Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Vaugue
|
Posted - 2006.07.11 11:06:00 -
[1]
I *flew* a Nighthawk... I've since downgraded (oh wait upgraded !) to a Cerberus. Honestly I don't see how a T2 cruiser should out do a T2 Battlecruiser. It even states in thier FAQ's that thier is 2 grades of these ships. So why does the Nighthawk feel so gimped?
Originally by: EvE-O FAQ's Quote can be found here Command ships are elite battlecruisers that are also feature two variants. One is a damage-dealing bruiser, with lower resistances. The other is intended for gang-support and equipped with higher resistances. Both of these types are designed to fill combat roles.
The training i did however opened up a whole slew of other ships to me which i don't regret. Really though i was training for the Nighthawk before it even existed and would like to see it useful like the other T2 BC's . My whole career in this game has revolved around the BC and Gang Assist till now... ========================= Why use a forum to auction when you can sell it on Eve-Bay!
|

Vaugue
|
Posted - 2006.07.19 17:51:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Vaugue on 19/07/2006 17:51:31 Um it doesn't make sence to me that a new type of launcher should be nessesary for *balancing* a ship. They should be balanced and in line with the other ships with it's basic set up, not with an advanced module (ie like a standard launcher is to an assault launcher).
The other CS's would be given an even higher boost should a more specialized turret come out. So why should it take a whole new module 2 months from now to bring it inline with the other command ships in their basic form now? ========================= Why use a forum to auction when you can sell it on Eve-Bay!
|

Vaugue
|
Posted - 2006.07.21 02:15:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Vaugue on 21/07/2006 02:19:46
Originally by: Ecce Drihten
Originally by: Nekora 1) Yes it tanks well, not the best FiCS tank but still good, thats not the issue. Damage is.
2) Has anyone tryed a passive tank on this yet?
The passive tank rocks. That is the reason I still love and want this ship fixed so badly.
It can tank beautifully, it just can't damage back much as you said.
Passive tank is the only way i have flown since the day i got my original ferrox. This one thing the NH does very well, but the others can do it just as equally well. Yet as we have seen with statistical proof over the last 19 pages the damage output is like the above post says *depressing* in comparison to other command ships... and yes i saw that tourney fight as well.. sad. ========================= Why use a forum to auction when you can sell it on Eve-Bay!
|

Vaugue
|
Posted - 2006.07.21 02:15:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Ecce Drihten
Originally by: Nekora 1) Yes it tanks well, not the best FiCS tank but still good, thats not the issue. Damage is.
2) Has anyone tryed a passive tank on this yet?
The passive tank rocks. That is the reason I still love and want this ship fixed so badly.
It can tank beautifully, it just can't damage back much as you said.
========================= Why use a forum to auction when you can sell it on Eve-Bay!
|
|
|