Key steps to getting petitions resolved quickly and hopefully in your favor.

1; Don't petition stuff that totally isn't against the rules/gonna get replaced.

Yes, We understand that you're torn up because you lost your ship because you're bad at the game or don't understand the mechanics. No, it's not getting replaced.

2; Don't be all uppity and insulting in your petition, they just gonna ignore it for a week before c/p the shittiest form response they can find and then laugh at your subsequent rage posts and demands to have it escalated.

3; Argue your case. Seriously, use supporting evidence, precedent and examples- offer proof if you can get it. Screenshots, video whatever. This part can either be incredibly easy or next to impossible due to the fact that a lot of GM's are drooling morons with little understand of the game. (Hilarious I know, but it's true.) This means that it's either going to be easy to convince them with your argument or impossible as they are too stupid to grasp the points you're making.

So while petitioning is totally hit or miss depending on which GM you get there are certainly steps you can take in order to maximise your chances of a good resolution.

I think it's just you, because I've had several favorable replies from the GM team, including the replacement of a flight of Ogre II's that ended up being "left" in a mission site due to a server crash.

I do agree that the GM's are sometimes rather blunt and ignorant to many issues. My best example is before Maze was changed. I warped in a Tengu to one of the rooms. This was when the rooms with 12 jump gates were all organized in a perfect circle. My Tengu dropped warp dead center of this clusterfuck of jump gates. I got stuck. No matter what I did I could not get out. Needless to say I was killed by the rats and lost my ship. Petitioned this and was told that there was "nothing in the logs" pretty much meaning "sucks to be you". What pisses me off the most about this is not only did I lose my Tengu, skill points, expensive mods and my dignity but they ******* changed Maze a week later to separate the gates out! WTF CCP!

All I ask of our GM's is to have some ******* common sense and don't think we are idiots and going to miss the obvious.

I haven't made that many petitions but the ones I did do were answered fairly quickly.

Some of them weren't in my favour but they did explain why they made the decision they did and did provide links to back this up. Whilst not the answer I wanted, I can't complain about the service I received.

I don't think this thread is really fair tbh as we don't know what your petitions were about and could all just be trivial things which would lead to a negative response.

Also, don't they come down hard on anything that discusses moderation?

And OMG so happy that you got your Ogre II's back... That is so awesome.... I'm talking about real petitions.... Not interested in some carebear who lost his drones on a mission and QQ'd about it....

No we dont need new ones we need COMPETENT ones that can read english and actually do there jobs

While I'm very happy to see that many of you speak kindly of us GMs and the support we provide, I can also understand many of the concerns raised in this thread. In regards to those, I want to add a few points to the discussion:

First of all, we actually do have a mixture of new and older GMs working in Customer Support. Even if the employee turnaround within Customer Support is relatively low (as most of us love to work on EVE and for CCP), there are always some GMs being recruited into other departments of the company and some that leave due to some other reasons. Those are replaced by fresh blood, which are very often EVE veterans and/or former ISD members that have performed well as such. That being said, of course we also need to look at many other skills to determine whether someone is well suited for customer support, such as good language skills and communication strengths. The guy who knows everything about EVE will not necessarily make the best GM This we know from experience.

Regarding our response times, we do our best to keep them down as possible, but of course this can vary on the petition category, the current load of incoming petitions at any given time and the issue at hand. But just to give you an idea of what you can usually expect, here are some average first response time numbers for our main petition categories.


All petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 32 hours and 31 minutes
• Last month = 16 hours and 31 minutes

Stuck petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 1 hour and 4 minutes
• Last month = 41 minutes

Billing & Account petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 22 hours and 6 minutes
• Last month = 12 hours and 6 minutes

Technical Support categories:

• Last 12 months =32 hours
• Last month = 11 hours and 52 minutes

Of course these are only averages and some petitions may need to wait for longer. Also these are only first response numbers and there may be more delay in between replies when petitions drag on/are escalated etc.

On reimbursement of losses in EVE, I'm not sure what to say as you have probably heard it all before. The fact remains that EVE is a very, very competitive game and in some aspects on the brink of what is technically possible, so our task is not always that easy. Of course we know that players lose ships and items to bugs and server issues, but we can simply not apply some kind of blanket "The customer is always right" method of deciding when to reimburse and when not to. We believe this would ruin the experience for everyone in the long run and thus we try to set clear policies that are equally fair to everyone (and equally unfair in some cases) and stick to them. Usually this means server log verification is required aka our logs show nothing

That being said, we will always keep working with the Dev teams on improving those logs/tools so that we have the verification needed in more cases and getting the bugs we are frequently exposed to through petitions fixed (with the current focus on EVE within the company, good things are happening in this area). Furthermore, we can keep working on finding the right balance between "canned responses" and manually typing up long personal and poetic replies to every petition with detailed explanations of everything and nothing, that would in turn slow the whole service down for everyone.

Finally, remember that if you are not happy with how your petition is handled, you can always request that a second opinion is given by another GM and/or a Senior GM.

And finally (again) ...use the rating tool to rate different aspects of our services after a petition is closed. It really helps us focus on where to improve and tells us how we are doing overall (overall rating for last year was 7.7 of 10 based on 63.731 rated petitions. Not all that bad but can of course be improved).

Winter is coming,
Lead GM Panzer

Yeah I put a billing/accounting enquiry in well over 24 hours ago... still nothing.

It's basically keeping me from playing, admittedly I caused the issue, but still taking a long time to even get an answer as to if they ARE WILLING to fix it.

Kinda blows your averages out of the water.
Edit: Although also, I think our GM's are pretty nice and decent guys. I've sat and chatted with them over questions I had a few times and got myself some decent answers to questions. Had I asked the questions on the forums the threads would've just been trolled to death.

ie. Not just a machine based automaton like GM's in WOW etc.. they have opinions and will answer if asked. Pretty cool that they will do that.

Yeah I put a billing/accounting enquiry in well over 24 hours ago... still nothing.

It's basically keeping me from playing, admittedly I caused the issue, but still taking a long time to even get an answer as to if they ARE WILLING to fix it.

Kinda blows your averages out of the water.

Edit: Although also, I think our GM's are pretty nice and decent guys. I've sat and chatted with them over questions I had a few times and got myself some decent answers to questions. Had I asked the questions on the forums the threads would've just been trolled to death.

ie. Not just a machine based automaton like GM's in WOW etc.. they have opinions and will answer if asked. Pretty cool that they will do that.

I replied to your petition now and hopefully the issue is fully resolved.

While I'm very happy to see that many of you speak kindly of us GMs and the support we provide, I can also understand many of the concerns raised in this thread. In regards to those, I want to add a few points to the discussion:

First of all, we actually do have a mixture of new and older GMs working in Customer Support. Even if the employee turnaround within Customer Support is relatively low (as most of us love to work on EVE and for CCP), there are always some GMs being recruited into other departments of the company and some that leave due to some other reasons. Those are replaced by fresh blood, which are very often EVE veterans and/or former ISD members that have performed well as such. That being said, of course we also need to look at many other skills to determine whether someone is well suited for customer support, such as good language skills and communication strengths. The guy who knows everything about EVE will not necessarily make the best GM This we know from experience.

Regarding our response times, we do our best to keep them down as possible, but of course this can vary on the petition category, the current load of incoming petitions at any given time and the issue at hand. But just to give you an idea of what you can usually expect, here are some average first response time numbers for our main petition categories.


All petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 32 hours and 31 minutes
• Last month = 16 hours and 31 minutes

Stuck petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 1 hour and 4 minutes
• Last month = 41 minutes

Billing & Account petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 22 hours and 6 minutes
• Last month = 12 hours and 6 minutes

Technical Support categories:

• Last 12 months =32 hours
• Last month = 11 hours and 52 minutes

Of course these are only averages and some petitions may need to wait for longer. Also these are only first response numbers and there may be more delay in between replies when petitions drag on/are escalated etc.

On reimbursement of losses in EVE, I'm not sure what to say as you have probably heard it all before. The fact remains that EVE is a very, very competitive game and in some aspects on the brink of what is technically possible, so our task is not always that easy. Of course we know that players lose ships and items to bugs and server issues, but we can simply not apply some kind of blanket "The customer is always right" method of deciding when to reimburse and when not to. We believe this would ruin the experience for everyone in the long run and thus we try to set clear policies that are equally fair to everyone (and equally unfair in some cases) and stick to them. Usually this means server log verification is required aka our logs show nothing

That being said, we will always keep working with the Dev teams on improving those logs/tools so that we have the verification needed in more cases and getting the bugs we are frequently exposed to through petitions fixed (with the current focus on EVE within the company, good things are happening in this area). Furthermore, we can keep working on finding the right balance between "canned responses" and manually typing up long personal and poetic replies to every petition with detailed explanations of everything and nothing, that would in turn slow the whole service down for everyone.

Finally, remember that if you are not happy with how your petition is handled, you can always request that a second opinion is given by another GM and/or a Senior GM.

And finally (again) ...use the rating tool to rate different aspects of our services after a petition is closed. It really helps us focus on where to improve and tells us how we are doing overall (overall rating for last year was 7.7 of 10 based on 63.731 rated petitions. Not all that bad but can of course be improved).

Winter is coming,
Lead GM Panzer

Also one thing more comes to mind:


GM Panzer: Has the Customer Relations Department ever considered internally maintaining a metric on players that submit legitimate reimbersement requests as opposed to those that attempt to abuse the system?

Not suggesting any pilot be singled out for past 'offenses', but wonder if this has ever been done in the past/considered/ attempted/ or is currently done to improve efficiency by improving 'routing' of petitions based on prioritization.

This way even a repeat offender will still get his 'hearing' with a GM, but it may not necessarily be as fast as someone that has always submitted legitimate petitions.

??

While I'm very happy to see that many of you speak kindly of us GMs and the support we provide, I can also understand many of the concerns raised in this thread. In regards to those, I want to add a few points to the discussion:

First of all, we actually do have a mixture of new and older GMs working in Customer Support. Even if the employee turnaround within Customer Support is relatively low (as most of us love to work on EVE and for CCP), there are always some GMs being recruited into other departments of the company and some that leave due to some other reasons. Those are replaced by fresh blood, which are very often EVE veterans and/or former ISD members that have performed well as such. That being said, of course we also need to look at many other skills to determine whether someone is well suited for customer support, such as good language skills and communication strengths. The guy who knows everything about EVE will not necessarily make the best GM This we know from experience.

Regarding our response times, we do our best to keep them down as possible, but of course this can vary on the petition category, the current load of incoming petitions at any given time and the issue at hand. But just to give you an idea of what you can usually expect, here are some average first response time numbers for our main petition categories.


All petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 32 hours and 31 minutes
• Last month = 16 hours and 31 minutes

Stuck petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 1 hour and 4 minutes
• Last month = 41 minutes

Billing & Account petition categories:

• Last 12 months = 22 hours and 6 minutes
• Last month = 12 hours and 6 minutes

Technical Support categories:

• Last 12 months =32 hours
• Last month = 11 hours and 52 minutes

Of course these are only averages and some petitions may need to wait for longer. Also these are only first response numbers and there may be more delay in between replies when petitions drag on/are escalated etc.

On reimbursement of losses in EVE, I'm not sure what to say as you have probably heard it all before. The fact remains that EVE is a very, very competitive game and in some aspects on the brink of what is technically possible, so our task is not always that easy. Of course we know that players lose ships and items to bugs and server issues, but we can simply not apply some kind of blanket "The customer is always right" method of deciding when to reimburse and when not to. We believe this would ruin the experience for everyone in the long run and thus we try to set clear policies that are equally fair to everyone (and equally unfair in some cases) and stick to them. Usually this means server log verification is required aka our logs show nothing

That being said, we will always keep working with the Dev teams on improving those logs/tools so that we have the verification needed in more cases and getting the bugs we are frequently exposed to through petitions fixed (with the current focus on EVE within the company, good things are happening in this area). Furthermore, we can keep working on finding the right balance between "canned responses" and manually typing up long personal and poetic replies to every petition with detailed explanations of everything and nothing, that would in turn slow the whole service down for everyone.

Finally, remember that if you are not happy with how your petition is handled, you can always request that a second opinion is given by another GM and/or a Senior GM.

And finally (again) ...use the rating tool to rate different aspects of our services after a petition is closed. It really helps us focus on where to improve and tells us how we are doing overall (overall rating for last year was 7.7 of 10 based on 63.731 rated petitions. Not all that bad but can of course be improved).

Winter is coming,
Lead GM Panzer

reasonable & brave words

But how do you determine if a request is legitimate or not since the logs never show anything? For my case as an example how is CCP going to prove that I wasn't stuck?