| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Revolution
   |
Posted - 2003.09.17 06:39:00 -
[31]
HI PRINCESS WELFARE.
|
Nasty Ways
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 06:46:00 -
[32]
I really hope you are roleplaying your stupidity, HP.
---
who didnt know
that there are
NO FAIR FIGHTS
? |
Revolution
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 06:54:00 -
[33]
Edited by: Revolution on 17/09/2003 07:06:45
high preistess = Princess Akmazara = lady Antares
http://oldforums.eveonline.com/?a=topic&threadID=20947
delete yourself again plzkthnx.
|
TMX
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 09:31:00 -
[34]
 Quote:
Homo Dear, its clear you are confused. Why did you leave Venal (I'm in upper lonetrek and noticed your ships leave). TTI is still there arent they? Yet you ran away? Perhaps their attacks in Fountain caused your allies to call you for help? As for killing "alts" are you sure theyre alts? I've seen several posts here already from people who were PK'd by your pirate fleet. Perhaps you'd like to post here and now for all to see that you will pay restitution to the innocent victims of your attack? Thank you.
TTI aint here just 1 or 2 trying to fight like the Taliban does in Afganistan wannabee Guerillaa worriors Log on Log off jump to a safe bookmark and jump back to try to shoot down a cruiser or a hauler Get my point its just pafetic to "fight"(if you can call it fighting) like that.
-------------------------------------------
Live fast die young, clone and take revenge! |
SirMolle
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 09:49:00 -
[35]
Quote:
Why did you leave Venal (I'm in upper lonetrek and noticed your ships leave).
We left Venal after the NVA was formed and our forces where no longer needed. NVA knows that if they need us they can call for us. Now, this is common knowledge, yet, you remain to see anything apart from the tip of your nose.
At times of war, such as this is, there are no "innocent" people in a warzone. Either they are with us, or not.
0.0 sec newb ships is scouts. Alts. Aliases. Spies. Whatever you wish to call them, if you fail to see this, I truly feel sad for you, because such naiivity is just not possible.
Since SINC fails to try and meet our attacks, they throw their alts in newb ships at us, in attempts to get us worried about our security status, also this fails.
With all due respect "Princess Akzamara", crawl back under the rock from where you came and paint your toenails, i suspect that is all you're good for. It is obvious you side with SINC in this matter, and for that, you are now, and forever, a hostile. If you do not side with SINC, please take the time to actually understand how battles are fought.
|
Mordessa
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 10:10:00 -
[36]
Oh god, here we go again.
Evolution goes on the offensive against the most well known PK'ers in the entire universe of EVE, and a certain well known schlep comes out from hiding underneath the fecies of EVE.
Good to see you again High Priestess.
However I would like to clarify a few things to you.
You say that we are far worse than Moo/Sinister ever was because we have ISSUED a WARNING to ALL CORPORATIONS, stated as follows:
Quote:
As of now, any corporation found next to SINC, will be a target, if you are in the same system as they are, and not fighting them, we will take for granted you are allied with them.
IF we were worse than Moo/Sinister, we would have just forgone this announcement and did what we damn well pleased anyhow.
However we have come here to post a warning to all corporations to stay clear of all systems controlled by these people.
Now pull your head out of your arse, quit being such a whiny little child and hear this.
There are those who see a problem and take it upon themselves to take care of it.
There are those who see a problem and ignore it.
There are even those who see that same problem and expect others to take care of it for them.
Then there are those like you who see a problem and foster it, fondle it, and do whatever they can to advance its cause.
We are growing weary of you.
We are becoming evermore irtritated at your constant be-littling of our actions.
Until you become Concord and control the known universe you should silence yourself and go back to whatever pile of excrement from which you crawled from.
Because until you extract those perma-miners off your ship, you obviously have NO CLUE what combat involves nor what, or how it can be.
|
Homo Erectus
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:32:00 -
[37]
lol high p reminds me of a few morons within the homeworld community.
Homo, it's clear that you are mistaken. 1+1 is obviously 3. For you to argue otherwise just proves my point...
All you have to do is use words like "clearly", "obviously", phrases like "is it clear" and then put in something that is far from clear, and anything but obvious. In fact, put something in that is complete bull****.
High P; you, like all TTI, all sinister, all pirates, and every poser in this universe, have no legs to stand on.
Keep crying for the sinister alts, I save your tears and use them for seasoning. |
Stavros
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:34:00 -
[38]
i mean she does have a point though, u flame us for lame about the warp in point camping and then hump it yourself...
kinda hypocritcal don't you think?
--
"Keep On Flaming Lamers, Like Your Ships Did When We Ended You" |
Homo Erectus
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:37:00 -
[39]
OH, WHATS WRONG STAV? YOU GUYS AT SIN DON'T LIVE BY THE POLICY DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU?
WE JUST THOUGHT YOU WERE WANTING US TO TREAT YOU THE SAME WAY YOU TREAT US?
AWWW. DON'T CRY. |
Georg
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:42:00 -
[40]
Edited by: Georg on 17/09/2003 13:43:17
Quote:
As of now, any corporation found next to SINC, will be a target, if you are in the same system as they are, and not fighting them, we will take for granted you are allied with them.
Now there's a sign of clear logical thought. I have no problem with you fighting any corporation you wish: I do have a problem with you telling everyone else that they have to be on your side or else.
I'm sure everyone will see the justice in it when you blow up miners in the belts of the same system who haven't a care or clue who else is in system and don't bother to check the id of every other person in local (even assuming it isn't bugged at the time) as soon as they appear.
I'm sure everyone will see the justice in it when you blow up the traders just passing through a system without bothering to a pot shot at YOUR enemy on the way through from their indy.
I'm sure everyone will see the justice when they get blown up simply because they don't read this board and hence haven't a clue about your overblown sense of importance in your own conflicts and that everyone is obviously with you or against you. NOw where have I heard that before? Didn't impress people much when it was first used either.
|
Homo Erectus
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:45:00 -
[41]
they don't have to be on our side. but if we see ppl hanging around sinister, and not being fired upon by them(since they fire on everyone who is not with them) we will make them horrible assumption, that they have an agreement.
1+1 still = 2 ppl. |
Tehel Necrona
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 13:51:00 -
[42]
Homo, its not that he is annoyed at you for using them straight out. It's that people like yourself complain when Sinister use them.
Clue, Get And Perhaps that Banana from your friend while your at it.
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:07:00 -
[43]
Sorry Georg youÆve blown your credibility with me on the NVA F&F list thread by accusing the NVA council of abandoning its declaration of principles when I made clear the democratic nature of the NVA council. ItÆs clear to me that either;
a) you canÆt count
b) you are morally blind
c) you are a Taggart sleeper
or
d) just an idiot.
Otherwise how do you justify kicking off against the clear NVA statement of principles and procedure when in the post above Shar Tegral of TTI names ôherselfö completely opposed to pirates and ôgriefersö while nonetheless remaining a loyal TTI drone.
I think Taggart sleeper agents are just not boxing clever.
The point of a sleeper is that to stay out of sight and out of mind.
Yet every time one posts an opinion, clear bias and randite conditioning just exposes the snakes for the creatures they are.
Sad
JF Public Forum |
Homo Erectus
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:27:00 -
[44]
Quote:
Homo, its not that he is annoyed at you for using them straight out. It's that people like yourself complain when Sinister use them.
(incorrect) |
Stavros
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:27:00 -
[45]
yeah but to be fair to us we never called ourselves lame exploiters did we?
--
"Keep On Flaming Lamers, Like Your Ships Did When We Ended You" |
Homo Erectus
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:29:00 -
[46]
stav, it's not an exploit to lag someone to hell at an entry point. i sure as hell didn't say it was. i just said that you were skillless newbies because thats 99% of your kills. without lag you are nothing.
you wanted to play the game that way, so we are playing it the way you wanted to. |
Stavros
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:31:00 -
[47]
thats ok then aint it ¼_¼
--
"Keep On Flaming Lamers, Like Your Ships Did When We Ended You" |
Raem Civrie
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:40:00 -
[48]
Edited by: Raem Civrie on 17/09/2003 14:42:43
I love it when Homo starts abusing his shift key. It always means something deliciously idiotic was said.
SINC attacked Fountain. Fountain is governed by the Fountain Alliance. Evolution is a part of the Fountain Alliance. Evolution go hunt down SINC where they hang out. Evolution states that everyone found NEXT TO SINC, operating BESIDE them, is a hostile. This is a very clear-cut logic. A large portion of registered corporations in EVE are "dummy companies". So do you think it's tactically viable to just ignore the alts in the scouts, just because some na´ve fools thought that it was unethical? Guess what, it isn't. If you are in a 0.0 system, EVERYONE is fair play. That's the logic of EVE. Until I had a cruiser, I didn't even think about entering 0.0 systems at all. Not to mention the aforementioned systems being declared WARZONES. Not pirate playground, but a warzone.
I'm just waiting for you people to complain about my use of Antimatter Hybrid Charges Uranium Projectile Rounds due to cancer risk. I line my ship with asbestos, and my cruiser cafeteria serves canned dogs with kitten sauce.
|
Georg
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:56:00 -
[49]
Quote:
Sorry Georg youÆve blown your credibility with me on the NVA F&F list thread by accusing the NVA council of abandoning its declaration of principles when I made clear the democratic nature of the NVA council. ItÆs clear to me that either;
a) you canÆt count
b) you are morally blind
c) you are a Taggart sleeper
or
d) just an idiot.
Otherwise how do you justify kicking off against the clear NVA statement of principles and procedure when in the post above Shar Tegral of TTI names ôherselfö completely opposed to pirates and ôgriefersö while nonetheless remaining a loyal TTI drone.
Well first off, I've made clear all along I have little respect for TTI. They are openly supporting/using pirate corps to some level or other.
To answer your 4 alternatives:
a) I fail to see what my numerical ability has to do with the point at all. Irrelevant.
b) Hardly, given it is the moral content of your words versus actions which I am commenting on.
c) I've never had any involvement with TTI to my knowledge, although I couldn't rule out buy/sell orders somewhere along the line. I am freelance and always have been. My position is as someone looking from the outside at the end results of the actions and statements of both your side and TTI's side in the Venal conflict.
d) I personally don't think so, but that sort of thing is always a matter of opinion.
To address your real points.
Firstly, I have always been clear that in my opinion the VA and the now NVA council is not democratic. For it to be democratic it would need to be elected by the residents of Venal: it was not and is not. Just because you use voting within your appointed board does not make it a democracy.
As for the abandonment of principles. As I understand it from your colleague, Athule, they have yet to even be ratified and hence as he admnitted there is no current definitive statement for the NVA position at this moment. Secondly I was refering to your own posts, which at the time of the NVA formation outrightly proclaimed your condemnation of piracy (despite your corp previously being quite happy to ally with pirate corps) and a very recent post in the thread you mentioned, in which you stated that if the majority position in the NVA was to allow piracy against neutrals in Venal then your corp would go along with it, even if it was against your own principles. That last is a significant drift from your original NVA statements and to me marks an abandonment of the, as yet unratified, Principles should such a thing be allowed to occur.
|
Jade Constantine
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 14:58:00 -
[50]
[Georg lied]
Quote:
in which you stated that if the majority position in the NVA was to allow piracy against neutrals in Venal then your corp would go along with it, even if it was against your own principles.
No I bloody didn't you appalling muppet.
JF Public Forum |
Revolution
|
Posted - 2003.09.17 15:10:00 -
[51]
Now try looking at it from our point of view;
these player corps kill anything that moves in the regions they lay claim to, a pure 'pod-on-sight' policy.
We must assume any corperation mining and trading quite happily alongside sin/rus/tor/etc in there home systems is infact hostile and so, we must kill them.
|
Rebellion
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 06:48:00 -
[52]
As harsh as these measures may seem. They are founded on the following tenets:
1. Sinc has and will use alternate characters and corporations to try and scout or do tasks as they get more desparate
2. Destruction and death is only to take place around Sinc prescence
3. Those present in a system that Sinc is also in are one of the following: completely clueless; Sinc alternates or allies. We give players the benefit of the doubt regarding cluelessness.
Regardless of everything. These measures will only last as long as it takes to stomp out Sinc.
|
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |