|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
114
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 09:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
OMG you whining tw@ts. Big alliances trying to control eve again.
its ONLY 5% jesus christ! what is up with you. Dont use the ESS you ARE NOT FORCED to.
if you ratted for an hour and made 80mill you would be ONLY losing 4 million isk from what you would get now. big deal! and if you live in nullsec if losing 4 million isk is a problem for you, your doing it wrong.
Sorry if your botters will now lose a little more income!
get a god damn grip
posting with my main-main because i dont give a feck, this is getting out of hand
personally if ccp wanted to nerf nullsec they should of gone further and dropped it to 50% then the ESS would go up in scale the longer its there to 110%. this would of made it a far far better and interesting concept. At the moment the 5% is so small i wouldnt even bother deploying a ESS, so ignore it. |
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
114
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:14:00 -
[2] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:tiberiusric wrote:OMG you whining tw@ts. Big alliances trying to control eve again.
its ONLY 5% jesus christ! what is up with you. Dont use the ESS you ARE NOT FORCED to.
if you ratted for an hour and made 80mill you would be ONLY losing 4 million isk from what you would get now. big deal! and if you live in nullsec if losing 4 million isk is a problem for you, your doing it wrong.
Sorry if your botters will now lose a little more income!
get a god damn grip
posting with my main-main because i dont give a feck, this is getting out of hand
personally if ccp wanted to nerf nullsec they should of gone further and dropped it to 50% then the ESS would go up in scale the longer its there to 110%. this would of made it a far far better and interesting concept. At the moment the 5% is so small i wouldnt even bother deploying a ESS, so ignore it. Its the fact that over the last decade null has seen nerf after nerf to its income and we are now at the point where high sec offers much better income. This latest nerf is simply making the problem even worse. There is no reason at all to run anoms over high sec level 4s.
mate, look the bounties in nullsec are far far higher in nullsec than lowsec or highsec. Why are you running anoms and not just belt ratting? True the anoms are pathetic isk wise, i have no idea why anom bounties in null are so bad. I never run anoms personally because i dont understand why i should spend more time on harder rats for less bounty, i just dont get why they are like that. So yes i agree with you on that part. But there is plenty of systems in nullsec with lots of belts to kill more, easier rats with much bigger bounties.
But actual belt ratting is much much better isk wise than high sec.
|
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
115
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 10:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tippia wrote:tiberiusric wrote:mate, look the bounties in nullsec are far far higher in nullsec than lowsec or highsec. I think you may be confusing the difference in bounties between different ships with some assumed difference between sec levels. The latter does not exist; the former does.
Not sure what your actual point is. The fact is a BS rat bounty in nullsec for example is far higher than in high or nullsec. The sec status is not relevant per say as its relative to how eve works whether in high/low/null. Bounty gets higher the lower the sec level becomes. so in a 1.0 system it will be lower than a 0.5 system relatively speaking but thats still in the high sec band. You would be hard pressed to find a 1.85Mill BS rat in highsec
But i do agree actual anom rats bounties in nullsec is wrong, they should be the same as the belt rat bounties, otherwise why bother. Unless your thinking about getting the juicy BPC or goodies at the end of the DED anomoly which then may balance it out a bit. However normal anoms dont give juicy goodies at the end of it and the bounties are still crap so they should raise them to be the same as the belt rats imo if they want to introduce the ESS |
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
117
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 14:11:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tauranon wrote:tiberiusric wrote:Tippia wrote:tiberiusric wrote:mate, look the bounties in nullsec are far far higher in nullsec than lowsec or highsec. I think you may be confusing the difference in bounties between different ships with some assumed difference between sec levels. The latter does not exist; the former does. Not sure what your actual point is. The fact is a BS rat bounty in nullsec for example is far higher than in high or nullsec. The sec status is not relevant per say as its relative to how eve works whether in high/low/null. Bounty gets higher the lower the sec level becomes. so in a 1.0 system it will be lower than a 0.5 system relatively speaking but thats still in the high sec band. You would be hard pressed to find a 1.85Mill BS rat in highsec But i do agree actual anom rats bounties in nullsec is wrong, they should be the same as the belt rat bounties, otherwise why bother. Unless your thinking about getting the juicy BPC or goodies at the end of the DED anomoly which then may balance it out a bit. However normal anoms dont give juicy goodies at the end of it and the bounties are still crap so they should raise them to be the same as the belt rats imo if they want to introduce the ESS You make 0 isk in warp. A sanctum spawns 40m of isk in the one spot. A good belt spawn is a triple 1.8. In any case, as has been pointed out ad infinitum in many threads, most of null is flyover country, and has belts that spawn veldspar to hedbergdite and cruisers with the odd double 500k battleship. I have such a system. Also note that in 634 anomalies completed, its spawned a grand total of 5 faction commanders, and it 100% reliably escalates into hostile space. Everyone that suggests that we all huddle in the 3 systems in PBLRD Vale that have decent truesec is entirely missing the point (ie that this debate is literally comparing the best 5% of null systems to highsec, not the worst 80%).
so basically you cant be bothered and want everything easy and free? just like the highsec carebears you complain exactly the same about. look you live in nullsec, so why live there if you refuse to use the other 80% then? there you go again thinking about yourself and not everything overall.
You know nullsec alliance are annoying as hell. You want free isk and do nothing for it. You want moon gold. You refuse to rat, you refuse to mine, you refuse to do anything that requires some effort. I bet your ratting those sanctums in carriers as well for minumun effort?
Think if you actually exploited all the resources around you? Large mining fleets, Large ratting fleets, could gain alliances a lot of ISK. But what you do is rent it out, so basically do nothing again for free ISK and allow some other carebears to mine.
You are worse much worse than the highsec carebears.
|
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
121
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:22:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tippia wrote:Quote:You know nullsec alliance are annoying as hell. You want free isk and do nothing for it. You want moon gold. You refuse to rat, you refuse to mine, you refuse to do anything that requires some effort. The reason they're annoying is because you're clueless. They don't want anything for free (or they'd be in highsec); they don't refuse to rat; they don't refuse to mine; they don't shy away from effortGǪ
let me get this straight you total absolute trolling idiot. I have lived in nullsec for years, i know damn well what i am talking about. All you ever do is post completely bigotted posts. to be honest i am totally sick of your constant moaning and trolling and derailing of topics because people dont agree with you. I am now going to block/hide you from the forums, because quite frankly i am tired of the trash that comes out of your mouth. You have no clue about anything. Good Day... ad you can post your usual pathetic retort because i wont see it - thank god
|
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
122
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 16:43:00 -
[6] - Quote
Ramona McCandless wrote:[quote=tiberiusric total absolute trolling idiot....... ad you can post your usual pathetic retort because i wont see it - thank god
Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
Seriously, rather than actually answer the post you just start with the insults.
Its pretty obvious that you Sir are a hypocrit of the highest order
GOOD DAY[/quote]
Jeez gonna be blocking a few people today
|
tiberiusric
Comply Or Die Retribution.
123
|
Posted - 2014.01.16 17:32:00 -
[7] - Quote
Mag's wrote:tiberiusric wrote:Tippia wrote:Quote:You know nullsec alliance are annoying as hell. You want free isk and do nothing for it. You want moon gold. You refuse to rat, you refuse to mine, you refuse to do anything that requires some effort. The reason they're annoying is because you're clueless. They don't want anything for free (or they'd be in highsec); they don't refuse to rat; they don't refuse to mine; they don't shy away from effortGǪ let me get this straight you total absolute trolling idiot. I have lived in nullsec for years, i know damn well what i am talking about. All you ever do is post completely bigotted posts. to be honest i am totally sick of your constant moaning and trolling and derailing of topics because people dont agree with you. I am now going to block/hide you from the forums, because quite frankly i am tired of the trash that comes out of your mouth. You have no clue about anything. Good Day... ad you can post your usual pathetic retort because i wont see it - thank god I must not be reading the same posts as you then. For I have not seen this trolling, constant moaning and completely bigoted posts you talk of. But that aside, instead of replying to the points raised, you simply went all personal and ranted lots of nonsense. Seems a little ironic and hypocritical, when reading what you actually posted in reply. Good day. (You can block me also, if that makes you feel better. )
thanks i will
|
|
|
|