| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jethro Man
   |
Posted - 2006.04.04 22:03:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Jethro Man on 04/04/2006 22:03:45
These have a 100% of working right? or can they be resisted?
Also what does the optimal range and falloff range mean on them? Can they miss?
|
Deva Blackfire
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 22:25:00 -
[2]
They work at 100% in optimal (so reduce tracking by 30% or more). In faloff their effectiveness is reduced (so instead of 30% they cut 20% or less from tracking).
|
Maya Rkell
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 23:05:00 -
[3]
Untrue. Like all EW it's hit/miss
"The Human eye is a marvelous device, with a very little effort it can overlook all but the most glaring injustice" - Quellchrist Falconer |
Elve Sorrow
|
Posted - 2006.04.04 23:54:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Maya Rkell
Untrue. Like all EW it's hit/miss
I've never seen mine miss under optimal though. I agree that's how its supposed to work according to what CCP have said, but both Disruptors and Dampeners seem to work every time under optimal.
|
Forsch
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 00:00:00 -
[5]
I think Maya refers to the falloff. If in optimal+falloff, it's a chance to work 100% or not at all.
________________________________________________________________
- Forsch
Defender of the empire
|
Elve Sorrow
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 00:14:00 -
[6]
Yea, thats what i meant. Im talking about in falloff too. Its easy to notice a failed attempt outside optimal + falloff, but ive not had it within falloff yet.
|
Kunming
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 01:50:00 -
[7]
Hmm, afaik all non-ECM EW will hit 100% at max range (optimal + 2x falloff) but will have their effect lessened. So lets say a 60% dampner at optimal+falloff should only dampen 30%. The other vets that replied have put me in doubt though, so not completely sure on this now, gotta test it...
|
Deva Blackfire
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 09:03:00 -
[8]
Same here. Was pretty sure it hit 100% of the time outside optimal (dont remember testing them at opti+2x faloff thou).
If anyone could test this it would be nice :)
|
Hoshi
|
Posted - 2006.04.05 11:10:00 -
[9]
Originally by: Kunming
Hmm, afaik all non-ECM EW will hit 100% at max range (optimal + 2x falloff) but will have their effect lessened. So lets say a 60% dampner at optimal+falloff should only dampen 30%. The other vets that replied have put me in doubt though, so not completely sure on this now, gotta test it...
This is wrong and is very easy to test. I have only tested it for ECM and Target Painters but on both cases there is a hit or miss, if they hit they work for 100%, if they miss they work for 0%. At optimal+falloff they have 50% hit chance.
For ECM it will give the same jamming probability as an effect drop would in most cases but you will see the difference if jamming strenght > target ship sensor strenght.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| |
|
| Pages: [1] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |