, Deep Core Mining must be short of dictionaries.
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
460
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:51:00 -
[463] - Quote
Anslo wrote:admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So forgive me, what again was the problem? That e-thug / cyberbully / terrorist / animal rights activists / cultists ruin the gameplay of people who pay their subscription and are thus entitled to solo play without any non-consentual interaction with the rest of the playerbase. If by playerbase you mean gankbears, no one wants to interact with you and your prrrro peeveepee.
It would seem that this response will not prevent them from interacting with you and the rest of the player base.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
629
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 22:40:00 -
[464] - Quote
Sometime ganker here. When I set up a gank, I usual start with teh intelligence, fisrt - I don't just run out and blast the first barge I see. I'll scout the systems and belts, look for potential targets, see who's being particularly dumb today. I'll also check to see if CONCORD has been pulled anywhere - That alters my targetting priorities just a bit - I'll deliberately choose tougher targets if CONCORD is busy. I generally avoid Procurers and Skiffs if they have even a half-way decent tank, simply because I gank solo, and don't have neough time to monkey with those. I also deliberately avoid barges that look like they're actively flown; again, low-probablity targets. When I go a-ganking, I mean to kill, and don't want to waste my time giving target practice for CONCORD.
And yes, that means that one of those harmless fellow-miners out there is stealthily checking out your hull, and deciding if you're a potential victim or not.
So - For me, at least - the gank begins well before my blasters start spewing hot particulate death.
Generally, I don't pod - Most miners don't have enough implant to be worth the security status hit. But the really bad 'bots? Yanno, the ones who try to keep on mining with their pod? THOSE, I burn with savage glee.
I've sen all manner of siliness, including pilots who try to open conversations about innania whilst I'm busy locking them up. Really?! A Cat motors on up, parks right on your bow, and locks you, and you're asking about LOL-Cats and sports teams..?! BURN!
So - To answer a question up-thread: No, you can't gank whilst AFK.
Also: Ganking doesn't have to be hard, but the way I do it, there is some thought and research invloved. Well-tanked hulls are fairly safe, unless a gang in is involved. Untanked but actively-piloted hulls are also generally safe, unless the pilot is an idiot. If CONCORD is busy elsewhere, the above two generalities are less-true. AFK miners are cold meat for me, unless they're tanked. More expensive untanked hulls are more tempting than bare-bones hulls. Hulls actively piloted by hard-core bone-heads will be selected as top priorities - above and beyond all other categories - if I think I have ANY chance of killing them (and as they're piloted by idjiits, that's a good chance!)
Been a while since I last went on a killing spree, but this thread has made me want to barf just a bit, and I need some flaming death to get the taste out it out of my mouth... Someone out there is going to pay with their hull for the content of this thread. CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

Anslo
The Scope Gallente Federation
4218
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 22:47:00 -
[465] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Anslo wrote:admiral root wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:So forgive me, what again was the problem? That e-thug / cyberbully / terrorist / animal rights activists / cultists ruin the gameplay of people who pay their subscription and are thus entitled to solo play without any non-consentual interaction with the rest of the playerbase. If by playerbase you mean gankbears, no one wants to interact with you and your prrrro peeveepee. It would seem that this response will not prevent them from interacting with you and the rest of the player base. I'll be waiting.
|

Capt Starfox
Northstar Cabal Tactical Narcotics Team
558
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 00:54:00 -
[466] - Quote
Attention entitled Carebears!
Fly a Skiff. /thread Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
137
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 00:55:00 -
[467] - Quote
But isk per hr...
THINK ABOUT THE ISK
WE WANT A GREATER FUTURE FOR OUR ISK PER HOURS!!! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
913
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:06:00 -
[468] - Quote
I think this thread is concluded.
But why, you ask?
Why should we listen to Dead?
Well, I will tell you...
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
137
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:13:00 -
[469] - Quote
Wasnt that movie a piece of trash? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
913
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:16:00 -
[470] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Wasnt that movie a piece of trash?
Yea it was. But I just woke from a nap, and that specific line was stuck in my head.
And since I seldom take anything seriously in a game of serious internet spaceships...
vOv
Why not?
    Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
138
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:20:00 -
[471] - Quote
Because all these forum newbs are already told bad things from day 1 in their npc corp  Best not put them to bad films as well https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
913
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:23:00 -
[472] - Quote
Bad films are important.
That one, for instance, allows them to appreciate picking up a book more.
Damn savages.
SOME OF THEM CANNOT EVEN READ, JILL!!!!!!!!!!
It's a travesty.
So I will take this opportunity to roll out the next stage.
For only 1isk a day, you can sponsor a poor, uneducated carebear.
*queue heartwarming music* Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
139
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:29:00 -
[473] - Quote
The book is really good, i have it sitting here, i got it on sale last christmas as it was about spaceships and was in their "top 100 lists"
I'll sponsor a carebear by taking them into a wormhole and showing them the wonders of the universe, the birds and the bees, and more  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
915
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:33:00 -
[474] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:The book is really good, i have it sitting here, i got it on sale last christmas as it was about spaceships and was in their "top 100 lists" I'll sponsor a carebear by taking them into a wormhole and showing them the wonders of the universe, the birds and the bees, and more 
You have good taste.
As for sponsorship...
Somewhere, across the interwebz...
A man is nodding in approval randomly at you, Jill, rubbing his hands together, saying...
"Something, something, something....Dark...side." Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:36:00 -
[475] - Quote
I swear to god if there aren't cookies this time im going to throw the milk in his face... You can't lead me on and string me along. its pure heartbreak  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
915
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:41:00 -
[476] - Quote
Don't worry....
There are cookies, candies, and rides.

And I was just speculating, is the worst part.
Now I fear for your safety.
Bolt the windows and doors...for protection!!! Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:44:00 -
[477] - Quote
:l we dont have doors... only wobbly holes, which by the way don't really stop people who want to go through them.
And they just don't go away. Worse than herpes i tell you, as soon as you think its gone it pops up in another place... https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
467
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:45:00 -
[478] - Quote
WTF happened here? Wait wait. Let me...
It's like that L1 Mission. Furrier Fiasco, where you fly up about 20k off the gate and you see in Local:
Something happened here...
Then there are just two spectators having an extremely pleasant conversation completely unrelated to the shitstorm that just passed overhead.
Seriously, you two are cracking me up. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
916
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:49:00 -
[479] - Quote
That sounds like some strange hellish otherworld.
I also see, that like myself, you have Thread Derailment trained to V.
Carebear entitlement crisis averted.
::Tiger Woods fist pump:: Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
140
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:52:00 -
[480] - Quote
I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |
|

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
916
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:57:00 -
[481] - Quote
We would have to capture one from the wild and study it's habits.
A dangerous game, you propose, Jill Chastot, a dangerous game, indeed.
But...
It must be done.
For science. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
469
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 01:59:00 -
[482] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound"
Real world problems like ISK/hr?
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:03:00 -
[483] - Quote
We are doing this for future generations, so our children may live in a land free of Concord and Empires. Free of tyranny and those faceless corporations sucking isk from the honest bounty hunter.
Where a man can say NAY! This is my space and i shall defend it and myself to the fullest of my abilities!
Where strength is what characters are judged by instead of the amount of begging they throw at the feet of our overlords.
...
I'll grab my tranquilizer gun and safari hat. 
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
916
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:03:00 -
[484] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr?
Nah, real world problems like what to feed your Fedo.
It's weird.
They kinda feed like the brain bugs from Starship Troopers.
Slurp!!!! And......done.
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:05:00 -
[485] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr?
We don't have problems with aquirinh isk so the rate does not matter 
Real problems are more like how to avoid suprise butsecks gangs <3 https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
469
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:06:00 -
[486] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr? Nah, real world problems like what to feed your Fedo. It's weird. They kinda feed like the brain bugs from Starship Troopers. Slurp!!!! And......done. 
When I get done with a mission I drop all the loot and salvage off in a neighboring station from the mission station. That is where Fedo lives. He is my junkyard dog. I have noticed that some janitors and militants are missing...
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:09:00 -
[487] - Quote
Did you hear about all the people just abandoning their Fedos over the christmas period?
Do people not even have a heart to spare a thought for these poor little creatures...  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
916
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:10:00 -
[488] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr? We don't have problems with aquirinh isk so the rate does not matter  Real problems are more like how to avoid suprise butsecks gangs <3
Pfft. And I thought I was the only one with these problems.
Isk per hour? What's that?
I judge isk by isk per day.
Some days I make 15isk.
Some days I make 1-2bil.
But like I always say.....some days you are the Japanese schoolgirl.....and some days you are the tentacle monster. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
141
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:14:00 -
[489] - Quote
Guess we all gotta give a little some time eh? Can't always be on top heh https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
916
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:20:00 -
[490] - Quote
Exactly, now if we could only get the greater bear population to understand that...
We could go back to making jokes about "Stealth Afk cloaking" and "Grrr Goons...."
Rather than replying to threads about how a ship was bumped a little.
Not ganked, mind you. Bumped. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:22:00 -
[491] - Quote
Actually where was the last afk stealth thread? or even drone assist thread? I don't remember seeing a single grr goons post today either.
What the hell is going on with GD today? https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16431
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:25:00 -
[492] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Actually where was the last afk stealth thread? or even drone assist thread? I don't remember seeing a single grr goons post today either.
What the hell is going on with GD today? We have a GRR BLOCKADE RUNNER thread.
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
143
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:30:00 -
[493] - Quote
Oh true, that counts as cloaking. So i guess we're not completely borked for the day https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome Caldari State Capturing
813
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:31:00 -
[494] - Quote
Why do people think everything is about them????? OP - Why would you think someone would go out of their way just to harrass you? Are you special?
From your own post it is very clear that the person you wrongly call a griefer was stalking your ship and not you.
I would even bet that had you ejected from that ship the bumping would have stopped. Self destruct would also have stopped him bumping you within 2 minutes.
Did you try this? Did you try any of the many in game option that guarantee you are no longer in a ship being bumped?
Seem it was all your own decision to be bumped for that hour.
If you want to get your soul to heaven, trust in me. Now don't judge or question. You are broken now, but faith can heal you. Just do everything I tell you to do. (Opiate - Tool) |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
632
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:38:00 -
[495] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr? Dem hyu! Almost, the thread they derail! But hyu! Hyu and yer ISK! Bringing back to topic must you..?! Dem hyu ize!  CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
918
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:46:00 -
[496] - Quote
Plastic Psycho wrote:Dem hyu! Almost, the thread they derail! But hyu! Hyu and yer ISK! Bringing back to topic must you..?! Dem hyu ize! 
No worries, friend. Kimmi is good people.
Plus, with the 30 different directions Jill and I took the conversation....
This thread can be about ANYTHING now.
Because science.
   Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
469
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:48:00 -
[497] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:This thread can be about ANYTHING now. Because science.   
This thread tastes like purple.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
144
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:51:00 -
[498] - Quote
I don't know why people assosicate purple with grape flavour. seems wrong to me. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

KnowUsByTheDead
New Eden Federation Of Justice
919
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:52:00 -
[499] - Quote
Purple tastes like chicken, Jill.
Kimmi knows...
She educated me. Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
469
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 02:59:00 -
[500] - Quote
Plastic Psycho wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:I wonder what the average attention span of a bear is and if it relates to the real world problems we all face
"Bears seem to have very short attention spans and if they are responding to a call and the sound stops, generally the bear will cease following the sound" Real world problems like ISK/hr? Dem hyu! Almost, the thread they derail! But hyu! Hyu and yer ISK! Bringing back to topic must you..?! Dem hyu ize! 
It's okay brother. The bears hold no sway over you.
Also, ISK/hr.

Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

Rick II Egnald
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 07:55:00 -
[501] - Quote
Thanks for all the replies, I never thought the response would be this big.
When I played in 2008, it was only for a few months... enough to get my miner up to a mammoth......... there is still a lot I have to learn about this game.... I still get confused a lot.
I am still having fun mining.... so far my experience has been positive after moving from being bumped. I do not agree with bumping, I think it's a lame tactic that is used to annoy people and nothing else....
I had never been bumped when I played before and I guess I now have to adjust my game play, but that's part of the learning process.
I am retired now and have enormous amounts of time I dedicate to gaming...especially in the winter time lol |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
473
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 10:22:00 -
[502] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I had never been bumped when I played before and I guess I now have to adjust my game play, but that's part of the learning process.
Adapting is good for you. Welcome back and have fun!!
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Debora Tsung
The Investment Bankers Guild
836
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 13:50:00 -
[503] - Quote
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: Seriously man, judgement of intelligence in a video game, cult status...wowzers. It's a game. For real. We don't like, worship James 315.
Am I the only one who had to think "Blasphemy! MADNESS!!!" right now?  Stupidity should be a bannable offense.
Also This --> https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=216699 Please stop making "afk cloak" threads, thanks in advance. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
154
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 19:26:00 -
[504] - Quote
Learning never killed anyone  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
476
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 19:31:00 -
[505] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Learning never killed anyone 
Yea. It's not like drinking yourself sober.
You can't learn yourself stupid
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
154
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 19:33:00 -
[506] - Quote
I would love to be able to drink myself drunk then right back sober, that would be bloody amazing  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Martinius Tiberius
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 20:48:00 -
[507] - Quote
So as a new char, I bet there's a lot I don't know yet - but this thread is very interesting. One one hand I like the fact the all areas of space are dangerous, on the other some things stand out as strange:
- why ship/structure bumping do not end up in hull destruction or at least some problems to be repaired? you guessed it, bumping would be affected immediately, including intentional bumping
- the idea of a 'suicide' and yet making profit seems strange as well - if dying hurt in some way, people would mostly die in encounters that are not suicides. It seems like dying is too easy in this supposedly harsh universe... - cheap ship, recycled body, collecedt profit, moved on... What if a death, any death 'cost' something meaningful? A time out from playing for a couple of days maybe? I mean, you want to die and get profit, as strange as it is it is just a game, so ok, you 'die', get profit, but then you should remain DEAD for a while as a cost/penalty for dying. Same for all death - not just the ship you fly, but a time out to actually do the deed of being DEAD? That would appear to be an almost tangible cost to consider before throwing a life away, intentionally or not.
Well, my 2 cents, cool discussion anyway. |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:13:00 -
[508] - Quote
Have you seen the undock of Jita? thats a pretty good reason for bumping to not damage ships haha Also in regards to flagging how do you determine who "agressed" who? Does it invoke a concord response for agression? Is it a way to kill people in high sec without concord response?
Also regarding death, as per lore our conciousness is instantly transmitted to some bio blob in a station so that we can keep playing and dying :D https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
634
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:16:00 -
[509] - Quote
KnowUsByTheDead wrote:Plastic Psycho wrote:Dem hyu! Almost, the thread they derail! But hyu! Hyu and yer ISK! Bringing back to topic must you..?! Dem hyu ize!  No worries, friend. Kimmi is good people. Plus, with the 30 different directions Jill and I took the conversation.... This thread can be about ANYTHING now. Because science.    Iz goot day for Science!
(ennyvun see my hat?) CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
634
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:21:00 -
[510] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Have you seen the undock of Jita? thats a pretty good reason for bumping to not damage ships haha Also in regards to flagging how do you determine who "agressed" who? Does it invoke a concord response for agression? Is it a way to kill people in high sec without concord response? ^^^ Dis. Jita 4-4 CNP Undock vud be madness. Concodokken to left, and to right. Concordokken 24/7/365. Leetle grannies, dey get criminal flag. Beeg industrialist, dey get flag too - and more. Goons, dey sit bek, und laugh butts silly.
Comedy, yes?
CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |
|

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
155
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 21:25:00 -
[511] - Quote
Oh i'll set up a fraps cloaked about 80-90 km away cloaked with the camera beelined to the undock and watch the pretty fireworks. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Martinius Tiberius
State War Academy Caldari State
5
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 22:00:00 -
[512] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Have you seen the undock of Jita? thats a pretty good reason for bumping to not damage ships haha Also in regards to flagging how do you determine who "agressed" who? Does it invoke a concord response for agression? Is it a way to kill people in high sec without concord response?
Also regarding death, as per lore our conciousness is instantly transmitted to some bio blob in a station so that we can keep playing and dying :D
Ah Jita, yeah, that would be a funny thing to see :)
But re DEATH, seems like an 'instant lore copout' :) |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
156
|
Posted - 2014.01.09 22:13:00 -
[513] - Quote
Well selling respawn timers is bad, war z dayz infestation whatever bad game....
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Sidrat Flush
Deadly Harmony
190
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 11:06:00 -
[514] - Quote
Such a big thread. No I haven't read it all, so apologies for any repeats.
Sagely advice to new and returning players.
"Eve is an MMO, while it can be played solo, it's not advised nor actually that interesting to do so. There are many ways to interact with your fellow pod pilots, find them all, in game and out of game. With and without blasters, drones, missiles.
If Eve isn't your first MMO, forget everything you've learnt in other games, because Eve is uniquely it's own niche.
Talk to everyone you can, investigate their claims before joining a corp and for goodness sake join a corp as soon as you've done the tutorial. There are many many corps that will recruit and train you if you are a personable and likeable person. Actually they'll train you even if you are not a personable and likeable person, just don't be a hassle to the corp members or their blues.
Whoever made people think mining in empire is a great way to spend their first few million skill points needs to be taken outside and given a right telling to.
Above all - Most game mechanics that exist in Eve are dull, repetitive and boring without interesting people to do it with or against. Its time to stand up against the bad empire based CEO telling falsehoods about what new characters can accomplish and pushing them towards an in game experience of drudgery and loneliness keeping them in the shadow of ignorance for at nest their own profit at worse apathy towards all the experiences that Eve has to offer. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2266
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 11:36:00 -
[515] - Quote
Jill Chastot wrote:Learning never killed anyone 
What about Marie Curie? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Lugalbandak
Anunnaku Warfare Corp.
404
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 13:38:00 -
[516] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:
I am retired now and have enormous amounts of time I dedicate to gaming...especially in the winter time lol
wish i could say that anyway welcome back , after bumping goes ganking , tank your mining ships , you may get less yield but if no bling faction fit you dont need to reship what makes your yield goes up again.
o/ The police horse is the only animal in the world that haz his male genitals on his back |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
654
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 17:28:00 -
[517] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:Learning never killed anyone  What about Marie Curie? She didn't die from learning. She died from not learning enough. Ignorance kills. CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

KnowUsByTheDead
Old Seers Of Arbitrary Stimulation
929
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 17:50:00 -
[518] - Quote
Ugh, two pages of thread derailment, and this somehow was necro'd?
What kind of black magic is this?
Mining permits for sale, as per usual.
 Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense. -á-á-á-á-á-á-á |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2276
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 18:19:00 -
[519] - Quote
Plastic Psycho wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Jill Chastot wrote:Learning never killed anyone  What about Marie Curie? She didn't die from learning. She died from not learning enough. Ignorance kills.
How do you learn to not be exposed to radiation after being exposed to it? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
164
|
Posted - 2014.01.14 23:41:00 -
[520] - Quote
She should have had a neutral scout with her https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |
|

Cannibal Kane
My Little Ponies of the Apocalypse Cannibal Empire
3182
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 01:35:00 -
[521] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:I have ganked, and please, continue to tell us all your sob story of how hard it is to gank. It's absolutely easy to do. You set up your insta-undocks well in advance, which takes all of a few minutes in a fast ship, and you can prep concord by ganking a softer target if you really want. Look at people like botslayer goblin, total EVE noobs able to pull off ganking continuously and honestly tell me it's hard to do.
Odd... According to KB you never have.
Getting on a cat kill when they alpha a ship is not ganking.
Also, I love White Knights or silly people that believe they make a difference by whoring in on a concord kill. When you join a corp again I will be there first to wardec you you brave soul you.
Freaking NPC corp alts... "I saw him fight by the monument in Jita. He flowed in his Machariel like a Shinto spirit, 800MM shells sprouting in his passing. His hair flowed in the corona of his target's warp core breach. It was truly majestic. And while everyone stared in awe I stole the loot and ran off. Because I am like that." - NEONOVUS |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
4
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 02:30:00 -
[522] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:But it's significantly easier to gank or bump than to avoid it. I... I'm honestly not sure how to respond to that.
Are you really trying to claim that tanking a mining barge is harder than ganking one? Ganking, a process that requires the collective effort of a scout and a gank fleet, team work, coordination and communication. This, on top of figuring out (or copying) an appropriate fit, just like the miner would.
Quote:Mining isn't PvP, it's PvE, In other games, maybe, but this is EVE.
In EVE, the ore you mine will be sold on, in some shape or form, denying other players an opportunity to profit.
In EVE, while in space, you can be shot, at any time, by any player, for any reason.
You may not be looking for a direct fight. You may not be looking to pewpew. But don't fool yourself. You're engaging in PVP when you do just about anything in EVE Online.
Quote:Everyone should be given a good chance to defend themselves though and they don't have that. They don't?
Procurer fit
F85 Peripheral Damage System I Beta Reactor Control: Diagnostic System I
Medium Subordinate Screen Stabilizer I Medium Subordinate Screen Stabilizer I Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I
Modulated Strip Miner II,Veldspar Mining Crystal I
~40-50kEHP depending on skills. A gank fleet is likely to lose, 20-25M trying to gank it, including retrieval of dropped mods. Losing this ship, factoring insurance payout is a mere 10M loss. Not only is it an unprofitable gank, but anyone that tries is guaranteed to lose more that you do, even with a successful gank in 0.5 space. Anyone that tries is a fool.
There, an ungankable ship. Even if a gank fleet is merely looking for tears, they wouldn't try against this ship.
The best part? This ship has about 3x the EHP of a mackinaw and costs one tenth of the price. The mackinaw's advantage? 33% greater yield.
Hitamino, meet perspective. Perspective, Hitamino.
Quote:If someone wants to bump them all day long, there's nothing they can do to stop them once they've started. At best, they can eject from their ship and warp their pod off. Disproportional response, much?
Assuming you're using that procurer. Just keep AFK mining - it's the easiest way. If the bumping goes on too long, warp to another belt, preferably where you're the only miner.
Miner bumping holds no value. The greatest value is in the tears that carebears offer. Don't give them tears and they will tire of you. It's no fun trying to annoy someone that offers no response and cannot be ganked. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 16:55:00 -
[523] - Quote
Cannibal Kane wrote:Odd... According to KB you never have. Note: Ther is such a thing in eve as alts. While my security status has recovered on my alt from his history, I felt that as I was going to be a white knight, it would probably be hard to gain trust if I had a KB full of ganks.
Cannibal Kane wrote:Also, I love White Knights or silly people that believe they make a difference by whoring in on a concord kill. Actually, what we do is we ECM the ganker, causing their gank to fail. Most gankers though know this, so they simply don't engage. Several times, I've sat in with miners, and gankers have had to pass up multiple targets and move on, since a single ECM ship can block up to 5 gankers with ease.
Cannibal Kane wrote:When you join a corp again I will be there first to wardec you you brave soul you. So what you are saying is, I can pick any corp I want, and you will wardec it? That sounds like an awesome way for me to selectively wardec people. Best of luck actually finding me where it matters, since I mainly do WH and null exploration sites right now. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 17:12:00 -
[524] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Hitamino wrote:But it's significantly easier to gank or bump than to avoid it. I... I'm honestly not sure how to respond to that. Are you really trying to claim that tanking a mining barge is harder than ganking one? Ganking, a process that requires the collective effort of a scout and a gank fleet, team work, coordination and communication. This, on top of figuring out (or copying) an appropriate fit, just like the miner would. Tanking 4 of the 6 mining barges is in fact impossible. Tanking a skiff is possible, but still risk since you are still able to be ganked for KB stats. Leaving you with a single choice of ship. And the part you missed there was the "or bumped", it's impossible to tank against a bump. Sure you can keep on the move, and if the bumper is new he won't be able get you, but an experienced bumper will get you anyway, and to avoid even newbie bumping, you usually have to sacrifice tank.
Ganking requires you to get in a catalyst, fly to a target and hit F1. Bumping requires to to fly to a target and fly at it.
So yes, avoiding it is harder than doing it.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:In other games, maybe, but this is EVE.
In EVE, the ore you mine will be sold on, in some shape or form, denying other players an opportunity to profit.
In EVE, while in space, you can be shot, at any time, by any player, for any reason.
You may not be looking for a direct fight. You may not be looking to pewpew. But don't fool yourself. You're engaging in PVP when you do just about anything in EVE Online. The usual rubbish that gets said here, well done. The fact that other players exists doesn't mean everything is PVP. People tend to just overstate what the definition of PVP covers like you have. Now if you actually take the quote in the context that I'd stated it, youd realise that what I was pointing out is that while the act of mining (ie targeting rocks and shooting them) isn't difficult, it is balanced in the same way that other PVE tasks (anoms, missions, etc) are balanced. Comparing it directly to a PVP task is dumb, which is why what I'm comparing is the attack vs the counter.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:They don't?
Procurer fit
F85 Peripheral Damage System I Beta Reactor Control: Diagnostic System I
Medium Subordinate Screen Stabilizer I Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I Limited Thermic Dissipation Field I Limited Kinetic Deflection Field I
Modulated Strip Miner II,Veldspar Mining Crystal I
~48-70kEHP depending on skills. A gank fleet is likely to lose, ~25M trying to gank it, including retrieval of dropped mods. Losing this ship, factoring insurance payout is a mere 10M loss. Not only is it an unprofitable gank, but anyone that tries is guaranteed to lose more that you do, even with a successful gank in 0.5 space. Anyone that tries is a fool.
There, an ungankable ship. Even if a gank fleet is merely looking for tears, they wouldn't try against this ship.
The best part? This ship has about 3x the EHP of a mackinaw and costs one tenth of the price. The mackinaw's advantage? 33% greater yield.
Hitamino, meet perspective. Perspective, Hitamino. I'm not saying avoiding ganking alone isn't possible. But people can bump you.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Disproportional response, much?
Assuming you're using that procurer. Just keep AFK mining - it's the easiest way. If the bumping goes on too long, warp to another belt, preferably where you're the only miner.
Miner bumping holds no value. The greatest value is in the tears that carebears offer. Don't give them tears and they will tire of you. It's no fun trying to annoy someone that offers no response and cannot be ganked. Maybe you should tell that to the people that actually will bump people for huge amounts of time then. And the point is there's no reasonable counter. People should be given a way to react, rather than having to just hope the bumper leaves them alone.
As for "warp to another belt" you realise that's not an option right? If someone is bumping you, they can keep bumping you out of alignment forever. You will never enter warp. You can even log off and they can continue bumping you and when you log back in an hour later, you are still being bumped. A newer player with a single account at that point cannot play the game, as their is no way to counter. Like I stated before, their only option is to eject. |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 19:22:00 -
[525] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Tanking 4 of the 6 mining barges is in fact impossible. You can tank them, just not to the point where ganking them is unattractive. This is part of a miner's decision making process. Does he choose the cheap, extremely tankable ship? Or does he sacrifice survivability for yield, necessitating him to mine ATK to avoid dying? If he's happy to mine ATK, he might consider the risk for added gain and shoot for the retriever, if not, the procurer is the ship of choice.
Quote:Tanking a skiff is possible, but still risk since you are still able to be ganked for KB stats. Leaving you with a single choice of ship. That's OK.
Quote:And the part you missed there was the "or bumped", it's impossible to tank against a bump. Sure you can keep on the move, and if the bumper is new he won't be able get you, but an experienced bumper will get you anyway, and to avoid even newbie bumping, you usually have to sacrifice tank. Or just ignore it. Like I've already said, bumping requires you to be at the keyboard, actively trying to hit the target. It's a dull activity that quickly becomes boring when the target doesn't react and doesn't offer an opportunity to gank him.
Quote:Ganking requires you to get in a catalyst, fly to a target and hit F1. Mining requires you to get in a mining barge, fly to a target and hit F1.
Quote:So yes, avoiding it is harder than doing it. Ganking requires you to get in a noobship to prepull CONCORD and then wait out the 15 min GCC. During this time, a scout needs to find a target (doing this efficiently is a skill in itself), scan it and report his findings to the FC, all the while keeping an eye out for white knights and vultures that could potentially interrupt the gank. FC needs to consider whether his fleet has sufficient DPS to kill the target before getting CONCORDed. Once a target is selected, the fleet must undock at the same time, FC initiates warp to instawarp bookmark (that would've been set up at an earlier point) and then fleetwarp to scout, who would've positioned either on top of the target if it's AFK or 10,20, 50, etc km off to avoid spooking the target. During warp, fleet members need to overheat and ensure safeties are off (too may funny tales of failed ganks because someone F'ed this step up). Once on grid, target and lock. Typically, the target will be primaried and set as terrible standings to help identify the target in a field full of miners (again, ganks have failed because someone shot the wrong guy). If there's time, target and kill the pod. Once done, a celestial must be selected and warped to ASAP to avoid potential retaliation by nearby white knights. The time spent in warp is usually long enough to tick down the combat timer which prevents you from docking or leaving system. The gank fleet docks at a predesignated station by warping to an instadock to avoid vultures. The scout or a designated looter hoovers up the gank fleet's dropped modules along with the victim's. Salvagers can also be deployed when an exhumer has popped. The gank fleet cleans up after themselves by slipping into a noobship and once again, all undock together to pull the entire CONCORD fleet away from the belt. Once in pods, warp to celestials and back to the predesignated station's instadock to avoid vultures.
I can totally see why you think ganking's easier. |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
7
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 19:30:00 -
[526] - Quote
Quote:The usual rubbish that gets said here, well done. The fact that other players exists doesn't mean everything is PVP. People tend to just overstate what the definition of PVP covers like you have. I haven't overstated it. EVE is a PvP game, just like any regular PvP game you may have played. I don't know about you, but if I go AFK in the middle of a game of Team Fortress 2 only to came back to find myself back in the spawn room, I don't freak out about it.
Unlike a regular PvP game, you don't have to constantly fly around, shooting people. EVE is a sandbox, you get to define your own objectives, but PvP will always present an obstacle for players to overcome.
Quote:Now if you actually take the quote in the context that I'd stated it, youd realise that what I was pointing out is that while the act of mining (ie targeting rocks and shooting them) isn't difficult, it is balanced in the same way that other PVE tasks (anoms, missions, etc) are balanced. I don't think I've ever disputed that. I think mining is overall pretty balanced. It's pretty much the worst paying profession in the game, because it's one of the lowest investment, lowest SP requirement, lowest commitment, lowest risk activities in the game.
Quote:Comparing it directly to a PVP task is dumb, which is why what I'm comparing is the attack vs the counter. As I mentioned earlier, the ability to mine is your objective. The potential for PvP is the challenge you must overcome. Your ability to deal with PvP by selecting the right ship for the job, fitting it appropriately and reacting to threats before they blow you up is what defines your success as a miner (or pretty much any space borne for that matter).
Quote:I'm not saying avoiding ganking alone isn't possible. But people can bump you. So? Why should you be immune to all forms of molestation?
Quote:Maybe you should tell that to the people that actually will bump people for huge amounts of time then. And the point is there's no reasonable counter. People should be given a way to react, rather than having to just hope the bumper leaves them alone.
As for "warp to another belt" you realise that's not an option right? If someone is bumping you, they can keep bumping you out of alignment forever. Sure, if you're in a freighter. Mining ships have a ~10 second TTW. That's ~10 seconds to bump the ship, reposition and rebump. No time to chat, no time to do any form of activity aside from bumping, at all. They can do this as long as they like, but all you had to do was press the warp button and the instantly they stop, or fail to bump, you escape. |

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
1088
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 21:26:00 -
[527] - Quote
Rick II Egnald wrote:I just started playing again after a 5 year break,,, I finally got myself up to a hulk to mine, and I only mine in .9 for now until I can train drones up enough to get some hobs for protection.
Anyways, I encountered this for the first time today....... some doorknob evidently finds great delight in ramming mining ships to keep knocking you out of mining distance...... this guy followed me around for an hour doing this and demandng a 10,000,000 ransom to stop.... you can't attack them in .9
Is this normal now?
Just cloak up and he cant bump you. Problem solved. Accounts may not be used for business purposes. Access to the System and playing EVE is intended for your personal entertainment, enjoyment and recreation, and not for corporate, business, commercial or income-seeking activities.-á |

Jill Chastot
Oath of the Forsaken Ragnarok.
166
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 21:34:00 -
[528] - Quote
Or he you know, could be not terrible a tthe game. Is that an option?  https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unreadOATHS wants you. Come to the WH |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 13:50:00 -
[529] - Quote
Just going to pick a couple of points out of your wall.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Ganking requires you to *whine whine whine* Sure, if you grossly exaggerate what you have to do for ganking, then it's hard to do. We could exaggerate the complexity of mining too, but it's pointless. You can't say ganking is a difficult task, since it's a well known fact that it isn't. This has been proven and stated literally hundreds of times.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Quote:Maybe you should tell that to the people that actually will bump people for huge amounts of time then. And the point is there's no reasonable counter. People should be given a way to react, rather than having to just hope the bumper leaves them alone.
As for "warp to another belt" you realise that's not an option right? If someone is bumping you, they can keep bumping you out of alignment forever. Sure, if you're in a freighter. Mining ships have a ~10 second TTW. That's ~10 seconds to bump the ship, reposition and rebump. No time to chat, no time to do any form of activity aside from bumping, at all. They can do this as long as they like, but all you had to do was press the warp button and the instantly they stop, or fail to bump, you escape. Oh thanks for telling me. I'll go tell all of the people that have in actual fact been bumped for hours on end that it's all just in their heads then? You say this like it's a solution. It's not this is just a statement to say that people have to be dedicated to annoying someone to bump them for hours. Unsurprisingly, there are many people that in fact do like to spend all of their time ruining other peoples ability to play. |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16476
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 13:56:00 -
[530] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Sure, if you're in a freighter. Mining ships have a ~10 second TTW. That's ~10 seconds to bump the ship, reposition and rebump. No time to chat, no time to do any form of activity aside from bumping, at all. They can do this as long as they like, but all you had to do was press the warp button and the instantly they stop, or fail to bump, you escape. Oh thanks for telling me. I'll go tell all of the people that have in actual fact been bumped for hours on end that it's all just in their heads then? You say this like it's a solution. It's not this is just a statement to say that people have to be dedicated to annoying someone to bump them for hours. Unsurprisingly, there are many people that in fact do like to spend all of their time ruining other peoples ability to play. So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end?
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |
|

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 14:12:00 -
[531] - Quote
Bumping is just stupid, and if it goes on for more than a few minutes, players should be able to flag the bumper. This would only work if the game somehow recognizes a ship collision. More than X collisions in a certain time frame allows a suspect flag. Once flagged, anyone around would be able to attack the bumper.
Alternately, If it continues for several minutes, the player should be able to call in Concord who will deliver a rebuke. The miner should have to pay a nominal fee to Concord for this service, and the bumper would receive no loss in standing.
This whole bump thing is dumb anyway, but I can ee how it would be impossible to put in true collision. Would be nice tho. A whole new strategy to employ! |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:09:00 -
[532] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:]Sure, if you grossly exaggerate what you have to do for ganking, then it's hard to do. It's not an exaggeration. That was a brief breakdown of how to gank a single miner. Yes, that was brief. Is any of it hard? No. Is it harder, riskier and requires more game knowledge than mining? Yes. That is what we were arguing about, not ganking being hard, just ganking being harder than mining.
Quote:We could exaggerate the complexity of mining too, but it's pointless. You can't say ganking is a difficult task, since it's a well known fact that it isn't. This has been proven and stated literally hundreds of times. I didn't say it was hard. Go on. Quote one of my posts where I say "ganking is hard".
Nothing is hard in this game, nothing requires fast reactions and exquisite hand-eye coordination skills. You click a button or two and like magic, your ship is orbiting, targeting, pewpewing away. All the hard work is done for you. Success in this game comes from being able to identify risks and preparing for them. That is the skill index. That is what allows one player to differentiate himself from everyone else.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Oh thanks for telling me. I'll go tell all of the people that have in actual fact been bumped for hours on end that it's all just in their heads then? You say this like it's a solution. It's not this is just a statement to say that people have to be dedicated to annoying someone to bump them for hours. Unsurprisingly, there are many people that in fact do like to spend all of their time ruining other peoples ability to play. People have been bumped for hours in their mining barges, eh? Got video proof? All the bumping I've ever witnessed tends to be one bumper herding several miners at a time. After all, if you like ruinging someone's day, why not ruin several, instead of just one? TL;DR: Don't reply. |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:12:00 -
[533] - Quote
ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Bumping is just stupid, and if it goes on for more than a few minutes, players should be able to flag the bumper. This would only work if the game somehow recognizes a ship collision. More than X collisions in a certain time frame allows a suspect flag. Once flagged, anyone around would be able to attack the bumper. +1 from me. It would be fun to trick the system into flagging an AFK miner. This would literally make AFK activites impossible, which is awesome.
But not AFK cloaking. AFK cloaking is awesome.
Quote:Alternately, If it continues for several minutes, the player should be able to call in Concord who will deliver a rebuke. -1 from me. CONCORD is a retaliatory response, not your personal army. TL;DR: Don't reply. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
177
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:17:00 -
[534] - Quote
*sighs* Create a new, pretty, female character! Make the name count! Join the epic boo bees! (RP,PvE/PvP,wardecs,new players!) You're at it from day 0! |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2309
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:24:00 -
[535] - Quote
Is this terrorbible bread still going?
Hasnt it covered everything yet?
Oh wait I thought of something
REUNITE THE BEATLES *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15571
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:35:00 -
[536] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Is this terrorbible bread still going?
Hasnt it covered everything yet?
Oh wait I thought of something
REUNITE THE BEATLES That would require the reincarnation of John Lennon and George Harrison, if that were possible we should do the same for Freddie Mercury and give Queen their rock god back. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2310
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:39:00 -
[537] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Is this terrorbible bread still going?
Hasnt it covered everything yet?
Oh wait I thought of something
REUNITE THE BEATLES That would require the reincarnation of John Lennon and George Harrison, if that were possible we should do the same for Freddie Mercury and give Queen their rock god back.
Hudson you arent reading it right
Reincarnation is not possible
But REUNITING them together IN ONE PLACE is totally possible *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Anomaly One
165
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:42:00 -
[538] - Quote
/batphoneConcord
Hello, Concord ? Yes this is doge such gank, so suicide, much tears, very help, wow. Never forget. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8sfaN8zT8E http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5l_ZjVyRxx4 Trust me, I'm an Anomaly. DUST 514 FOR PC |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15571
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:46:00 -
[539] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Is this terrorbible bread still going?
Hasnt it covered everything yet?
Oh wait I thought of something
REUNITE THE BEATLES That would require the reincarnation of John Lennon and George Harrison, if that were possible we should do the same for Freddie Mercury and give Queen their rock god back. Hudson you arent reading it right Reincarnation is not possible But REUNITING them together IN ONE PLACE is totally possible I hadn't thought about it that way , you'd be pouring money into Apples pockets with a firkin bathtub though.
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2311
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:51:00 -
[540] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I hadn't thought about it that way  , you'd be pouring money into Apples pockets with a firkin bathtub though.
There's no accounting for taste.
Apple make money out of the mentally ill constantly as it is anyway. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
177
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:54:00 -
[541] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I hadn't thought about it that way  , you'd be pouring money into Apples pockets with a firkin bathtub though. There's no accounting for taste. Apple make money out of the mentally ill constantly as it is anyway. The NSA calls them zombies for a reason. Create a new, pretty, female character! Make the name count! Join the epic boo bees! (RP,PvE/PvP,wardecs,new players!) You're at it from day 0! |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15571
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:54:00 -
[542] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:
There's no accounting for taste.
Apple make money out of the mentally ill and fashion victims constantly as it is anyway.
FTFY |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2312
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 15:54:00 -
[543] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:
There's no accounting for taste.
Apple make money out of the mentally ill and fashion victims constantly as it is anyway.
FTFY
What makes them two seperate problems? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15571
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:11:00 -
[544] - Quote
^^ You can treat mental illness  |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2313
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:13:00 -
[545] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:^^ You can treat mental illness 
And bad clothes are..permanently attached?
WAT *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15571
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:21:00 -
[546] - Quote
LOL bad clothes can be burnt, bad taste on the other hand is for life. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2314
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:29:00 -
[547] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:LOL bad clothes can be burnt, bad taste on the other hand is for life.
So... how does burning them while still on the target not cure fashion victim-itis? *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:30:00 -
[548] - Quote
Mag's wrote:So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end? No, I'm saying there is no option to stop yourself getting bumped once the bumping has begun. If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. Player with a single account then have the options of eject from their ship, or stop playing EVE. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2112
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:36:00 -
[549] - Quote
Angelica Dreamstar wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Jonah Gravenstein wrote:I hadn't thought about it that way  , you'd be pouring money into Apples pockets with a firkin bathtub though. There's no accounting for taste. Apple make money out of the mentally ill constantly as it is anyway. The NSA calls them zombies for a reason.
Idk, that term for Macintossers has been around for at least 15 years that I know of. I doubt it predates the NSA itself, but it certainly does the current climate there. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2314
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:37:00 -
[550] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Mag's wrote:So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end? No, I'm saying there is no option to stop yourself getting bumped once the bumping has begun. If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. Player with a single account then have the options of eject from their ship, or stop playing EVE.
You need to train Spaceship Operation to 1 *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |
|

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:38:00 -
[551] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:Hitamino wrote:]Sure, if you grossly exaggerate what you have to do for ganking, then it's hard to do. It's not an exaggeration. That was a brief breakdown of how to gank a single miner. Yes, that was brief. Is any of it hard? No. Is it harder, riskier and requires more game knowledge than mining? Yes. That is what we were arguing about, not ganking being hard, just ganking being harder than mining. Bull****. What you quoted was a complex multi-player gank. A solo gank can often be performed in an unprepared system with a single character. You choosing to highlight a complex gank and compare it to mining in general is a pretty unfair comparison. Compare it to a complex mining fleet and suddenly it doesn;t look so tough.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:I didn't say it was hard. Go on. Quote one of my posts where I say "ganking is hard". You implied, and you know you did. you are just being difficult because you are having a little rage fit. Why not stop posting until you've calmed a little, eh sunshine. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2112
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:39:00 -
[552] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Mag's wrote:So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end? No, I'm saying there is no option to stop yourself getting bumped once the bumping has begun. If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. Player with a single account then have the options of eject from their ship, or stop playing EVE.
There are plenty of ways.
You know, kill them. If you are being bumped for, as you put it, "until downtime", then it's time enough to cross half the galaxy to get there in a catalyst and gank the guy bumping you.
Hell, you can't tell me you don't have friends.
You can also double web your freighter for much much faster align times in the first place, so you will rarely get bumped.
I've personally never seen a freighter with an escort get ganked. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:44:00 -
[553] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hitamino wrote:Mag's wrote:So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end? No, I'm saying there is no option to stop yourself getting bumped once the bumping has begun. If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. Player with a single account then have the options of eject from their ship, or stop playing EVE. There are plenty of ways. You know, kill them. If you are being bumped for, as you put it, "until downtime", then it's time enough to cross half the galaxy to get there in a catalyst and gank the guy bumping you. Hell, you can't tell me you don't have friends. You can also double web your freighter for much much faster align times in the first place, so you will rarely get bumped. I've personally never seen a freighter with an escort get ganked. I'm telling you some people don't. Some people are new, and don;t have alts and friends to do their bidding. That's why I white knight, because I think that they should have support, and if the game is going to balance everything in favour of the dickhead that wants to ruin the game for people with a random alt while he scams in Jita, then I have to step in and do what I can to stop it.
I've seen new order guys bumping nubs until they quit, and they are given no forewarning that they can have that done to them and there's nothing they can do to get out of it. That's just not right. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2112
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:50:00 -
[554] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:I'm telling you some people don't. Some people are new, and don;t have alts and friends to do their bidding. That's why I white knight, because I think that they should have support, and if the game is going to balance everything in favour of the dickhead that wants to ruin the game for people with a random alt while he scams in Jita, then I have to step in and do what I can to stop it.
I've seen new order guys bumping nubs until they quit, and they are given no forewarning that they can have that done to them and there's nothing they can do to get out of it. That's just not right.
The same people don't take proper care of their Freighters are about the same as miners who don't fit tanks.
There is something to do to reduce your risk immensely. If you don't do it, you have given consent to your destruction to anyone who happens along and cares to do something about it.
"some people are new"?
Not anyone with enough skillpoints to fly a Freighter, no.
And everyone has friends. If you've been playing the game for long enough to fly a Freighter, and you don't know anyone who might strap into a cat and come help you, then while you may have my pity, you're certainly nothing the game should be balanced around.
The point is that there are counters. That's it, they exist, the end. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
10
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:57:00 -
[555] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hitamino wrote:I'm telling you some people don't. Some people are new, and don;t have alts and friends to do their bidding. That's why I white knight, because I think that they should have support, and if the game is going to balance everything in favour of the dickhead that wants to ruin the game for people with a random alt while he scams in Jita, then I have to step in and do what I can to stop it.
I've seen new order guys bumping nubs until they quit, and they are given no forewarning that they can have that done to them and there's nothing they can do to get out of it. That's just not right. The same people don't take proper care of their Freighters are about the same as miners who don't fit tanks. There is something to do to reduce your risk immensely. If you don't do it, you have given consent to your destruction to anyone who happens along and cares to do something about it. "some people are new"? Not anyone with enough skillpoints to fly a Freighter, no. And everyone has friends. If you've been playing the game for long enough to fly a Freighter, and you don't know anyone who might strap into a cat and come help you, then while you may have my pity, you're certainly nothing the game should be balanced around. The point is that there are counters. That's it, they exist, the end. Why are you just talking about freighters? This is about miners getting bumped. It's in the OP and everything. |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15572
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 17:16:00 -
[556] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:I'm telling you some people don't. Some people are new, and don;t have alts and friends to do their bidding. That's why I white knight, because I think that they should have support, and if the game is going to balance everything in favour of the dickhead that wants to ruin the game for people with a random alt while he scams in Jita, then I have to step in and do what I can to stop it. Bullshit, you white knight because you don't know any better and it makes you feel like you have the moral high ground. There are counters to bumping, just as there are counters to everything else in this game, paying attention and purchasing a permit are the least of them.
Quote:I've seen new order guys bumping nubs until they quit, and they are given no forewarning that they can have that done to them and there's nothing they can do to get out of it. That's just not right. No you haven't, the NO guys go for barges and exhumers, if you're flying one of those, you're not a newbie, although you can be considered a noob (learn the difference between newbie and noob, the distinction is fairly clear, and you fall into the latter category). You're not given forewarning about pretty much any form of PvP in Eve, that's why it's sometimes known as surprise buttsexh. Why should miners be any different?
Just as an FYI, the guy you're calling out on presenting an overly complex summary of ganking has in fact presented a pretty accurate summary of what goes into a gank, small gang ganking is just as prevalent as solo ganking, and therefore just as relevant.
In fact I would say that solo ganking is probably more difficult than doing it as a group. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2112
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 17:19:00 -
[557] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hitamino wrote:I'm telling you some people don't. Some people are new, and don;t have alts and friends to do their bidding. That's why I white knight, because I think that they should have support, and if the game is going to balance everything in favour of the dickhead that wants to ruin the game for people with a random alt while he scams in Jita, then I have to step in and do what I can to stop it.
I've seen new order guys bumping nubs until they quit, and they are given no forewarning that they can have that done to them and there's nothing they can do to get out of it. That's just not right. The same people don't take proper care of their Freighters are about the same as miners who don't fit tanks. There is something to do to reduce your risk immensely. If you don't do it, you have given consent to your destruction to anyone who happens along and cares to do something about it. "some people are new"? Not anyone with enough skillpoints to fly a Freighter, no. And everyone has friends. If you've been playing the game for long enough to fly a Freighter, and you don't know anyone who might strap into a cat and come help you, then while you may have my pity, you're certainly nothing the game should be balanced around. The point is that there are counters. That's it, they exist, the end. Why are you just talking about freighters? This is about miners getting bumped. It's in the OP and everything.
Because orbiting and turning on an afterburner is hard. 
And before you start in, yes, there are some guys in the New Order who are good enough to hit an orbiting miner with a bumping ship. I'm certainly not one of them, it's like 3 guys, 5 tops.
So you won't ever have perfect immunity, yeah. But if that's unacceptable to you, then you're playing the wrong game. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Mag's
the united SCUM.
16508
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 17:23:00 -
[558] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Mag's wrote:So are you saying it's the bumpers fault, that someone allowed themselves to be bumped for hours on end? No, I'm saying there is no option to stop yourself getting bumped once the bumping has begun. If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. Player with a single account then have the options of eject from their ship, or stop playing EVE. You can only be bumped for hours, if you allow yourself to be bumped for hours.
At one time one of the most complained about things, was those that logged off. Now it seems people can't even do that. 
Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the lions will ignore you in the savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2319
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 17:26:00 -
[559] - Quote
Confirmed; Tanked orbitting Proc with one eye on local and DScan is hard
Confirmed; Autopiloting freighters makes sense
Confirmed; EvE has no PVP is always on flag
Seriously, that last bunch of crap has been regurgitated so many times in this thread a lone its turned into cheese *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Debra Scully
Imperial Phoenix Legion
3
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 18:50:00 -
[560] - Quote
I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca. |
|

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2325
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 18:52:00 -
[561] - Quote
Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca.
1) Yup
2) Usually, the complainers have been flying something with the manueverability of a dead slug and not a sensible ship for solo/small gang mining. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
179
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 18:52:00 -
[562] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:LOL bad clothes can be burnt, bad taste on the other hand is for life. I'm sorry to tell you, but this isn't the case. That people refuse to change does not mean that they can't change. This includes taste, which is simply a reflection of themselves.
Also ... nice facial expression. I really like it. There are so many zombies to see, it scares me. Not the pictures, but the creators of these pictures. Create a new, pretty, female character! Make the name count! Join the epic boo bees! (RP,PvE/PvP,wardecs,new players!) You're at it from day 0! |

Notorious Fellon
Republic University Minmatar Republic
115
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 18:59:00 -
[563] - Quote
Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca.
Somewhat risky in that, most bumpers belonging to the clownfleet will simply gank you if they can't annoy you enough with bumping and repeated extortion.
That tactic would likely only work once. Then they would just start bumping and then bring in the gank fleet while you were in logout timer.
The miner (who wants to preserve their security rating) has basically little to no recourse, aside from leaving the system and then leaving the next. You have to then submit a ticket for griefing if they followed you to multiple places. You can't shoot the bumper, without loss of security rating and concorde intervention. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2325
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 19:11:00 -
[564] - Quote
Notorious Fellon wrote: The miner (who wants to preserve their security rating) has basically little to no recourse, aside from leaving the system and then leaving the next. You have to then submit a ticket for griefing if they followed you to multiple places. You can't shoot the bumper, without loss of security rating and concorde intervention.
This is, of course, an example of an incorrect answer.
It doesn't explain how to deal with a problem, it just complains that dealing with the problem is
a) Too Hard
b) Unfair
c) Obscured in a mist of intellect *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
180
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 19:13:00 -
[565] - Quote
It's easy to prevent being bumped. You can put armor on or have other people simply web you. If you don't have "friends" then that's not the fault of the game, which enables you not to get bumped by putting more mass on or getting webbed, multiple times at best. Create a new, pretty, female character! Make the name count! Join the epic boo bees! (RP,PvE/PvP,wardecs,new players!) You're at it from day 0! |

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 00:50:00 -
[566] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:If the bumper does not choose to stop, they can continue bumping you until downtime. My response to anyone that can keep me bumped after I've clicked warp until downtime: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euI3v2jpTlI
Hitamino wrote:Bull****. What you quoted was a complex multi-player gank. A solo gank can often be performed in an unprepared system with a single character. Is it possible to gank in the way you've described (fly to belt, find & lock target, pewpew)? Yes, it could happen. Does it? Moreover, does it happen often, as you claim? No.
That (admittedly poorly presented) wall of instruction wasn't a whine. That's standard procedure for a regular miner gank when flying in a fleet. Even when ganking solo, it's strongly recommended that you use two accounts (one to scout, one to gank) and ideally, use three (to loot "safely"). The fact you claim that ganking can be done effectively not only from a single account, but from a single character is absurd.
Scouts are used to quickly find potential targets. It is essential to know what modules they have fitted, particularly as a solo ganker. You cannot quickly gather this information using one character exlusively. It is significantly faster to warp to a waiting scout than to dock up, contract a bookmark to your alt, logoff, log back in as the gank alt, collect the bookmark, add it to P&P, then warp to it.
Prepulling is a necessary step, even in 0.5 systems. The time difference between a spawning CONCORD and a "moving" CONCORD is six seconds, enough for ~4500 damage for a single skilled toon. This does make a difference. It's the difference between killing an untanked mackinaw and hilarious, shameful failure.
Gankers need to use instawarps to prevent vultures killing them at station. They warp right on top their target because the gankalyst's effective range sucks (little more than ~2km) and remaining on grid presents two problems. The first being enemy players (vultures) and the second being the faction police that spawn and kill you if you remain in one location too long. They don't usually bother clearing their criminal status as it's an additional expense that doesn't deal with the issue of vultures - who may still have access to kill rights that the gankers cannot clear, themselves.
Gankers must warp their pods from the scene of the crime/judgement ASAP to avoid retaliation from vultures and white knights.
I don't know why you don't appear to think any of these things aren't necessary as a ganker. You've claimed you've ganked before, but the fact you're denying the importance of key factors within the ganking process leads me to believe you're lying or simply don't want to admit you were wrong.
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:]You implied, and you know you did. you are just being difficult Did I? Where did I imply that ganking was hard?
Was it here? "Ganking isn't hard. It's pretty much the easiest form of PvP IMO. It is however, significantly harder than mining." - https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4087045#post4087045
Maybe not. Maybe I was just being difficult. TL;DR: Don't reply. |

ZynnLee Akkori
Perkone Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 01:12:00 -
[567] - Quote
Ekkentros Mercari wrote:ZynnLee Akkori wrote:Bumping is just stupid, and if it goes on for more than a few minutes, players should be able to flag the bumper. This would only work if the game somehow recognizes a ship collision. More than X collisions in a certain time frame allows a suspect flag. Once flagged, anyone around would be able to attack the bumper. +1 from me. It would be fun to trick the system into flagging an AFK miner. This would literally make AFK activites impossible, which is awesome. But not AFK cloaking. AFK cloaking is awesome. Quote:Alternately, If it continues for several minutes, the player should be able to call in Concord who will deliver a rebuke. -1 from me. CONCORD is a retaliatory response, not your personal army. That is true! I didn't look at it from that angle. It would be nice to get rid of the bot and/or afk miners. Granted, mining is deadly boring, but my only concession to that, on the few occasions when I do it, is to have Netflix running on the other monitor.
Maybe if we can clear out those miners (and prices start to go up for mostly everything in Eve), CCP will do something to make mining more engaging. I like the passive PI-type of mining, but requiring more input than PI. |

Hitamino
Perkone Caldari State
13
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 14:56:00 -
[568] - Quote
Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca. Nope, they can continue to bump you out of your ewarp, so you'll not disappear even once logged off, so you log back in and you are still being bumped. And it's not that hard to keep a miner bumped, they suck at manoeuvrability and you can bump them with a tiny ship. Sure, if you want to bump them miles with every hit it takes a run up, but to keep a miner out of alignment once you've moved them off of a rock its simple.
Of course new order guys will come along saying how hard it is as they want to preserve their OP tactic that has no counter.
|

Ekkentros Mercari
Science and Trade Institute Caldari State
9
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 15:03:00 -
[569] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Nope, they can continue to bump you out of your ewarp, so you'll not disappear even once logged off, so you log back in and you are still being bumped. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=300515 TL;DR: Don't reply. |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2123
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 15:03:00 -
[570] - Quote
Hitamino wrote:Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca. Nope, they can continue to bump you out of your ewarp, so you'll not disappear even once logged off, so you log back in and you are still being bumped. And it's not that hard to keep a miner bumped, they suck at manoeuvrability and you can bump them with a tiny ship. Sure, if you want to bump them miles with every hit it takes a run up, but to keep a miner out of alignment once you've moved them off of a rock its simple. Of course new order guys will come along saying how hard it is as they want to preserve their OP tactic that has no counter.
I already explained to you, very thoroughly I might add, that it has a counter.
But if you're asking for perfect safety like it sure seems you're asking for, then you're out of luck. Not to mention playing the wrong game. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |
|

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15573
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 15:58:00 -
[571] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hitamino wrote:Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca. Nope, they can continue to bump you out of your ewarp, so you'll not disappear even once logged off, so you log back in and you are still being bumped. And it's not that hard to keep a miner bumped, they suck at manoeuvrability and you can bump them with a tiny ship. Sure, if you want to bump them miles with every hit it takes a run up, but to keep a miner out of alignment once you've moved them off of a rock its simple. Of course new order guys will come along saying how hard it is as they want to preserve their OP tactic that has no counter. I already explained to you, very thoroughly I might add, that it has a counter. But if you're asking for perfect safety like it sure seems you're asking for, then you're out of luck. Not to mention playing the wrong game. I think he suffers from selective reading and a bee in his bonnet about James and his merry band of miscreants. My mother suffers from a similar affliction called selective hearing although in her case I can put it down to being a cantankerous old lady in her 70's (<3 you Mum). |

Kaarous Aldurald
ROC Academy The ROC
2124
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 16:07:00 -
[572] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Kaarous Aldurald wrote:Hitamino wrote:Debra Scully wrote:I've never been bumped, but since you don't have a combat flag, can't you just log off or kill your internet connection, log back on and your ship will be in a different spot?
Also, by the time the bumper lines you up for the next bump, can't you warp out by then? Obvious I'm talking mining barge here, not a freighter or Orca. Nope, they can continue to bump you out of your ewarp, so you'll not disappear even once logged off, so you log back in and you are still being bumped. And it's not that hard to keep a miner bumped, they suck at manoeuvrability and you can bump them with a tiny ship. Sure, if you want to bump them miles with every hit it takes a run up, but to keep a miner out of alignment once you've moved them off of a rock its simple. Of course new order guys will come along saying how hard it is as they want to preserve their OP tactic that has no counter. I already explained to you, very thoroughly I might add, that it has a counter. But if you're asking for perfect safety like it sure seems you're asking for, then you're out of luck. Not to mention playing the wrong game. I think he suffers from selective reading and a bee in his bonnet about James and his merry band of miscreants. My mother suffers from a similar affliction called selective hearing although in her case I can put it down to being a cantankerous old lady in her 70's (<3 you Mum).
You know, the shout out to your mom kinda makes me wonder about someone I ganked once who told me that they were an old lady playing Eve from a nursing home... Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á |

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
867
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 16:09:00 -
[573] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote: You know, the shout out to your mom kinda makes me wonder about someone I ganked once who told me that they were an old lady playing Eve from a nursing home...
OK, now *there* is an awesome granny. Bet she's a holy terror to the aides...  |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15573
|
Posted - 2014.01.17 16:14:00 -
[574] - Quote
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:You know, the shout out to your mom kinda makes me wonder about someone I ganked once who told me that they were an old lady playing Eve from a nursing home... It wouldn't surprise me if that were true, I was in a corp, on another character, that was led by a lady claiming to be in her late 60's, she had a mouth on that would make a drill instructor blush and was an absolute riot to fly with. |
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 .. 20 :: [one page] |