EVE Search - Erotica 1 for CSM 9

All Channels

CSM Campaigns

Erotica 1 for CSM 9

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 3 post(s)
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.07 06:33:00 - [1] - Quote Platform Vote for the sandbox/against a theme park. Vote to make highsec a better place. I expect record turnout from highsec miners to celebrate the Code. If highsec miners are, instead, afk for the vote, then they are effectively voting for a dramatic increase in enforcement actions until satisfactory compliance objectives are met. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 42	Posted - 2014.03.07 06:50:00 - [2] - Quote Are you serious though or are you going to do a james 315? Erotica 1: "I would create a massive pyramid scheme in Eve to show you what it is, but I'm an honest business person, so you'll just have to find education elsewhere. Start with the wiki link that was linked by a person who didn't even read what he linked." Theres a reason I play eve XD
unidenify Caldari Provisions Caldari State 74	Posted - 2014.03.07 16:12:00 - [3] - Quote are you planning to promise us a double vote?
Giorgos Rbs Lead Head Inc 32	Posted - 2014.03.09 05:46:00 - [4] - Quote Were i you i would be affraid to be elected. Lots of ppl would be interested in seeing your face
Steve Ronuken Fuzzwork Enterprises Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM 2881	Posted - 2014.03.09 16:06:00 - [5] - Quote Giorgos Rbs wrote: Were i you i would be affraid to be elected. Lots of ppl would be interested in seeing your face Well, as part of the election process, you have to disclose your real identity. (proven by a scan of your passport, to CCP). And CCP disclose your name. Steve Ronuken for CSM 9! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=4236322 http://www.fuzzwork.co.uk/ Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter
Dalketh Caldari Provisions Caldari State 96	Posted - 2014.03.09 18:41:00 - [6] - Quote Tarojan wrote: Are you serious though or are you going to do a james 315? He/She did a 'James 315' already last time (as in start to run then quit). Tried sucking up to the goons for support and that didn't work. Exposed by goon Then quit
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.09 19:02:00 - [7] - Quote Judging from your posts, you seem to have some sort of infatuation with me. I'll mark you down in the "more enforcement" column. Thanks. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Endovior Osmosis Inc Li3 Federation 190	Posted - 2014.03.10 00:55:00 - [8] - Quote I always approve of the noble task of separating fools from their money, and so I'm a fan of your efforts in general. Nonetheless, I find myself skeptical as to your suitability as a CSM representative. Most CSMs come to the table with some kind of plan, to improve EVE, making things better and more fun. You, on the other hand, have an anti-plan; you want a certain segment of the playerbase to stop having fun (for whatever value of 'fun' is to be had from mining). As such, even though I have no respect for AFK hisec miners, I can't support your position unless you're offering something different. Ok, so you want AFK mining to not happen. Do you have an alternative in mind? Would you support, say, an exploration-type minigame to replace the senseless tedium of mining? Or do your ideas stop at "I want those guys to stop doing what they're doing"?
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.10 01:05:00 - [9] - Quote Yes, but in steps for testing purposes. It's not like I want to break the game or anything. For instance, remove all the ore and ice (1 variety, or more over time) and have players accept missions to work towards unraveling the mystery and putting things back in order. This would be an ongoing group mission sort of thing, which would encourage miners to work together. Rewards from these missions would be carefully considered so that there is minimal impact to the players themselves for plexing their accounts. In a plot twist, missions would also be offered to aid the pirate faction that is behind all of this. There are a number of possible solutions to afk mining that do not specifically target one group of people over others, but have a broad impact. I'm not here to impose my will on anyone. It's important that a good CSM member be open to community ideas and actively work with the community. Every idea (beyond the obvious crazy ones) would get fully considered and researched. Of course, ideas by pillars of the community such as James 315 or the Mittani would get fast tracked since we all know their ideas have already been thoroughly considered by some of the best minds in the game. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Endovior Osmosis Inc Li3 Federation 190	Posted - 2014.03.10 07:44:00 - [10] - Quote I see where you're coming from, but that's more or less exactly what I'm referring to. Suggestions like "remove all the ore and ice" fail at the first word, remove. CCP isn't in the business of removing features; it's bad for business. If a new expansion included in its patch notes anything approximating "Removed all the ore and ice from high security space", subscriptions would plummet. It is a fact that CCP lost subscriptions off of Odyssey, based on changing "push button, receive bacon" into an actual piece of content requiring some effort. It may be argued that that was partly due to flaws in the implementation (re: the much-hated loot scatter mechanic, which is already confirmed to be on the chopping block), but the fact remains that there are a lot of players who will simply stop playing in response to being required to put forth effort... and as a CSM, that's actually something you need to be concerned with. Similarly, though the question of "How exactly is it that the belts respawn, anyways?" is a valid one, and one could conceive of interesting gameplay regarding prospecting and the discovery of new belts... you don't actually go there. Your proposed ideas have too much stick and not enough carrot; you've simply suggested that stuff go away until arbitrary objectives are completed. Okay, fine... but once those objectives are completed, then what? More of the same thing that was there before? Again, insomuch as I'm taking you as a serious candidate, my problem is primarily that I don't see you bringing anything to the table. You've got things that you want taken off the table, but you don't have anything to replace them with. In this context, that effectively means that you want to implement plans which will lower the subscriber base, and have no corresponding plans to increase it. And that doesn't actually work, since the CSM is an advisory body, not a governing one; if you're not bringing things to the table, you're not effective as a CSM. That being said... what do you think you can bring to the table? Do you have 'Reasonable Things' to champion, or actual plans to improve gameplay? Or am I essentially right in seeing you as an anti-CSM, wanting mainly to implement anti-plans against the things you dislike?
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3187	Posted - 2014.03.10 07:51:00 - [11] - Quote Quote: CCP isn't in the business of removing features; it's bad for business. Bad features are worse for business. Oh, and I should point out that they are removing loot spew from exploration. Since it was a bad feature. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Endovior Osmosis Inc Li3 Federation 190	Posted - 2014.03.10 08:08:00 - [12] - Quote For reference, I already mentioned that. Also note that the specifics of that change haven't been announced yet; there may be some other non-standard loot mechanic in the works, or otherwise be something other than the default 'box with stuff in it'. Even if loot spew were simply replaced with the standard loot mechanic, though, I'd argue that there's a largish difference between changing a wildly unpopular bit of one particular feature and removing the feature entirely; it's the difference between reworking loot spew and removing exploration. CCP is prepared to change specific minor details to improve the gameplay experience. They do not remove features wholesale. Incarna was horribly unpopular, but the crappy hotel simulator in space is here to stay, and probably won't even be improved or tweaked much in the foreseeable future.
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.11 01:31:00 - [13] - Quote I'm okay with all of the highsec miners quitting EVE, if that's what happens. We can replace them with new miners who want to be at their keyboards for some sort of active mining mechanic. You can't make decisions based on pro-themepark carebears crying. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 42	Posted - 2014.03.11 10:03:00 - [14] - Quote Thats Endoviors point though Erotica. Your ok with all the high sec miners quiting eve, but most people aren't and CCP definetly isnt. I think if you did a survey of miners who mine because they enjoy it, they would love an active mining mechanic (as opposed to the guys who do it on a tabbed out alt for the free isk). Make mining actually FUN. You could champion this, your smart enough to see the benefits of this and there are many ways to do it. Your not saying this though (or appear not to be). Your simply saying get rid of the high sec miners/remove their play time. Erotica 1: "I would create a massive pyramid scheme in Eve to show you what it is, but I'm an honest business person, so you'll just have to find education elsewhere. Start with the wiki link that was linked by a person who didn't even read what he linked." Theres a reason I play eve XD
Cavalira The Greater Goon Clockwork Pineapple 300	Posted - 2014.03.11 16:17:00 - [15] - Quote Erotica 1 wrote: We can replace them with new miners who want to be at their keyboards for some sort of active mining mechanic. You can't make decisions based on pro-themepark carebears crying. I wonder where you'll find enough players willing to mine to compensate for all the ones that will quit. Also, if EVE was to be a full sandbox without moderation, you wouldn't have any concord at all. Do you think that's a good idea to remove Concord entirely? EDIT: Found this on the minerbumping site: "- The New Order of Highsec continues to recognize The Mittani as the legitimate Chairman of the CSM. This determination remains the rule in all New Order territories."
Tarojan Tarojan Corporation 42	Posted - 2014.03.11 16:24:00 - [16] - Quote Would a removal of concord help or hinder the game? Thats a very good question. I too would like to hear the ops thoughts on this. Its one way to ensure miner interaction as they are all forced to spam dscan or die. Erotica 1: "I would create a massive pyramid scheme in Eve to show you what it is, but I'm an honest business person, so you'll just have to find education elsewhere. Start with the wiki link that was linked by a person who didn't even read what he linked." Theres a reason I play eve XD
Helena Russell Makanen Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 189	Posted - 2014.03.11 18:45:00 - [17] - Quote Erotica 1 wrote: I'm not here to impose my will on anyone. Such hypocrisy. That is exactly what you want to do. "If a miner needs to go to the bathroom, for instance, I ask that they dock up first, or at the very least ask the Supreme Protector for permission to go."-á --á James 315 - aka - the miner bumper
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.11 20:36:00 - [18] - Quote Helena Russell Makanen wrote: Erotica 1 wrote: I'm not here to impose my will on anyone. Such hypocrisy. That is exactly what you want to do. And you would be wrong. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Dalketh Caldari Provisions Caldari State 96	Posted - 2014.03.12 04:06:00 - [19] - Quote Erotica 1 wrote: Judging from your posts, you seem to have some sort of infatuation with me. I'll mark you down in the "more enforcement" column. Thanks. What a terribly unpopular thread you have here. No I just have an "infatuation" with fail blowhards. However what a mature and stable answer addressing your trying before and bolting when things got a little tough the last time you said you were running for CSM. Snip Please refrain from personal attacks. ISD Ezwal.
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4373	Posted - 2014.03.12 04:54:00 - [20] - Quote Do you have a question? Please be respectful in the forums. Thanks. See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Lakotnik TSOE Po1ice TSOE Consortium 3	Posted - 2014.03.12 15:29:00 - [21] - Quote Like many others in this thread before me, I also strongly dissaprove with you being even a candidate for CSM. You bring nothing remotely interesting to the table and your "ideas" are unthought through and unimaginative. Seems more like you're trying to (again) promote yourself and your imfamy like an attention wh**e. So.. hell no.
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4366	Posted - 2014.03.12 15:57:00 - [22] - Quote Lakotnik wrote: Like many others in this thread before me, I also strongly dissaprove with you being even a candidate for CSM. You bring nothing remotely interesting to the table and your "ideas" are unthought through and unimaginative. Seems more like you're trying to (again) promote yourself and your imfamy like an attention wh**e. So.. hell no. Another vote for extra enforcement. Thanks for coming! See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Kiryen O'Bannon Thrall Nation Brave Collective 87	Posted - 2014.03.13 02:53:00 - [23] - Quote Why don't you come out to Sendaya? There's about 14000 of us who are most likely not going to vote for you, that you can try some Extra Enforcement on? Really, why would anyone actually vote for you? Leaving aside the obvious self-aggrandizement going on here, how do you represent my interests as a low-sec PVPer? Ganking miners? So.. mineral prices go up, ship prices go up.. I have to pay more for Thoraxes which we apparently ran Jita completely out of for several hours this past week. Yeah.. no. High sec miners are really only a problem for people that want to gank in highsec, or just spend all their time worrying about the "Carebear menace" on the forum. You simply don't represent a significant number of people.
Erotica 1 Krypteia Operations CODE. 4366	Posted - 2014.03.14 11:45:00 - [24] - Quote Brave Newbies, more enforcement. Thanks! See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.
Tear Jar The Conference Elite CODE. 19	Posted - 2014.03.18 17:27:00 - [25] - Quote Tarojan wrote: Would a removal of concord help or hinder the game? Thats a very good question. I too would like to hear the ops thoughts on this. Its one way to ensure miner interaction as they are all forced to spam dscan or die. As an active suicide ganker, I think there should be a Concord. Concord does not make ganking impossible, it just shifts the risk/reward curve. I think Concord is in a good spot right now. My main issue would be with CCPs slow reaction time to real bots. I have seen 23/7 bots in my local system and CCP has ignored my reports for over a month.
Makie Tachibana EVE University Ivy League 1	Posted - 2014.03.20 17:54:00 - [26] - Quote Erotica 1 wrote: ... If highsec miners are, instead, afk for the vote, then they are effectively voting for a dramatic increase in enforcement actions until satisfactory compliance objectives are met. Erotica 1, how would you go about enacting this increase in enforcement actions?
Malcolm Shinhwa Bad Touches 1355	Posted - 2014.03.21 23:25:00 - [27] - Quote Along with Psychotic Monk, I support Erotica 1 for CSM. Eve needs more ganky and a ton more panky. They will both be on my ballot. I know violence isn't the answer. I got it wrong on purpose.
Tengu Grib Maniacal Laughter Ltd. 9	Posted - 2014.03.24 17:22:00 - [28] - Quote Erotica 1 will be on ALL my ballots. More content in high sec, more content for everyone. Tengu Grib > I agree. The distinct lack of quality spaceships makes RL the worst space sim ever.
Josef Djugashvilis Acme Mining Corporation 2069	Posted - 2014.03.24 20:35:00 - [29] - Quote Erotica 1 wrote: I'm okay with all of the highsec miners quitting EVE, if that's what happens. We can replace them with new miners who want to be at their keyboards for some sort of active mining mechanic. You can't make decisions based on pro-themepark carebears crying. I may vote for you so that I can spend a year laughing at you when CCP pat you on the head when you tell them to lose customers. CCP will not give you a free supply of mayonnaise, so there is no real point in you standing, even for giggles. I take it you still have the goons backing you? This is not a signature.
okoolos rimmer Deep Core Mining Inc. Caldari State 36	Posted - 2014.03.25 10:54:00 - [30] - Quote I just read Jester's article and listened to the recording of your "bonus room". Despicable doesn't even begin to describe it. Shame on you.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.