| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction
The Pursuit of Happiness
1076
   |
Posted - 2014.01.15 14:32:00 -
[31] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
And that is a problem in eve. Is much cheaper to gank than to wage war. Wardec costs must be halved.. at LEAST...
If 50m is too much for you, then you cannot afford to wage a war. If you are Deccing someone large enough to cost more, then you DEFINATELY cant afford a war with them.
Just pay attention to wich corp you direct such bullshit.
The fact is.. its WRONG that gankign is so much easier and cheaper than war deccing!!!
And the cost is not 50 M. is up to 500 M!!!
So how many wars YOu have running? As far as I know only marmite have more than us.
"If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Dave Stark
4189
|
Posted - 2014.01.15 14:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Kagura Nikon wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
And that is a problem in eve. Is much cheaper to gank than to wage war. Wardec costs must be halved.. at LEAST...
If 50m is too much for you, then you cannot afford to wage a war. If you are Deccing someone large enough to cost more, then you DEFINATELY cant afford a war with them. Just pay attention to wich corp you direct such bullshit. The fact is.. its WRONG that gankign is so much easier and cheaper than war deccing!!! And the cost is not 50 M. is up to 500 M!!! So how many wars YOu have running? As far as I know only marmite have more than us.
cost isn't the issue with war decs, the issue is how trivial they are to avoid. |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
629
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 02:43:00 -
[33] - Quote
Chribba wrote:Anti-grief feature is that the wardec cost will be paid to the victim... wonder how many will use the feature then...
/c
Excellent idea :)
"I do want to point out one "abuse" thing I did see however. *snipped*
Please do not post details of possible exploits on the forums. - CCP Eterne"
... Because of Falcon. |
KnowUsByTheDead
Old Seers Of Arbitrary Stimulation
934
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 06:41:00 -
[34] - Quote
Thor Kerrigan wrote:Erufen Rito wrote:
Or take my answer as "it's cheaper to gank" Since you know, that is my answer.
Mara Pahrdi wrote:
Players will just create more alts to evade this.
Both your answers would be wrong if the cost was be 0.01 ISK. I suggest actually answering the question if you bother typing a reply.
Last time I checked, people do not require your permission to post.
And I too, would just gank.
Hell, half the time, I cannot be bothered to waste 50m on a war-dec.
So yea.
Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.
-á-á-á-á-á-á-á |
Kagura Nikon
Mentally Assured Destruction
The Pursuit of Happiness
1078
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 09:19:00 -
[35] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:Ramona McCandless wrote:Kagura Nikon wrote:
And that is a problem in eve. Is much cheaper to gank than to wage war. Wardec costs must be halved.. at LEAST...
If 50m is too much for you, then you cannot afford to wage a war. If you are Deccing someone large enough to cost more, then you DEFINATELY cant afford a war with them. Just pay attention to wich corp you direct such bullshit. The fact is.. its WRONG that gankign is so much easier and cheaper than war deccing!!! And the cost is not 50 M. is up to 500 M!!! So how many wars YOu have running? As far as I know only marmite have more than us. cost isn't the issue with war decs, the issue is how trivial they are to avoid.
at least if the cost was tricial we could comepnsate by deccing more.. At our level the cost starts to be an issue when we spend several billions per week on wars.
"If brute force does not solve your problem..... -áthen you are -ásurely not using enough!" |
Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
1128
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 12:11:00 -
[36] - Quote
A single player is near-incapable of harming anyting more then ships, which can be prevented by staying docked. Single players are no threat to any infra (POS, POCO) that isn't blatantly neglected. Hence, I feel there is simply no need to WD and pursue a target through hisec. Thinking of the fun I could have not running after 'wardockers' or the ISK I could have made in PVE, I ask of OP the question: what motive is there to legalize agression between you and a specific individual character, as to allow you to shoot at them in the rare case they are not docked / cloaked / offline? |
Thor Kerrigan
Guardians of Asceticism
629
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 05:27:00 -
[37] - Quote
Inxentas Ultramar wrote:A single player is near-incapable of harming anyting more then ships, which can be prevented by staying docked. Single players are no threat to any infra (POS, POCO) that isn't blatantly neglected. Hence, I feel there is simply no need to WD and pursue a target through hisec. Thinking of the fun I could have not running after 'wardockers' or the ISK I could have made in PVE, I ask of OP the question: what motive is there to legalize agression between you and a specific individual character, as to allow you to shoot at them in the rare case they are not docked / cloaked / offline?
Same reason people wardec 1-man corps, especially if said player flies shiny ships.
Also, since you can't wardec ppl in NPC corps due to the fact the corp is owned by an NPC, at least it gives some players the ability to try and chase targets hiding in those, one at a time though.
If the cost was, say 25 mil (half the cost of the cheapest wardec), one could easily dec all the mission runners in a hub and hope at least one undocks.
Also, a 1v1 wardec could seem less threatening.
"I do want to point out one "abuse" thing I did see however. *snipped*
Please do not post details of possible exploits on the forums. - CCP Eterne"
... Because of Falcon. |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |