If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null.

You assume that moving L4s would cause people to move out of High Sec.

It would not.

Why would you think that changing High Sec would do anything to fix Null Sec?

Because they use the same servers.

For example for the HED-GP fight they took resources from Jita.

I'm not saying the affect would be immediate at all, I mean in terms of future development goals, if CCP focused more on nullsec servers perhaps things would be better?

Hi.
I am just wondering, if CCP were to shift their aim from hisec being a heavily focused on area, and instead used those resources on nullsec, would the lag be fixed to an extent?

Just looking at average pilots in space, there are a lot of people in hisec compared to null.
If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null, could CCP then concentrate more on growing the nullsec server infrastructure?

I think the best strategy for CCP as a business is to make money. They should pull resources from null sec, low sec, high sec and WH and allocate it all to Dust.

Eve is getting old and makes hardly any money, Dust is new and highly profitable so that is where they should be sending resources.

I mean in terms of future development goals, if CCP focused more on nullsec servers perhaps things would be better?

Hi.
I am just wondering, if CCP were to shift their aim from hisec being a heavily focused on area, and instead used those resources on nullsec, would the lag be fixed to an extent?

Just looking at average pilots in space, there are a lot of people in hisec compared to null.
If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null, could CCP then concentrate more on growing the nullsec server infrastructure?

My personal opinion is they would be better putting full resources into a eve 2

Hi.
I am just wondering, if CCP were to shift their aim from hisec being a heavily focused on area, and instead used those resources on nullsec, would the lag be fixed to an extent?

Just looking at average pilots in space, there are a lot of people in hisec compared to null.
If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null, could CCP then concentrate more on growing the nullsec server infrastructure?

lets nerf null (more ESS) so we can all move to hisec and this will never happens again :D
i bet everyone would be happy having goons in their mission hubs :P

The only way to stop the kind of fights that happened last night is to rework Sov Mechanics.

When you have structures that have millions of hit points then caps are the best thing to use.

The only real way you can stop a cap fleet is with another cap fleet, throw on top who ever has more numbers usually wins then you have thousands of guys in ships with millions of HP.

Nullsec players do not enjoy terrible lag and massive TiDi but it is not their fault.

The Mechanics of Sov Warfare is the catalyst, the driver behind these massive cap fights, you can not expect people to have some gentleman's agreement to only bring x number of ships to any given fight.

The only way to stop the kind of fights that happened last night is to rework Sov Mechanics.

When you have structures that have millions of hit points then caps are the best thing to use.

The only real way you can stop a cap fleet is with another cap fleet, throw on top who ever has more numbers usually wins then you have thousands of guys in ships with millions of HP.
.

Hi.
I am just wondering, if CCP were to shift their aim from hisec being a heavily focused on area, and instead used those resources on nullsec, would the lag be fixed to an extent?

Just looking at average pilots in space, there are a lot of people in hisec compared to null.
If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null, could CCP then concentrate more on growing the nullsec server infrastructure?

The Mechanics of Sov Warfare is the catalyst

Totally agree with this.

They either need to remove the incentive for us to put 4000 dudes in 1 system or create a basis were the code/servers allow such numbers without crashing the server.

if If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null...

The day CCP allow 4000 players to fight without lag, ppl will bring 6000+ to the fight.

It's been that way since the dawn of EVE.

Caps have nothing to do with this.
Even if there where no caps people would just stuff 4000 Subcaps into the system, because higher numbers win.

However it's not just CCPs fault alone. If the nullbears would grow some balls and not blueball half the galaxy we would see a lot more smaller fights between alliances instead of those massive blobs between mega coalitions which the game just can't handle.

Hi.
I am just wondering, if CCP were to shift their aim from hisec being a heavily focused on area, and instead used those resources on nullsec, would the lag be fixed to an extent?

Just looking at average pilots in space, there are a lot of people in hisec compared to null.
If CCP was to nerf hisec (remove level 4s from there for instance) and more people would move to null, could CCP then concentrate more on growing the nullsec server infrastructure?

You must work at the CCP Accounting Department or something. Else this statement would sound like it came straight out of your ass.

You have two baskets, each half-full of apples. Now a truck full of apples arrives. You need to fit the apples into the two baskets. Would moving all the apples from the "highsec" basket into the "nullsec" basket help you fit the truckload of apples into the baskets?

10-15% of population in nullsec.... YES, FOCUS ALL RESOURCES THERE!!!

The 10-15% that drives the economy for the rest of the game, tests ship and mechanic balance on a massive scale, and routinely puts CCP's hardware to the test so that they know where they stand.

These are things that miners4lyfe and mission runners never do. These are things that marmite collective and the other assorted trash that consider shooting wardecs on trade-hub undocks "elite pvp" never do. This is something that, unfortunately, due to its nature, lowsec can't do, that WHers don'tt have the numbers to do.

When nullsec says something is broken. Especially when long-time enemies and people who have little to zero reason to ever agree on anything are coming out and saying, "hey this is ****** up", yeah, nullsec should get priority.

I also think you underestimate how often nullsec is involved in hi-sec activities.

GSF has a handful of ultra-wealthy dudes who know hi-sec markets better than any pubbie and do tons of business outside of the confines of null. I have a jita trader alt, and soon I'll probably have a PI alt. That would make 2/3 of my account hi-sec based. That's only on one account, when I open up a second one inevitably, that too will probably have a couple of characters based in hi-sec.

Nullsec is hi-sec too, hi-sec is not necessarily nullsec.

We should be getting attention when we call for it. Sorry you disagree, we drive this game more than the guys mining veldspar and running l4's in their pimpfit marauders or whatever fotm missioning ship is in vogue