Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Tuttomenui II
Aliastra Gallente Federation
181
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:37:00 -
[31] - Quote
Misunderstood the mtu mechanic, tried to ***** in on perceived concord kills, became killmail himself, funny stuff. Funnier when my fellow mission runners make the mistake.
As a farmer doesn't eat his Milk cow you shouldn't pvp in your mining ship you use to earn isk with. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2077
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:38:00 -
[32] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:. An MTU uses 100 cubic metres of your cargo hold and cannot be pulled in while any cargo in inside them.
This is untrue. You can recover it, it spits the cargo out in a jetcan. A Procurer can easily carry both MTUs in its 350m3 bay.
Rhonan Irwin wrote:Both units had cargo and I was using them because of travel time effects efficiency which is the reason for the MTU's.
Ok, well staying alive works out better for your efficency than raw mining efficency does. How many blocks of ice are you losing per hour by spending less than 2% of your mining time in flight? How much Ice are you wasting to replace your ship? Also, if you have a hauler alt or corp mate (not saying that you did, I wasnt there) but thats how can mining used to work, get them to come out and get it.
Rhonan Irwin wrote:I could not take the cargo from any MTU as at the time I was full or to far away from the MTU being I had two out.
How much Ice were the two frigates that attacked you able to hold? My guess is none. why were you so far away from your MTU?
Rhonan Irwin wrote:Only two ships were present at the time a Venture and an unknown T1 scanning probe frigate ship
Yes, they cant carry ice.
Rhonan Irwin wrote: I knew at that time I was able to defend my MTU's with my drones from the low. After the Slicer navy issue came in (it warped in) all my chances were scrambled and the slicer attacked my drones which then attacked him. That is when the warp tacklers came in and I thought I would be able to wait it out not knowing any better
So pull the 8 mill MTU, leave the can and come back in a hauler to pick up your ice.
Easy money. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
440
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:An MTU has a capacity of 27 000 cubic meter's they are in game considered *secure* in the sense that only people in your fleet or yourself can access them. An MTU uses 100 cubic metres of your cargo hold and cannot be pulled in while any cargo in inside them. Both units had cargo and I was using them because of travel time effects efficiency which is the reason for the MTU's.
The Procurer has a cargo hold of 12 000 cubic metres and one Icicle is 1 000 cubic metres.
I could not take the cargo from any MTU as at the time I was full or to far away from the MTU being I had two out.
Only two ships were present at the time a Venture and an unknown T1 scanning probe frigate ship I knew at that time I was able to defend my MTU's with my drones from the low. After the Slicer navy issue came in (it warped in) all my chances were scrambled and the slicer attacked my drones which then attacked him. That is when the warp tacklers came in and I thought I would be able to wait it out not knowing any better
There is that word again. Efficiency. Maybe I don't get it because I generally prefer to sub my accounts rather than PLEX. I don't want to feel like I have to logon to maximize ISK/hr so I can buy a PLEX. I'd rather logon when I feel like and enjoy the game at my pace. I don't know that efficiency is necessarily a good thing. When I see threads from miners who have gotten ganked or baited they always use that word and there is just something unsettling in that for me.
Since I'm a hisec mission runner I'll try and correlate this to what I know.
I would never in a million years put one of these MTUs out. The cargohold on a Golem is fine and the bonus to tractors is great. Once a room is clear it IS a pain in the ass getting all the wrecks and often I wait until a target is <40k out before firing so I don't have to slowboat to within the range of the tractors. Too often though the Battleship rats will sit out at >40k. Solution, MWD. That's right! I put a ******* MWD on a Golem for efficiency. Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2078
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:46:00 -
[34] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:
I would never in a million years put one of these MTUs out. The cargohold on a Golem is fine and the bonus to tractors is great. Once a room is clear it IS a pain in the ass getting all the wrecks and often I wait until a target is <40k out before firing so I don't have to slowboat to within the range of the tractors. Too often though the Battleship rats will sit out at >40k. Solution, MWD. That's right! I put a ******* MWD on a Golem for efficiency.
Alas I cannot afford a Marauder yet, so I find MTUs invaluable for site clearing and ratting, especially in null.
I have friends who used to use them a lot for mining, but then they got an Orca and so now not so much.
Of course, they mine for personal manufacturing use, so efficency is irrelevant to them.
Also, they told me about a gank on them where they got hit by two catalysts with full T2 fit. They had a tractor out, but the gankers didnt bother with it. So when concord showed, the MTUs sucked up the lovely wrecks and fits.
One smelly retriever down, easily replaced with a lovely procurer and profit-cash to boot. *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Azami Nevinyrall
Red Federation RvB - RED Federation
1546
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:51:00 -
[35] - Quote
Posting in a "I don't know how mechanics work" thread... ... |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
441
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 10:57:00 -
[36] - Quote
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:Posting in a "I don't know how mechanics work" thread...
He does now and I think he'll be the better for it.
I do have to agree with Ramona though.
Vote MTU for CSM!
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |

Cheng Musana
Purple Space Ponys AAA Citizens
46
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:10:00 -
[37] - Quote
MTU's are supposed to be used in nullsec for ratting. Using them in highsec is just a way to get yourself killed espacially if you set your drones to "aggressive". |

Ramona McCandless
Epic Boo Bees
2080
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:18:00 -
[38] - Quote
Cheng Musana wrote:MTU's are supposed to be used in nullsec for ratting. Using them in highsec is just a way to get yourself killed espacially if you set your drones to "aggressive".
Its an item
Its "supposed " to be used in any way you find useful *** Vote MTU For CSM *** "They feel the need to cover their ears and eyes in horror at your very presence." --áPontianak Sythaeryn Omnis nomiom nom nom nomi |

Rastafarian God
University of Caille Gallente Federation
0
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:23:00 -
[39] - Quote
The blue (well blue / green) blinky is for dual / limited engagement.
If I had to ques, the other people shot at your unit as well and they where blinking with the little yellow / orange icon and you just did not notice. The guy blinking blue would have been the guy that you "where fighting back against". He would still have a suspect timer to everyone else but the little blinky would show blue to you to alert you to the fact that he can return fire at will. If you attack someone with a yellow suspect timer, it will show blue on your overview since attacking them triggers a limited engagement. At least thats the way it works with the default overview settings.
As for the guys that did not show up on the KM. Unless there was a MAJOR glitch (which I doubt) the reason they where not recorded was because they never actually did anything hostile against you and where just on grid (or where repping the hostile or something weird),
If you are new, and stuff like this happens, hell even if you are a vet, instances like this can feel like a car crash. Its all chaos and memory rarely serves to be correct. To put it simply, more experienced players caught you off guard that happen to know the game mechanics better and adrenalin is just most likely clouding your memory. Its OK, its happened to all of us when we first started.
As far as Concorde response, you do not get a notification of that other then a generic message on screen (that everyone see's) that goes by so fast that its easy to miss. the response time is not 25 seconds in 0.5. I personally watched an old corp mate shoot an anchored can in 0.5 once 9although i told him not to) and Concorde was there in under 10 seconds (more like 5) to blow his ass up. Its just that with you, the people attacking you knew the mechanics well enough to not trigger the Concorde response.
Unless there was some kind of glitch, in wich case, if CCP reviews the logs, they will know for sure either way if you report it.
That is assuming this is real and not a troll post.. no offense man but this type of thing is a hot topic right now so trolls are common on this subject.
|

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
445
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Cheng Musana wrote:MTU's are supposed to be used in nullsec for ratting. Using them in highsec is just a way to get yourself killed espacially if you set your drones to "aggressive". Its an item Its "supposed " to be used in any way you find useful
I will find it useful as a member of the CSM!
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
2356
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:36:00 -
[41] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:I want to discuss something I had happen to me today in Eve. I was mining an Icicle belt in Warouh which is 0.5 security space when I had a Venture and another player that was not recorded in my logs attack my two deployed mobile tractor units. This gave them a criminal status as it was an unprovoked attack with no permission of a duel given. I defended my tractor unit with my drones and got the unrecorded player to retreat from bad damage with no shots put onto my Procurer.
I was then attacked by the other two ships that are recorded in the battle log below. All three players were blue criminal status by this stage and was expecting concord backup and tried to shield tank my procurer. By my understanding I needed to wait 25 seconds from when they started attacking my tractor units for the concord. I lasted a full minute with no backup and ejected from my procurer to save my clone which I just got away from being warp scrambled again.
Can someone please help me understand what happened?
2014.01.08 08:48:00
Victim: Rhonan Irwin Corp: Imperial Academy Alliance: Unknown Faction: Unknown Destroyed: Procurer System: Warouh Security: 0.5 Damage Taken: 20570
Involved parties:
Name: Tul Breetai (laid the final blow) Security: 0.70 Corp: Impromptu Asset Requisition Alliance: Insurance Fraud. Faction: None Ship: Venture Weapon: Small Focused Pulse Laser II Damage Done: 10677
Name: Dieter Rams Security: -0.7 Corp: The Nommo Alliance: Insurance Fraud. Faction: None Ship: Tristan Weapon: Hobgoblin I Damage Done: 9893
A few mistakes here. One, blue is not a criminal status. It denotes a limited engagement - both parties have fired at the other.
Concord doesn't come for suspects (yellow), only criminals. Suspects, however, are open season for other capsuleers.
Stop expecting concord to come to the rescue, start making friends and learning to defend yourself.
You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Remiel Pollard
The 0th Fleet A Rather Intimidating Group of Individuals
2356
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:43:00 -
[42] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Shooting an MTU does not invoke Concord.
It is a misunderstanding of aggression mechanics.
You got baited and you took the bait.
If you don't mind me asking, what is the purpose of the MTU when you're mining? The MTU's were deployed for Icicle collection the be collected by myself after I filled them it creates a more profitable way of mining. I guess what your all saying is I should of returned my drones to drone bay and waited them out?
You will lose the MTU if you don't defend it or recall it. Recall drones first, then collect the MTU, then ignore suspects. Get a combat ship and hunt them down. You don't scare me. I've been to Jita. |

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
101
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:51:00 -
[43] - Quote
Instead of stopping to use the MTU, you'll have more fun stopping the mining and doing something worthwile. Like... playing EVE instead of mining half AFK and playing something else.
Who the hell told you to mine in the first place? Any day 0 noob can make more money doing other things! New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Angelica Dreamstar
Epic Boo Bees
101
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 11:53:00 -
[44] - Quote
Quote:A few mistakes here. One, blue is not a criminal status. It denotes a limited engagement - both parties have fired at the other.
Concord doesn't come for suspects (yellow), only criminals. Suspects, however, are open season for other capsuleers.
Stop expecting concord to come to the rescue, start making friends and learning to defend yourself.
It's actually a darker shade of turquoise, not blue. New player feeling neglected? You're important from day 1!!! Join the Epic Boo Bees! (female chars only, RP!)
|

Vipre Morte
Team JK
65
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 14:44:00 -
[45] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:By attacking the group who were attacking the MTUs, you flagged yourself as available for PvP.
Be careful with that statement McCandless. Logging on to Eve flags you for PvP. Ok Chan(? Are we in Public School, whats with the surnames? just curious), but you know what I meant, it flags you for CONSEXUAL PvP
... did you just say CONSEXUAL when you meant CONSENSUAL?
Is consexual PvP fighting during sex? |

Meilandra Vanderganken
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 16:50:00 -
[46] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:Not really that fair without being able to defend yourself and being ganged up on the MTU's are about 8 million each plus cargo. They should be like secure cargo containers in they are attacked They are the way they are by design, CONCORD will not come to protect the new mobile deployables, if you want to defend them you have to do it yourself. Trying to defend them in a procurer against 3 other players is a bad idea though. |

Bagrat Skalski
Poseidaon
984
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 16:57:00 -
[47] - Quote
Next time bring more alts. a++ püñ Gùò_Gùò a++püñ [TALOCAN STUFF] |

Oraac Ensor
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
410
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:11:00 -
[48] - Quote
Kimmi Chan wrote:You commanded your drones to attack the shooter making yourself a suspect. Shooting a suspect makes you also a suspect?
If this is true I've misunderstood the new flagging mechanic since it was introduced. |

admiral root
Red Galaxy Disband.
717
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:22:00 -
[49] - Quote
Oraac Ensor wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:You commanded your drones to attack the shooter making yourself a suspect. Shooting a suspect makes you also a suspect? If this is true I've misunderstood the new flagging mechanic since it was introduced.
No, it starts a limited engagement between you and the suspect you shot. No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff |

Kimmi Chan
Tastes Like Purple
458
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 17:35:00 -
[50] - Quote
admiral root wrote:Oraac Ensor wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:You commanded your drones to attack the shooter making yourself a suspect. Shooting a suspect makes you also a suspect? If this is true I've misunderstood the new flagging mechanic since it was introduced. No, it starts a limited engagement between you and the suspect you shot.
Correct. Sorry, I misspoke.
Paranoia never killed anyone. -áA complete absence of it has. |
|

Bobby Frutt
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
28
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:01:00 -
[51] - Quote
Umm, it's not really fair. That's not the right word to use.
The mechanic is functioning as it was meant to. The process has been described. In that regard it was "fair" as they didn't cheat, but the mechanic itself is largely unfair.
MTU's are given special priveledges for no logical reason other than CCP wanting an increase in PVP. You could remove CONCORD, thus increasing PVP too... that doesn't mean you should do it.
From EVE's wiki: "Cargo containers and wrecks are considered valid property just like drones and ships. If you damage either, you are initiating aggression on its owner. If you are not in their corporation, or otherwise allowed to legally engage, then you should be ready for a security hit and Concord intervention."
Read that carefully, guys. CONCORD intervenes as they have attacked your property. That is the explanation given by CCP. Why then, is an MTU not considered your property?
The answer is: It is. The MTU aggression mechanics are simply developed inconsistently with the other related mechanics.
I'm sure at a point CCP actually knew what they were doing... the game's quite wonderful so they must have. Can we hire those people back please? |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4102
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:18:00 -
[52] - Quote
Yet another tale of easy highsec ganks provided by.....
someone not knowing better.
C'mon, let's have a comprehensive new pilot training course or popup warnings like "this device can be shot by anybody and shooting back makes you a target as well" and there will be rivers of tears from these highsec gankbears claiming "amusement park" and "dumbing down". How is it dumbing down when you rely on your target being dumb?
|

Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
8973
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:19:00 -
[53] - Quote
MTU: The greatest buff to highsec "warfare" ever.
Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings? |

Cypherous
Liberty Rogues Aprilon Dynasty
54
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:42:00 -
[54] - Quote
Vipre Morte wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kimmi Chan wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:By attacking the group who were attacking the MTUs, you flagged yourself as available for PvP.
Be careful with that statement McCandless. Logging on to Eve flags you for PvP. Ok Chan(? Are we in Public School, whats with the surnames? just curious), but you know what I meant, it flags you for CONSEXUAL PvP ... did you just say CONSEXUAL when you meant CONSENSUAL? Is consexual PvP fighting during sex?
To be fair, PvP is a lot like sex, you spend a while getting ready and preparing for it then someone gets ****** and before you know if the explosions have happened and everyone is left to clean up after themselves |

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
15543
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 18:53:00 -
[55] - Quote
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Yet another tale of easy highsec ganks provided by.....
someone not knowing better.
C'mon, let's have a comprehensive new pilot training course or popup warnings like "this device can be shot by anybody and shooting back makes you a target as well" and there will be rivers of tears from these highsec gankbears claiming "amusement park" and "dumbing down". How is it dumbing down when you rely on your target being dumb?
I don't think many of the people you think will be crying rivers of tears will actually be doing so if this was the case. Do you know why? Because people will ignore it, just as they ignore the tutorials and the wealth of information about Eve that is widely available all over the internet. People can't be bothered to learn about the game they're coming to, what makes you think they'll bother with a new pilot course or popups that warn them of things (see the pre safety catch popup warnings and lowsec stargate warnings and the amount if wailing caused by clicking "don't show me this again" ). CCP can't patch stupidity, wilful ignorance or just plain laziness out of the game. |

Meilandra Vanderganken
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
29
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 19:46:00 -
[56] - Quote
Bobby Frutt wrote:Umm, it's not really fair. That's not the right word to use.
The mechanic is functioning as it was meant to. The process has been described. In that regard it was "fair" as they didn't cheat, but the mechanic itself is largely unfair.
MTU's are given special priveledges for no logical reason other than CCP wanting an increase in PVP. You could remove CONCORD, thus increasing PVP too... that doesn't mean you should do it.
From EVE's wiki: "Cargo containers and wrecks are considered valid property just like drones and ships. If you damage either, you are initiating aggression on its owner. If you are not in their corporation, or otherwise allowed to legally engage, then you should be ready for a security hit and Concord intervention."
Read that carefully, guys. CONCORD intervenes as they have attacked your property. That is the explanation given by CCP. Why then, is an MTU not considered your property?
The answer is: It is. The MTU aggression mechanics are simply developed inconsistently with the other related mechanics.
I'm sure at a point CCP actually knew what they were doing... the game's quite wonderful so they must have. Can we hire those people back please? The MTU is not just some static container, it's basicly your own CCP aproved bot for looting. Making using it completely risk free would not be in the spirit of EVE.
If you want CONCORD protection for it, I'd say it would have to recieve a significant nerf. That nerf could come in a (huge) decrease in hit points so it would be easier to gank, huge nerf to cargo space, range, making it more expensive or what not. A 50k hitpoint or something afk looter that costs a few mil should not be treated the same way as a mere cargo container. |

Marlona Sky
D00M. Northern Coalition.
4722
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 21:30:00 -
[57] - Quote
Just a little FYI: If you have the cargo room you can scoop your MTU at any time as long as you are in range. If there is anything inside it, the contents will be automatically jettisoned in a can.
So as long as you are in range and paying attention and not watching Sponge Bob in the other room, saving your MTU should be simple.
Also, everyone take a moment to mouse over the green safety setting and post a screen shot here what it says... . |

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
4102
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 22:15:00 -
[58] - Quote
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:Yet another tale of easy highsec ganks provided by.....
someone not knowing better.
C'mon, let's have a comprehensive new pilot training course or popup warnings like "this device can be shot by anybody and shooting back makes you a target as well" and there will be rivers of tears from these highsec gankbears claiming "amusement park" and "dumbing down". How is it dumbing down when you rely on your target being dumb?
I don't think many of the people you think will be crying rivers of tears will actually be doing so if this was the case. Do you know why? Because people will ignore it, just as they ignore the tutorials and the wealth of information about Eve that is widely available all over the internet. People can't be bothered to learn about the game they're coming to, what makes you think they'll bother with a new pilot course or popups that warn them of things (see the pre safety catch popup warnings and lowsec stargate warnings and the amount of wailing caused by clicking "don't show me this again" ). CCP can't patch stupidity, wilful ignorance or just plain laziness out of the game.
You are probably correct. The mentality that MMOs attract then do be the "you can't tell me what to do" mindset.
I've said before: "Alphas are gonna alpha, then get alpha'ed".
|

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
629
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 22:17:00 -
[59] - Quote
Aggression rules. Learn them.
EVE, working as intended. CCP, debuff Barges, or buff Ganking. Either will do for me, but we need more Yaaar! in this game lest it become WoW in Spaaaaace! -á~ Me |

Ginger Barbarella
Caldari Provisions Caldari State
1840
|
Posted - 2014.01.08 22:52:00 -
[60] - Quote
Rhonan Irwin wrote:Not really that fair without being able to defend yourself and being ganged up on the MTU's are about 8 million each plus cargo. They should be like secure cargo containers in they are attacked
Defend yourself?!?!?! YOU aggressed THEM!!!  "Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |