| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 3 post(s) |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
310
   |
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:46:00 -
[61] - Quote
Princess Saskia wrote:Evening Corbexx. I have reason to belive you have participated in an Erotica 1 Bonus room.. Can you please rate your experience providing an in depth look at any positive side effects you will have suffered relating to having taken part.
No when I found out who and what it was I just left so really wasn't a issue. However the mass invites I am now getting is alot of fun. On the plus side I do now know where some of your wormholes are ;)
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Xuixien
Attitude Adjustment Incorporated
997
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:48:00 -
[62] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Princess Saskia wrote:Evening Corbexx. I have reason to belive you have participated in an Erotica 1 Bonus room.. Can you please rate your experience providing an in depth look at any positive side effects you will have suffered relating to having taken part. No when I found out who and what it was I just left so really wasn't a issue. However the mass invites I am now getting is alot of fun. On the plus side I do now know where some of your wormholes are ;)
Oh nice! Maybe you'll stop in and visit us sometime? We can have a town hall!
I'm interested in your campaign. I really think you're the guy I can get behind on this.
AUT5M - Active WH Corporation seeking new recruits. Frequent fleets, perfect boosts, material buyback, and more. Battleship/Logi/T3 pilots needed. Inquire within. Full API required. |
Slumber
Aperture Harmonics
No Holes Barred
11
|
Posted - 2014.03.26 23:50:00 -
[63] - Quote
Cor, your trustworthy and in this game that is a very difficult word to say. I hope you can take this all the way. You have my votes.
AHARM
Recruiter |
James Arget
Future Corps
Sleeper Social Club
322
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 18:55:00 -
[64] - Quote
A bit of a late start, but I'm hardly one to fault you on that I suppose.
I've been running across Corbexx in wspace for a couple of years now, and while the result isn't always what I had in mind, he's been a stand up guy regardless of the outcome. He's obviously an expert in wspace, and I think he would make a wingman for me on CSM 9.
CSM 8 Representative
http://csm8.org |
Proclus Diadochu
Obstergo
Red Coat Conspiracy
1360
|
Posted - 2014.03.27 21:01:00 -
[65] - Quote
From deep within the void,
Resides a legend told to few;
His wake, homes destroyed,
But his future designs anew.
The name Corbexx, now your focal,
A bright and menacing depiction;
A wave in your home, no local,
At the dawning of your eviction.
As his forces collapse in, Bhaals deep,
And if only you took time to analyze;
Check your system with a simple sweep,
YouGÇÖd had seen what needed destabilized.
The moral of the story comes at the end,
As we ponder the name of our luminary;
When you consider the choices for CSM,
Remember Corbexx, the man, the visionary.
CSM9 Candidate | Twitter: @autoritare | Gmail: [email protected]
Campaign Thread: http://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=325889
My Blog: http://casualcapsuleer.wordpress.com | No-Local News Writer/Editor |
Lanctharus Onzo
Alea Iacta Est Universal
Brave Collective
34
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 08:35:00 -
[66] - Quote
CSM9 Candidate Interview: Corbexx
http://www.capstable.net/2014/03/29/csm9-candidate-interview-corbexx
Writer, Co-host of the Cap Stable Podcast
Twitter: @Lanctharus |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
328
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 11:19:00 -
[67] - Quote
Thanks very much for having me on.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Dmitry Wizard
THE AESIR.
Ragnarok.
288
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 12:39:00 -
[68] - Quote
Ragnarok.'s love is coming from Nova, Corbexx. You have our support and our vote.
"Wormhole corps are like a bunch of homeschooled kids" |
Louis Robichaud
Red Federation
RvB - RED Federation
213
|
Posted - 2014.03.29 16:31:00 -
[69] - Quote
Time for a serious question from me :)
It's about the T3 role in WH economy.
Now, I'll admit: I haven't flown T3, and I've only rarely fought against them. I'm not really qualified to comment on the details of T3 balance.
However, even with that lack of experience, I do find it striking that the WH economy is so closely tied to how valuable T3s are. If CCP nerfed T3 so badly that HACs were now clearly superior combat ships (a bad idea IMO), their value would plummet and this would seriously hurt WH economy.
There are lots of ships that are better suited for one type of space than another, and this is fine. But I can't think of any other ship where the value of the ship is so tied to the economy of a certain space. This makes T3 ship balancing far more challenging.
Do you see this as a problem? What do you think CCP should do to diversify the WH economy?
(note: if it turns out I'm missinformed and T3 only constitute a small part of the WH economy, please feel free to educate!)
cheers |
Jack Miton
Sky Fighters
Sky Syndicate
3196
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 00:01:00 -
[70] - Quote
I have had the pleasure of flying with Corbexx in CCRES and later in AHARM and I'd be hard pressed to put forth a more suitable CSM representative.
Corbexx knows his WHs and also has wide spread knowledge of other aspects of EVE, in particular industry and productions.
Definitely high on my list.
I do have one question for you mate.
What is your opinion on the proposed probing delay for newly spawned K162 WHs?
Given the unpopular views others from your alliance have been posting on the threadnaught on the matter, I'd like to know where you stand.
In any case, best of luck.
JM
Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
334
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 09:31:00 -
[71] - Quote
Jack Miton wrote:
I do have one question for you mate.
What is your opinion on the proposed probing delay for newly spawned K162 WHs?
JM
My view is here.
But in short I'd rather have it back how it was. Having sigs instantly appear on overview is just to easy. Having a delay on them being able to be found seems to be going to fare in the other direction.
There should be some counter and to me that should be, if you have probes out and are scanning you should be able to find new sigs.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
334
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 10:16:00 -
[72] - Quote
Louis Robichaud wrote:Time for a serious question from me :)
It's about the T3 role in WH economy.
Now, I'll admit: I haven't flown T3, and I've only rarely fought against them. I'm not really qualified to comment on the details of T3 balance.
However, even with that lack of experience, I do find it striking that the WH economy is so closely tied to how valuable T3s are. If CCP nerfed T3 so badly that HACs were now clearly superior combat ships (a bad idea IMO), their value would plummet and this would seriously hurt WH economy.
There are lots of ships that are better suited for one type of space than another, and this is fine. But I can't think of any other ship where the value of the ship is so tied to the economy of a certain space. This makes T3 ship balancing far more challenging.
Do you see this as a problem? What do you think CCP should do to diversify the WH economy?
(note: if it turns out I'm missinformed and T3 only constitute a small part of the WH economy, please feel free to educate!)
cheers
Thanks for the question.
T3's are indeed tied to wormhole economy. It's also worth noting this will effect lower class wormholes alot more than C5 or C6 space as around 15% - 20% of thier income is from salvage. In a C2 I think its much closer to 50% from salvage and C3 is about 35% from salvage.
So yes I do see this as a added issue when T3 get their balance pass. So much so it's one of topics I have concerns with.
corbexx wrote:
Insuring that when T3's get balanced they are still useful and viable in wh's. I don't want them nerfed into the ground as the knock on effect will be to make the income in lower class wormholes even worse.
One of the ways I see this being sorted, would be to slightly increase the income in C1 to C4 but have this extra income as sleeper tags so the lower class wormholes are less reliant on the price of T3's. C5 and C6 space I think would be ok even if the salvage prices did drop more.
On the subject of T3, most people I have spoke to (this includes several lowsec groups a couple null groups and a tonne of wormhole people) feel T3 are fine and there benefits are made up for in the fact, they cost alot more and you lose skill points.
I'd much rather see useless subsystems made more useful, and maybe a couple more added in. I know CCP don't like to add stuff unless there is a use.
A couple that jump out to me are maybe new electronic subs
Loki get a painter sub.
Prot get a damp sub
Legion get a tracking disruptor sub.
Sort of falls down on the Tengu (still thinking about this one).
But this way you can have one bonus of the recons but not both, this might be a bit OP in large fleets mind.
Derailed a bit there but hope that answers your questions.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Jack Miton
Sky Fighters
Sky Syndicate
3198
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 11:46:00 -
[73] - Quote
corbexx wrote:Jack Miton wrote:
I do have one question for you mate.
What is your opinion on the proposed probing delay for newly spawned K162 WHs?
JM
My view is here. But in short I'd rather have it back how it was. Having sigs instantly appear on overview is just to easy. Having a delay on them being able to be found seems to be going to fare in the other direction. There should be some counter and to me that should be, if you have probes out and are scanning you should be able to find new sigs.
thanks mate :)
i came into that thread at around page 20 so missed your post on my skim through!
Stuck In Here With Me:-á http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/ |
Ya Huei
Imperial Collective
Unsettled.
158
|
Posted - 2014.03.31 12:11:00 -
[74] - Quote
Looks like a solid candidate to me.
Would vote in favor! |
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887
EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 12:38:00 -
[75] - Quote
Hello Corbexx,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
337
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 12:50:00 -
[76] - Quote
CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Corbexx,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ?
Yes.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Bjorn Fellhand
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 14:21:00 -
[77] - Quote
Ive known Corbexx for around 9 years now and hes always been open, accessible and easy to talk to.
This has been with him throughout eve and is easy to see with all the people he has been busy talking to about what they think and what they want, and not just the big alliances but loads of small ones too which i think is very refreshing and how a good CSM member should be. After all it is for the peoples interest and Corbexx has shown he is interested in EVERYONE'S legitimate opinion within Wspace.
Beyond this he has the knowledge of how Wspace works and the wisdom of how things will affect it if implemented.
Hes Trustworthy, in it for the people, wants to better wspace, knows his stuff and what to do with it.
For these reasons he is getting my vote.
|
CYL0N72
Eve Corporation 125335887
EVE Alliance 1236539078
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.02 17:13:00 -
[78] - Quote
corbexx wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Corbexx,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? Yes.
Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. |
Alec Freeman
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
294
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 01:34:00 -
[79] - Quote
corbexx wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Corbexx,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? Yes.
Care to elaborate on why you support the banning of content creators who operate within the eve EULA? |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
344
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 09:17:00 -
[80] - Quote
Alec Freeman wrote:corbexx wrote:CYL0N72 wrote:Hello Corbexx,
I only have 1 short, pointed question, so this should be a pretty easy "yes" or "no" answer.
Everyone has their own reasoning / logic, so I don't want to know why, just a clear answer to whether or not you support a ban.
Do you support banning players, for actions, like Erotica 1 ? Yes. Care to elaborate on why you support the banning of content creators who operate within the eve EULA?
First of all it's for CCP to ban people and they decide if he broke the TOS/EULA. Assuming he is banned. We already have seen CCP will ban people for things happening out of game (Mittens). We're still assuming he's been banned just for the bonus room, there could well be other things we don't know about.
On his actions erotica 1 has gone out of his way to circumvent rules, knowing full well if it was on in game comms he would be banned. Some have compared NOHO to him saying our getting people to sing is exactly the same. Here is where the grey line comes in. People want to know exactly what you can and can't do out of game, CCP have left it very grey.
But if you can't see what your doing is so fundamentally and morally wrong (I don't think anyone would argue that what ero did is that), that you go way way over that line. then you run the risk of being banned.
Could this lead to a slippery slope, ooh yes. It may well come back to bite CCP.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
|
ISD Ezwal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
1090
|
Posted - 2014.04.03 21:06:00 -
[81] - Quote
I have removed a rule breaking post and those quoting them.
The Rules:
10. Discussion of warnings and bans is prohibited.
Such matters shall remain private between CCP and the involved user. Questions or comments concerning warnings and bans will be conveyed through email or private messaging. CCP respect the right of our players to privacy and as such you are not permitted to publicize private correspondence (including petition responses and emails) received from any of the aforementioned parties.
ISD Ezwal
Captain
Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)
Interstellar Services Department |
|
Elmnt80
Life. Universe. Everything.
Clockwork Pineapple
14
|
Posted - 2014.04.04 02:26:00 -
[82] - Quote
Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper? |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
349
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 12:31:00 -
[83] - Quote
Elmnt80 wrote:Hello.
Currently the Serpentis are the only pirate faction in the game that don't have a rated 6/10 and 9/10 DED complex available to be run. These sites have been on the "coming soon" list for quite a few years, but no further news or information has been released. Would you be willing to request that CCP introduce these sites to the game so that areas like syndicate that rely on running sites as the main form of income can continue to grow and prosper?
I believe Mynnna has already sorted this for you here.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Winthorp
1436
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 12:58:00 -
[84] - Quote
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=334871&find=unread
Please respond if you agree with the tone the current CSM reps took on possible changes and how you would have responded.
(Insert witty signature here) |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
349
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 13:28:00 -
[85] - Quote
Winthorp wrote:https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=334871&find=unread
Please respond if you agree with the tone the current CSM reps took on possible changes and how you would have responded.
There is in my mind, nothing at all wrong with pulsars or wolf rayets. They just need different set ups to fight in, or you run the risk of being at a disadvantage, but that's what wormhole space is about adapting.
Black holes there is issues with.
Red giants have some issues with over heating of ewar modules to get ... shall we say "interesting effects". That does need looking at and sorting.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Rage Slice
Anomalous Existence
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 14:27:00 -
[86] - Quote
I live in a wormhole, but I also have a non-trivial industrial presence in hi-sec. When I saw a wormhole candidate who was interested in improving hi-sec industry, my first thought was "Ohhh, I'm certainly voting for this guy," but then I read exactly what you're proposing:
corbexx wrote:For hisec industry I'd like to see it made less clicky. A simple start to this would be to have reverse engineering, invention and production default to the pos module the blueprint is located in, not having to select that location manually every time you do a job.
For hi-sec, this would be the worst thing in the world for industry. Hi-sec blueprints are not necessarily kept in the POSs where the jobs go, they're often kept in corp hangars in nearby stations for security and organization. Your idea makes perfect sense in wormhole space, where people live out of POSs, but for people who prefer the security of a station corp hangar, your proposal would make RevEng, Invention, and Manufacturing default to where the jobs DON'T go. A much more practical solution would be to have a "remember location for this blueprint type" option.
I'm probably voting for you regardless because of everything else you offer, but please reconsider your hi-sec proposal. |
Abla Tive
Serpent.Sisters.of.Eve
43
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 14:53:00 -
[87] - Quote
Question about mining activity to all candidates |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
349
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 14:57:00 -
[88] - Quote
Rage Slice wrote:I live in a wormhole, but I also have a non-trivial industrial presence in hi-sec. When I saw a wormhole candidate who was interested in improving hi-sec industry, my first thought was "Ohhh, I'm certainly voting for this guy," but then I read exactly what you're proposing: corbexx wrote:For hisec industry I'd like to see it made less clicky. A simple start to this would be to have reverse engineering, invention and production default to the pos module the blueprint is located in, not having to select that location manually every time you do a job. For hi-sec, this would be the worst thing in the world for industry. Hi-sec blueprints are not necessarily kept in the POSs where the jobs go, they're often kept in corp hangars in nearby stations for security and organization. Your idea makes perfect sense in wormhole space, where people live out of POSs, but for people who prefer the security of a station corp hangar, your proposal would make RevEng, Invention, and Manufacturing default to where the jobs DON'T go. A much more practical solution would be to have a "remember location for this blueprint type" option. I'm probably voting for you regardless because of everything else you offer, but please reconsider your hi-sec proposal.
My idea is that it would default to what the items are in and you then just click ok. if you want to change the location you can so isn't a issue there.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
Rage Slice
Anomalous Existence
0
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:10:00 -
[89] - Quote
Right, but that wouldn't actually make industry less clicky, your stated goal, for the aforementioned hi-sec folk who keep their blueprints in station. It would just give preference to those who don't. Industry being less clicky is the change I want more than any other because of the immediate benefit to my poor, beleaguered hands. Defaulting to the blueprint location might be easier, it could be done as simply as a single menu setting, with no saving of information, but if job location for each blueprint type was cached, all kinds of industrialists would benefit from the reduction in clickiness.
I understand that even that is not a complete solution, because if a character does ten invention jobs from station, they get split between two labs(max 5 invention slots). It would still only require two slot selections, one for one lab, and one for the other. |
corbexx
eXceed Inc.
No Holes Barred
349
|
Posted - 2014.04.05 15:47:00 -
[90] - Quote
Replied to you.
Corbexx for CSM 9 - Wormholes deserve better |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 :: one page |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |