EVE Search - New Navy Battleships

Check My IP Information

All Channels

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

New Navy Battleships

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Pages: [1] :: one page

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Arthur Aihaken Arsenite 3098	Posted - 2014.03.20 01:30:00 - [1] - Quote Abaddon Imperial Issue Rokh Navy Issue Hyperion Navy Issue Maelstrom Fleet Issue I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Caleb Seremshur Capital Storm. The Storm Collective 207	Posted - 2014.03.20 02:21:00 - [2] - Quote awesome. Three more hybrid platforms. Just what this game didn't have enough of. LP store weapon cost rebalance
Arthur Aihaken Arsenite 3099	Posted - 2014.03.20 02:26:00 - [3] - Quote Caleb Seremshur wrote: awesome. Three more hybrid platforms. Just what this game didn't have enough of. 1 laser, 2 hybrid and 1 projectile. You could easily make the Abaddon missiles, though... I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Mazzara Gale Force Contractors 7	Posted - 2014.03.20 02:32:00 - [4] - Quote Great idea! +1
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1078	Posted - 2014.03.20 03:37:00 - [5] - Quote Amarr shouldn't have large missile-based siege ships, but I can think of other Amarrian hulls I'd like to see with missiles! Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Rowells Unknown Soldiers Fidelas Constans 331	Posted - 2014.03.20 04:20:00 - [6] - Quote Launchers for the abaddon?
Arthur Aihaken Arsenite 3099	Posted - 2014.03.20 04:59:00 - [7] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Amarr shouldn't have large missile-based siege ships, but I can think of other Amarrian hulls I'd like to see with missiles! There are other Amarr missile-based ships: Legion, Prophecy, DamnationGÇª Rowells wrote: Launchers for the abaddon? Wouldn't that be more interesting than a buffed Abaddon? I am currently away, traveling through time and will be returning last week.
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3223	Posted - 2014.03.20 05:05:00 - [8] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Amarr shouldn't have large missile-based siege ships, but I can think of other Amarrian hulls I'd like to see with missiles! In particular, one of our freaking frigates needs to be remade into a missile boat. I would say that I would be pretty happy to see a bonused missile battleship, though. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1080	Posted - 2014.03.20 05:07:00 - [9] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: In particular, one of our freaking frigates needs to be remade into a missile boat. Oh, I know which one, I know which one!! Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Kaarous Aldurald ROC Deep Space The ROC 3223	Posted - 2014.03.20 05:09:00 - [10] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: In particular, one of our freaking frigates needs to be remade into a missile boat. Oh, I know which one, I know which one!! Well, from what I have heard, people are of two minds about it. Some just want either the Tormentor or the Punisher remade into a missile frigate. Some want the Inquisitor made back into the missile boat, and one of the aforementioned made into the logi frigate. I personally would not be sorry to see the entire T1 logi frigate concept die in a fire. Not posting on my main, and loving it.-á Because free speech.-á Psychotic Monk for CSM9.

Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1080	Posted - 2014.03.20 05:25:00 - [11] - Quote I want to see tech 1 flexible-fit ships, with a full rack of turret and launcher hardpoints and 2 bonuses to one type but only one for the other. Could have 3 laser frigates: Executioner Role: fast tackle 10% reduction in small laser capacitor 5% bonus to small laser damage 7.5% bonus to missile velocity 2 turret hardpoints, 2 missile hardpoints Tormentor Role: attack 10% reduction in small laser capacitor 5% bonus to small laser damage 10% bonus to Amarr drone damage and hit points 3 turret hardpoints, 10mbit/sec bandwidth Punisher Role: brawler 5% bonus to small laser damage 4% bonus to armor resists 3 high slots, 3 turret hardpoints, 3 launcher hardpoints Inquisitor Role: bomber 10% bonus to rocket and light missile EM damage 5% bonus to rocket and light missile rate of fire 7.5% bonus to small laser tracking 3 high slots, 3 turret hardpoints, 3 launcher hardpoints Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
pyronatic Mecha Enterprises Fleet 28	Posted - 2014.03.20 06:36:00 - [12] - Quote Arthur Aihaken wrote: Abaddon Imperial Issue GÇó 8 launchers; +1 low GÇó 5% bonus to large missile damage, 4% bonus to armor resistances You mean 8 Turrets
Tsobai Hashimoto Amarrian Vengeance Team Amarrica 214	Posted - 2014.03.20 06:48:00 - [13] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: Reaver Glitterstim wrote: Kaarous Aldurald wrote: In particular, one of our freaking frigates needs to be remade into a missile boat. Oh, I know which one, I know which one!! Well, from what I have heard, people are of two minds about it. Some just want either the Tormentor or the Punisher remade into a missile frigate. Some want the Inquisitor made back into the missile boat, and one of the aforementioned made into the logi frigate. I personally would not be sorry to see the entire T1 logi frigate concept die in a fire. I feel the exact other way around....and was just about to post that, rather than more Faction BS (we already have two for each race) I would like to see a Faction T1 Logi frig for each faction..... I think it would be something that could have a lot of use, and would be fun to use in FW (and earn in FW as well ofc)
Reaver Glitterstim Dromedaworks inc Test Alliance Please Ignore 1080	Posted - 2014.03.20 07:07:00 - [14] - Quote Would be nice if navy had utility ships too Fit a warfare link to your tech 1 battlecruiser. Train Wing Commander. Get in the Squad Commander or Wing Commander position. Your fleets will be superior to everyone else's. (had this sig BEFORE Odyssey BC rebalance) And bring back the missile Inquisitor!!
Zan Shiro Alternative Enterprises 403	Posted - 2014.03.20 07:18:00 - [15] - Quote +1 you had me at navy rokh so rest have to get theirs too to be fair.
Kenrailae Mind Games. Suddenly Spaceships. 269	Posted - 2014.03.20 08:11:00 - [16] - Quote Caleb Seremshur wrote: awesome. Three more hybrid platforms. Just what this game didn't have enough of. There will never be enough Neutron blaster cannons! +1 to more shiny BS The Law is a point of View


Pages: [1] :: one page
First page \| Previous page \| Next page \| Last page

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.