|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1656
|
Posted - 2014.02.06 17:23:00 -
[1] - Quote
I could give you a long list of things that would make you pretty much 99 % safe from all ganks, ever. But why should I?
Go figure out yourself you lazy piece of **** instead of demanding CCP to save your ass.
WoW is that way ---> |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1658
|
Posted - 2014.02.10 14:00:00 -
[2] - Quote
DSpite Culhach wrote:
I would like to suggest a new "Set Standing" of SuperBlue so that if you set a another player to that, regardless of them being in other corps or even wartargets, you instantly become best buddies and can target/web/open fire on each other without consequence (as if you were in corp togheter)
L-Like.... dueling?
*facepalm* |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1659
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 14:46:00 -
[3] - Quote
People looking to nerf bumping is literally looking to simply buff freighters and make them more secure because they can't possibly warrant spending 1 PLEX a month to make their freighter 99 % gank secure against 10 other player accounts.
You are the absolute scum of EVE and against the very essence of it. You should be ashamed of yourselves.
"I am flying an expensive, harmless and slow ship with a very valuable cargo and I demand that I, me, myself and on my own can defend myself against 10 other ingame players/accounts - and I demand CCP do it for me. Why should I start a new account? Why should I bring friends? I am the VICTIM here, I DEMAND DEFENSES" |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1660
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 15:37:00 -
[4] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote: You are the scum of the EvE. But don't worry, no one is taking your gank away, except now you have to, you know, play the game and gank, instead of having one guy bump till you finish your **** and grab a shower and show up in the game, ya know?
His fault for being valuable, his fault for not webbing himself into warp. His fault for not having friends like the gankers do.
The bumper is spending time there as well, you know? Like he has to actually work for it and spend time keeping the other guy in place. And it only takes one other guy on the freighter's side to avoid being bumped.
But no, you'd rather have everything served to you on a silver platter, maybe WoW is a good game to try? |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1660
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 16:03:00 -
[5] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote:https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/ad-hominemFYI even empty freighter is being ganked, not only those who load 10b ISK inside. Daichy Yamato: Simply no. Ejecting is not an option. Problem with bumping is that there is no defense. You say webbing, but that happens before bumping. Once bumping is in place, you are ******. Simple as that. You say, attack the bumper, no. This is not correct way. You want your friends to gank the ganker? So they lose ships for no value (bumper doesn't drop much) and their security status? Are you insane?!
I was being serious about WoW. Mistakes happen, once we ganked a freighter as a trial-run to get everyone up to speed on how things works. Once we ganked a freighter we thought was carrying 4b, but mistakes were made by the scanner.
Webbing should be applied before bumping. Just like you should get vaccines before getting exposed to disease. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 16:33:00 -
[6] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
So, do give a good reason why freighter bumping in hisec to disallow leaving grid needs to be allowed for a ganker?
Scrambler and disruptor does the same thing, disallows leaving grid. The time it takes for a freighter to get back to stargate is longer than the time it takes concord to kill the suiciders. So what is it that bumping is required for in hisec freighter killing (you know, what this threads about)
It's called emergent gameplay and is one of the key selling features of EVE: The Sandbox If you want to kill emergent gameplay you are going to be in a lot of trouble because either you do it from a "moral point of view" which is very, very bad (do I have to explain why?) or you just nerf all emergent gameplay - which FYI putting up POS in wormholes is (CCP never expected people wanting to live there).
Regardless, taking bumping away will not prevent ganking - it will only constitute to slightly raising the prices of ganks, which in turn means more people will be hauling much more expensive stuff. Just like a system in equilibrium which is put out of balance due to a change in composition, it will re-instate the balance and things will be back to normal.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 16:39:00 -
[7] - Quote
JetStream Drenard wrote: This is one option, their are many ways around this if CCP makes it so. A heavily tanked freighter may still push the bounds of ganking limits. Just like with miner gankers, the freighter gankers would have to use a calculator to make that call. Instead of just copy and pasting cargo values, they would also have to establish EHP and so forth. Really its the gankers who are ALSO using dumb down play. ( x cargo value = gank -set number of ships required based on hull-. ) should have to do more math ( x cargo value + freighter EHP = gank+ number of ships required )
This is already being done with orcas. Orcas can tank anywhere from 4-5 to 30 catalysts depending on their fitting.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:00:00 -
[8] - Quote
JetStream Drenard wrote: exactly my point. orca ganking requires these computations, why should not a freighter?
Because a freighter is relatively static in terms of tank, because they do not have fitting slots. When freighters are being taken down by a group of players, because the freighter pilot did not protect himself properly against that group of players DOES NOT warrant a gameplay change to freighters. E.g. giving them fitting slots. You can take virtually any freighter that has ever been ganked in highsec and be like: "If this guy had been webbed, then he would have escaped."
Motoko Innocentius wrote: So what you're saying is, it's harder to gank if you can't just start bumping someone and gank when you've gotten all your friends in place? Sounds like you want to make ganking easier, how bout you try wow?
Guess you're just another ganker that wants ccp to do their job for them.
I am not asking anything from CCP, this is how the game works currently and how it has worked for a long time. Ganking is not "easy", it takes time, effort, ingame knowledge, investment and I could write you an essay on how to counter it and make it absolutely pain in the ass for gankers, but I am not going to. You're the one with the faulty imagination and/or knowledge of game mechanics so your only resort is to cry out to CCP for help even though there are plenty of completely valid, non-criminal methods to counter ganking freighters, both by the freighter pilot and by "freighter protection pilots". |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:02:00 -
[9] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote: At lest that way, freighter pilot can use logoffski during gate cloak to attempt to save the freighter and cargo. He can't do that with bumping. Without bumping, he still has (meta)fighting chance to win "PVP" match, with it he has none.
No, a freighter cannot logoffski during gate cloak to prevent getting ganked. Again - faulty knowledge of game mechanics. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:16:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote: I do not own freighter yet, so I don't know, but since when was this fixed? I thought you could log off at any time, during the cloak, then disappear minute afterwards (you use cloak to prevent aggro 15m timer).
Ever since the new mechanics. Crimewatch. |
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:24:00 -
[11] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Saying ganking is hard and requires ingame knollage is bullshit. With bumping, you only need to bump a whale, gathe people when they bother to come in, then do a countdown and shoot.
This is all it requires, ...
I didn't say you said ganking must not be allowed - I was using ganking synonymously with bumping. You have no right to state that, you don't have the faintest idea (well actually only the faintest idea) the system you have to setup to successfully locate, immobilize, execute and loot a gank. Any error in any of the procedures and you have wasted all your time, potentially flopped 1b isk down the drain if the gank goes wrong.
This is like exactly like people with no knowledge within software development complaining about bugs in a game and "how ******* difficult can it be to just get it right?". How about you go out and do some freighter ganking, then come back and tell me:
1. That it was easy as **** 2. And how every single freighter you ganked could not just have been insta-webbed and got away from you. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark.
~creativity~ |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 17:56:00 -
[13] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Now your fleet is locked from doing anything and the characters in the fleet are locked from doing anything until next dt comes. This is great gameplay right? Now are you going to bring ships to gank these bumpers?
I would dock up. Then I would undock. Then I would warp to my insta undock bookmark. ~creativity~ Can't dock when bumped to 200kmk off the station, stop evading the issue. The end result will be the same if you've just jumped through a stargate and start getting bumped. edit: Estrella , stop evading the issue
You're the one avoiding the issue. I just told you. Virtually any freighter is uncatchable with a webbing alt. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:31:00 -
[14] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:You are not answering the question, that is avoiding the issue.
Edit: just to add, you are basicly saying, a freighter needs to always have a webbing alt or it g¦¦e¦¦t¦¦s¦¦ can be ganked (you earlier said you gank empty freighters for testing purposes).
Fixed that for you. Just like a bumping character needs some friends to gank the freighter. The freighter needs someone to make it almost ungankable/uncatchable. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:35:00 -
[15] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something.
Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve".
- But it's nice to see you agree now. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:53:00 -
[16] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
Bumping a freighter does not require a friend, .
Yup, it's a 1-to-1 equation. The freighter might be rendered unusable, well there's 1 player devoting his full attention into making that ship unusable. "indefinitely locked from playing the game" is pretty much harassment and not allowed. Don't exaggerate the issue to try and back up your feeble viewpoints please. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 18:55:00 -
[17] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote:Ammzi wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:Tbh, i think ccp saying "upto 20 minutes is okay" would be great, with the sudden influx of idiots bumping freighters going up ccp would be forced to think about something. Well thank God, heavens, lord almighty and Bob that you are not in CCP or the GM team. Cause you might actually singlehandedly wreck EVE with whatever other ideas you might have to "fix eve". - But it's nice to see you agree now. Is 20 minutes too short for you to get your ganking buddies? HTFU?
It's plenty of time, but not enough time to pay a ransom. I've had multiple people be "I need to login in and alt and transfer isk" after the 10 min. initial conversation or "hang on, I need to sell some assets".
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:04:00 -
[18] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Dear ammzi, there is no time limit you idiot. Stop being dumb. For it to become harrassment, you need to be able to get away. That is the ccp ruling. And what is indefinite time in the end, is it me saying "you're stuck here forever" or is it enough if i say "you're stuck till my bro's come back from china to gank you", or is keeping someone thisway for 5 minutes enough already ?
I didn't say there was a time limit you useless single-cellular minded organism. I just told you - freighters can be webbed into warp and avoid being bumped. THAT was their chance at getting away. So what - pointing someone in nullsec until downtime is an exploit because they can't get away? Any freighter being bumped had their shot at getting away and they dropped it. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1661
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:15:00 -
[19] - Quote
Red Frog are cool about this and know how to avoid ganks. They hardly become targets and run one of the most famous business' in EVE. Then there's these people who come from cookie-on-a-plate-for-you games, who don't have sufficient ingame knowledge to solve their issues and try to make CCP fix their "problems" for them.
THEN when the solution to their problem is explained to them they pout, cross their arms and exclaim things such as "unfairness" or put their fingers in their ears while exaggerating their difficulties to make the discussion completely pointless and mindnumbing till everyone just gives up, starts shitting the thread so that ISD/CCP come in and have to clean it up and/or lock the thread. Give it a few weeks and another one will pop up, rinse & repeat.
All we can do is hope that CCP never listens to them.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1679
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:
And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic,
IT'S NOT NATURAL GUYS. PLEASE NERF IT - I AM A VEGAN AND IT OFFENDS ME. |
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1681
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:37:00 -
[21] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Mag's wrote:Motoko Innocentius wrote:And stop being an imbecile with your whiny "web it web it webit", webbing isn't a natural mechanic, freighters can't be designed around same corp alts webbing them, that is imbalanced and poor design. It's as stupid as your inability to answer to my question still. What you mean is that your NPC freighter pilot designed to avoid war decs, cannot be webbed without punishment. Shame that, but then NPC corps do have some disadvantages.  Thanks for making this clear, can't argue with webs when they can't be used eh. Whats the disadvantage for an npc corp bumper btw?
Dueling your webber = free webbing wherever you go! Again - insufficient and faulty knowledge of game mechanics, please refer back to my previous posts.
Oh and Motoko - here's one of your buddies: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=319374 You can go around and claim "exploits" together with him. Hell, he might even web your freighter for you or vice versa! |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1681
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:42:00 -
[22] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:Ah, but then i'd be open for wardeccing which would just make my freighter completely useless :O does this mean freighters are completely at the mercy of others ? Sounds to me like it's a useless ship.
Alright, now you're just trolling. That's good, that's all you have left since your puffed up arguments got punctured. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 19:59:00 -
[23] - Quote
Seras VictoriaX wrote:Mag's wrote: Please read the thread, you'll find he clarifies that stance.
I did, you want to quote it? I dont see anything addressing "attempting to leave but unable to" In fact the last rule clarification regarding bumping titans before they go into e-warp is pretty similar. http://community.eveonline.com/news/news-channels/eve-online-news/exploit-bumping-in-order-to-prevent-e-warpCCP Dolan wrote: Ships undergoing emergency warp upon appearing in space have no means to activate modules, cancel warp, or otherwise defend themselves during this period; they cannot be stopped by any warp disruption mechanic. Bumping them during this period renders the ship in question utterly helpless, against the intention of the game mechanics.
A freighter attempting to "leave the area" is 'utterly helpless'
Incorrect - and if you actually knew anything about game mechanics you'd know they fixed that up a few patches ago. When a ship is ADDED into space now from logging in it'll insta-warp. The freighter had a chance at getting away, he could have been webbed - he chose not to, he chose to risk his cargo and his ship while aligning, either knowingly or unknowingly. That's that pilot's fault.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:09:00 -
[24] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote: This thread , like the topic sais is about "why freighter bumping in high sec is an exploit",
Quote:exploit verb +¬k-êspl+ö+¬t,+¢k-/ ..... 2. make use of (a situation) in a way considered unfair or underhand. "the company was exploiting a legal loophole"
- It's "unfair" according to you.
- It is easily avoidable (webbing), thus not unfair.
- CCP is well aware of bumping mechanics and deemed it within the rules
- Any and all arguments here against bumping have been dismantled
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Once bumped, can not be in anyway escaped from
Wrong, reference all my other posts and your lack of imagination+ingame knowledge.
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Other players may help but must lose ships and security status in order to do so
Wrong, again lack of imagination+ingame knowledge.
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Is used as a way of warp disrupting without having to aggress
Bumping ships is deemed completely acceptable and within rules.
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Creates risk free ganking (target cannot escape, sufficient numbers can be gotten with time, unlimited planning time)
Risk free!? Hahahahha. Completely and utterly wrong.
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Webbing does not give 100% guarantee of safety and requires an additional account while perma bump requires only one. 100 % safety? In my EVE? Get the **** out.
|

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 20:21:00 -
[26] - Quote
Motoko Innocentius wrote:- Subsequent ganking requires more, but being safe from said gank isn't guaranteed even with unlimited amount of fleet members helping. While successful gank can always be made.
Successful gank IS NOT guaranteed. I couldn't fit more quotes in. |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 22:24:00 -
[27] - Quote
Cathy Mikakka wrote: You haven't said a single thing on how to escape except "call yo corp bros" one. Which makes no sense unless you want to gank the bumper?
And what risk do gankers risk while doing this?
Why should I tell you? That would be equal to asking a dude playing the market what is the best item right now to invest in. Why should he tell you and ruin his own isk making opportunities?
Trust me, I have had some really baller freighter pilots push me to the limit and escape because they were prepared and they knew their game mechanics. Even after/during bumping them. No way in hell I am going to disclose how though. :D |

Ammzi
Love Squad Black Legion.
1682
|
Posted - 2014.02.11 22:38:00 -
[28] - Quote
It's in the name. Player versus Player.
|
|
|
|