| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Mr Blah Blahson
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
24
   |
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Container_and_wreck_ownership
Quote:Cargo containers and wrecks are considered valid property just like drones and ships. If you damage either, you are initiating aggression on its owner. If you are not in their corporation, or otherwise allowed to legally engage, then you should be ready for a security hit and Concord intervention.
MTU's:
- Can only be accessed by the person who deployed it
- Can only be scooped by the person who deployed it
- When destroyed shows a loss against the person who deployed it
Therefore MTU's are clearly property (owned) by the person deploying it.
Therefore CONCORD should intervene when an MTU is attacked, as you are initiating aggression on it's owner.
Fix please CCP thanks. |
Billy McCandless
The McCandless Clan
Turing Tested
96
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:24:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mr Blah Blahson wrote:https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Container_and_wreck_ownership Quote:Cargo containers and wrecks are considered valid property just like drones and ships. If you damage either, you are initiating aggression on its owner. If you are not in their corporation, or otherwise allowed to legally engage, then you should be ready for a security hit and Concord intervention. MTU's: - Can only be accessed by the person who deployed it - Can only be scooped by the person who deployed it - When destroyed shows a loss against the person who deployed it Therefore MTU's are clearly property (owned) by the person deploying it. Therefore CONCORD should intervene when an MTU is attacked, as you are initiating aggression on it's owner. Fix please CCP thanks.
Yes please fix it so I can scoop them like drones and salvage them like wrecks free from any counteraction by their owners kthanxbai |
Caviar Liberta
Moira.
Villore Accords
417
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:32:00 -
[3] - Quote
Better Living Through Mobile Structures
Attacking Mobile Structures is only punished with a suspect flag, even in high security space |
Paranoid Loyd
342
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:36:00 -
[4] - Quote
MTU is not a container or a wreck.
CCP Fozzie wrote:Attacking Mobile Structures is only punished with a suspect flag, even in high security space
The flipside of mobile structures being light, inexpensive and available to all is that they also need to be easily attacked. When a pilot shoots any of these four mobile structures, the most severe penalty they will ever receive is a crimewatch suspect flag, making them free targets for all other players for 15 minutes. CONCORD will never retaliate against a player for shooting these structures, and shooting them will never result in a security status loss. This means that Mobile Structures must be defended either by active pilots or by deploying away from the beaten path. The Mobile Depot does benefit from a special version of the reinforcement mechanic that allows a regularly active player to keep their Depot alive; more on that later.
Destroying any mobile structure will always provide a killmail and there is a chance of loot dropping from any mobile structure that has a cargo bay.
"PvE in EVE is a trap to turn you into PvP content, don't confuse it for actual gameplay." Lipbite |
Erufen Rito
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
116
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:39:00 -
[5] - Quote
2/10 stealth make hisec safer thread.
This is as nice as I get.
Best quote ever
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4137165#post4137165 |
Joshu Mumon
Four Corners Exploration
17
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 19:44:00 -
[6] - Quote
Don't take away my hobby.
Also, that wiki has a lot of out of date articles. I would not consider it authoritative source of CCP's policies. |
Cheng Musana
Purple Space Ponys
AAA Citizens
51
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:06:00 -
[7] - Quote
Oh noes somebody is shoting my looting bot. Please concord protect my 5 million ISK asset so i can continue to AFK loot my mission wrecks. |
Aiwha
Infinite Point
Nulli Secunda
700
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:09:00 -
[8] - Quote
You can steal wrecks and cans without CONCODORKEN. You can shoot MTU's without CONCODORKEN. Like wrecks and cans, you can shoot anybody who shoots your MTU.
We're winning the war if it says so on CAOD! -á
|
Ptraci
3 R Corporation
Boarderline Cartel
1717
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
Mr Blah Blahson wrote:
Therefore CONCORD should intervene when an MTU is attacked, as you are initiating aggression on it's owner.
These tears, these oh so sweet carebear tears! The rules can change sometimes.
I am altering our arrangement, pray I don't alter it any further... |
psycho freak
EVE Corporation 987654321-POP
The Marmite Collective
278
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:17:00 -
[10] - Quote
Show me on the killbord were the bad man touched you
my spelling sux brb find phone number for someone who gives a fu*k
nop cant find it |
Batelle
Komm susser Tod
1381
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:37:00 -
[11] - Quote
i agree, attacking MTU should not count as aggression.
"CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"
Never forget. |
kes88
Swords of Persephone
44
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 20:44:00 -
[12] - Quote
Not being funny, but if you don't like it, don't use it? |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
795
|
Posted - 2014.01.24 22:33:00 -
[13] - Quote
I you do not feel comfortable with a current game mechanic, please feel free to write a serious, well worded proposal for changing aforementioned game mechanic and post it in the Features & Ideas Discussion part of the forum.
Thread closed.
ISD Ezwal
Commander
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |