Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

DarkAegix
Blue Republic RvB - BLUE Republic
273
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:30:00 -
[61] - Quote
It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned. |

Delegado Cero
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
28
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:32:00 -
[62] - Quote
Ban DHD But do it when he does something really stupid, not because of this. Free him so we can look forward to that massive troll that went to far. |

Nex apparatu5
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
32
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:34:00 -
[63] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned.
This was the petition, tell me which part is stupid.
DurrHurrDurr wrote:It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.
Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.
From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.
Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.
The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.
[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility. An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums. |

Shad0wsFury
Habitual Euthanasia Pandemic Legion
25
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:34:00 -
[64] - Quote
Durrhurrdurr is a good man, and his father was a good man, he should be freed. |

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
417
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:35:00 -
[65] - Quote
All is not lost.
His bots are all still running.
Thank God for small miracles.
Mr Epeen  If you can read this, you haven't blocked me yet. |

Belthizaar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
39
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
DarkAegix wrote:It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned.
Full contents of DHD's single petition he sent:
Quote: It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.
Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.
From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.
Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.
The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.
[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.
They banned him for this. |

NearNihil
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:37:00 -
[67] - Quote
Obligatory "FREE DHD" post. |

Djehngo
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:38:00 -
[68] - Quote
So a GM makes a ill-considered decision, DurrHurrDurr writes a reasonable criticism and gets banned for it? Is that more or less the straight of it?
Clearly reasoned criticism of CCP employees is a clear and present danager to EVE as we know it, the people giving constructive feedback will be banned and the toys shall be cast from the pram  |

TheGodofRock
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:39:00 -
[69] - Quote
FREE DHD |

thatboydc
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
5
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:44:00 -
[70] - Quote
FREE DHD TURBONIGGERS |
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
238
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:45:00 -
[71] - Quote
Belthizaar wrote:DarkAegix wrote:It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned. Full contents of DHD's single petition he sent: Quote: It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.
Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.
From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.
Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.
The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.
[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.
They banned him for this.
Yep, pretty stupid, but also not the reason for the ban.
Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why.
Not the brightest move. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

Silk75
The Foreign Legion Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:45:00 -
[72] - Quote
/Brick Tamlan
WHAT ARE WE ALL SHOUTING ABOUT, FREE DURRHURRDURR?!? |

SilentMajority
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
If you won't free DHD, at least ban the rest of B0RT and disband TEST |

Xutech
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
118
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:47:00 -
[74] - Quote
Free Saint DHD |

Andski
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
610
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:48:00 -
[75] - Quote
SilentMajority wrote:disband TEST
|

Fader Bane
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
1
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:49:00 -
[76] - Quote
This will not stand. |

Hershman
G-Weezy
55
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:49:00 -
[77] - Quote
I really do love Durr... |

Belthizaar
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
43
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:49:00 -
[78] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Belthizaar wrote:DarkAegix wrote:It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned. Full contents of DHD's single petition he sent: Quote: It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.
Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.
From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.
Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.
The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.
[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.
They banned him for this. Yep, pretty stupid, but also not the reason for the ban. Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why. Not the brightest move.
He sent it once. You're wrong. You can only send 3 petitions at any one time, if you dont believe me, try it yourself.
|

Rylee
Martyr's Vengence Test Alliance Please Ignore
0
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:51:00 -
[79] - Quote
FREE DHD!!
Time to kick the tires and light the fires! |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
20
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:52:00 -
[80] - Quote
lolz. love the butthurt testies. delicious.
Quote:No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam.
Quote:As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.
Reading the new MOTD suggests this was actually aimed at Goons. hahahaha.
Collateral damage.  |
|

Nemesis Factor
Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State
16
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:52:00 -
[81] - Quote
Belthizaar wrote:DarkAegix wrote:It must have been an impressively stupid petition to get him banned. Full contents of DHD's single petition he sent: Quote: It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.
It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.
Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.
From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.
Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.
The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.
[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporationGÇÖs recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.
They banned him for this.
They did not ban him for that. I don't know what he was banned for, but if you are suggesting it's this, you are as stupid as he is.
Edit: There are several reasons to NOT free DHD.
- He was friggin banned, and CCP doesn't ban people for no reason.
- Never even heard of this guy, so his celebrity status is no reason to let him out.
- He has all of TEST behind him, which is reason enough for ANYONE to be banned for at least a week.
- Apparently he likes to scam new players.
|

Tarion Awessi
Dreddit Test Alliance Please Ignore
3
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:54:00 -
[82] - Quote
Ranger 1 wrote:Yep, pretty stupid, but also not the reason for the ban.
Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why.
Not the brightest move. DHD is one man. He can only have 3 petitions open, right? The fact that other people took the wording of his petition and used it themselves is not his fault. He's not in a position of power within TEST vis-+á-vis scamming, petitioning, or any combination thereof and shouldn't be held responsible because people who share his concerns were too lazy to write their own petitions.
Besides, if other people using your petition is reason for you to get banned, then I see a new metagaming tactic coming.
|

Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:58:00 -
[83] - Quote
DidntWantThatShipAnway wrote:Banned because he filed one petition. Then a bunch of other people copied the body of his petition (he didn't ask them to) and filed their own. How is this his fault? :CCP:
Belthizaar wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why. Not the brightest move. He sent it once. You're wrong. You can only send 3 petitions at any one time, if you dont believe me, try it yourself.
If he hadn't made the contents of his petition public and had a legion of retards not copied/pasted it, he would not have got banned.
Arguably, not his fault but hey, if you going to play with a bunch of spaz's and they act like spaz's and you get blamed for it, you don't really get to cry about it.
Next time, don't share petition contents with lemmings? |

Zions Child
Odyssey Inc SpaceMonkey's Alliance
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:58:00 -
[84] - Quote
Posting in a thread.
What are we here for again? |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 22:59:00 -
[85] - Quote
Tarion Awessi wrote:The fact that other people took the wording of his petition and used it themselves is not his fault. And they got the copy of the petition how?
Tarion Awessi wrote: Besides, if other people using your petition is reason for you to get banned, then I see a new metagaming tactic coming.
How. The ORIGINAL petition writer has to GIVE the copy. Yes?
|

Tuggboat
Republic Military School Minmatar Republic
6
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:00:00 -
[86] - Quote
Send a message CCP, Send a Message.... louder |

Pesky LaRue
Mercatoris Etherium Cartel
57
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:02:00 -
[87] - Quote
Tarion Awessi wrote: Besides, if other people using your petition is reason for you to get banned, then I see a new metagaming tactic coming.
How do they find out about it if the petition owner doesn't share it?
|

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
240
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:04:00 -
[88] - Quote
Pesky LaRue wrote:DidntWantThatShipAnway wrote:Banned because he filed one petition. Then a bunch of other people copied the body of his petition (he didn't ask them to) and filed their own. How is this his fault? :CCP: Belthizaar wrote:Ranger 1 wrote:Swamping the petition system with this would be the cause of the ban, so you already know exactly who got him banned and why. Not the brightest move. He sent it once. You're wrong. You can only send 3 petitions at any one time, if you dont believe me, try it yourself. If he hadn't made the contents of his petition public and had a legion of reta rds not copied/pasted it, he would not have got banned. Arguably, not his fault but hey, if you going to play with a bunch of spaz's and they act like spaz's and you get blamed for it, you don't really get to cry about it. Next time, don't share petition contents with lemmings?
This.
I never said he did the spamming, however he made it available to be spammed.
Apparently CCP takes a dim view of having the petition system swamped by lemming petitons from people trying to be clever and held the original author responsible for making it available.
Not an unreasonable stance. To kill the enemy and break their toys!
It's not so much a mission statement,-áit's more like a family motto. |

K Suri
Red Gooey Bananas
23
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:05:00 -
[89] - Quote
Pesky LaRue wrote:Tarion Awessi wrote: Besides, if other people using your petition is reason for you to get banned, then I see a new metagaming tactic coming.
How do they find out about it if the petition owner doesn't share it? Exactly. And what's happened is Testies launched a fail petition spam and the originator got nailed.
They oughta be thankful that CCP didn't nail all of them for participating in the abuse of the petition system.
Pretty bloody stupid really. |

Hershman
G-Weezy
58
|
Posted - 2011.11.09 23:05:00 -
[90] - Quote
DHD actually has writing skills... unlike the rest of test |
|
|
|
|
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 :: one page |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |