I'm glad you like having alliance bookmarks. What do you think about blapdreads?

Regarding T3 balance, what do you think of the current trend in nullsec that every major alliance/coalition is deploying T3 doctrines en-masse. CFC has re-rolled out Tengus, Russians have been using Tengus for a long time, and NC./PL make wide use of Proteuses/Proteoi.

You wish to keep T3's viable, but what is your stance on the current state where "generalized" T3's being better than "Specialized" Tech 2's at their job?

Why is "Wormhole Stabilizers" a bad idea?

I would think it is a good idea!

Am I wrong for thinking that?

Some wormholers have expressed discontent, thinking they're overpowered. Would you address their concerns or lobby to keep them as is?

Also how do you feel about the recent tracking change nerf to dreads?

What about a deployable that could extend or reduce the life of a wormhole?

True, but this would give more control over that.

For reducing lifespan, for example, you would place 2 deployable structures that would kill it off faster then armor HACS.

Extending life would work the same. Obviously in reverse!

Corbexx, in your OP you state you were unimpressed with the other canidates. What was it that didn't impress and why are you a better choice than them?

Why me over other wormhole candidates.

I feel my communication skills are good and I can put forward a good and well thought out argument. I've made a lot of contacts in wormhole space among both low and high class corps and alliances. Some have even said I know just about everyone in wormhole space, it's sadly not true but I'm working on it. While I live in a high class wormhole (Polaris is a C6 with a C6 static) I'm certainly not going to forget about the lower class wormholes. I'm happy talking to anyone should they feel like contacting me.

First of all I feel my general wormhole knowledge is right at the top. I have a great understanding of how issues will affect not just C5 and C6 but all classes, something I feel a lot of people forget about. IGÇÖve spent the last few years talking to people all over wormhole space, this isnGÇÖt something I have just started doing now for a CSM campaign. IGÇÖve helped develop the fleets people fly nowadays in wormhole space. I also have plenty of time to dedicate to this which is something I hope to prove over the coming weeks.

Again, sorry corbexx, but I felt I'd stick up for myself.

This is another candidate's thread so I am surprised at a CSM candidate advocating another CSM candidate in a 3rd's thread or am I?

BTW you are wrong. Because you think you go to know a guy over the last 4 weeks doesn't mean you got to know him at all. You got to know what he wanted you to know because that's politics and it gets him to post what you just posted advocating him over you and Corbexx over even yourself.

GL with that campaign now sheep.

Evening Corbexx. I have reason to belive you have participated in an Erotica 1 Bonus room.. Can you please rate your experience providing an in depth look at any positive side effects you will have suffered relating to having taken part.

CSM9 Candidate Interview: Corbexx
http://www.capstable.net/2014/03/29/csm9-candidate-interview-corbexx

I do have one question for you mate.
What is your opinion on the proposed probing delay for newly spawned K162 WHs?
JM

Time for a serious question from me :)

It's about the T3 role in WH economy.

Now, I'll admit: I haven't flown T3, and I've only rarely fought against them. I'm not really qualified to comment on the details of T3 balance.

However, even with that lack of experience, I do find it striking that the WH economy is so closely tied to how valuable T3s are. If CCP nerfed T3 so badly that HACs were now clearly superior combat ships (a bad idea IMO), their value would plummet and this would seriously hurt WH economy.

There are lots of ships that are better suited for one type of space than another, and this is fine. But I can't think of any other ship where the value of the ship is so tied to the economy of a certain space. This makes T3 ship balancing far more challenging.

Do you see this as a problem? What do you think CCP should do to diversify the WH economy?

(note: if it turns out I'm missinformed and T3 only constitute a small part of the WH economy, please feel free to educate!)

cheers

Insuring that when T3's get balanced they are still useful and viable in wh's. I don't want them nerfed into the ground as the knock on effect will be to make the income in lower class wormholes even worse.

Hello Corbexx,

I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.

Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ?

Care to elaborate on why you support the banning of content creators who operate within the eve EULA?

Hello.

Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=334871&find=unread

Please respond if you agree with the tone the current CSM reps took on possible changes and how you would have responded.

I live in a wormhole, but I also have a non-trivial industrial presence in hi-sec. When I saw a wormhole candidate who was interested in improving hi-sec industry, my first thought was "Ohhh, I'm certainly voting for this guy," but then I read exactly what you're proposing:



For hi-sec, this would be the worst thing in the world for industry. Hi-sec blueprints are not necessarily kept in the POSs where the jobs go, they're often kept in corp hangars in nearby stations for security and organization. Your idea makes perfect sense in wormhole space, where people live out of POSs, but for people who prefer the security of a station corp hangar, your proposal would make RevEng, Invention, and Manufacturing default to where the jobs DON'T go. A much more practical solution would be to have a "remember location for this blueprint type" option.

I'm probably voting for you regardless because of everything else you offer, but please reconsider your hi-sec proposal.

I am happy to endorse Corbexx for election to the 9th Council of Stellar Management! Good luck at the polls!

Corbexx, you seem like a pretty good candidate. My problem with your stance is that you seem to focus on only wormhole space. I will not vote for any candidate with a rigid one-way platform no matter how good the candidate seems. Could you please expand on what flexibilities you have; tell us what problems you see outside of wormhole space? I am also interested in hearing about how you would collaborate with other CSM members with other platforms different or even oppositional to yours.