Assuming we keep the bad instant teleport mechanics of EVE, yes the first in wins ONE system, as opposed one coalition owning EVERY system.

So you think that entering a fight that was over before you even got there timeline wise is the way it should work?

A small group of leaders already owns every system, so talking about this in the future tense is pretty silly. The OP's idea isn't perfect but it is a step in the right direction.

It's not about locking people out

its about making reinforcements behave as if the whole game is in TiDi

TiDI is an arbitrary and meaningless restriction in the first place

If you were too far away to from the fight in the first place, why should you reinforce faster because the ships in combat are in a 10% speed goop

Nobody is talking about removing TiDi or going back to the old ways.

Just because TiDi is the best opetion available doesnt mean it is a good option.

This is wrong. It unfairly and inappropriately allows force projection.

Not a good solution for these issues but neither is TiDi.

While this is true its only true because of the current broken mechanics and player behavior based on these mechanics.

[GǪ]

But at the end of the day the real issue is the way that the mechanics were changed to make EVE into doughnut shaped map rather than the original pocket based map.

Tippia, you are obviously a mouth breathing mongoloid.

You must be a goon and got the" goon of the month" award resulting in your 20k likes because a review of your posts show you are completely lacking in anything approaching an intellect.

You are the one that has not made even the sembelence of a point.

Just repeatedly saying "op is stupid so is this idea" is not a point made.

It is too bad that people cannot withdraw "likes"

and oh noes, I am being petitioned.

Thanks for bringing this topic back on the rails.

Basically regarding Tippia, its best to just ignore. It makes statements of fact based on fantasy and likes to redefine words at will.

The above argument is basically, "why fix a broken system when we're so big we'd just continue to steamroll over the rest of EVE with impunity just like we're doing now".

As I said in another thread, removing AUTOMATED EMAILS, not necessarily timers, exposes the large bloated easymode coalitions who hold thousands of systems without actually inhabiting or using. It exposes them to attacks, many of which won't be noticed until too late, and sudden loss of sovereignty.

The above should not happen, intel should be a responsibility of the player, not the server.

Did you just redefine the meanings of "confusing"?

No one, especially me, is arguing for going back to the previous broken incarnation of sov. As I have repeatedly stated, a fix would involve a number of changes, not simply the removal of timers.

Large ezymode coalitions benefit directly from the mails

Removal of local is not a removal of intel.

removal of local in the sense of mails is not a removal of intel since it would only directly affect those systems that are unoccupied.

Are you seriously arguing "if a tree falls in a forest and there is no one to hear it?"

Really? I mean really.

There was no mention of removing local so the point your attempting to stitch together is irrelevant.

Already explained it.

They do which is a very poor non-sandbox mechanic implemented by a null sec player turned dev turned PL member.