| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Jorev
   |
Posted - 2003.09.18 18:03:00 -
[1]
This has got to be one of the slickest hustles I have seen CCP pull off yet.
Congrats for being so underhanded and exploiting your own game mechanics.
The Eve world is expected to change, and not all changes have to be announced, but there is no logical reason for an item's mineral content to change from one day to the next.
You should have stated in the patch that some of the drones would have their mineral content lowered drastically.
You guys are worse than the player pirates.
|
Jorev
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 18:15:00 -
[2]
 Quote:
õhm please about what are you Talking???
and when you are so angry cancel your account ok but plz dont WHINNNNNNNE HERE ARGGGGGGGGGGGG.
Well clueless wonder, you do have the option of not reading threads you consider to be whining, which means you shouldn't read the general forums at all since 95% of the threads here are complaints.
Complaints are how things get changed and fixed. If no one complained or pointed out errors, not much would get improved.
|
Jorev
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 18:27:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Jorev on 18/09/2003 18:27:39
Quote:
If it's only the drones that is 1/10th a recycle value and they have changed the loot tables x10 on drones, they haven't changed it by much, have they?
tard
Your assumption that this has no detrimental effect is based on your lack of insight so let me spell it out for you.
What if I was in the business of buying items below their recycle value on a regionwide basis and had hundreds or thousands of drones in inventory which were purchased prior to the change at more than their new lower recycle value.
Hope that helps clear things up for you since you seem slow on the uptake.
|
Jorev
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 18:43:00 -
[4]
Quote:
Why bother with additional text? Your subject line droned on and on about the issue anyway.
I fscking hate people who can't figure out the difference between the Subject field and the Message field.
A subject field should state the topic of the thread.
Could I have shortened it? Yes. But I wanted my main point to get accross to anyone who was just scanning topics.
There are so many subject fields on this forum that are non descriptive, your complaint would be better served elsewhere. I at least gave you enough information in my subject field to decide wether this topic and my viewpoint, would interest you in reading it.
|
Jorev
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 18:55:00 -
[5]
Quote:
Heh, diden't think about that. But I'll still laugh at you anyways because you defraud newbies, I just kill them.
How do you figure I defraud newbies if I am paying more than anyone else? I am paying a lot more than NPCs and more than other players if I have the highest buy bid. Perhaps they were the ones defrauding newbies.
I can afford to pay more since I have max recycling skills and am willing to sweep a region's stations to pick up and recycle the damn things every now and then and then sell off the minerals. That is why both experienced and new players sell to me.
Isn't my labor worth something since I provide convenience for the person selling their loot who may have crappy recycling skills and be selling in a remote station that won't pay well for the minerals?
|
Jorev
|
Posted - 2003.09.18 23:14:00 -
[6]
Quote:
Quote:
A subject field should state the topic of the thread.
Could I have shortened it? Yes. But I wanted my main point to get accross to anyone who was just scanning topics.
Contradictory paragraphs.
How so?
Obviously a subject field should state the topic to be discussed.
I could have shortened it but included my opinion all in one sentence.
|
| |
|