Do you think this idea has merit or is it pie in the sky ending up the same way as WiS?

Do you think this idea has merit or is it pie in the sky ending up the same way as WiS?

It'll become the new WH space, WH space will become the new null space, null will become the new lowsec, lowsec will become the new highsec, and highsec will become a forest populated by boars where you can level up in complete safety without any worry of pvp. A new race will also be featured: Space Pandas.

I am more interested in how these gates are supposed to work.

...

I mean if it is full of resources and you can only access that space via that star gate then aren't you effectively giving the large null sec alliances even more of an advantage?

Why adding new space when stuff in old ones is broken? And the same broken stuff will be there...

some say it's possibly linked to the ghost sites and the new implants.

It sounded like a not so subtle hint giving the ability to build gates from to w-space.

If it's new space great, but I hope they fix sov first or make it unclaimable. Wild West type space rather than more systems filled with undockable outposts.

Do you think this idea has merit or is it pie in the sky ending up the same way as WiS?

Players are notoriously bad at doing the whole "work together long and hard for some epic achievement" thing.

FTFY

FTFY

FTFY

Except we aren't.

Would people build these stargates to new space if they took, for example, 4 aeons and an avatar as components and they removed the ability to build new supercaps at the same time? I'm imagining the required ships flying somewhere in space, docking with some pre-built superstructure, and physically becoming the gate.

What would the economic benefits have to be to build a stargate to get enough people OUT of the supers? and what would CCP have to do to compensate the effectively unusable skill points in the super pilot? Could supercap proliferation be put into reverse like this? Any interest or terri-bad idea?

Would people build these stargates to new space if they took, for example, 4 aeons and an avatar as components and they removed the ability to build new supercaps at the same time? I'm imagining the required ships flying somewhere in space, docking with some pre-built superstructure, and physically becoming the gate.

What would the economic benefits have to be to build a stargate to get enough people OUT of the supers? and what would CCP have to do to compensate the effectively unusable skill points in the super pilot? Could supercap proliferation be put into reverse like this? Any interest or terri-bad idea?

Would people build these stargates to new space if they took, for example, 4 aeons and an avatar as components and they removed the ability to build new supercaps at the same time? I'm imagining the required ships flying somewhere in space, docking with some pre-built superstructure, and physically becoming the gate.

What would the economic benefits have to be to build a stargate to get enough people OUT of the supers? and what would CCP have to do to compensate the effectively unusable skill points in the super pilot? Could supercap proliferation be put into reverse like this? Any interest or terri-bad idea?

How about adding a hacking thing to these new stargates.

You find one and have a dude in your gang hacking the gate-acces so you can jump everybody in and kill all the carebears in there or mess up the baby Nyx cooking in that "private" system.

Do you think this idea has merit or is it pie in the sky ending up the same way as WiS?

It'll become the new WH space, WH space will become the new null space, null will become the new lowsec, lowsec will become the new highsec, and highsec will become a forest populated by boars where you can level up in complete safety without any worry of pvp. A new race will also be featured: Space Pandas.

This is a pretty interesting idea for reducing supercapital numbers. However, if this new space ends up being too similar to currently available areas of space, then I don't think you'll encounter a lot of people who are willing to commit to such a goal with a trade-off like that.

Success for this vision is entirely dependent on CCP's ability to deliver on it. If they fail this, the situation has potential to harm EVE as much as Incarna did. Unlike walking in stations, however, development this time around seems to be sensibly focused.

push button/receive bacon.

OR we could lock the gate down leaving you on the other side exposed for an hour while you hack it open :)

Would prefer the POS revamp came before this new space thing but, whatever it could be something cool.

16. Redundant and re-posted threads will be locked.

As a courtesy to other forum users, please search to see if there is a thread already open on the topic you wish to discuss. If so, please place your comments there instead. Multiple threads on the same subject clutter up the forums needlessly, causing good feedback and ideas to be lost. Please keep discussions regarding a topic to a single thread.

22. Post constructively.

Negative feedback can be very useful to further improve EVE Online provided that it is presented in a civil and factual manner. All users are encouraged to honestly express their feelings regarding EVE Online and how it can be improved. Posts that are non-constructive, insulting or in breach of the rules will be deleted regardless of how valid the ideas behind them may be. Users are also reminded that posting with a lack of content also constitutes non-constructive posting.